Loading…

Kinetics and Mechanisms of the Unimolecular Elimination of 2,2-Diethoxypropane and 1,1-Diethoxycyclohexane in the Gas Phase: Experimental and Theoretical Study

The gas-phase thermal elimination of 2,2-diethoxypropane was found to give ethanol, acetone, and ethylene, while 1,1-diethoxycyclohexane yielded 1-ethoxycyclohexene and ethanol. The kinetics determinations were carried out, with the reaction vessels deactivated with allyl bromide, and the presence o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of physical chemistry. A, Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory, 2012-01, Vol.116 (2), p.846-854
Main Authors: Rosas, Felix, Maldonado, Alexis, Lezama, Jesus, Domínguez, Rosa M, Mora, José R, Cordova, Tania, Chuchani, Gabriel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The gas-phase thermal elimination of 2,2-diethoxypropane was found to give ethanol, acetone, and ethylene, while 1,1-diethoxycyclohexane yielded 1-ethoxycyclohexene and ethanol. The kinetics determinations were carried out, with the reaction vessels deactivated with allyl bromide, and the presence of the free radical suppressor cyclohexene and toluene. Temperature and pressure ranges were 240.1–358.3 °C and 38–102 Torr. The elimination reactions are homogeneous, unimolecular, and follow a first-order rate law. The rate coefficients are given by the following Arrhenius equations: for 2,2-diethoxypropane, log k 1 (s–1) = (13.04 ± 0.07) – (186.6 ± 0.8) kJ mol–1 (2.303RT)−1; for the intermediate 2-ethoxypropene, log k 1 (s–1) = (13.36 ± 0.33) – (188.8 ± 3.4) kJ mol–1 (2.303RT)−1; and for 1,1-diethoxycyclohexane, log k = (14.02 ± 0.11) – (176.6 ± 1.1) kJ mol–1 (2.303RT)−1. Theoretical calculations of these reactions using DFT methods B3LYP, MPW1PW91, and PBEPBE, with 6-31G(d,p) and 6-31++G(d,p) basis set, demonstrated that the elimination of 2,2-diethoxypropane and 1,1-diethoxycyclohexane proceeds through a concerted nonsynchronous four-membered cyclic transition state type of mechanism. The rate-determining factor in these reactions is the elongation of the C–O bond. The intermediate product of 2,2-diethoxypropane elimination, that is, 2-ethoxypropene, further decomposes through a concerted cyclic six-membered cyclic transition state mechanism.
ISSN:1089-5639
1520-5215
DOI:10.1021/jp209596p