Loading…

Working conditions of nursing personnel at clinics in Taiwan

Objectives To understand working conditions and potential occupational hazards of nurses in clinics, and to formulate strategic plans for work environment improvement. Methods A total of 1953 clinics were recruited in questionnaire survey. An expert focus group, four hospital field visits, and ergon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) England), 2011-09, Vol.68 (Suppl 1), p.A123-A123
Main Authors: Wang, Li-Jie, Shiao, Judith SC, Guo, Yue Leon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page A123
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A123
container_title Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)
container_volume 68
creator Wang, Li-Jie
Shiao, Judith SC
Guo, Yue Leon
description Objectives To understand working conditions and potential occupational hazards of nurses in clinics, and to formulate strategic plans for work environment improvement. Methods A total of 1953 clinics were recruited in questionnaire survey. An expert focus group, four hospital field visits, and ergonomic analysis were also performed. Results A total of 2006 (52.6%) questionnaires were completed and returned and were eligible for final analysis. The mean age was 36.0 years old among respondents. As for biological hazards, 409 (20.4%) nurses sustained at least one needlestick injury in the past 12 months, and 442 (22.2%) got exposed to blood or body fluids. As for ergonomic hazards, the prevalence of musculoskeletal discomforts was high (n=1879, 93.6%) and over a half (n=984, 52.4%) of respondents believed that musculoskeletal discomforts affected their performance at work. For psychosocial hazards, nearly a half of nurses (n=995, 49.6%) reported feeling stressed at work. Most of nurses cope with stress by getting rest and sleep (n=1572, 78.4%). Nonetheless, 58.5% (n=1173) of nurses were satisfied with their jobs. Conclusions This study has identified that the clinic nurse's work environment has some room for improvement. The problem of non-report of needlestick injury and lack of proper post-exposure management, musculoskeletal discomforts, and high level of self-perceived job stress are of higher priority for improvement. We suggest that occupational safety and health guidelines for nursing routines/tasks to be formulated if the “good” working conditions for nurses are to be achieved.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/oemed-2011-100382.409
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911151952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4024234181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2329-cd2d3951f56d342fa3e86e7920bd769da6e38ac0d7063022b8e8da73f86f8ee23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BKHgwVPXTNImKXiRxS8U9bCux5BtUslum6xJi_rvba148ORphuF5Z4YHoWPAMwDKzrxpjE4JBkgBYyrILMPFDppAxnHKC8J2-57mkGIOsI8OYlxjDJRTMkHnLz5srHtNSu-0ba13MfFV4roQh-nWhOidM3Wi2qSsrbNlTKxLFsq-K3eI9ipVR3P0U6fo-epyMb9J7x-vb-cX9-mKUFKkpSaaFjlUOdM0I5WiRjDTP4ZXmrNCK2aoUCXWHDOKCVkJI7TitBKsEsYQOkWn495t8G-dia1sbCxNXStnfBdlAQA5FPlAnvwh174Lrn9OAhdAMc8y0VP5SJXBxxhMJbfBNip8SsByUCq_lcpBqRyVyl5pn0vHnI2t-fgNqbCRjFOey4flXLKC8rsnIuSy5_HIr5r1P098AYRDh2U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781307448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Working conditions of nursing personnel at clinics in Taiwan</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Wang, Li-Jie ; Shiao, Judith SC ; Guo, Yue Leon</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-Jie ; Shiao, Judith SC ; Guo, Yue Leon</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To understand working conditions and potential occupational hazards of nurses in clinics, and to formulate strategic plans for work environment improvement. Methods A total of 1953 clinics were recruited in questionnaire survey. An expert focus group, four hospital field visits, and ergonomic analysis were also performed. Results A total of 2006 (52.6%) questionnaires were completed and returned and were eligible for final analysis. The mean age was 36.0 years old among respondents. As for biological hazards, 409 (20.4%) nurses sustained at least one needlestick injury in the past 12 months, and 442 (22.2%) got exposed to blood or body fluids. As for ergonomic hazards, the prevalence of musculoskeletal discomforts was high (n=1879, 93.6%) and over a half (n=984, 52.4%) of respondents believed that musculoskeletal discomforts affected their performance at work. For psychosocial hazards, nearly a half of nurses (n=995, 49.6%) reported feeling stressed at work. Most of nurses cope with stress by getting rest and sleep (n=1572, 78.4%). Nonetheless, 58.5% (n=1173) of nurses were satisfied with their jobs. Conclusions This study has identified that the clinic nurse's work environment has some room for improvement. The problem of non-report of needlestick injury and lack of proper post-exposure management, musculoskeletal discomforts, and high level of self-perceived job stress are of higher priority for improvement. We suggest that occupational safety and health guidelines for nursing routines/tasks to be formulated if the “good” working conditions for nurses are to be achieved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-0711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100382.409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Biohazards ; Ergonomics ; Medical personnel ; Occupational exposure ; Occupational health ; Occupational safety ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2011-09, Vol.68 (Suppl 1), p.A123-A123</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2011 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/68/Suppl_1/A123.2.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/68/Suppl_1/A123.2.