Loading…

Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece)

This paper describes an integrated GIS-based methodology for conservation value assessment using the traditional species-based and a habitat-based multi-criteria evaluation. The methodology was applied to 49 small islands and islets in the East Aegean area, belonging to a SCI Natura 2000 site. The s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal for nature conservation 2011-10, Vol.19 (5), p.269-275
Main Authors: Panitsa, Maria, Koutsias, Nikos, Tsiripidis, Ioannis, Zotos, Anastasios, Dimopoulos, Panayotis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3
container_end_page 275
container_issue 5
container_start_page 269
container_title Journal for nature conservation
container_volume 19
creator Panitsa, Maria
Koutsias, Nikos
Tsiripidis, Ioannis
Zotos, Anastasios
Dimopoulos, Panayotis
description This paper describes an integrated GIS-based methodology for conservation value assessment using the traditional species-based and a habitat-based multi-criteria evaluation. The methodology was applied to 49 small islands and islets in the East Aegean area, belonging to a SCI Natura 2000 site. The species-based (botanical approach) conservation status assessment attributes a specific weight to the parameter of endemism, while the multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) approach emphasises the criteria of diversity, rarity, naturalness, replaceability and threat on each habitat type in combination with the number of significant taxa. The conservation values attained from the two approaches are significantly correlated, but the multi-criteria approach is more effective as it includes all the habitat types within the study area in the 25% of the polygons with the highest conservation values. Furthermore, results from the multi-criteria analysis were more in line with subjective assessments of the conservation value of the habitat types than the ones obtained by the botanical approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jnc.2011.04.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911152469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1617138111000173</els_id><sourcerecordid>911152469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OHDEMh0dVkUopD8CpubU9zDSeZP6pJ4QoRULqAThH3sSBrHYn2zi7Eg_Q9yZ06JVcYlnfz7K_qjoD2YCE_vu6Wc-2aSVAI3UjJbyrjqGHsQY5qff_6qEGNcKH6iPzWsoWQE_H1d_bHdlAXK-QyYkDJd6zeMRVyJhfm3TAzR5ziLPwMQkbZ6Z0WBpcsBJAZmLe0pxF9P_jIj_tiEWYRX4kcYmcxTk9EM4i8AZnx-LrVSKy9O1TdeRxw3T6-p9U9z8v7y5-1Te_r64vzm9qqzqVa60tDTQNatW3tlPYj0OvJnDOy8E7GHFUndelbHs3wCjH1iFC59px8nqlrDqpvixzdyn-2RNnsw1saVO2obhnMwFA1-p-KiQspE2ROZE3uxS2mJ4MSPNi3KxNMW5ejBupTTFeMp-XjMdo8CEFNve3BdCyvLKaLMSPhaBy5CFQMlzkz5ZcSGSzcTG8Mf8Z9HKUHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>911152469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Panitsa, Maria ; Koutsias, Nikos ; Tsiripidis, Ioannis ; Zotos, Anastasios ; Dimopoulos, Panayotis</creator><creatorcontrib>Panitsa, Maria ; Koutsias, Nikos ; Tsiripidis, Ioannis ; Zotos, Anastasios ; Dimopoulos, Panayotis</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes an integrated GIS-based methodology for conservation value assessment using the traditional species-based and a habitat-based multi-criteria evaluation. The methodology was applied to 49 small islands and islets in the East Aegean area, belonging to a SCI Natura 2000 site. The species-based (botanical approach) conservation status assessment attributes a specific weight to the parameter of endemism, while the multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) approach emphasises the criteria of diversity, rarity, naturalness, replaceability and threat on each habitat type in combination with the number of significant taxa. The conservation values attained from the two approaches are significantly correlated, but the multi-criteria approach is more effective as it includes all the habitat types within the study area in the 25% of the polygons with the highest conservation values. Furthermore, results from the multi-criteria analysis were more in line with subjective assessments of the conservation value of the habitat types than the ones obtained by the botanical approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1617-1381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1093</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2011.04.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Conservation assessment ; Conservation mapping ; habitats ; Habitats diversity ; Island ecosystems ; islands ; Multi-criteria analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal for nature conservation, 2011-10, Vol.19 (5), p.269-275</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panitsa, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koutsias, Nikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiripidis, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zotos, Anastasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimopoulos, Panayotis</creatorcontrib><title>Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece)</title><title>Journal for nature conservation</title><description>This paper describes an integrated GIS-based methodology for conservation value assessment using the traditional species-based and a habitat-based multi-criteria evaluation. The methodology was applied to 49 small islands and islets in the East Aegean area, belonging to a SCI Natura 2000 site. The species-based (botanical approach) conservation status assessment attributes a specific weight to the parameter of endemism, while the multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) approach emphasises the criteria of diversity, rarity, naturalness, replaceability and threat on each habitat type in combination with the number of significant taxa. The conservation values attained from the two approaches are significantly correlated, but the multi-criteria approach is more effective as it includes all the habitat types within the study area in the 25% of the polygons with the highest conservation values. Furthermore, results from the multi-criteria analysis were more in line with subjective assessments of the conservation value of the habitat types than the ones obtained by the botanical approach.</description><subject>Conservation assessment</subject><subject>Conservation mapping</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>Habitats diversity</subject><subject>Island ecosystems</subject><subject>islands</subject><subject>Multi-criteria analysis</subject><issn>1617-1381</issn><issn>1618-1093</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9OHDEMh0dVkUopD8CpubU9zDSeZP6pJ4QoRULqAThH3sSBrHYn2zi7Eg_Q9yZ06JVcYlnfz7K_qjoD2YCE_vu6Wc-2aSVAI3UjJbyrjqGHsQY5qff_6qEGNcKH6iPzWsoWQE_H1d_bHdlAXK-QyYkDJd6zeMRVyJhfm3TAzR5ziLPwMQkbZ6Z0WBpcsBJAZmLe0pxF9P_jIj_tiEWYRX4kcYmcxTk9EM4i8AZnx-LrVSKy9O1TdeRxw3T6-p9U9z8v7y5-1Te_r64vzm9qqzqVa60tDTQNatW3tlPYj0OvJnDOy8E7GHFUndelbHs3wCjH1iFC59px8nqlrDqpvixzdyn-2RNnsw1saVO2obhnMwFA1-p-KiQspE2ROZE3uxS2mJ4MSPNi3KxNMW5ejBupTTFeMp-XjMdo8CEFNve3BdCyvLKaLMSPhaBy5CFQMlzkz5ZcSGSzcTG8Mf8Z9HKUHg</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Panitsa, Maria</creator><creator>Koutsias, Nikos</creator><creator>Tsiripidis, Ioannis</creator><creator>Zotos, Anastasios</creator><creator>Dimopoulos, Panayotis</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece)</title><author>Panitsa, Maria ; Koutsias, Nikos ; Tsiripidis, Ioannis ; Zotos, Anastasios ; Dimopoulos, Panayotis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Conservation assessment</topic><topic>Conservation mapping</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>Habitats diversity</topic><topic>Island ecosystems</topic><topic>islands</topic><topic>Multi-criteria analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panitsa, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koutsias, Nikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiripidis, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zotos, Anastasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimopoulos, Panayotis</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal for nature conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panitsa, Maria</au><au>Koutsias, Nikos</au><au>Tsiripidis, Ioannis</au><au>Zotos, Anastasios</au><au>Dimopoulos, Panayotis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece)</atitle><jtitle>Journal for nature conservation</jtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>269-275</pages><issn>1617-1381</issn><eissn>1618-1093</eissn><abstract>This paper describes an integrated GIS-based methodology for conservation value assessment using the traditional species-based and a habitat-based multi-criteria evaluation. The methodology was applied to 49 small islands and islets in the East Aegean area, belonging to a SCI Natura 2000 site. The species-based (botanical approach) conservation status assessment attributes a specific weight to the parameter of endemism, while the multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) approach emphasises the criteria of diversity, rarity, naturalness, replaceability and threat on each habitat type in combination with the number of significant taxa. The conservation values attained from the two approaches are significantly correlated, but the multi-criteria approach is more effective as it includes all the habitat types within the study area in the 25% of the polygons with the highest conservation values. Furthermore, results from the multi-criteria analysis were more in line with subjective assessments of the conservation value of the habitat types than the ones obtained by the botanical approach.</abstract><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jnc.2011.04.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1617-1381
ispartof Journal for nature conservation, 2011-10, Vol.19 (5), p.269-275
issn 1617-1381
1618-1093
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911152469
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Conservation assessment
Conservation mapping
habitats
Habitats diversity
Island ecosystems
islands
Multi-criteria analysis
title Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T10%3A51%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Species-based%20versus%20habitat-based%20evaluation%20for%20conservation%20status%20assessment%20of%20habitat%20types%20in%20the%20East%20Aegean%20islands%20(Greece)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20nature%20conservation&rft.au=Panitsa,%20Maria&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=269-275&rft.issn=1617-1381&rft.eissn=1618-1093&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jnc.2011.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E911152469%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=911152469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true