Loading…

Relational collaboration among spatial multipoint competitors

The presence of network ties between multipoint competitors is frequently assumed but rarely examined directly. The outcomes of multipoint competition, therefore, are better understood than their underlying relational mechanisms. Using original fieldwork and data that we have collected on an interor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social networks 2012, Vol.34 (1), p.101-111
Main Authors: Lomi, Alessandro, Pallotti, Francesca
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-50f1905435f967f90c91ef93719bcd76c57fdccc06d995e45982b0d53eeb23b43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-50f1905435f967f90c91ef93719bcd76c57fdccc06d995e45982b0d53eeb23b43
container_end_page 111
container_issue 1
container_start_page 101
container_title Social networks
container_volume 34
creator Lomi, Alessandro
Pallotti, Francesca
description The presence of network ties between multipoint competitors is frequently assumed but rarely examined directly. The outcomes of multipoint competition, therefore, are better understood than their underlying relational mechanisms. Using original fieldwork and data that we have collected on an interorganizational network of patient transfer relations within a regional community of hospitals, we report and interpret estimates of Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGM) that specify the probability of observing network ties between organizations as a function of the degree of their spatial multipoint contact. We find that hospitals competing more intensely for patients across multiple geographical segments of their market (spatial multipoint competitors) are significantly more likely to collaborate. This conclusion is robust to alternative explanations for the formation of network ties based on organizational size differences, resource complementarities, performance differentials, and capacity constraints. We show that interorganizational networks between spatial multipoint competitors are characterized by clear tendencies toward clustering and a global core-periphery structure arising as consequences of multiple mechanisms of triadic closure operating simultaneously. We conclude that the effects of competition on the structure of interorganizational fields depends on how markets as physical and social settings are connected by cross-cutting network ties between competitors.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.10.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_916515588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378873310000547</els_id><sourcerecordid>916515588</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-50f1905435f967f90c91ef93719bcd76c57fdccc06d995e45982b0d53eeb23b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQQIMouK7-Aw9700vXTNM0yUFBxC9YEETPoU2nkqVtapIV_PemW897GmbmzTDzCLkEugYK5c12HZwZMK5zui-tKeVHZAFSqCwHgGOyoEzITArGTslZCFtKaSlALsjtO3ZVtG6oupVxXVfVzu_zVdW74WsVxpSlXr_roh2dHWLC-hGjjc6Hc3LSVl3Ai_-4JJ9Pjx8PL9nm7fn14X6TmYKJmHHagqK8YLxVpWgVNQqwVUyAqk0jSsNF2xhjaNkoxbHgSuY1bThDrHNWF2xJrua9o3ffOwxR9zYYTOcO6HZBKyg5cC5lIq8PkjCJkAKgTGgxo8a7EDy2evS2r_xvgvTkVW_17FVPXqdq8prG7uYxTA__WPQ6GIuDwcZ6NFE3zh5e8Acrc4NW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1037887116</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relational collaboration among spatial multipoint competitors</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Lomi, Alessandro ; Pallotti, Francesca</creator><creatorcontrib>Lomi, Alessandro ; Pallotti, Francesca</creatorcontrib><description>The presence of network ties between multipoint competitors is frequently assumed but rarely examined directly. The outcomes of multipoint competition, therefore, are better understood than their underlying relational mechanisms. Using original fieldwork and data that we have collected on an interorganizational network of patient transfer relations within a regional community of hospitals, we report and interpret estimates of Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGM) that specify the probability of observing network ties between organizations as a function of the degree of their spatial multipoint contact. We find that hospitals competing more intensely for patients across multiple geographical segments of their market (spatial multipoint competitors) are significantly more likely to collaborate. This conclusion is robust to alternative explanations for the formation of network ties based on organizational size differences, resource complementarities, performance differentials, and capacity constraints. We show that interorganizational networks between spatial multipoint competitors are characterized by clear tendencies toward clustering and a global core-periphery structure arising as consequences of multiple mechanisms of triadic closure operating simultaneously. We conclude that the effects of competition on the structure of interorganizational fields depends on how markets as physical and social settings are connected by cross-cutting network ties between competitors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-8733</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.10.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SONED4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Competition ; Cooperation ; Exponential random graph models ; Fieldwork ; Hospitals ; Interorganizational Networks ; Markets ; Multipoint competition ; Mutual forbearance ; Networks ; Organization theory ; Organizational Effectiveness ; Patients ; Social Networks</subject><ispartof>Social networks, 2012, Vol.34 (1), p.101-111</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-50f1905435f967f90c91ef93719bcd76c57fdccc06d995e45982b0d53eeb23b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-50f1905435f967f90c91ef93719bcd76c57fdccc06d995e45982b0d53eeb23b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,33224,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lomi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallotti, Francesca</creatorcontrib><title>Relational collaboration among spatial multipoint competitors</title><title>Social networks</title><description>The presence of network ties between multipoint competitors is frequently assumed but rarely examined directly. The outcomes of multipoint competition, therefore, are better understood than their underlying relational mechanisms. Using original fieldwork and data that we have collected on an interorganizational network of patient transfer relations within a regional community of hospitals, we report and interpret estimates of Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGM) that specify the probability of observing network ties between organizations as a function of the degree of their spatial multipoint contact. We find that hospitals competing more intensely for patients across multiple geographical segments of their market (spatial multipoint competitors) are significantly more likely to collaborate. This conclusion is robust to alternative explanations for the formation of network ties based on organizational size differences, resource complementarities, performance differentials, and capacity constraints. We show that interorganizational networks between spatial multipoint competitors are characterized by clear tendencies toward clustering and a global core-periphery structure arising as consequences of multiple mechanisms of triadic closure operating simultaneously. We conclude that the effects of competition on the structure of interorganizational fields depends on how markets as physical and social settings are connected by cross-cutting network ties between competitors.</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Exponential random graph models</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Interorganizational Networks</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Multipoint competition</subject><subject>Mutual forbearance</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational Effectiveness</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Social Networks</subject><issn>0378-8733</issn><issn>1879-2111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQQIMouK7-Aw9700vXTNM0yUFBxC9YEETPoU2nkqVtapIV_PemW897GmbmzTDzCLkEugYK5c12HZwZMK5zui-tKeVHZAFSqCwHgGOyoEzITArGTslZCFtKaSlALsjtO3ZVtG6oupVxXVfVzu_zVdW74WsVxpSlXr_roh2dHWLC-hGjjc6Hc3LSVl3Ai_-4JJ9Pjx8PL9nm7fn14X6TmYKJmHHagqK8YLxVpWgVNQqwVUyAqk0jSsNF2xhjaNkoxbHgSuY1bThDrHNWF2xJrua9o3ffOwxR9zYYTOcO6HZBKyg5cC5lIq8PkjCJkAKgTGgxo8a7EDy2evS2r_xvgvTkVW_17FVPXqdq8prG7uYxTA__WPQ6GIuDwcZ6NFE3zh5e8Acrc4NW</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Lomi, Alessandro</creator><creator>Pallotti, Francesca</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Relational collaboration among spatial multipoint competitors</title><author>Lomi, Alessandro ; Pallotti, Francesca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-50f1905435f967f90c91ef93719bcd76c57fdccc06d995e45982b0d53eeb23b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Exponential random graph models</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Interorganizational Networks</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Multipoint competition</topic><topic>Mutual forbearance</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational Effectiveness</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Social Networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lomi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallotti, Francesca</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Social networks</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lomi, Alessandro</au><au>Pallotti, Francesca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relational collaboration among spatial multipoint competitors</atitle><jtitle>Social networks</jtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>101-111</pages><issn>0378-8733</issn><eissn>1879-2111</eissn><coden>SONED4</coden><abstract>The presence of network ties between multipoint competitors is frequently assumed but rarely examined directly. The outcomes of multipoint competition, therefore, are better understood than their underlying relational mechanisms. Using original fieldwork and data that we have collected on an interorganizational network of patient transfer relations within a regional community of hospitals, we report and interpret estimates of Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGM) that specify the probability of observing network ties between organizations as a function of the degree of their spatial multipoint contact. We find that hospitals competing more intensely for patients across multiple geographical segments of their market (spatial multipoint competitors) are significantly more likely to collaborate. This conclusion is robust to alternative explanations for the formation of network ties based on organizational size differences, resource complementarities, performance differentials, and capacity constraints. We show that interorganizational networks between spatial multipoint competitors are characterized by clear tendencies toward clustering and a global core-periphery structure arising as consequences of multiple mechanisms of triadic closure operating simultaneously. We conclude that the effects of competition on the structure of interorganizational fields depends on how markets as physical and social settings are connected by cross-cutting network ties between competitors.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.socnet.2010.10.005</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-8733
ispartof Social networks, 2012, Vol.34 (1), p.101-111
issn 0378-8733
1879-2111
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_916515588
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Competition
Cooperation
Exponential random graph models
Fieldwork
Hospitals
Interorganizational Networks
Markets
Multipoint competition
Mutual forbearance
Networks
Organization theory
Organizational Effectiveness
Patients
Social Networks
title Relational collaboration among spatial multipoint competitors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T21%3A30%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relational%20collaboration%20among%20spatial%20multipoint%20competitors&rft.jtitle=Social%20networks&rft.au=Lomi,%20Alessandro&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=101-111&rft.issn=0378-8733&rft.eissn=1879-2111&rft.coden=SONED4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.10.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E916515588%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-50f1905435f967f90c91ef93719bcd76c57fdccc06d995e45982b0d53eeb23b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1037887116&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true