Loading…
Probabilistic inference of regularisation in non-rigid registration
A long-standing issue in non-rigid image registration is the choice of the level of regularisation. Regularisation is necessary to preserve the smoothness of the registration and penalise against unnecessary complexity. The vast majority of existing registration methods use a fixed level of regulari...
Saved in:
Published in: | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2012-02, Vol.59 (3), p.2438-2451 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-5d540b656216ada6ca5fe93a4c332337b4eefbd3cece6b1b3164b6b15944dfca3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-5d540b656216ada6ca5fe93a4c332337b4eefbd3cece6b1b3164b6b15944dfca3 |
container_end_page | 2451 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2438 |
container_title | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Simpson, Ivor J.A. Schnabel, Julia A. Groves, Adrian R. Andersson, Jesper L.R. Woolrich, Mark W. |
description | A long-standing issue in non-rigid image registration is the choice of the level of regularisation. Regularisation is necessary to preserve the smoothness of the registration and penalise against unnecessary complexity. The vast majority of existing registration methods use a fixed level of regularisation, which is typically hand-tuned by a user to provide “nice" results. However, the optimal level of regularisation will depend on the data which is being processed; lower signal-to-noise ratios require higher regularisation to avoid registering image noise as well as features, and different pairs of images require registrations of varying complexity depending on their anatomical similarity. In this paper we present a probabilistic registration framework that infers the level of regularisation from the data. An additional benefit of this proposed probabilistic framework is that estimates of the registration uncertainty are obtained. This framework has been implemented using a free-form deformation transformation model, although it would be generically applicable to a range of transformation models. We demonstrate our registration framework on the application of inter-subject brain registration of healthy control subjects from the NIREP database. In our results we show that our framework appropriately adapts the level of regularisation in the presence of noise, and that inferring regularisation on an individual basis leads to a reduction in model over-fitting as measured by image folding while providing a similar level of overlap.
► Infers the level of regularisation in non-rigid registration using Bayes. ► Adapts regularisation to signal-to-noise ratios and anatomical variability. ► Provides a spatial map of the uncertainty in the registration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_915380464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S105381191101041X</els_id><sourcerecordid>915380464</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-5d540b656216ada6ca5fe93a4c332337b4eefbd3cece6b1b3164b6b15944dfca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2L1TAUhoMozof-BSm4cNV6TvPRZjle1BkY0IWuQ5KeXnLpbcakHfDfm3rnA9y4yoH3eXMOD2MVQoOA6uOhmWlNMRztnpoWEBvQDUD7gp0jaFlr2bUvt1nyukfUZ-wi5wMAaBT9a3bWoua669pztvueorMuTCEvwVdhHinR7KmKY5Vov042hWyXEOeSVXOc6xT2Ydiy0kh_kzfs1WinTG8f3kv288vnH7vr-vbb15vd1W3tBeBSy0EKcEqqFpUdrPJWjqS5FZ7zlvPOCaLRDdyTJ-XQcVTClUFqIYbRW37JPpz-vUvx10p5MceQPU2TnSmu2WiUvAehRCHf_0Me4prmcpxBKToNXa-gUP2J8inmnGg0d6koTb8Ngtk8m4N59mw2zwa0KZ5L9d3DgtUdaXgqPootwKcTQEXIfaBksg-b2CEk8osZYvj_lj_leZSF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547907860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Probabilistic inference of regularisation in non-rigid registration</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Simpson, Ivor J.A. ; Schnabel, Julia A. ; Groves, Adrian R. ; Andersson, Jesper L.R. ; Woolrich, Mark W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Ivor J.A. ; Schnabel, Julia A. ; Groves, Adrian R. ; Andersson, Jesper L.R. ; Woolrich, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><description>A long-standing issue in non-rigid image registration is the choice of the level of regularisation. Regularisation is necessary to preserve the smoothness of the registration and penalise against unnecessary complexity. The vast majority of existing registration methods use a fixed level of regularisation, which is typically hand-tuned by a user to provide “nice" results. However, the optimal level of regularisation will depend on the data which is being processed; lower signal-to-noise ratios require higher regularisation to avoid registering image noise as well as features, and different pairs of images require registrations of varying complexity depending on their anatomical similarity. In this paper we present a probabilistic registration framework that infers the level of regularisation from the data. An additional benefit of this proposed probabilistic framework is that estimates of the registration uncertainty are obtained. This framework has been implemented using a free-form deformation transformation model, although it would be generically applicable to a range of transformation models. We demonstrate our registration framework on the application of inter-subject brain registration of healthy control subjects from the NIREP database. In our results we show that our framework appropriately adapts the level of regularisation in the presence of noise, and that inferring regularisation on an individual basis leads to a reduction in model over-fitting as measured by image folding while providing a similar level of overlap.
► Infers the level of regularisation in non-rigid registration using Bayes. ► Adapts regularisation to signal-to-noise ratios and anatomical variability. ► Provides a spatial map of the uncertainty in the registration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21939772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian modelling ; Brain - anatomy & histology ; Deformation ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Models, Statistical ; Noise ; Normal Distribution ; Pattern Recognition, Automated ; Registration ; Regularisation ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2012-02, Vol.59 (3), p.2438-2451</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 1, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-5d540b656216ada6ca5fe93a4c332337b4eefbd3cece6b1b3164b6b15944dfca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-5d540b656216ada6ca5fe93a4c332337b4eefbd3cece6b1b3164b6b15944dfca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21939772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Ivor J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnabel, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groves, Adrian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Jesper L.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolrich, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><title>Probabilistic inference of regularisation in non-rigid registration</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>A long-standing issue in non-rigid image registration is the choice of the level of regularisation. Regularisation is necessary to preserve the smoothness of the registration and penalise against unnecessary complexity. The vast majority of existing registration methods use a fixed level of regularisation, which is typically hand-tuned by a user to provide “nice" results. However, the optimal level of regularisation will depend on the data which is being processed; lower signal-to-noise ratios require higher regularisation to avoid registering image noise as well as features, and different pairs of images require registrations of varying complexity depending on their anatomical similarity. In this paper we present a probabilistic registration framework that infers the level of regularisation from the data. An additional benefit of this proposed probabilistic framework is that estimates of the registration uncertainty are obtained. This framework has been implemented using a free-form deformation transformation model, although it would be generically applicable to a range of transformation models. We demonstrate our registration framework on the application of inter-subject brain registration of healthy control subjects from the NIREP database. In our results we show that our framework appropriately adapts the level of regularisation in the presence of noise, and that inferring regularisation on an individual basis leads to a reduction in model over-fitting as measured by image folding while providing a similar level of overlap.
► Infers the level of regularisation in non-rigid registration using Bayes. ► Adapts regularisation to signal-to-noise ratios and anatomical variability. ► Provides a spatial map of the uncertainty in the registration.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian modelling</subject><subject>Brain - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Normal Distribution</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Automated</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Regularisation</subject><subject>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2L1TAUhoMozof-BSm4cNV6TvPRZjle1BkY0IWuQ5KeXnLpbcakHfDfm3rnA9y4yoH3eXMOD2MVQoOA6uOhmWlNMRztnpoWEBvQDUD7gp0jaFlr2bUvt1nyukfUZ-wi5wMAaBT9a3bWoua669pztvueorMuTCEvwVdhHinR7KmKY5Vov042hWyXEOeSVXOc6xT2Ydiy0kh_kzfs1WinTG8f3kv288vnH7vr-vbb15vd1W3tBeBSy0EKcEqqFpUdrPJWjqS5FZ7zlvPOCaLRDdyTJ-XQcVTClUFqIYbRW37JPpz-vUvx10p5MceQPU2TnSmu2WiUvAehRCHf_0Me4prmcpxBKToNXa-gUP2J8inmnGg0d6koTb8Ngtk8m4N59mw2zwa0KZ5L9d3DgtUdaXgqPootwKcTQEXIfaBksg-b2CEk8osZYvj_lj_leZSF</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Simpson, Ivor J.A.</creator><creator>Schnabel, Julia A.</creator><creator>Groves, Adrian R.</creator><creator>Andersson, Jesper L.R.</creator><creator>Woolrich, Mark W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Probabilistic inference of regularisation in non-rigid registration</title><author>Simpson, Ivor J.A. ; Schnabel, Julia A. ; Groves, Adrian R. ; Andersson, Jesper L.R. ; Woolrich, Mark W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-5d540b656216ada6ca5fe93a4c332337b4eefbd3cece6b1b3164b6b15944dfca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian modelling</topic><topic>Brain - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Normal Distribution</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Automated</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Regularisation</topic><topic>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Ivor J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnabel, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groves, Adrian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Jesper L.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolrich, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simpson, Ivor J.A.</au><au>Schnabel, Julia A.</au><au>Groves, Adrian R.</au><au>Andersson, Jesper L.R.</au><au>Woolrich, Mark W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Probabilistic inference of regularisation in non-rigid registration</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2438</spage><epage>2451</epage><pages>2438-2451</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>A long-standing issue in non-rigid image registration is the choice of the level of regularisation. Regularisation is necessary to preserve the smoothness of the registration and penalise against unnecessary complexity. The vast majority of existing registration methods use a fixed level of regularisation, which is typically hand-tuned by a user to provide “nice" results. However, the optimal level of regularisation will depend on the data which is being processed; lower signal-to-noise ratios require higher regularisation to avoid registering image noise as well as features, and different pairs of images require registrations of varying complexity depending on their anatomical similarity. In this paper we present a probabilistic registration framework that infers the level of regularisation from the data. An additional benefit of this proposed probabilistic framework is that estimates of the registration uncertainty are obtained. This framework has been implemented using a free-form deformation transformation model, although it would be generically applicable to a range of transformation models. We demonstrate our registration framework on the application of inter-subject brain registration of healthy control subjects from the NIREP database. In our results we show that our framework appropriately adapts the level of regularisation in the presence of noise, and that inferring regularisation on an individual basis leads to a reduction in model over-fitting as measured by image folding while providing a similar level of overlap.
► Infers the level of regularisation in non-rigid registration using Bayes. ► Adapts regularisation to signal-to-noise ratios and anatomical variability. ► Provides a spatial map of the uncertainty in the registration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21939772</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.002</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-8119 |
ispartof | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2012-02, Vol.59 (3), p.2438-2451 |
issn | 1053-8119 1095-9572 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_915380464 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Bayes Theorem Bayesian analysis Bayesian modelling Brain - anatomy & histology Deformation Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data Imaging, Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Models, Statistical Noise Normal Distribution Pattern Recognition, Automated Registration Regularisation Signal-To-Noise Ratio |
title | Probabilistic inference of regularisation in non-rigid registration |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A43%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Probabilistic%20inference%20of%20regularisation%20in%20non-rigid%20registration&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Simpson,%20Ivor%20J.A.&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2438&rft.epage=2451&rft.pages=2438-2451&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E915380464%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-5d540b656216ada6ca5fe93a4c332337b4eefbd3cece6b1b3164b6b15944dfca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547907860&rft_id=info:pmid/21939772&rfr_iscdi=true |