Loading…
Over-the-counter β2 -agonist purchase versus script: A cross-sectional study
Summary Background Purchase of short-acting β2 -agonist (SABA), but not anti-inflammatory asthma medication, is permitted in Australia without a doctor’s prescription. This has been associated with worse asthma outcomes. We sought to compare the asthma outcomes between those purchasing SABA with and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Respiratory medicine 2012-02, Vol.106 (2), p.223-229 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary Background Purchase of short-acting β2 -agonist (SABA), but not anti-inflammatory asthma medication, is permitted in Australia without a doctor’s prescription. This has been associated with worse asthma outcomes. We sought to compare the asthma outcomes between those purchasing SABA with and without a doctor’s prescription. Methods Design: Cross-sectional study, using stratified randomisation of pharmacies. Setting: 43 pharmacies in Victoria, Australia. Participants Up to 10 consecutive adults purchasing β2 -agonists were recruited from each pharmacy, with 316 adults in total. Outcome measures Participants underwent spirometry and questionnaires on respiratory health, asthma control, Quality of Life and medication adherence. Asthma severity was determined by GINA medication step. Regression analyses were performed that allowed for clustering by pharmacy. Results Of 316 individuals recruited (65% participation rate), 191 (60%) purchased a β2 -agonist with a prescription. Purchase of SABA without prescription was not associated with worse asthma outcomes or lung function. Mean (±SD) asthma control score (ACQ) was 1.65 ± 1.03; only 63 (20%) had well-controlled asthma (ACQ |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0954-6111 1532-3064 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.09.012 |