High-intensity interval running is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise: Implications for exercise adherence

The aim of this study was to objectively quantify ratings of perceived enjoyment using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale following high-intensity interval running versus moderate-intensity continuous running. Eight recreationally active men performed two running protocols consisting of high-inte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of sports sciences 2011-03, Vol.29 (6), p.547-553
Main Authors: Bartlett, Jonathan D., Close, Graeme L., MacLaren, Don P. M., Gregson, Warren, Drust, Barry, Morton, James P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Emotions
endurance training
Energy Metabolism
Exercise
Exercise - psychology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Heart Rate
Humans
intermittent exercise
Male
Maximal oxygen uptake
Men
Oxygen Consumption
Personal health
Physical Exertion
Pleasure
Running
Running - psychology
Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to objectively quantify ratings of perceived enjoyment using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale following high-intensity interval running versus moderate-intensity continuous running. Eight recreationally active men performed two running protocols consisting of high-intensity interval running (6×3 min at 90% [Vdot]O 2max interspersed with 6×3 min active recovery at 50% [Vdot]O 2max with a 7-min warm-up and cool down at 70% [Vdot]O 2max ) or 50 min moderate-intensity continuous running at 70% [Vdot]O 2max . Ratings of perceived enjoyment after exercise were higher (P 
ISSN:0264-0414
1466-447X
DOI:10.1080/02640414.2010.545427