A machine-to-loop assignment and layout design methodology for tandem AGV systems with single-load vehicles

In this paper, we propose a method for design of tandem automated guided vehicle (AGV) systems with single-load vehicles. We consider the concurrent design of machines layout and AGV guide paths for a tandem system. Our goal is to devise a method that can achieve the following objectives: (1) maximi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of production research 2011-06, Vol.49 (12), p.3605-3633
Main Authors: Rezapour, Shabnam, Zanjirani-Farahani, Reza, Miandoabchi, Elnaz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
AGV
AGVS
Algorithms
Applied sciences
Automated guided vehicles
Comparative analysis
Computer science
control theory
systems
Control system synthesis
Control theory. Systems
Design engineering
Exact sciences and technology
layout design
Links
Material handling, hoisting. Storage. Packaging
Mathematical problems
Mechanical engineering. Machine design
Operations research
simulated annealing
Studies
Systems design
tandem configuration
Transfert equipment, manipulators
industrial robots
Transportation
Vehicles
Workload
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper, we propose a method for design of tandem automated guided vehicle (AGV) systems with single-load vehicles. We consider the concurrent design of machines layout and AGV guide paths for a tandem system. Our goal is to devise a method that can achieve the following objectives: (1) maximise the workload balance between loops; (2) minimise the inter-loop flow; and (3) minimise the total flow distance. Our method solves the problem in four stages, considering the machines layout and the tandem paths at the same time. It assigns machines to loops, determines the layout of each loop, arranges loops on the floor, and finally designs a transportation centre to link the loops. We compare the performance of our method with a sequential design method that first determines the layout and then assigns the machines to loops. We solve a number of randomly generated problems for both methods. Results indicate that the proposed algorithm performs faster and achieves lower values of inter-loop flows and inter-loop flow distances.
ISSN:0020-7543
1366-588X
DOI:10.1080/00207543.2010.489056