Impact of the Cognitive Status on the Memory Complaints in MS Patients

• Published in: Canadian journal of neurological sciences 2011-09, Vol.38 (5), p.728-733
• Main Authors: Demers, M., Rouleau, I., Scherze, P., Ouellet, J., Jobin, C., Duquette, P.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Biological and medical sciences; Case-Control Studies; Cognition Disorders - etiology; Disability Evaluation; Female; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Memory Disorders - complications; Memory Disorders - etiology; Mental Recall - physiology; Middle Aged; Multiple Sclerosis - complications; Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis; Neurology; Neuropsychological Tests; Original Article; Surveys and Questionnaires; Verbal Learning - physiology
• ISSN: 0317-1671; 2057-0155
• DOI: 10.1017/S031716710005410X

Despite the evidence of cognitive deficits in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients, evaluation of their cognitive integrity is often limited to the use of clinical interviews and questionnaires. However, the consensus in the literature is that these patients under- or overestimate their deficits and repercussions. The objective of this study was to clarify why some patients overestimate while others underestimate their memory deficits. Fifty-four participants (30 MS, 24 controls) completed the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ) and were tested on a battery of neuropsychological tests. Based on the test results, MS patients were categorized as having either mild or moderate/severe cognitive deficits. The moderate/severe MS group differed from the two other groups on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) but did not differ from the control group on the PRMQ. Conversely, the mild MS group did not differ from the control group on the RAVLT but did report significantly more problems than this group on the PRMQ. There was no difference between the two clinical groups on the Depression Index (Beck) but there was a significant correlation (r=.409) between the depression scores and the overestimation of prospective memory problems (PRMQ). The results explain the contradiction in the literature. It is the mild group who overestimates, maybe because they are overly concerned by their deficits, whereas the cognitive impairments of the moderate/severe group lead them to underestimate and may make their self-assessment unreliable. Formal testing or information from a significant other would be advisable.