Application of a contribution to sustainability test by the Joint Review Panel for the Canadian Mackenzie Gas Project

Ultimately, the enhancement we need to deliver through environmental assessment is confidence that every approved undertaking will move us positively towards a desirable and durable future. In Canada, the most promising steps in this direction have been in several major project assessment reviews wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Impact assessment and project appraisal 2011-09, Vol.29 (3), p.231-244
Main Author: Gibson, Robert B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
alternatives
Canada
cumulative effects
Economic development
Economic impact analysis
enhancement
Environmental impact
Impact analysis
legacy
Mackenzie gas pipeline
Natural gas
net gains
Oil industry
panel review
Pollution control
Risk
Studies
Sustainability
sustainability assessment
Sustainable development
trade-offs
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Ultimately, the enhancement we need to deliver through environmental assessment is confidence that every approved undertaking will move us positively towards a desirable and durable future. In Canada, the most promising steps in this direction have been in several major project assessment reviews with public hearings and independent panels that applied a contribution to sustainability test. The most recent and advanced case is the review of a proposed C$16.2 billion natural gas infrastructure undertaking in the Northwest Territories. The Panel's application of the contribution to sustainability test compared the cumulative effects, equity and legacy implications of a range of project pace and scale alternatives. The Panel concluded that the project would offer positive overall contributions only if 176 recommendations were implemented. While the Panel's process was slow and the governments accepted only the most modest recommendations, the Panel's review set a new standard of analytical practice. This paper examines how the review was done and assesses its strengths and limitations, with particular attention to the design and application of the contribution to sustainability test.
ISSN:1461-5517
1471-5465
DOI:10.3152/146155111X12959673796209