BEYOND BRAND NAMES OF PSYCHOTHERAPY: IDENTIFYING EMPIRICALLY SUPPORTED CHANGE PROCESSES

There is considerable debate about which empirical research methods best advance clinical outcomes in psychotherapy. The prevailing tendency has been to test treatment packages using randomized, controlled clinical trials. Recently, focus has shifted to considering how studying the process of change...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 2006, Vol.43 (2), p.216-231
Main Authors: ABLON, J. STUART, LEVY, RAYMOND A, KATZENSTEIN, TAI
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Female
Human
Male
Outpatient
Panic Disorder
Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
Psychotherapeutic Outcomes
Psychotherapeutic Processes
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There is considerable debate about which empirical research methods best advance clinical outcomes in psychotherapy. The prevailing tendency has been to test treatment packages using randomized, controlled clinical trials. Recently, focus has shifted to considering how studying the process of change in naturalistic treatments can be a useful complement to controlled trials. Clinicians self-identifying as psychodynamic treated 17 panic disorder patients in naturalistic psychotherapy for an average of 21 sessions. Patients achieved statistically significant reductions in symptoms across all domains. Rates of remission and clinically significant change as well as effect sizes were commensurate with those of empirically supported therapies for panic disorder. Treatment gains were maintained at 6-month follow-up. Intensive analysis of the process of the treatments revealed that integrative elements characterized the treatments: Adherence to cognitive-behavioral process was most characteristic, adherence to interpersonal and psychodynamic process, however, was most predictive of positive outcome. Specific process predictors of outcome were identified using the Psychotherapy Process Q-Set. These findings demonstrate how process research can be used to empirically validate change processes in naturalistic treatments as opposed to treatment packages in controlled trials.
ISSN:0033-3204
1939-1536
DOI:10.1037/0033-3204.43.2.216