Loading…
Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece)
This paper describes an integrated GIS-based methodology for conservation value assessment using the traditional species-based and a habitat-based multi-criteria evaluation. The methodology was applied to 49 small islands and islets in the East Aegean area, belonging to a SCI Natura 2000 site. The s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal for nature conservation 2011-10, Vol.19 (5), p.269-275 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3 |
container_end_page | 275 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 269 |
container_title | Journal for nature conservation |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Panitsa, Maria Koutsias, Nikos Tsiripidis, Ioannis Zotos, Anastasios Dimopoulos, Panayotis |
description | This paper describes an integrated GIS-based methodology for conservation value assessment using the traditional species-based and a habitat-based multi-criteria evaluation. The methodology was applied to 49 small islands and islets in the East Aegean area, belonging to a SCI Natura 2000 site. The species-based (botanical approach) conservation status assessment attributes a specific weight to the parameter of endemism, while the multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) approach emphasises the criteria of diversity, rarity, naturalness, replaceability and threat on each habitat type in combination with the number of significant taxa. The conservation values attained from the two approaches are significantly correlated, but the multi-criteria approach is more effective as it includes all the habitat types within the study area in the 25% of the polygons with the highest conservation values. Furthermore, results from the multi-criteria analysis were more in line with subjective assessments of the conservation value of the habitat types than the ones obtained by the botanical approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jnc.2011.04.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911152469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1617138111000173</els_id><sourcerecordid>911152469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OHDEMh0dVkUopD8CpubU9zDSeZP6pJ4QoRULqAThH3sSBrHYn2zi7Eg_Q9yZ06JVcYlnfz7K_qjoD2YCE_vu6Wc-2aSVAI3UjJbyrjqGHsQY5qff_6qEGNcKH6iPzWsoWQE_H1d_bHdlAXK-QyYkDJd6zeMRVyJhfm3TAzR5ziLPwMQkbZ6Z0WBpcsBJAZmLe0pxF9P_jIj_tiEWYRX4kcYmcxTk9EM4i8AZnx-LrVSKy9O1TdeRxw3T6-p9U9z8v7y5-1Te_r64vzm9qqzqVa60tDTQNatW3tlPYj0OvJnDOy8E7GHFUndelbHs3wCjH1iFC59px8nqlrDqpvixzdyn-2RNnsw1saVO2obhnMwFA1-p-KiQspE2ROZE3uxS2mJ4MSPNi3KxNMW5ejBupTTFeMp-XjMdo8CEFNve3BdCyvLKaLMSPhaBy5CFQMlzkz5ZcSGSzcTG8Mf8Z9HKUHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>911152469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Panitsa, Maria ; Koutsias, Nikos ; Tsiripidis, Ioannis ; Zotos, Anastasios ; Dimopoulos, Panayotis</creator><creatorcontrib>Panitsa, Maria ; Koutsias, Nikos ; Tsiripidis, Ioannis ; Zotos, Anastasios ; Dimopoulos, Panayotis</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes an integrated GIS-based methodology for conservation value assessment using the traditional species-based and a habitat-based multi-criteria evaluation. The methodology was applied to 49 small islands and islets in the East Aegean area, belonging to a SCI Natura 2000 site. The species-based (botanical approach) conservation status assessment attributes a specific weight to the parameter of endemism, while the multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) approach emphasises the criteria of diversity, rarity, naturalness, replaceability and threat on each habitat type in combination with the number of significant taxa. The conservation values attained from the two approaches are significantly correlated, but the multi-criteria approach is more effective as it includes all the habitat types within the study area in the 25% of the polygons with the highest conservation values. Furthermore, results from the multi-criteria analysis were more in line with subjective assessments of the conservation value of the habitat types than the ones obtained by the botanical approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1617-1381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1093</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2011.04.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Conservation assessment ; Conservation mapping ; habitats ; Habitats diversity ; Island ecosystems ; islands ; Multi-criteria analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal for nature conservation, 2011-10, Vol.19 (5), p.269-275</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panitsa, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koutsias, Nikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiripidis, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zotos, Anastasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimopoulos, Panayotis</creatorcontrib><title>Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece)</title><title>Journal for nature conservation</title><description>This paper describes an integrated GIS-based methodology for conservation value assessment using the traditional species-based and a habitat-based multi-criteria evaluation. The methodology was applied to 49 small islands and islets in the East Aegean area, belonging to a SCI Natura 2000 site. The species-based (botanical approach) conservation status assessment attributes a specific weight to the parameter of endemism, while the multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) approach emphasises the criteria of diversity, rarity, naturalness, replaceability and threat on each habitat type in combination with the number of significant taxa. The conservation values attained from the two approaches are significantly correlated, but the multi-criteria approach is more effective as it includes all the habitat types within the study area in the 25% of the polygons with the highest conservation values. Furthermore, results from the multi-criteria analysis were more in line with subjective assessments of the conservation value of the habitat types than the ones obtained by the botanical approach.