Loading…
Finite element modelling of equestrian helmet impacts exposes the need to address rotational kinematics in future helmet designs
Jockey head injuries, especially concussions, are common in horse racing. Current helmets do help to reduce the severity and incidences of head injury, but the high concussion incidence rates suggest that there may be scope to improve the performance of equestrian helmets. Finite element simulations...
Saved in:
Published in: | Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering 2011-12, Vol.14 (12), p.1021-1031 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6f9236bb03231c44b4453b57a4c1a4ae21508f1790cbb649f9a6264a416f8a533 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6f9236bb03231c44b4453b57a4c1a4ae21508f1790cbb649f9a6264a416f8a533 |
container_end_page | 1031 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1021 |
container_title | Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Forero Rueda, M. A. Cui, L. Gilchrist, M. D. |
description | Jockey head injuries, especially concussions, are common in horse racing. Current helmets do help to reduce the severity and incidences of head injury, but the high concussion incidence rates suggest that there may be scope to improve the performance of equestrian helmets. Finite element simulations in ABAQUS/Explicit were used to model a realistic helmet model during standard helmeted rigid headform impacts and helmeted head model University College Dublin Brain Trauma Model (UCDBTM) impacts.
Current helmet standards for impact determine helmet performance based solely on linear acceleration. Brain injury-related values (stress and strain) from the UCDBTM showed that a performance improvement based on linear acceleration does not imply the same improvement in head injury-related brain tissue loads. It is recommended that angular kinematics be considered in future equestrian helmet standards, as angular acceleration was seen to correlate with stress and strain in the brain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10255842.2010.504922 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905669869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>905669869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6f9236bb03231c44b4453b57a4c1a4ae21508f1790cbb649f9a6264a416f8a533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9vFSEQgInR2Fr9D4zh5mkrsMCDkzGNVZMmXvRMZtmhRRd4AhvtzT_dfb4-j57mR76ZyXyEvOTskjPD3nAmlDJSXAq2tRSTVohH5JzLnR6MUPbxlm_IcGDOyLPWvjHGDDfyKTkTTGslrDwnv69jjh0pLpgwd5rKjMsS8y0tgeKPFVuvETK9wyVhpzHtwfdG8de-NGy03yHNiDPthcI8V2yN1tKhx5Jhod9jxrQVvtGYaVj7WvG0asYWb3N7Tp4EWBq-eIgX5Ov1-y9XH4ebzx8-Xb27Gbxkpg86WDHqaWKjGLmXcpJSjZPagfQcJKDgipnAd5b5adLSBgtaaAmS62BAjeMFeX3cu6_l71suxea3XyFjWZuzTGltjbYbKY-kr6W1isHta0xQ7x1n7qDendS7g3p3VL-NvXo4sE4J539DJ9cb8PYIxBxKTfCz1GV2He6XUkOF7GNz439P_AF0t5Ry</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>905669869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Finite element modelling of equestrian helmet impacts exposes the need to address rotational kinematics in future helmet designs</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Forero Rueda, M. A. ; Cui, L. ; Gilchrist, M. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Forero Rueda, M. A. ; Cui, L. ; Gilchrist, M. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Jockey head injuries, especially concussions, are common in horse racing. Current helmets do help to reduce the severity and incidences of head injury, but the high concussion incidence rates suggest that there may be scope to improve the performance of equestrian helmets. Finite element simulations in ABAQUS/Explicit were used to model a realistic helmet model during standard helmeted rigid headform impacts and helmeted head model University College Dublin Brain Trauma Model (UCDBTM) impacts.
Current helmet standards for impact determine helmet performance based solely on linear acceleration. Brain injury-related values (stress and strain) from the UCDBTM showed that a performance improvement based on linear acceleration does not imply the same improvement in head injury-related brain tissue loads. It is recommended that angular kinematics be considered in future equestrian helmet standards, as angular acceleration was seen to correlate with stress and strain in the brain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1025-5842</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-8259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2010.504922</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20665294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Animals ; Athletic Injuries - etiology ; Athletic Injuries - physiopathology ; Athletic Injuries - prevention & control ; Brain Injuries - etiology ; Brain Injuries - physiopathology ; Brain Injuries - prevention & control ; Computer Simulation ; Computer-Aided Design ; concussion ; Craniocerebral Trauma - etiology ; Craniocerebral Trauma - physiopathology ; Craniocerebral Trauma - prevention & control ; Equipment Design ; Finite Element Analysis ; head impact ; Head Protective Devices ; horse racing ; Horses ; Humans ; Models, Biological ; Rotation ; Sports Equipment ; sports helmets ; Stress, Mechanical ; Torque ; traumatic brain injury (TBI) ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - etiology ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - physiopathology ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering, 2011-12, Vol.14 (12), p.1021-1031</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6f9236bb03231c44b4453b57a4c1a4ae21508f1790cbb649f9a6264a416f8a533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6f9236bb03231c44b4453b57a4c1a4ae21508f1790cbb649f9a6264a416f8a533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20665294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forero Rueda, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilchrist, M. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Finite element modelling of equestrian helmet impacts exposes the need to address rotational kinematics in future helmet designs</title><title>Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering</title><addtitle>Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin</addtitle><description>Jockey head injuries, especially concussions, are common in horse racing. Current helmets do help to reduce the severity and incidences of head injury, but the high concussion incidence rates suggest that there may be scope to improve the performance of equestrian helmets. Finite element simulations in ABAQUS/Explicit were used to model a realistic helmet model during standard helmeted rigid headform impacts and helmeted head model University College Dublin Brain Trauma Model (UCDBTM) impacts.
Current helmet standards for impact determine helmet performance based solely on linear acceleration. Brain injury-related values (stress and strain) from the UCDBTM showed that a performance improvement based on linear acceleration does not imply the same improvement in head injury-related brain tissue loads. It is recommended that angular kinematics be considered in future equestrian helmet standards, as angular acceleration was seen to correlate with stress and strain in the brain.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Athletic Injuries - etiology</subject><subject>Athletic Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Athletic Injuries - prevention & control</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - etiology</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - prevention & control</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>concussion</subject><subject>Craniocerebral Trauma - etiology</subject><subject>Craniocerebral Trauma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Craniocerebral Trauma - prevention & control</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>head impact</subject><subject>Head Protective Devices</subject><subject>horse racing</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Sports Equipment</subject><subject>sports helmets</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>traumatic brain injury (TBI)</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - etiology</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - physiopathology</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - prevention & control</subject><issn>1025-5842</issn><issn>1476-8259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9vFSEQgInR2Fr9D4zh5mkrsMCDkzGNVZMmXvRMZtmhRRd4AhvtzT_dfb4-j57mR76ZyXyEvOTskjPD3nAmlDJSXAq2tRSTVohH5JzLnR6MUPbxlm_IcGDOyLPWvjHGDDfyKTkTTGslrDwnv69jjh0pLpgwd5rKjMsS8y0tgeKPFVuvETK9wyVhpzHtwfdG8de-NGy03yHNiDPthcI8V2yN1tKhx5Jhod9jxrQVvtGYaVj7WvG0asYWb3N7Tp4EWBq-eIgX5Ov1-y9XH4ebzx8-Xb27Gbxkpg86WDHqaWKjGLmXcpJSjZPagfQcJKDgipnAd5b5adLSBgtaaAmS62BAjeMFeX3cu6_l71suxea3XyFjWZuzTGltjbYbKY-kr6W1isHta0xQ7x1n7qDendS7g3p3VL-NvXo4sE4J539DJ9cb8PYIxBxKTfCz1GV2He6XUkOF7GNz439P_AF0t5Ry</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Forero Rueda, M. A.</creator><creator>Cui, L.</creator><creator>Gilchrist, M. D.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>Finite element modelling of equestrian helmet impacts exposes the need to address rotational kinematics in future helmet designs</title><author>Forero Rueda, M. A. ; Cui, L. ; Gilchrist, M. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6f9236bb03231c44b4453b57a4c1a4ae21508f1790cbb649f9a6264a416f8a533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Athletic Injuries - etiology</topic><topic>Athletic Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Athletic Injuries - prevention & control</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - etiology</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - prevention & control</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>concussion</topic><topic>Craniocerebral Trauma - etiology</topic><topic>Craniocerebral Trauma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Craniocerebral Trauma - prevention & control</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>head impact</topic><topic>Head Protective Devices</topic><topic>horse racing</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Sports Equipment</topic><topic>sports helmets</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>traumatic brain injury (TBI)</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - etiology</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - physiopathology</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forero Rueda, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilchrist, M. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forero Rueda, M. A.</au><au>Cui, L.</au><au>Gilchrist, M. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Finite element modelling of equestrian helmet impacts exposes the need to address rotational kinematics in future helmet designs</atitle><jtitle>Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin</addtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1021</spage><epage>1031</epage><pages>1021-1031</pages><issn>1025-5842</issn><eissn>1476-8259</eissn><abstract>Jockey head injuries, especially concussions, are common in horse racing. Current helmets do help to reduce the severity and incidences of head injury, but the high concussion incidence rates suggest that there may be scope to improve the performance of equestrian helmets. Finite element simulations in ABAQUS/Explicit were used to model a realistic helmet model during standard helmeted rigid headform impacts and helmeted head model University College Dublin Brain Trauma Model (UCDBTM) impacts.
Current helmet standards for impact determine helmet performance based solely on linear acceleration. Brain injury-related values (stress and strain) from the UCDBTM showed that a performance improvement based on linear acceleration does not imply the same improvement in head injury-related brain tissue loads. It is recommended that angular kinematics be considered in future equestrian helmet standards, as angular acceleration was seen to correlate with stress and strain in the brain.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>20665294</pmid><doi>10.1080/10255842.2010.504922</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1025-5842 |
ispartof | Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering, 2011-12, Vol.14 (12), p.1021-1031 |
issn | 1025-5842 1476-8259 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905669869 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | Acceleration Animals Athletic Injuries - etiology Athletic Injuries - physiopathology Athletic Injuries - prevention & control Brain Injuries - etiology Brain Injuries - physiopathology Brain Injuries - prevention & control Computer Simulation Computer-Aided Design concussion Craniocerebral Trauma - etiology Craniocerebral Trauma - physiopathology Craniocerebral Trauma - prevention & control Equipment Design Finite Element Analysis head impact Head Protective Devices horse racing Horses Humans Models, Biological Rotation Sports Equipment sports helmets Stress, Mechanical Torque traumatic brain injury (TBI) Wounds, Nonpenetrating - etiology Wounds, Nonpenetrating - physiopathology Wounds, Nonpenetrating - prevention & control |
title | Finite element modelling of equestrian helmet impacts exposes the need to address rotational kinematics in future helmet designs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A45%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Finite%20element%20modelling%20of%20equestrian%20helmet%20impacts%20exposes%20the%20need%20to%20address%20rotational%20kinematics%20in%20future%20helmet%20designs&rft.jtitle=Computer%20methods%20in%20biomechanics%20and%20biomedical%20engineering&rft.au=Forero%20Rueda,%20M.%20A.&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1021&rft.epage=1031&rft.pages=1021-1031&rft.issn=1025-5842&rft.eissn=1476-8259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10255842.2010.504922&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E905669869%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6f9236bb03231c44b4453b57a4c1a4ae21508f1790cbb649f9a6264a416f8a533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=905669869&rft_id=info:pmid/20665294&rfr_iscdi=true |