Loading…
How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation
We derive a closed-form solution for Tobin's Q in a stochastic dynamic framework. We show analytically that investment is positively related to Tobin's Q and cash flow, even in the absence of adjustment costs or financing frictions. Both Q and investment move in the same direction as expec...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Review of economic studies 2011-10, Vol.78 (4), p.1179-1200 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33 |
container_end_page | 1200 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1179 |
container_title | The Review of economic studies |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | ABEL, ANDREW B. EBERLY, JANICE C. |
description | We derive a closed-form solution for Tobin's Q in a stochastic dynamic framework. We show analytically that investment is positively related to Tobin's Q and cash flow, even in the absence of adjustment costs or financing frictions. Both Q and investment move in the same direction as expected revenue growth, so changes in expected revenue growth induce Q and investment to comove positively. Similarly, shocks to current cash flow, arising from shocks to the user cost of capital in our model, cause investment and cash flow per unit of capital to comove positively. Furthermore, we show that this alternative mechanism for the relationship among investment, Q, and cash flow delivers larger cash flow effects for smaller-and faster-growing firms, as observed in the data. Moreover, the empirically small sensitivity of investment to Tobin's Q does not imply implausibly large adjustment costs in our model (since there are no adjustment costs). Calibrating the model generates values of Q similar to those in the data; investment is more sensitive to cash flow than it is to ß, and both responses are of empirically plausible magnitudes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/restud/rdr006 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917297477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41407058</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/restud/rdr006</oup_id><sourcerecordid>41407058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p0aMQvOil7uVHm8bbGJsOBiooeCtp2rKOrqlJ6tx_b0bFgxfhQXjkw-PLF6FLAncEJJvY0vm-mNjCAiRHaER4IiLJxPsxGgEwHiUxFafozLkNAJA0FSP0_Gh2-AWrtsAz5dZ40YR9WlWl9njZfoaL27L1eFf7tek9Xtha-9q07h5P2zCq2fta4_lX16hWHX7O0UmlGlde_Lxj9LaYv84eo9XTw3I2XUWap8RHFROUqIomVIKShDINKQEuIZFSCJqmcS4o5bySoOM4L4s4j9MkT0SiKy0LxsboZrjbWfPRh5zZtna6bEKO0vQuk0RQKbgQQV7_kRvT2xA9IGCUUCp5QNGAtDXO2bLKOltvld1nBLJDu9nQbja0G_zt4E3f_UuvBrpx3thfzAkHAXHKvgG0pYUK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>903212294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources</source><creator>ABEL, ANDREW B. ; EBERLY, JANICE C.</creator><creatorcontrib>ABEL, ANDREW B. ; EBERLY, JANICE C.</creatorcontrib><description>We derive a closed-form solution for Tobin's Q in a stochastic dynamic framework. We show analytically that investment is positively related to Tobin's Q and cash flow, even in the absence of adjustment costs or financing frictions. Both Q and investment move in the same direction as expected revenue growth, so changes in expected revenue growth induce Q and investment to comove positively. Similarly, shocks to current cash flow, arising from shocks to the user cost of capital in our model, cause investment and cash flow per unit of capital to comove positively. Furthermore, we show that this alternative mechanism for the relationship among investment, Q, and cash flow delivers larger cash flow effects for smaller-and faster-growing firms, as observed in the data. Moreover, the empirically small sensitivity of investment to Tobin's Q does not imply implausibly large adjustment costs in our model (since there are no adjustment costs). Calibrating the model generates values of Q similar to those in the data; investment is more sensitive to cash flow than it is to ß, and both responses are of empirically plausible magnitudes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-937X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdr006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Review of Economic Studies Ltd., Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Access to credit ; Business investment ; Capital formation ; Capital investments ; Capital stock ; Capital stocks ; Cash flow ; Coefficients ; Corporate finance ; Costs ; Economic models ; Financial investments ; Financial management ; Financing methods ; Investment policy ; Investment value ; Net investment ; Research papers ; Revenue ; Stochastic models ; Studies ; User costs</subject><ispartof>The Review of economic studies, 2011-10, Vol.78 (4), p.1179-1200</ispartof><rights>The Review of Economic Studies Ltd 2011</rights><rights>The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Review of Economic Studies Limited. 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Oct 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41407058$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41407058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200,33201,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>ABEL, ANDREW B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EBERLY, JANICE C.</creatorcontrib><title>How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation</title><title>The Review of economic studies</title><description>We derive a closed-form solution for Tobin's Q in a stochastic dynamic framework. We show analytically that investment is positively related to Tobin's Q and cash flow, even in the absence of adjustment costs or financing frictions. Both Q and investment move in the same direction as expected revenue growth, so changes in expected revenue growth induce Q and investment to comove positively. Similarly, shocks to current cash flow, arising from shocks to the user cost of capital in our model, cause investment and cash flow per unit of capital to comove positively. Furthermore, we show that this alternative mechanism for the relationship among investment, Q, and cash flow delivers larger cash flow effects for smaller-and faster-growing firms, as observed in the data. Moreover, the empirically small sensitivity of investment to Tobin's Q does not imply implausibly large adjustment costs in our model (since there are no adjustment costs). Calibrating the model generates values of Q similar to those in the data; investment is more sensitive to cash flow than it is to ß, and both responses are of empirically plausible magnitudes.</description><subject>Access to credit</subject><subject>Business investment</subject><subject>Capital formation</subject><subject>Capital investments</subject><subject>Capital stock</subject><subject>Capital stocks</subject><subject>Cash flow</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Corporate finance</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Financial investments</subject><subject>Financial management</subject><subject>Financing methods</subject><subject>Investment policy</subject><subject>Investment value</subject><subject>Net investment</subject><subject>Research papers</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Stochastic models</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>User costs</subject><issn>0034-6527</issn><issn>1467-937X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p0aMQvOil7uVHm8bbGJsOBiooeCtp2rKOrqlJ6tx_b0bFgxfhQXjkw-PLF6FLAncEJJvY0vm-mNjCAiRHaER4IiLJxPsxGgEwHiUxFafozLkNAJA0FSP0_Gh2-AWrtsAz5dZ40YR9WlWl9njZfoaL27L1eFf7tek9Xtha-9q07h5P2zCq2fta4_lX16hWHX7O0UmlGlde_Lxj9LaYv84eo9XTw3I2XUWap8RHFROUqIomVIKShDINKQEuIZFSCJqmcS4o5bySoOM4L4s4j9MkT0SiKy0LxsboZrjbWfPRh5zZtna6bEKO0vQuk0RQKbgQQV7_kRvT2xA9IGCUUCp5QNGAtDXO2bLKOltvld1nBLJDu9nQbja0G_zt4E3f_UuvBrpx3thfzAkHAXHKvgG0pYUK</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>ABEL, ANDREW B.</creator><creator>EBERLY, JANICE C.</creator><general>Review of Economic Studies Ltd., Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation</title><author>ABEL, ANDREW B. ; EBERLY, JANICE C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Access to credit</topic><topic>Business investment</topic><topic>Capital formation</topic><topic>Capital investments</topic><topic>Capital stock</topic><topic>Capital stocks</topic><topic>Cash flow</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Corporate finance</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Financial investments</topic><topic>Financial management</topic><topic>Financing methods</topic><topic>Investment policy</topic><topic>Investment value</topic><topic>Net investment</topic><topic>Research papers</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Stochastic models</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>User costs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ABEL, ANDREW B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EBERLY, JANICE C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Review of economic studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ABEL, ANDREW B.</au><au>EBERLY, JANICE C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation</atitle><jtitle>The Review of economic studies</jtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1179</spage><epage>1200</epage><pages>1179-1200</pages><issn>0034-6527</issn><eissn>1467-937X</eissn><abstract>We derive a closed-form solution for Tobin's Q in a stochastic dynamic framework. We show analytically that investment is positively related to Tobin's Q and cash flow, even in the absence of adjustment costs or financing frictions. Both Q and investment move in the same direction as expected revenue growth, so changes in expected revenue growth induce Q and investment to comove positively. Similarly, shocks to current cash flow, arising from shocks to the user cost of capital in our model, cause investment and cash flow per unit of capital to comove positively. Furthermore, we show that this alternative mechanism for the relationship among investment, Q, and cash flow delivers larger cash flow effects for smaller-and faster-growing firms, as observed in the data. Moreover, the empirically small sensitivity of investment to Tobin's Q does not imply implausibly large adjustment costs in our model (since there are no adjustment costs). Calibrating the model generates values of Q similar to those in the data; investment is more sensitive to cash flow than it is to ß, and both responses are of empirically plausible magnitudes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Review of Economic Studies Ltd., Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/restud/rdr006</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-6527 |
ispartof | The Review of economic studies, 2011-10, Vol.78 (4), p.1179-1200 |
issn | 0034-6527 1467-937X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917297477 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Oxford Journals Online; JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources |
subjects | Access to credit Business investment Capital formation Capital investments Capital stock Capital stocks Cash flow Coefficients Corporate finance Costs Economic models Financial investments Financial management Financing methods Investment policy Investment value Net investment Research papers Revenue Stochastic models Studies User costs |
title | How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A44%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Q%20and%20Cash%20Flow%20Affect%20Investment%20without%20Frictions:%20An%20Analytic%20Explanation&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20economic%20studies&rft.au=ABEL,%20ANDREW%20B.&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1179&rft.epage=1200&rft.pages=1179-1200&rft.issn=0034-6527&rft.eissn=1467-937X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/restud/rdr006&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41407058%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=903212294&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41407058&rft_oup_id=10.1093/restud/rdr006&rfr_iscdi=true |