Loading…

Market Earnings and Household Work: New Tests of Gender Performance Theory

I examine the contested finding that men and women engage in gender performance through housework. Prior scholarship has found a curvilinear association between earnings share and housework that has been interpreted as evidence of gender performance. I reexamine these findings by conducting the firs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of marriage and family 2011-08, Vol.73 (4), p.845-860
Main Author: Schneider, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5161-498b75c371e4fd53cc0e7733b2e7b1b3f2ea06e7fcd9ae31f41dc33397e0cc503
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5161-498b75c371e4fd53cc0e7733b2e7b1b3f2ea06e7fcd9ae31f41dc33397e0cc503
container_end_page 860
container_issue 4
container_start_page 845
container_title Journal of marriage and family
container_volume 73
creator Schneider, Daniel
description I examine the contested finding that men and women engage in gender performance through housework. Prior scholarship has found a curvilinear association between earnings share and housework that has been interpreted as evidence of gender performance. I reexamine these findings by conducting the first such analysis to use high-quality time diary data for a U.S. sample in the contemporary period. Drawing on data on 11,868 married women and 10,770 married men in the American Time Use Survey (2003-2007), I find no evidence that married men "do gender" through housework. I do, however, find strong evidence of gender performance among women as evidenced by a curvilinear association between earnings share and women's housework time.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00851.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914769189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ932411</ericid><jstor_id>29789630</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>29789630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5161-498b75c371e4fd53cc0e7733b2e7b1b3f2ea06e7fcd9ae31f41dc33397e0cc503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktuO0zAQhiMEEmXhDUCykBDcJHhsJ46R9gKqtku1Bw5FvbRcZ8Kmm8aL3Wrbt8fZrIrEBWJubOn_5uB_nCQEaAYx3q8zkAJSLrnMGAXIKC1zyPaPktFReJyMKGUsZULkT5NnIaxpDKboKJlfGH-DWzIxvmu6n4GYriJnbhfw2rUVWTp_84Fc4h1ZYNgG4moyw65CT76gr53fmM4iWVyj84fnyZPatAFfPJwnyY_pZDE-S8-vZp_HH89Tm0MBqVDlSuaWS0BRVzm3lqKUnK8YyhWseM3Q0AJlbStlkEMtoLKccyWRWptTfpK8HereevdrF8fSmyZYbFvTYRxcKxCyUFCqSL77Jwms5IUAVvCIvv4LXbud7-I7dFlKBUW0NkLlAFnvQvBY61vfbIw_aKC634Ze69503Zuu-23o-23ofUx981DfBGva2kfjmnDMZ4LHLkxG7uXAoW_sUZ7MFWfifoLTQb5rWjz8d3s9v7qYxlvMfzXkr8PW-T_tlSxVwXtv00Fvwhb3Rz3-EV3EorleXs701-X00_fxN6EZ_w117b0e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>887916011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Market Earnings and Household Work: New Tests of Gender Performance Theory</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Schneider, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>I examine the contested finding that men and women engage in gender performance through housework. Prior scholarship has found a curvilinear association between earnings share and housework that has been interpreted as evidence of gender performance. I reexamine these findings by conducting the first such analysis to use high-quality time diary data for a U.S. sample in the contemporary period. Drawing on data on 11,868 married women and 10,770 married men in the American Time Use Survey (2003-2007), I find no evidence that married men "do gender" through housework. I do, however, find strong evidence of gender performance among women as evidenced by a curvilinear association between earnings share and women's housework time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00851.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMFAA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Autobiographical Materials ; Bargaining theory ; Comparable Worth ; Data analysis ; Diaries ; Division of labour ; Earnings ; Evidence ; family and work ; Family life ; Females ; Gender ; Gender equality ; Gender Issues ; Gender performativity ; Gender relations ; Households ; Housekeeping ; Housework ; housework/division of labor ; Husbands ; Males ; Marital Status ; Markets ; Men ; Of General Interest ; Performance theory ; Sex ; Sex Fairness ; Sex Role ; Sexuality. Marriage. Family relations ; Sociology ; Sociology of the family. Age groups ; Spouses ; Surveys ; Theory ; Time ; U.S.A ; United States ; Wives ; Woman social status. Women's emancipation ; Womens rights ; Work hours</subject><ispartof>Journal of marriage and family, 2011-08, Vol.73 (4), p.845-860</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2011 The National Council on Family Relations</rights><rights>Copyright © National Council on Family Relations, 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright National Council on Family Relations Aug 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5161-498b75c371e4fd53cc0e7733b2e7b1b3f2ea06e7fcd9ae31f41dc33397e0cc503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5161-498b75c371e4fd53cc0e7733b2e7b1b3f2ea06e7fcd9ae31f41dc33397e0cc503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/887916011/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/887916011?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12826,21357,21373,21374,27321,27901,27902,33200,33201,33588,33589,33751,33752,33854,33855,34507,34508,43709,43856,44091,58213,58446,74192,74367,74609</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ932411$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24387927$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Market Earnings and Household Work: New Tests of Gender Performance Theory</title><title>Journal of marriage and family</title><description>I examine the contested finding that men and women engage in gender performance through housework. Prior scholarship has found a curvilinear association between earnings share and housework that has been interpreted as evidence of gender performance. I reexamine these findings by conducting the first such analysis to use high-quality time diary data for a U.S. sample in the contemporary period. Drawing on data on 11,868 married women and 10,770 married men in the American Time Use Survey (2003-2007), I find no evidence that married men "do gender" through housework. I do, however, find strong evidence of gender performance among women as evidenced by a curvilinear association between earnings share and women's housework time.