Loading…

Questioning Parliamentary Questions

The conclusion highlights the heuristic potential of Parliamentary Questions (PQs) and suggests that they should form an important unit of analysis for scholars of legislative studies. PQs offer an original and comparative basis for measuring both legislators' individual behaviour and legislatu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of legislative studies 2011-09, Vol.17 (3), p.394-404
Main Authors: Rozenberg, Olivier, Martin, Shane
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033
container_end_page 404
container_issue 3
container_start_page 394
container_title Journal of legislative studies
container_volume 17
creator Rozenberg, Olivier
Martin, Shane
description The conclusion highlights the heuristic potential of Parliamentary Questions (PQs) and suggests that they should form an important unit of analysis for scholars of legislative studies. PQs offer an original and comparative basis for measuring both legislators' individual behaviour and legislatures' role within the political system. A comparison between oral and written questions indicates that both the institutional designs for asking questions and the frequency of the use of the procedures are non-random and consequential.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13572334.2011.595132
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914766209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>889173366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLxDAQhYMouK7-Aw8LHsRD16STJs1JFlFXWFBBzyFNE420zZp0lf33ptT1qKcZZr73eDyETgmeE1ziSwIFzwHoPMeEzAtREMj30IRwCpkA4PtpT0g2MIfoKMZ3jHMCopigs6eNib3zneteZ48qNE61putV2M52n3iMDqxqojn5mVP0cnvzfL3MVg9399eLVaYpgz7joK3C1gAVnFS0KrjRvKBYMWsqbVSta1oaxmnNqdU5ZdgQwYWlVtlKYYApuhh931Qj18G1KYX0ysnlYiWHWwpdskLgT5LY85FdB_8xBJWti9o0jeqM30QpCOWM5Vj8S5alIByAsUTSkdTBxxiM_Q1BsByKlrui5VC0HItOsqtR5jrrQ6u-fGhq2att44MNqtMuSvjT4RtSWYMX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>889173366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Questioning Parliamentary Questions</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Rozenberg, Olivier ; Martin, Shane</creator><creatorcontrib>Rozenberg, Olivier ; Martin, Shane</creatorcontrib><description>The conclusion highlights the heuristic potential of Parliamentary Questions (PQs) and suggests that they should form an important unit of analysis for scholars of legislative studies. PQs offer an original and comparative basis for measuring both legislators' individual behaviour and legislatures' role within the political system. A comparison between oral and written questions indicates that both the institutional designs for asking questions and the frequency of the use of the procedures are non-random and consequential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1357-2334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9337</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2011.595132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Heuristics ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Information ; Legislative behaviour ; Legislative Bodies ; Legislative work ; legislatives studies ; Legislators ; legislatures ; Parliament ; Parliamentarians ; Political science ; Political Systems ; question time ; questions ; State Role ; written questions</subject><ispartof>Journal of legislative studies, 2011-09, Vol.17 (3), p.394-404</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2468-7639</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,33201</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-02186590$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rozenberg, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Shane</creatorcontrib><title>Questioning Parliamentary Questions</title><title>Journal of legislative studies</title><description>The conclusion highlights the heuristic potential of Parliamentary Questions (PQs) and suggests that they should form an important unit of analysis for scholars of legislative studies. PQs offer an original and comparative basis for measuring both legislators' individual behaviour and legislatures' role within the political system. A comparison between oral and written questions indicates that both the institutional designs for asking questions and the frequency of the use of the procedures are non-random and consequential.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Legislative behaviour</subject><subject>Legislative Bodies</subject><subject>Legislative work</subject><subject>legislatives studies</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>legislatures</subject><subject>Parliament</subject><subject>Parliamentarians</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political Systems</subject><subject>question time</subject><subject>questions</subject><subject>State Role</subject><subject>written questions</subject><issn>1357-2334</issn><issn>1743-9337</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLxDAQhYMouK7-Aw8LHsRD16STJs1JFlFXWFBBzyFNE420zZp0lf33ptT1qKcZZr73eDyETgmeE1ziSwIFzwHoPMeEzAtREMj30IRwCpkA4PtpT0g2MIfoKMZ3jHMCopigs6eNib3zneteZ48qNE61putV2M52n3iMDqxqojn5mVP0cnvzfL3MVg9399eLVaYpgz7joK3C1gAVnFS0KrjRvKBYMWsqbVSta1oaxmnNqdU5ZdgQwYWlVtlKYYApuhh931Qj18G1KYX0ysnlYiWHWwpdskLgT5LY85FdB_8xBJWti9o0jeqM30QpCOWM5Vj8S5alIByAsUTSkdTBxxiM_Q1BsByKlrui5VC0HItOsqtR5jrrQ6u-fGhq2att44MNqtMuSvjT4RtSWYMX</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>Rozenberg, Olivier</creator><creator>Martin, Shane</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis (Routledge): SSH Titles</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2468-7639</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Questioning Parliamentary Questions</title><author>Rozenberg, Olivier ; Martin, Shane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Legislative behaviour</topic><topic>Legislative Bodies</topic><topic>Legislative work</topic><topic>legislatives studies</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>legislatures</topic><topic>Parliament</topic><topic>Parliamentarians</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political Systems</topic><topic>question time</topic><topic>questions</topic><topic>State Role</topic><topic>written questions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rozenberg, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Shane</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Journal of legislative studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rozenberg, Olivier</au><au>Martin, Shane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Questioning Parliamentary Questions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of legislative studies</jtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>404</epage><pages>394-404</pages><issn>1357-2334</issn><eissn>1743-9337</eissn><abstract>The conclusion highlights the heuristic potential of Parliamentary Questions (PQs) and suggests that they should form an important unit of analysis for scholars of legislative studies. PQs offer an original and comparative basis for measuring both legislators' individual behaviour and legislatures' role within the political system. A comparison between oral and written questions indicates that both the institutional designs for asking questions and the frequency of the use of the procedures are non-random and consequential.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13572334.2011.595132</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2468-7639</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1357-2334
ispartof Journal of legislative studies, 2011-09, Vol.17 (3), p.394-404
issn 1357-2334
1743-9337
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914766209
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)
subjects Comparative analysis
Heuristics
Humanities and Social Sciences
Information
Legislative behaviour
Legislative Bodies
Legislative work
legislatives studies
Legislators
legislatures
Parliament
Parliamentarians
Political science
Political Systems
question time
questions
State Role
written questions
title Questioning Parliamentary Questions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T07%3A26%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Questioning%20Parliamentary%20Questions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20legislative%20studies&rft.au=Rozenberg,%20Olivier&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=404&rft.pages=394-404&rft.issn=1357-2334&rft.eissn=1743-9337&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13572334.2011.595132&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E889173366%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-73cfa0fe34971b4b57ec7540a6febceadcd48e674d74fc2460e1979f4fafba033%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=889173366&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true