Resistance Training vs. Static Stretching: Effects on Flexibility and Strength

• Published in: Journal of strength and conditioning research 2011-12, Vol.25 (12), p.3391-3398
• Main Authors: Morton, Sam K, Whitehead, James R, Brinkert, Ronald H, Caine, Dennis J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Design of experiments; Female; Hip Joint - physiology; Humans; Knee; Male; Movement; Muscle Strength; Muscle Stretching Exercises; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Muscular system; Quadriceps Muscle - physiology; Range of Motion, Articular; Resistance Training; Sample size; Shoulder Joint - physiology; Torque; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1064-8011; 1533-4287
• DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31821624aa

Morton, SK, Whitehead, JR, Brinkert, RH, and Caine, DJ. Resistance training vs. static stretchingEffects on flexibility and strength. J Strength Cond Res 25(12)3391–3398, 2011—The purpose of this study was to determine how full-range resistance training (RT) affected flexibility and strength compared to static stretching (SS) of the same muscle–joint complexes in untrained adults. Volunteers (n = 25) were randomized to an RT or SS training group. A group of inactive volunteers (n = 12) served as a convenience control group (CON). After pretesting hamstring extension, hip flexion and extension, shoulder extension flexibility, and peak torque of quadriceps and hamstring muscles, subjects completed 5-week SS or RT treatments in which the aim was to stretch or to strength train the same muscle–joint complexes over similar movements and ranges. Posttests of flexibility and strength were then conducted. There was no difference in hamstring flexibility, hip flexion, and hip extension improvement between RT and SS, but both were superior to CON values. There were no differences between groups on shoulder extension flexibility. The RT group was superior to the CON in knee extension peak torque, but there were no differences between groups on knee flexion peak torque. The results of this preliminary study suggest that carefully constructed full-range RT regimens can improve flexibility as well as the typical SS regimens employed in conditioning programs. Because of the potential practical significance of these results to strength and conditioning programs, further studies using true experimental designs, larger sample sizes, and longer training durations should be conducted with the aim of confirming or disproving these results.