</description><subject>Conservation assessment</subject><subject>Conservation mapping</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>Habitats diversity</subject><subject>Island ecosystems</subject><subject>islands</subject><subject>Multi-criteria analysis</subject><issn>1617-1381</issn><issn>1618-1093</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9OHDEMh0dVkUopD8CpubU9zDSeZP6pJ4QoRULqAThH3sSBrHYn2zi7Eg_Q9yZ06JVcYlnfz7K_qjoD2YCE_vu6Wc-2aSVAI3UjJbyrjqGHsQY5qff_6qEGNcKH6iPzWsoWQE_H1d_bHdlAXK-QyYkDJd6zeMRVyJhfm3TAzR5ziLPwMQkbZ6Z0WBpcsBJAZmLe0pxF9P_jIj_tiEWYRX4kcYmcxTk9EM4i8AZnx-LrVSKy9O1TdeRxw3T6-p9U9z8v7y5-1Te_r64vzm9qqzqVa60tDTQNatW3tlPYj0OvJnDOy8E7GHFUndelbHs3wCjH1iFC59px8nqlrDqpvixzdyn-2RNnsw1saVO2obhnMwFA1-p-KiQspE2ROZE3uxS2mJ4MSPNi3KxNMW5ejBupTTFeMp-XjMdo8CEFNve3BdCyvLKaLMSPhaBy5CFQMlzkz5ZcSGSzcTG8Mf8Z9HKUHg</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Panitsa, Maria</creator><creator>Koutsias, Nikos</creator><creator>Tsiripidis, Ioannis</creator><creator>Zotos, Anastasios</creator><creator>Dimopoulos, Panayotis</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece)</title><author>Panitsa, Maria ; Koutsias, Nikos ; Tsiripidis, Ioannis ; Zotos, Anastasios ; Dimopoulos, Panayotis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Conservation assessment</topic><topic>Conservation mapping</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>Habitats diversity</topic><topic>Island ecosystems</topic><topic>islands</topic><topic>Multi-criteria analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panitsa, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koutsias, Nikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiripidis, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zotos, Anastasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimopoulos, Panayotis</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal for nature conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panitsa, Maria</au><au>Koutsias, Nikos</au><au>Tsiripidis, Ioannis</au><au>Zotos, Anastasios</au><au>Dimopoulos, Panayotis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece)</atitle><jtitle>Journal for nature conservation</jtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>269-275</pages><issn>1617-1381</issn><eissn>1618-1093</eissn><abstract>This paper describes an integrated GIS-based methodology for conservation value assessment using the traditional species-based and a habitat-based multi-criteria evaluation. The methodology was applied to 49 small islands and islets in the East Aegean area, belonging to a SCI Natura 2000 site. The species-based (botanical approach) conservation status assessment attributes a specific weight to the parameter of endemism, while the multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) approach emphasises the criteria of diversity, rarity, naturalness, replaceability and threat on each habitat type in combination with the number of significant taxa. The conservation values attained from the two approaches are significantly correlated, but the multi-criteria approach is more effective as it includes all the habitat types within the study area in the 25% of the polygons with the highest conservation values. Furthermore, results from the multi-criteria analysis were more in line with subjective assessments of the conservation value of the habitat types than the ones obtained by the botanical approach.</abstract><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jnc.2011.04.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1617-1381 |
ispartof | Journal for nature conservation, 2011-10, Vol.19 (5), p.269-275 |
issn | 1617-1381 1618-1093 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911152469 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Conservation assessment Conservation mapping habitats Habitats diversity Island ecosystems islands Multi-criteria analysis |
title | Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T10%3A51%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Species-based%20versus%20habitat-based%20evaluation%20for%20conservation%20status%20assessment%20of%20habitat%20types%20in%20the%20East%20Aegean%20islands%20(Greece)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20nature%20conservation&rft.au=Panitsa,%20Maria&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=269-275&rft.issn=1617-1381&rft.eissn=1618-1093&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jnc.2011.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E911152469%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-44ce7e973b62c53a6876391ddf07fd18a835f47fd26d718082daa15d289f4b3c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=911152469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |