Loading…

Removal of strontium by electrocoagulation using stainless steel and aluminum electrodes

In the present work, removal of strontium (up to 100 mg/L) from synthetic wastewater by electrocoagulation has been studied. Stainless steel and aluminum electrodes have been used and removal efficiencies have been compared with respect to electrocoagulation time, current density, amount of electrol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Desalination 2011-11, Vol.282, p.63-67
Main Authors: Murthy, Z.V.P., Parmar, Snehal
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-2e513027020532132c74bc5fecff242ad7afc8d8ae510661b64f9498b5fa445c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-2e513027020532132c74bc5fecff242ad7afc8d8ae510661b64f9498b5fa445c3
container_end_page 67
container_issue
container_start_page 63
container_title Desalination
container_volume 282
creator Murthy, Z.V.P.
Parmar, Snehal
description In the present work, removal of strontium (up to 100 mg/L) from synthetic wastewater by electrocoagulation has been studied. Stainless steel and aluminum electrodes have been used and removal efficiencies have been compared with respect to electrocoagulation time, current density, amount of electrolyte added, solution pH, distance between electrodes, temperature and initial concentration of strontium. Preliminary operating cost estimation has been found out for both electrode materials. The strontium removal data has been used to find adsorption kinetics using pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetics models. Results show that the optimum operating variables values are 50 min of process time, 8 mA/cm 2 current density and solution pH 5 for which around 93% and 77% removal efficiency was achieved with using stainless steel and aluminum electrodes, respectively. Pseudo-second-order kinetic model fitted the data better than the pseudo-first-order model. ► Removal of strontium from by electrocoagulation is reported for the first time. ► Stainless steel (SS) and Al electrodes are used and removal efficiencies compared. ► Preliminary operating cost estimation is reported for both electrode materials. ► The strontium removal data have been used to find adsorption kinetics. ► 93 and 77% Sr(II) removal was achieved by SS and Al electrodes, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.058
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911163895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0011916411007764</els_id><sourcerecordid>911163895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-2e513027020532132c74bc5fecff242ad7afc8d8ae510661b64f9498b5fa445c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKu_wMvePO2ar91mDx6k-AUFQRS8hWx2UlKySU12C_33prZnTzPDvM8w74vQLcEVwaS531Q9JOUqigmpsKhwLc7QjIgFKzlv-Dma4bwpW9LwS3SV0iaPtGVshr4_YAg75YpgijTG4Ec7DUW3L8CBzrMOaj05NdrgiylZv84qZb2DlHIH4Arl-0K5abA-gycqf3ONLoxyCW5OdY6-np8-l6_l6v3lbfm4KjXHZCwp1IRhusAU14wSRvWCd7o2oI2hnKp-oYwWvVBZh5uGdA03LW9FVxvFea3ZHN0d725j-JkgjXKwSYNzykOYkmwJIQ0TbZ2V7KjUMaQUwchttIOKe0mwPMQoN_IvRnmIUWIhc4yZejhSkE3sLESZtAWvobcxe5V9sP_yvyzffgk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>911163895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Removal of strontium by electrocoagulation using stainless steel and aluminum electrodes</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Murthy, Z.V.P. ; Parmar, Snehal</creator><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Z.V.P. ; Parmar, Snehal</creatorcontrib><description>In the present work, removal of strontium (up to 100 mg/L) from synthetic wastewater by electrocoagulation has been studied. Stainless steel and aluminum electrodes have been used and removal efficiencies have been compared with respect to electrocoagulation time, current density, amount of electrolyte added, solution pH, distance between electrodes, temperature and initial concentration of strontium. Preliminary operating cost estimation has been found out for both electrode materials. The strontium removal data has been used to find adsorption kinetics using pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetics models. Results show that the optimum operating variables values are 50 min of process time, 8 mA/cm 2 current density and solution pH 5 for which around 93% and 77% removal efficiency was achieved with using stainless steel and aluminum electrodes, respectively. Pseudo-second-order kinetic model fitted the data better than the pseudo-first-order model. ► Removal of strontium from by electrocoagulation is reported for the first time. ► Stainless steel (SS) and Al electrodes are used and removal efficiencies compared. ► Preliminary operating cost estimation is reported for both electrode materials. ► The strontium removal data have been used to find adsorption kinetics. ► 93 and 77% Sr(II) removal was achieved by SS and Al electrodes, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-9164</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Aluminum ; Aluminum electrode ; Current density ; Electrocoagulation ; Electrodes ; Mathematical models ; Stainless steel electrode ; Stainless steels ; Strontium</subject><ispartof>Desalination, 2011-11, Vol.282, p.63-67</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-2e513027020532132c74bc5fecff242ad7afc8d8ae510661b64f9498b5fa445c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-2e513027020532132c74bc5fecff242ad7afc8d8ae510661b64f9498b5fa445c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Z.V.