Lung cancer and exposure to mineral wools: the ICARE study

Objectives This work aims at assessing the risk of lung cancer associated with mineral wools (MW) currently used as a substitute for asbestos. They are suspected of increasing the risk of lung cancer because of their structure close to asbestos. Methods ICARE is a large multicentre population-based...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) England), 2011-09, Vol.68 (Suppl 1), p.A15-A15
Main Authors: Guida, Florence, Lamkarkach, Farida, Cenée, Sylvie, Cyr, Diane, Gaye, Oumar, Lacourt, Aude, Brochard, Patrick, Ducamp, Stéphane, Paris, Christophe, Fevotte, Joelle, Luce, Danièle, Stücker, Isabelle
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Age
Algorithms
Asbestos
Exposure
Lung cancer
Risk assessment
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives This work aims at assessing the risk of lung cancer associated with mineral wools (MW) currently used as a substitute for asbestos. They are suspected of increasing the risk of lung cancer because of their structure close to asbestos. Methods ICARE is a large multicentre population-based case-control study conducted between 2001 and 2006 in 10 French departments with a general cancer registry. ICARE includes 2926 incident lung cancer cases and 3555 controls with 78% of men. The subjects' exposure to MW was first determined using a Job-Exposure Matrix (JEM) specific for MW. Then, individual exposure was assessed with an algorithm using specific questions on exposing tasks. We used unconditional logistic regression adjusted for age, department, number of job periods, lifelong cigarette smoking and exposure to asbestos (also assessed by a JEM and an algorithm). Results Analyses were conducted among men (2301 cases, 2780 controls) and concerned 27191 jobs. In the first analyses, we find significant associations between the risk of lung cancer and exposure to MW assessed with the JEM. They became non non-significant and close to 1 when adjusting for exposure to asbestos. In contrast, a significant dose-response relation was found between exposure to asbestos and the risk of lung cancer, even when adjusted for exposure to MW. Conclusions These results need to be completed with the exposure assessment from the algorithm. This algorithm would help us disentangle MW and asbestos exposure, which are closely related because of similar exposing jobs. Both results will be presented.
ISSN:1351-0711
1470-7926
DOI:10.1136/oemed-2011-100382.47