Loading…
Questioning Parliamentary Questions
The conclusion highlights the heuristic potential of Parliamentary Questions (PQs) and suggests that they should form an important unit of analysis for scholars of legislative studies. PQs offer an original and comparative basis for measuring both legislators' individual behaviour and legislatu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of legislative studies 2011-09, Vol.17 (3), p.394-404 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033 |
container_end_page | 404 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 394 |
container_title | Journal of legislative studies |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Rozenberg, Olivier Martin, Shane |
description | The conclusion highlights the heuristic potential of Parliamentary Questions (PQs) and suggests that they should form an important unit of analysis for scholars of legislative studies. PQs offer an original and comparative basis for measuring both legislators' individual behaviour and legislatures' role within the political system. A comparison between oral and written questions indicates that both the institutional designs for asking questions and the frequency of the use of the procedures are non-random and consequential. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13572334.2011.595132 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914766209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>889173366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLxDAQhYMouK7-Aw8LHsRD16STJs1JFlFXWFBBzyFNE420zZp0lf33ptT1qKcZZr73eDyETgmeE1ziSwIFzwHoPMeEzAtREMj30IRwCpkA4PtpT0g2MIfoKMZ3jHMCopigs6eNib3zneteZ48qNE61putV2M52n3iMDqxqojn5mVP0cnvzfL3MVg9399eLVaYpgz7joK3C1gAVnFS0KrjRvKBYMWsqbVSta1oaxmnNqdU5ZdgQwYWlVtlKYYApuhh931Qj18G1KYX0ysnlYiWHWwpdskLgT5LY85FdB_8xBJWti9o0jeqM30QpCOWM5Vj8S5alIByAsUTSkdTBxxiM_Q1BsByKlrui5VC0HItOsqtR5jrrQ6u-fGhq2att44MNqtMuSvjT4RtSWYMX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>889173366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Questioning Parliamentary Questions</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Rozenberg, Olivier ; Martin, Shane</creator><creatorcontrib>Rozenberg, Olivier ; Martin, Shane</creatorcontrib><description>The conclusion highlights the heuristic potential of Parliamentary Questions (PQs) and suggests that they should form an important unit of analysis for scholars of legislative studies. PQs offer an original and comparative basis for measuring both legislators' individual behaviour and legislatures' role within the political system. A comparison between oral and written questions indicates that both the institutional designs for asking questions and the frequency of the use of the procedures are non-random and consequential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1357-2334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9337</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2011.595132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Heuristics ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Information ; Legislative behaviour ; Legislative Bodies ; Legislative work ; legislatives studies ; Legislators ; legislatures ; Parliament ; Parliamentarians ; Political science ; Political Systems ; question time ; questions ; State Role ; written questions</subject><ispartof>Journal of legislative studies, 2011-09, Vol.17 (3), p.394-404</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2468-7639</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,33201</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-02186590$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rozenberg, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Shane</creatorcontrib><title>Questioning Parliamentary Questions</title><title>Journal of legislative studies</title><description>The conclusion highlights the heuristic potential of Parliamentary Questions (PQs) and suggests that they should form an important unit of analysis for scholars of legislative studies. PQs offer an original and comparative basis for measuring both legislators' individual behaviour and legislatures' role within the political system. A comparison between oral and written questions indicates that both the institutional designs for asking questions and the frequency of the use of the procedures are non-random and consequential.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Legislative behaviour</subject><subject>Legislative Bodies</subject><subject>Legislative work</subject><subject>legislatives studies</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>legislatures</subject><subject>Parliament</subject><subject>Parliamentarians</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political Systems</subject><subject>question time</subject><subject>questions</subject><subject>State Role</subject><subject>written questions</subject><issn>1357-2334</issn><issn>1743-9337</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLxDAQhYMouK7-Aw8LHsRD16STJs1JFlFXWFBBzyFNE420zZp0lf33ptT1qKcZZr73eDyETgmeE1ziSwIFzwHoPMeEzAtREMj30IRwCpkA4PtpT0g2MIfoKMZ3jHMCopigs6eNib3zneteZ48qNE61putV2M52n3iMDqxqojn5mVP0cnvzfL3MVg9399eLVaYpgz7joK3C1gAVnFS0KrjRvKBYMWsqbVSta1oaxmnNqdU5ZdgQwYWlVtlKYYApuhh931Qj18G1KYX0ysnlYiWHWwpdskLgT5LY85FdB_8xBJWti9o0jeqM30QpCOWM5Vj8S5alIByAsUTSkdTBxxiM_Q1BsByKlrui5VC0HItOsqtR5jrrQ6u-fGhq2att44MNqtMuSvjT4RtSWYMX</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>Rozenberg, Olivier</creator><creator>Martin, Shane</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis (Routledge): SSH Titles</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2468-7639</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Questioning Parliamentary Questions</title><author>Rozenberg, Olivier ; Martin, Shane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Legislative behaviour</topic><topic>Legislative Bodies</topic><topic>Legislative work</topic><topic>legislatives studies</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>legislatures</topic><topic>Parliament</topic><topic>Parliamentarians</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political Systems</topic><topic>question time</topic><topic>questions</topic><topic>State Role</topic><topic>written questions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rozenberg, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Shane</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Journal of legislative studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rozenberg, Olivier</au><au>Martin, Shane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Questioning Parliamentary Questions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of legislative studies</jtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>404</epage><pages>394-404</pages><issn>1357-2334</issn><eissn>1743-9337</eissn><abstract>The conclusion highlights the heuristic potential of Parliamentary Questions (PQs) and suggests that they should form an important unit of analysis for scholars of legislative studies. PQs offer an original and comparative basis for measuring both legislators' individual behaviour and legislatures' role within the political system. A comparison between oral and written questions indicates that both the institutional designs for asking questions and the frequency of the use of the procedures are non-random and consequential.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13572334.2011.595132</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2468-7639</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1357-2334 |
ispartof | Journal of legislative studies, 2011-09, Vol.17 (3), p.394-404 |
issn | 1357-2334 1743-9337 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914766209 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Comparative analysis Heuristics Humanities and Social Sciences Information Legislative behaviour Legislative Bodies Legislative work legislatives studies Legislators legislatures Parliament Parliamentarians Political science Political Systems question time questions State Role written questions |
title | Questioning Parliamentary Questions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T07%3A26%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Questioning%20Parliamentary%20Questions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20legislative%20studies&rft.au=Rozenberg,%20Olivier&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=404&rft.pages=394-404&rft.issn=1357-2334&rft.eissn=1743-9337&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13572334.2011.595132&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E889173366%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=889173366&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |