Loading…
Unruly humans vs the lust for order
Emanuel Derman, one of the first physicists on Wall Street, explains how models can lead people astray. He writes from experience, having been guilty of pragmamorphism in using methods drawn from the physical sciences and mathematics to model stock prices, those decidedly non-physical quantities tha...
Saved in:
Published in: | New scientist (1971) 2011-10, Vol.212 (2835), p.32-33 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-ffae891cb683be33d5820650e8fee9e47a66163c2f5adc4a842e664e39fdc07e3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 33 |
container_issue | 2835 |
container_start_page | 32 |
container_title | New scientist (1971) |
container_volume | 212 |
creator | Derman, Emanuel |
description | Emanuel Derman, one of the first physicists on Wall Street, explains how models can lead people astray. He writes from experience, having been guilty of pragmamorphism in using methods drawn from the physical sciences and mathematics to model stock prices, those decidedly non-physical quantities that represent value as determined by humans interacting in markets. Model building is not necessarily bad, as long as one understands the limitations. Moreover, Derman asserts that models in social science, and in finance particularly, are very different from models in the physical sciences. They should be accompanied by a health warning to ensure that no one forgets. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0262-4079(11)62584-0 |
format | magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904936533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0262407911625840</els_id><sourcerecordid>2515118061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-ffae891cb683be33d5820650e8fee9e47a66163c2f5adc4a842e664e39fdc07e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Kw0AYRQdRsFYfQQi4sC6i3_xmZiVS_IOCC-16mE6-oZE0qTNJoW9v2opLXd3NuRfuIeSSwi0Fqu7egSmWCyjMhNIbxaQWORyREQNpcsl1cUxGv8gpOUvpEwAUaBiRq3kT-3qbLfuVa1K2SVm3xKzuU5eFNmZtLDGek5Pg6oQXPzkm86fHj-lLPnt7fp0-zHLPQXR5CA61oX6hNF8g56XUDJQE1AHRoCicUlRxz4J0pRdOC4ZKCeQmlB4K5GNyfdhdx_arx9TZVZU81rVrsO2TNSAMV5LzgZz8SVJlGKcMmBhQeUB9bFOKGOw6VisXt5aC3emze31258ZSavf6LAy9-0MPh8ebCqNNvsLGY1lF9J0t2-qfhW-dPXVt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1692312024</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Unruly humans vs the lust for order</title><source>Nexis Advance UK (Federated Access)</source><creator>Derman, Emanuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Derman, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><description>Emanuel Derman, one of the first physicists on Wall Street, explains how models can lead people astray. He writes from experience, having been guilty of pragmamorphism in using methods drawn from the physical sciences and mathematics to model stock prices, those decidedly non-physical quantities that represent value as determined by humans interacting in markets. Model building is not necessarily bad, as long as one understands the limitations. Moreover, Derman asserts that models in social science, and in finance particularly, are very different from models in the physical sciences. They should be accompanied by a health warning to ensure that no one forgets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0262-4079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-5387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0262-4079(11)62584-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NWSCAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: New Scientist</publisher><subject>Apartheid ; Construction costs ; Economic models ; Economics ; Economists ; Finance ; Human ; Markets ; Mathematical models ; Physical sciences ; Physicists ; Raw materials ; Stock prices ; Warning</subject><ispartof>New scientist (1971), 2011-10, Vol.212 (2835), p.32-33</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>Copyright Reed Business Information Limited Oct 22-Oct 28, 2011</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-ffae891cb683be33d5820650e8fee9e47a66163c2f5adc4a842e664e39fdc07e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Derman, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><title>Unruly humans vs the lust for order</title><title>New scientist (1971)</title><description>Emanuel Derman, one of the first physicists on Wall Street, explains how models can lead people astray. He writes from experience, having been guilty of pragmamorphism in using methods drawn from the physical sciences and mathematics to model stock prices, those decidedly non-physical quantities that represent value as determined by humans interacting in markets. Model building is not necessarily bad, as long as one understands the limitations. Moreover, Derman asserts that models in social science, and in finance particularly, are very different from models in the physical sciences. They should be accompanied by a health warning to ensure that no one forgets.</description><subject>Apartheid</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Physical sciences</subject><subject>Physicists</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Warning</subject><issn>0262-4079</issn><issn>2059-5387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1Kw0AYRQdRsFYfQQi4sC6i3_xmZiVS_IOCC-16mE6-oZE0qTNJoW9v2opLXd3NuRfuIeSSwi0Fqu7egSmWCyjMhNIbxaQWORyREQNpcsl1cUxGv8gpOUvpEwAUaBiRq3kT-3qbLfuVa1K2SVm3xKzuU5eFNmZtLDGek5Pg6oQXPzkm86fHj-lLPnt7fp0-zHLPQXR5CA61oX6hNF8g56XUDJQE1AHRoCicUlRxz4J0pRdOC4ZKCeQmlB4K5GNyfdhdx_arx9TZVZU81rVrsO2TNSAMV5LzgZz8SVJlGKcMmBhQeUB9bFOKGOw6VisXt5aC3emze31258ZSavf6LAy9-0MPh8ebCqNNvsLGY1lF9J0t2-qfhW-dPXVt</recordid><startdate>20111022</startdate><enddate>20111022</enddate><creator>Derman, Emanuel</creator><general>New Scientist</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111022</creationdate><title>Unruly humans vs the lust for order</title><author>Derman, Emanuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-ffae891cb683be33d5820650e8fee9e47a66163c2f5adc4a842e664e39fdc07e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Apartheid</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Physical sciences</topic><topic>Physicists</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Warning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Derman, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>New scientist (1971)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Derman, Emanuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unruly humans vs the lust for order</atitle><jtitle>New scientist (1971)</jtitle><date>2011-10-22</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>212</volume><issue>2835</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>32-33</pages><issn>0262-4079</issn><eissn>2059-5387</eissn><coden>NWSCAL</coden><abstract>Emanuel Derman, one of the first physicists on Wall Street, explains how models can lead people astray. He writes from experience, having been guilty of pragmamorphism in using methods drawn from the physical sciences and mathematics to model stock prices, those decidedly non-physical quantities that represent value as determined by humans interacting in markets. Model building is not necessarily bad, as long as one understands the limitations. Moreover, Derman asserts that models in social science, and in finance particularly, are very different from models in the physical sciences. They should be accompanied by a health warning to ensure that no one forgets.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>New Scientist</pub><doi>10.1016/S0262-4079(11)62584-0</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0262-4079 |
ispartof | New scientist (1971), 2011-10, Vol.212 (2835), p.32-33 |
issn | 0262-4079 2059-5387 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904936533 |
source | Nexis Advance UK (Federated Access) |
subjects | Apartheid Construction costs Economic models Economics Economists Finance Human Markets Mathematical models Physical sciences Physicists Raw materials Stock prices Warning |
title | Unruly humans vs the lust for order |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T08%3A24%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unruly%20humans%20vs%20the%20lust%20for%20order&rft.jtitle=New%20scientist%20(1971)&rft.au=Derman,%20Emanuel&rft.date=2011-10-22&rft.volume=212&rft.issue=2835&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=32-33&rft.issn=0262-4079&rft.eissn=2059-5387&rft.coden=NWSCAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0262-4079(11)62584-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2515118061%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-ffae891cb683be33d5820650e8fee9e47a66163c2f5adc4a842e664e39fdc07e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1692312024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |