Loading…
Risk governance within aviation
Air traffic is global in nature. Regulation of the industry is therefore restrained by international recommendations and common rules. As a result of a comprehensive deregulation process, companies are able to conduct air traffic wherever they want, as long as they meet the demands of the regulators...
Saved in:
Published in: | Risk management (Leicestershire, England) England), 2010-10, Vol.12 (4), p.256-284 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-17312eb6ecacec87b880ddcf740ef9090146f5d255f1896d5602b95291ca9c433 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-17312eb6ecacec87b880ddcf740ef9090146f5d255f1896d5602b95291ca9c433 |
container_end_page | 284 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 256 |
container_title | Risk management (Leicestershire, England) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Tjoerhom, Berit Berg |
description | Air traffic is global in nature. Regulation of the industry is therefore restrained by international recommendations and common rules. As a result of a comprehensive deregulation process, companies are able to conduct air traffic wherever they want, as long as they meet the demands of the regulators and the recommendations of the trade organisations. This article results from an exploratory case study examining the global risk governance that Norwegian civil aviation traffic is a part of. By using the concept of risk governance, this research underlines the importance of involving all relevant actors in aviation risk management. Specifically, the article highlights the relationship between national and supranational risk governance and the challenges this relationship poses for risk management. The results of this study show that the extensive numbers of actors grouped in different organisations pose both possibilities and challenges for the risk governance process within aviation -possibilities in the form of formal structures for participation, and challenges in the form of the integration and implementation of different contextual knowledge within the EU rule framework. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1057/rm.2010.5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_906329902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40927415</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40927415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-17312eb6ecacec87b880ddcf740ef9090146f5d255f1896d5602b95291ca9c433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0EtLAzEQB_AgCtbqwQ8gFi-isHXy3hxL8QUFQfQc0my2pu6jJtuK396UFQXx4Glm4Md_mEHoGMMYA5dXoR4TSAPfQQMsGc2YoHI39UxARqVS--ggxiUAF0LgATp99PF1tGg3LjSmsW707rsX34zMxpvOt80h2itNFd3RVx2i55vrp-ldNnu4vZ9OZpllkHcZlhQTNxfOGutsLud5DkVhS8nAlQoUpP0lLwjnJc6VKLgAMlecKGyNsozSITrvc1ehfVu72OnaR-uqyjSuXUetQFCiFJB_SEKZlAQnefZLLtt1OrOKWnJJOAG2jbvokQ1tjMGVehV8bcKHxqC3L9Wh1tuXap7sZW9jMs3ChZ_Av_BJj5exa8N3KgNFJMOcfgLWcX3i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757252042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk governance within aviation</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><creator>Tjoerhom, Berit Berg</creator><creatorcontrib>Tjoerhom, Berit Berg</creatorcontrib><description>Air traffic is global in nature. Regulation of the industry is therefore restrained by international recommendations and common rules. As a result of a comprehensive deregulation process, companies are able to conduct air traffic wherever they want, as long as they meet the demands of the regulators and the recommendations of the trade organisations. This article results from an exploratory case study examining the global risk governance that Norwegian civil aviation traffic is a part of. By using the concept of risk governance, this research underlines the importance of involving all relevant actors in aviation risk management. Specifically, the article highlights the relationship between national and supranational risk governance and the challenges this relationship poses for risk management. The results of this study show that the extensive numbers of actors grouped in different organisations pose both possibilities and challenges for the risk governance process within aviation -possibilities in the form of formal structures for participation, and challenges in the form of the integration and implementation of different contextual knowledge within the EU rule framework.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-3799</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-4637</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/rm.2010.5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Air traffic ; Air transport ; Air transportation ; Aviation ; Aviation law ; Aviation regulation ; Case studies ; Civil aviation ; Competitive firms ; Complex organization ; Corporate governance ; Decision making ; Deregulation ; Economic regulation ; Economics and Finance ; European Union ; Finance ; Globalization ; Governance ; International agreements ; Knowledge ; Multi-level governance ; Norway ; Original Article ; Publishing industry ; Risk assessment ; Risk Management ; Society ; Supranational organizations ; System theory ; Trade associations ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>Risk management (Leicestershire, England), 2010-10, Vol.12 (4), p.256-284</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.</rights><rights>Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-17312eb6ecacec87b880ddcf740ef9090146f5d255f1896d5602b95291ca9c433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-17312eb6ecacec87b880ddcf740ef9090146f5d255f1896d5602b95291ca9c433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/757252042/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/757252042?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,12826,27901,27902,33200,33201,36037,36038,44339,58213,58446,74865</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tjoerhom, Berit Berg</creatorcontrib><title>Risk governance within aviation</title><title>Risk management (Leicestershire, England)</title><addtitle>Risk Manag</addtitle><description>Air traffic is global in nature. Regulation of the industry is therefore restrained by international recommendations and common rules. As a result of a comprehensive deregulation process, companies are able to conduct air traffic wherever they want, as long as they meet the demands of the regulators and the recommendations of the trade organisations. This article results from an exploratory case study examining the global risk governance that Norwegian civil aviation traffic is a part of. By using the concept of risk governance, this research underlines the importance of involving all relevant actors in aviation risk management. Specifically, the article highlights the relationship between national and supranational risk governance and the challenges this relationship poses for risk management. The results of this study show that the extensive numbers of actors grouped in different organisations pose both possibilities and challenges for the risk governance process within aviation -possibilities in the form of formal structures for participation, and challenges in the form of the integration and implementation of different contextual knowledge within the EU rule framework.