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Snehal</creatorcontrib><title>Removal of strontium by electrocoagulation using stainless steel and aluminum electrodes</title><title>Desalination</title><description>In the present work, removal of strontium (up to 100 mg/L) from synthetic wastewater by electrocoagulation has been studied. Stainless steel and aluminum electrodes have been used and removal efficiencies have been compared with respect to electrocoagulation time, current density, amount of electrolyte added, solution pH, distance between electrodes, temperature and initial concentration of strontium. Preliminary operating cost estimation has been found out for both electrode materials. The strontium removal data has been used to find adsorption kinetics using pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetics models. Results show that the optimum operating variables values are 50 min of process time, 8 mA/cm 2 current density and solution pH 5 for which around 93% and 77% removal efficiency was achieved with using stainless steel and aluminum electrodes, respectively. Pseudo-second-order kinetic model fitted the data better than the pseudo-first-order model. ► Removal of strontium from by electrocoagulation is reported for the first time. ► Stainless steel (SS) and Al electrodes are used and removal efficiencies compared. ► Preliminary operating cost estimation is reported for both electrode materials. ► The strontium removal data have been used to find adsorption kinetics. ► 93 and 77% Sr(II) removal was achieved by SS and Al electrodes, respectively.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Aluminum electrode</subject><subject>Current density</subject><subject>Electrocoagulation</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Stainless steel electrode</subject><subject>Stainless steels</subject><subject>Strontium</subject><issn>0011-9164</issn><issn>1873-4464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKu_wMvePO2ar91mDx6k-AUFQRS8hWx2UlKySU12C_33prZnTzPDvM8w74vQLcEVwaS531Q9JOUqigmpsKhwLc7QjIgFKzlv-Dma4bwpW9LwS3SV0iaPtGVshr4_YAg75YpgijTG4Ec7DUW3L8CBzrMOaj05NdrgiylZv84qZb2DlHIH4Arl-0K5abA-gycqf3ONLoxyCW5OdY6-np8-l6_l6v3lbfm4KjXHZCwp1IRhusAU14wSRvWCd7o2oI2hnKp-oYwWvVBZh5uGdA03LW9FVxvFea3ZHN0d725j-JkgjXKwSYNzykOYkmwJIQ0TbZ2V7KjUMaQUwchttIOKe0mwPMQoN_IvRnmIUWIhc4yZejhSkE3sLESZtAWvobcxe5V9sP_yvyzffgk</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Murthy, Z.V.P.</creator><creator>Parmar, Snehal</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Removal of strontium by electrocoagulation using stainless steel and aluminum electrodes</title><author>Murthy, Z.V.P. ; Parmar, Snehal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-2e513027020532132c74bc5fecff242ad7afc8d8ae510661b64f9498b5fa445c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Aluminum electrode</topic><topic>Current density</topic><topic>Electrocoagulation</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Stainless steel electrode</topic><topic>Stainless steels</topic><topic>Strontium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Z.V.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Snehal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Desalination</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murthy, Z.V.P.</au><au>Parmar, Snehal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Removal of strontium by electrocoagulation using stainless steel and aluminum electrodes</atitle><jtitle>Desalination</jtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>282</volume><spage>63</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>63-67</pages><issn>0011-9164</issn><eissn>1873-4464</eissn><abstract>In the present work, removal of strontium (up to 100 mg/L) from synthetic wastewater by electrocoagulation has been studied. Stainless steel and aluminum electrodes have been used and removal efficiencies have been compared with respect to electrocoagulation time, current density, amount of electrolyte added, solution pH, distance between electrodes, temperature and initial concentration of strontium. Preliminary operating cost estimation has been found out for both electrode materials. The strontium removal data has been used to find adsorption kinetics using pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetics models. Results show that the optimum operating variables values are 50 min of process time, 8 mA/cm 2 current density and solution pH 5 for which around 93% and 77% removal efficiency was achieved with using stainless steel and aluminum electrodes, respectively. Pseudo-second-order kinetic model fitted the data better than the pseudo-first-order model. ► Removal of strontium from by electrocoagulation is reported for the first time. ► Stainless steel (SS) and Al electrodes are used and removal efficiencies compared. ► Preliminary operating cost estimation is reported for both electrode materials. ► The strontium removal data have been used to find adsorption kinetics. ► 93 and 77% Sr(II) removal was achieved by SS and Al electrodes, respectively.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.058</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-9164
ispartof Desalination, 2011-11, Vol.282, p.63-67
issn 0011-9164
1873-4464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911163895
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adsorption
Aluminum
Aluminum electrode
Current density
Electrocoagulation
Electrodes
Mathematical models
Stainless steel electrode
Stainless steels
Strontium
title Removal of strontium by electrocoagulation using stainless steel and aluminum electrodes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A13%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Removal%20of%20strontium%20by%20electrocoagulation%20using%20stainless%20steel%20and%20aluminum%20electrodes&rft.jtitle=Desalination&rft.au=Murthy,%20Z.V.P.&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=282&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=63-67&rft.issn=0011-9164&rft.eissn=1873-4464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E911163895%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-2e513027020532132c74bc5fecff242ad7afc8d8ae510661b64f9498b5fa445c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=911163895&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true