</description><subject>Autobiographical Materials</subject><subject>Bargaining theory</subject><subject>Comparable Worth</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Diaries</subject><subject>Division of labour</subject><subject>Earnings</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>family and work</subject><subject>Family life</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender equality</subject><subject>Gender Issues</subject><subject>Gender performativity</subject><subject>Gender relations</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housekeeping</subject><subject>Housework</subject><subject>housework/division of labor</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Marital Status</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Of General Interest</subject><subject>Performance theory</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex Fairness</subject><subject>Sex Role</subject><subject>Sexuality. Marriage. Family relations</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of the family. Age groups</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Wives</subject><subject>Woman social status. Women's emancipation</subject><subject>Womens rights</subject><subject>Work hours</subject><issn>0022-2445</issn><issn>1741-3737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktuO0zAQhiMEEmXhDUCykBDcJHhsJ46R9gKqtku1Bw5FvbRcZ8Kmm8aL3Wrbt8fZrIrEBWJubOn_5uB_nCQEaAYx3q8zkAJSLrnMGAXIKC1zyPaPktFReJyMKGUsZULkT5NnIaxpDKboKJlfGH-DWzIxvmu6n4GYriJnbhfw2rUVWTp_84Fc4h1ZYNgG4moyw65CT76gr53fmM4iWVyj84fnyZPatAFfPJwnyY_pZDE-S8-vZp_HH89Tm0MBqVDlSuaWS0BRVzm3lqKUnK8YyhWseM3Q0AJlbStlkEMtoLKccyWRWptTfpK8HereevdrF8fSmyZYbFvTYRxcKxCyUFCqSL77Jwms5IUAVvCIvv4LXbud7-I7dFlKBUW0NkLlAFnvQvBY61vfbIw_aKC634Ze69503Zuu-23o-23ofUx981DfBGva2kfjmnDMZ4LHLkxG7uXAoW_sUZ7MFWfifoLTQb5rWjz8d3s9v7qYxlvMfzXkr8PW-T_tlSxVwXtv00Fvwhb3Rz3-EV3EorleXs701-X00_fxN6EZ_w117b0e</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>Schneider, Daniel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PGAAH</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Market Earnings and Household Work: New Tests of Gender Performance Theory</title><author>Schneider, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5161-498b75c371e4fd53cc0e7733b2e7b1b3f2ea06e7fcd9ae31f41dc33397e0cc503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Autobiographical Materials</topic><topic>Bargaining theory</topic><topic>Comparable Worth</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Diaries</topic><topic>Division of labour</topic><topic>Earnings</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>family and work</topic><topic>Family life</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender equality</topic><topic>Gender Issues</topic><topic>Gender performativity</topic><topic>Gender relations</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housekeeping</topic><topic>Housework</topic><topic>housework/division of labor</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Marital Status</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Of General Interest</topic><topic>Performance theory</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex Fairness</topic><topic>Sex Role</topic><topic>Sexuality. Marriage. Family relations</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of the family. Age groups</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Wives</topic><topic>Woman social status. Women's emancipation</topic><topic>Womens rights</topic><topic>Work hours</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Religion &amp; Philosophy</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology &amp; Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ932411</ericid><atitle>Market Earnings and Household Work: New Tests of Gender Performance Theory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>845</spage><epage>860</epage><pages>845-860</pages><issn>0022-2445</issn><eissn>1741-3737</eissn><coden>JMFAA6</coden><abstract>I examine the contested finding that men and women engage in gender performance through housework. Prior scholarship has found a curvilinear association between earnings share and housework that has been interpreted as evidence of gender performance. I reexamine these findings by conducting the first such analysis to use high-quality time diary data for a U.S. sample in the contemporary period. Drawing on data on 11,868 married women and 10,770 married men in the American Time Use Survey (2003-2007), I find no evidence that married men "do gender" through housework. I do, however, find strong evidence of gender performance among women as evidenced by a curvilinear association between earnings share and women's housework time.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00851.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2445
ispartof Journal of marriage and family, 2011-08, Vol.73 (4), p.845-860
issn 0022-2445
1741-3737
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_914769189
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sociology Collection; ERIC; Sociological Abstracts; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection
subjects Autobiographical Materials
Bargaining theory
Comparable Worth
Data analysis
Diaries
Division of labour
Earnings
Evidence
family and work
Family life
Females
Gender
Gender equality
Gender Issues
Gender performativity
Gender relations
Households
Housekeeping
Housework
housework/division of labor
Husbands
Males
Marital Status
Markets
Men
Of General Interest
Performance theory
Sex
Sex Fairness
Sex Role
Sexuality. Marriage. Family relations
Sociology
Sociology of the family. Age groups
Spouses
Surveys
Theory
Time
U.S.A
United States
Wives
Woman social status. Women's emancipation
Womens rights
Work hours
title Market Earnings and Household Work: New Tests of Gender Performance Theory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T13%3A28%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Market%20Earnings%20and%20Household%20Work:%20New%20Tests%20of%20Gender%20Performance%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marriage%20and%20family&rft.au=Schneider,%20Daniel&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=845&rft.epage=860&rft.pages=845-860&rft.issn=0022-2445&rft.eissn=1741-3737&rft.coden=JMFAA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00851.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E29789630%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5161-498b75c371e4fd53cc0e7733b2e7b1b3f2ea06e7fcd9ae31f41dc33397e0cc503%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=887916011&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ932411&rft_jstor_id=29789630&rfr_iscdi=true