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Air traffic</subject><subject>Air transport</subject><subject>Air transportation</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Aviation law</subject><subject>Aviation regulation</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Civil aviation</subject><subject>Competitive firms</subject><subject>Complex organization</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deregulation</subject><subject>Economic regulation</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>International agreements</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Multi-level governance</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Publishing industry</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Management</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Supranational organizations</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Trade associations</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>1460-3799</issn><issn>1743-4637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0EtLAzEQB_AgCtbqwQ8gFi-isHXy3hxL8QUFQfQc0my2pu6jJtuK396UFQXx4Glm4Md_mEHoGMMYA5dXoR4TSAPfQQMsGc2YoHI39UxARqVS--ggxiUAF0LgATp99PF1tGg3LjSmsW707rsX34zMxpvOt80h2itNFd3RVx2i55vrp-ldNnu4vZ9OZpllkHcZlhQTNxfOGutsLud5DkVhS8nAlQoUpP0lLwjnJc6VKLgAMlecKGyNsozSITrvc1ehfVu72OnaR-uqyjSuXUetQFCiFJB_SEKZlAQnefZLLtt1OrOKWnJJOAG2jbvokQ1tjMGVehV8bcKHxqC3L9Wh1tuXap7sZW9jMs3ChZ_Av_BJj5exa8N3KgNFJMOcfgLWcX3i</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Tjoerhom, Berit Berg</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Risk governance within aviation</title><author>Tjoerhom, Berit Berg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-17312eb6ecacec87b880ddcf740ef9090146f5d255f1896d5602b95291ca9c433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Air traffic</topic><topic>Air transport</topic><topic>Air transportation</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Aviation law</topic><topic>Aviation regulation</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Civil aviation</topic><topic>Competitive firms</topic><topic>Complex organization</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deregulation</topic><topic>Economic regulation</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>International agreements</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Multi-level governance</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Publishing industry</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Management</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Supranational organizations</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Trade associations</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tjoerhom, Berit Berg</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Risk management (Leicestershire, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tjoerhom, Berit Berg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk governance within aviation</atitle><jtitle>Risk management (Leicestershire, England)</jtitle><stitle>Risk Manag</stitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>256-284</pages><issn>1460-3799</issn><eissn>1743-4637</eissn><abstract>Air traffic is global in nature. Regulation of the industry is therefore restrained by international recommendations and common rules. As a result of a comprehensive deregulation process, companies are able to conduct air traffic wherever they want, as long as they meet the demands of the regulators and the recommendations of the trade organisations. This article results from an exploratory case study examining the global risk governance that Norwegian civil aviation traffic is a part of. By using the concept of risk governance, this research underlines the importance of involving all relevant actors in aviation risk management. Specifically, the article highlights the relationship between national and supranational risk governance and the challenges this relationship poses for risk management. The results of this study show that the extensive numbers of actors grouped in different organisations pose both possibilities and challenges for the risk governance process within aviation -possibilities in the form of formal structures for participation, and challenges in the form of the integration and implementation of different contextual knowledge within the EU rule framework.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan</pub><doi>10.1057/rm.2010.5</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1460-3799 |
ispartof | Risk management (Leicestershire, England), 2010-10, Vol.12 (4), p.256-284 |
issn | 1460-3799 1743-4637 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_906329902 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List |
subjects | Accountability Air traffic Air transport Air transportation Aviation Aviation law Aviation regulation Case studies Civil aviation Competitive firms Complex organization Corporate governance Decision making Deregulation Economic regulation Economics and Finance European Union Finance Globalization Governance International agreements Knowledge Multi-level governance Norway Original Article Publishing industry Risk assessment Risk Management Society Supranational organizations System theory Trade associations Transnationalism |
title | Risk governance within aviation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T20%3A26%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20governance%20within%20aviation&rft.jtitle=Risk%20management%20(Leicestershire,%20England)&rft.au=Tjoerhom,%20Berit%20Berg&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=256-284&rft.issn=1460-3799&rft.eissn=1743-4637&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/rm.2010.5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40927415%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-17312eb6ecacec87b880ddcf740ef9090146f5d255f1896d5602b95291ca9c433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757252042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40927415&rfr_iscdi=true |