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77472,77503</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiao, Judith SC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yue Leon</creatorcontrib><title>Working conditions of nursing personnel at clinics in Taiwan</title><title>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</title><addtitle>Occup Environ Med</addtitle><description>Objectives To understand working conditions and potential occupational hazards of nurses in clinics, and to formulate strategic plans for work environment improvement. Methods A total of 1953 clinics were recruited in questionnaire survey. An expert focus group, four hospital field visits, and ergonomic analysis were also performed. Results A total of 2006 (52.6%) questionnaires were completed and returned and were eligible for final analysis. The mean age was 36.0 years old among respondents. As for biological hazards, 409 (20.4%) nurses sustained at least one needlestick injury in the past 12 months, and 442 (22.2%) got exposed to blood or body fluids. As for ergonomic hazards, the prevalence of musculoskeletal discomforts was high (n=1879, 93.6%) and over a half (n=984, 52.4%) of respondents believed that musculoskeletal discomforts affected their performance at work. For psychosocial hazards, nearly a half of nurses (n=995, 49.6%) reported feeling stressed at work. Most of nurses cope with stress by getting rest and sleep (n=1572, 78.4%). Nonetheless, 58.5% (n=1173) of nurses were satisfied with their jobs. Conclusions This study has identified that the clinic nurse's work environment has some room for improvement. The problem of non-report of needlestick injury and lack of proper post-exposure management, musculoskeletal discomforts, and high level of self-perceived job stress are of higher priority for improvement. We suggest that occupational safety and health guidelines for nursing routines/tasks to be formulated if the “good” working conditions for nurses are to be achieved.</description><subject>Biohazards</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1351-0711</issn><issn>1470-7926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BKHgwVPXTNImKXiRxS8U9bCux5BtUslum6xJi_rvba148ORphuF5Z4YHoWPAMwDKzrxpjE4JBkgBYyrILMPFDppAxnHKC8J2-57mkGIOsI8OYlxjDJRTMkHnLz5srHtNSu-0ba13MfFV4roQh-nWhOidM3Wi2qSsrbNlTKxLFsq-K3eI9ipVR3P0U6fo-epyMb9J7x-vb-cX9-mKUFKkpSaaFjlUOdM0I5WiRjDTP4ZXmrNCK2aoUCXWHDOKCVkJI7TitBKsEsYQOkWn495t8G-dia1sbCxNXStnfBdlAQA5FPlAnvwh174Lrn9OAhdAMc8y0VP5SJXBxxhMJbfBNip8SsByUCq_lcpBqRyVyl5pn0vHnI2t-fgNqbCRjFOey4flXLKC8rsnIuSy5_HIr5r1P098AYRDh2U</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Wang, Li-Jie</creator><creator>Shiao, Judith SC</creator><creator>Guo, Yue Leon</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Working conditions of nursing personnel at clinics in Taiwan</title><author>Wang, Li-Jie ; Shiao, Judith SC ; Guo, Yue Leon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2329-cd2d3951f56d342fa3e86e7920bd769da6e38ac0d7063022b8e8da73f86f8ee23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biohazards</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiao, Judith SC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yue Leon</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Li-Jie</au><au>Shiao, Judith SC</au><au>Guo, Yue Leon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Working conditions of nursing personnel at clinics in Taiwan</atitle><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Occup Environ Med</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A123</spage><epage>A123</epage><pages>A123-A123</pages><issn>1351-0711</issn><eissn>1470-7926</eissn><abstract>Objectives To understand working conditions and potential occupational hazards of nurses in clinics, and to formulate strategic plans for work environment improvement. Methods A total of 1953 clinics were recruited in questionnaire survey. An expert focus group, four hospital field visits, and ergonomic analysis were also performed. Results A total of 2006 (52.6%) questionnaires were completed and returned and were eligible for final analysis. The mean age was 36.0 years old among respondents. As for biological hazards, 409 (20.4%) nurses sustained at least one needlestick injury in the past 12 months, and 442 (22.2%) got exposed to blood or body fluids. As for ergonomic hazards, the prevalence of musculoskeletal discomforts was high (n=1879, 93.6%) and over a half (n=984, 52.4%) of respondents believed that musculoskeletal discomforts affected their performance at work. For psychosocial hazards, nearly a half of nurses (n=995, 49.6%) reported feeling stressed at work. Most of nurses cope with stress by getting rest and sleep (n=1572, 78.4%). Nonetheless, 58.5% (n=1173) of nurses were satisfied with their jobs. Conclusions This study has identified that the clinic nurse's work environment has some room for improvement. The problem of non-report of needlestick injury and lack of proper post-exposure management, musculoskeletal discomforts, and high level of self-perceived job stress are of higher priority for improvement. We suggest that occupational safety and health guidelines for nursing routines/tasks to be formulated if the “good” working conditions for nurses are to be achieved.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><doi>10.1136/oemed-2011-100382.409</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1351-0711
ispartof Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2011-09, Vol.68 (Suppl 1), p.A123-A123
issn 1351-0711
1470-7926
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911151952
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Biohazards
Ergonomics
Medical personnel
Occupational exposure
Occupational health
Occupational safety
Working conditions
title Working conditions of nursing personnel at clinics in Taiwan
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A45%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Working%20conditions%20of%20nursing%20personnel%20at%20clinics%20in%20Taiwan&rft.jtitle=Occupational%20and%20environmental%20medicine%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Wang,%20Li-Jie&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A123&rft.epage=A123&rft.pages=A123-A123&rft.issn=1351-0711&rft.eissn=1470-7926&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2011-100382.409&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4024234181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2329-cd2d3951f56d342fa3e86e7920bd769da6e38ac0d7063022b8e8da73f86f8ee23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781307448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true