Loading…

The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor? A systematic review

BACKGROUND In IVF treatment a considerable proportion of women are faced with a low number of oocytes retrieved. These poor responders have reduced pregnancy rates compared with normal responders. However, this may not be applicable to all poor responders. This review aims at identifying patient cha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human reproduction update 2012-01, Vol.18 (1), p.1-11
Main Authors: Oudendijk, J.F., Yarde, F., Eijkemans, M.J.C., Broekmans, F.J.M., Broer, S.L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-6f1769bb33153cc2a39b78012776e8f4a9b646538f5db339bbb36bbb283c31183
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-6f1769bb33153cc2a39b78012776e8f4a9b646538f5db339bbb36bbb283c31183
container_end_page 11
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Human reproduction update
container_volume 18
creator Oudendijk, J.F.
Yarde, F.
Eijkemans, M.J.C.
Broekmans, F.J.M.
Broer, S.L.
description BACKGROUND In IVF treatment a considerable proportion of women are faced with a low number of oocytes retrieved. These poor responders have reduced pregnancy rates compared with normal responders. However, this may not be applicable to all poor responders. This review aims at identifying patient characteristics and ovarian reserve tests (ORT) that will determine prognosis for pregnancy in poor responders. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and SCOPUS databases in April 2010. Studies regarding patient characteristics or ORT in poor responders and their pregnancy prospects were included. All included papers were summarized in descriptive tables. RESULTS Nineteen studies were included. Pooled data of six studies comparing poor and normal responders demonstrated clearly lower pregnancy rates in poor responders (14.8 versus 34.5%). Ten studies indicated that older poor responders have a lower range of pregnancy rates compared with younger (1.5-12.7 versus 13.0-35%, respectively). Four studies showed that pregnancy prospects become reduced when fewer oocytes are retrieved (0-7% with 1 oocyte versus 11.5-18.6% with 4 oocytes). Five studies concerning pregnancy rates in subsequent cycles suggested a more favourable outcome in unexpected poor responders, and if ≥2 oocytes were retrieved. CONCLUSIONS Poor responders are not a homogeneous group of women with regards to pregnancy prospects. Female age and number of oocytes retrieved in particular will modulate the chances for pregnancy in current and subsequent cycles. Applying these criteria will allow the identification of couples with a reasonable prognosis and balanced decision-making on the management of poor responders.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/humupd/dmr037
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911937877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humupd/dmr037</oup_id><sourcerecordid>911937877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-6f1769bb33153cc2a39b78012776e8f4a9b646538f5db339bbb36bbb283c31183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M1PwyAYBnBiNG5Oj14NN73UQd-WDy9mWZwuWeJlem1oS11NWyq0W_bfy-z06gV4w48n5EHompJ7SiRMN33dt_k0ry0BfoLGNGIkCIHJU3-GOA4iLtgIXTj3SQhlVPBzNAqpFDwO4zFarTcat8ZYbLVrTZNri8sGL98XD7h0uDvcWvPRGOcnVe3U3v3wRzzDbu86XauuzPzjbal3l-isUJXTV8d9gt4WT-v5S7B6fV7OZ6sgi4B0ASsoZzJNAWgMWRYqkCkXhIacMy2KSMmURSwGUcS5R16mwPwSCsiAUgETdDvk-q999dp1SV26TFeVarTpXSIplcAF514Gg8yscc7qImltWSu7TyhJDv0lQ3_J0J_3N8fkPq11_qd_C_PgbgCmb__J-gY2kXrf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>911937877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor? A systematic review</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Oudendijk, J.F. ; Yarde, F. ; Eijkemans, M.J.C. ; Broekmans, F.J.M. ; Broer, S.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oudendijk, J.F. ; Yarde, F. ; Eijkemans, M.J.C. ; Broekmans, F.J.M. ; Broer, S.L.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND In IVF treatment a considerable proportion of women are faced with a low number of oocytes retrieved. These poor responders have reduced pregnancy rates compared with normal responders. However, this may not be applicable to all poor responders. This review aims at identifying patient characteristics and ovarian reserve tests (ORT) that will determine prognosis for pregnancy in poor responders. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and SCOPUS databases in April 2010. Studies regarding patient characteristics or ORT in poor responders and their pregnancy prospects were included. All included papers were summarized in descriptive tables. RESULTS Nineteen studies were included. Pooled data of six studies comparing poor and normal responders demonstrated clearly lower pregnancy rates in poor responders (14.8 versus 34.5%). Ten studies indicated that older poor responders have a lower range of pregnancy rates compared with younger (1.5-12.7 versus 13.0-35%, respectively). Four studies showed that pregnancy prospects become reduced when fewer oocytes are retrieved (0-7% with 1 oocyte versus 11.5-18.6% with 4 oocytes). Five studies concerning pregnancy rates in subsequent cycles suggested a more favourable outcome in unexpected poor responders, and if ≥2 oocytes were retrieved. CONCLUSIONS Poor responders are not a homogeneous group of women with regards to pregnancy prospects. Female age and number of oocytes retrieved in particular will modulate the chances for pregnancy in current and subsequent cycles. Applying these criteria will allow the identification of couples with a reasonable prognosis and balanced decision-making on the management of poor responders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-4786</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2369</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21987525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Humans ; Oocytes ; Ovulation Induction ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Prognosis</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction update, 2012-01, Vol.18 (1), p.1-11</ispartof><rights>The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-6f1769bb33153cc2a39b78012776e8f4a9b646538f5db339bbb36bbb283c31183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-6f1769bb33153cc2a39b78012776e8f4a9b646538f5db339bbb36bbb283c31183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21987525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oudendijk, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarde, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eijkemans, M.J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broekmans, F.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broer, S.L.</creatorcontrib><title>The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor? A systematic review</title><title>Human reproduction update</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod Update</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND In IVF treatment a considerable proportion of women are faced with a low number of oocytes retrieved. These poor responders have reduced pregnancy rates compared with normal responders. However, this may not be applicable to all poor responders. This review aims at identifying patient characteristics and ovarian reserve tests (ORT) that will determine prognosis for pregnancy in poor responders. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and SCOPUS databases in April 2010. Studies regarding patient characteristics or ORT in poor responders and their pregnancy prospects were included. All included papers were summarized in descriptive tables. RESULTS Nineteen studies were included. Pooled data of six studies comparing poor and normal responders demonstrated clearly lower pregnancy rates in poor responders (14.8 versus 34.5%). Ten studies indicated that older poor responders have a lower range of pregnancy rates compared with younger (1.5-12.7 versus 13.0-35%, respectively). Four studies showed that pregnancy prospects become reduced when fewer oocytes are retrieved (0-7% with 1 oocyte versus 11.5-18.6% with 4 oocytes). Five studies concerning pregnancy rates in subsequent cycles suggested a more favourable outcome in unexpected poor responders, and if ≥2 oocytes were retrieved. CONCLUSIONS Poor responders are not a homogeneous group of women with regards to pregnancy prospects. Female age and number of oocytes retrieved in particular will modulate the chances for pregnancy in current and subsequent cycles. Applying these criteria will allow the identification of couples with a reasonable prognosis and balanced decision-making on the management of poor responders.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><issn>1355-4786</issn><issn>1460-2369</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0M1PwyAYBnBiNG5Oj14NN73UQd-WDy9mWZwuWeJlem1oS11NWyq0W_bfy-z06gV4w48n5EHompJ7SiRMN33dt_k0ry0BfoLGNGIkCIHJU3-GOA4iLtgIXTj3SQhlVPBzNAqpFDwO4zFarTcat8ZYbLVrTZNri8sGL98XD7h0uDvcWvPRGOcnVe3U3v3wRzzDbu86XauuzPzjbal3l-isUJXTV8d9gt4WT-v5S7B6fV7OZ6sgi4B0ASsoZzJNAWgMWRYqkCkXhIacMy2KSMmURSwGUcS5R16mwPwSCsiAUgETdDvk-q999dp1SV26TFeVarTpXSIplcAF514Gg8yscc7qImltWSu7TyhJDv0lQ3_J0J_3N8fkPq11_qd_C_PgbgCmb__J-gY2kXrf</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Oudendijk, J.F.</creator><creator>Yarde, F.</creator><creator>Eijkemans, M.J.C.</creator><creator>Broekmans, F.J.M.</creator><creator>Broer, S.L.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor? A systematic review</title><author>Oudendijk, J.F. ; Yarde, F. ; Eijkemans, M.J.C. ; Broekmans, F.J.M. ; Broer, S.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-6f1769bb33153cc2a39b78012776e8f4a9b646538f5db339bbb36bbb283c31183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oudendijk, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarde, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eijkemans, M.J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broekmans, F.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broer, S.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction update</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oudendijk, J.F.</au><au>Yarde, F.</au><au>Eijkemans, M.J.C.</au><au>Broekmans, F.J.M.</au><au>Broer, S.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor? A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction update</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod Update</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>1355-4786</issn><eissn>1460-2369</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND In IVF treatment a considerable proportion of women are faced with a low number of oocytes retrieved. These poor responders have reduced pregnancy rates compared with normal responders. However, this may not be applicable to all poor responders. This review aims at identifying patient characteristics and ovarian reserve tests (ORT) that will determine prognosis for pregnancy in poor responders. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and SCOPUS databases in April 2010. Studies regarding patient characteristics or ORT in poor responders and their pregnancy prospects were included. All included papers were summarized in descriptive tables. RESULTS Nineteen studies were included. Pooled data of six studies comparing poor and normal responders demonstrated clearly lower pregnancy rates in poor responders (14.8 versus 34.5%). Ten studies indicated that older poor responders have a lower range of pregnancy rates compared with younger (1.5-12.7 versus 13.0-35%, respectively). Four studies showed that pregnancy prospects become reduced when fewer oocytes are retrieved (0-7% with 1 oocyte versus 11.5-18.6% with 4 oocytes). Five studies concerning pregnancy rates in subsequent cycles suggested a more favourable outcome in unexpected poor responders, and if ≥2 oocytes were retrieved. CONCLUSIONS Poor responders are not a homogeneous group of women with regards to pregnancy prospects. Female age and number of oocytes retrieved in particular will modulate the chances for pregnancy in current and subsequent cycles. Applying these criteria will allow the identification of couples with a reasonable prognosis and balanced decision-making on the management of poor responders.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>21987525</pmid><doi>10.1093/humupd/dmr037</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1355-4786
ispartof Human reproduction update, 2012-01, Vol.18 (1), p.1-11
issn 1355-4786
1460-2369
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911937877
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Humans
Oocytes
Ovulation Induction
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Prognosis
title The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor? A systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A50%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20poor%20responder%20in%20IVF:%20is%20the%20prognosis%20always%20poor?%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20update&rft.au=Oudendijk,%20J.F.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=1355-4786&rft.eissn=1460-2369&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmr037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E911937877%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-6f1769bb33153cc2a39b78012776e8f4a9b646538f5db339bbb36bbb283c31183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=911937877&rft_id=info:pmid/21987525&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humupd/dmr037&rfr_iscdi=true