Loading…

How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation

We derive a closed-form solution for Tobin's Q in a stochastic dynamic framework. We show analytically that investment is positively related to Tobin's Q and cash flow, even in the absence of adjustment costs or financing frictions. Both Q and investment move in the same direction as expec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Review of economic studies 2011-10, Vol.78 (4), p.1179-1200
Main Authors: ABEL, ANDREW B., EBERLY, JANICE C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33
container_end_page 1200
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1179
container_title The Review of economic studies
container_volume 78
creator ABEL, ANDREW B.
EBERLY, JANICE C.
description We derive a closed-form solution for Tobin's Q in a stochastic dynamic framework. We show analytically that investment is positively related to Tobin's Q and cash flow, even in the absence of adjustment costs or financing frictions. Both Q and investment move in the same direction as expected revenue growth, so changes in expected revenue growth induce Q and investment to comove positively. Similarly, shocks to current cash flow, arising from shocks to the user cost of capital in our model, cause investment and cash flow per unit of capital to comove positively. Furthermore, we show that this alternative mechanism for the relationship among investment, Q, and cash flow delivers larger cash flow effects for smaller-and faster-growing firms, as observed in the data. Moreover, the empirically small sensitivity of investment to Tobin's Q does not imply implausibly large adjustment costs in our model (since there are no adjustment costs). Calibrating the model generates values of Q similar to those in the data; investment is more sensitive to cash flow than it is to ß, and both responses are of empirically plausible magnitudes.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/restud/rdr006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917297477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41407058</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/restud/rdr006</oup_id><sourcerecordid>41407058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p0aMQvOil7uVHm8bbGJsOBiooeCtp2rKOrqlJ6tx_b0bFgxfhQXjkw-PLF6FLAncEJJvY0vm-mNjCAiRHaER4IiLJxPsxGgEwHiUxFafozLkNAJA0FSP0_Gh2-AWrtsAz5dZ40YR9WlWl9njZfoaL27L1eFf7tek9Xtha-9q07h5P2zCq2fta4_lX16hWHX7O0UmlGlde_Lxj9LaYv84eo9XTw3I2XUWap8RHFROUqIomVIKShDINKQEuIZFSCJqmcS4o5bySoOM4L4s4j9MkT0SiKy0LxsboZrjbWfPRh5zZtna6bEKO0vQuk0RQKbgQQV7_kRvT2xA9IGCUUCp5QNGAtDXO2bLKOltvld1nBLJDu9nQbja0G_zt4E3f_UuvBrpx3thfzAkHAXHKvgG0pYUK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>903212294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources</source><creator>ABEL, ANDREW B. ; EBERLY, JANICE C.</creator><creatorcontrib>ABEL, ANDREW B. ; EBERLY, JANICE C.</creatorcontrib><description>We derive a closed-form solution for Tobin's Q in a stochastic dynamic framework. We show analytically that investment is positively related to Tobin's Q and cash flow, even in the absence of adjustment costs or financing frictions. Both Q and investment move in the same direction as expected revenue growth, so changes in expected revenue growth induce Q and investment to comove positively. Similarly, shocks to current cash flow, arising from shocks to the user cost of capital in our model, cause investment and cash flow per unit of capital to comove positively. Furthermore, we show that this alternative mechanism for the relationship among investment, Q, and cash flow delivers larger cash flow effects for smaller-and faster-growing firms, as observed in the data. Moreover, the empirically small sensitivity of investment to Tobin's Q does not imply implausibly large adjustment costs in our model (since there are no adjustment costs). Calibrating the model generates values of Q similar to those in the data; investment is more sensitive to cash flow than it is to ß, and both responses are of empirically plausible magnitudes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-937X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdr006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Review of Economic Studies Ltd., Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Access to credit ; Business investment ; Capital formation ; Capital investments ; Capital stock ; Capital stocks ; Cash flow ; Coefficients ; Corporate finance ; Costs ; Economic models ; Financial investments ; Financial management ; Financing methods ; Investment policy ; Investment value ; Net investment ; Research papers ; Revenue ; Stochastic models ; Studies ; User costs</subject><ispartof>The Review of economic studies, 2011-10, Vol.78 (4), p.1179-1200</ispartof><rights>The Review of Economic Studies Ltd 2011</rights><rights>The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Review of Economic Studies Limited. 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Oct 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41407058$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41407058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200,33201,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>ABEL, ANDREW B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EBERLY, JANICE C.</creatorcontrib><title>How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation</title><title>The Review of economic studies</title><description>We derive a closed-form solution for Tobin's Q in a stochastic dynamic framework. We show analytically that investment is positively related to Tobin's Q and cash flow, even in the absence of adjustment costs or financing frictions. Both Q and investment move in the same direction as expected revenue growth, so changes in expected revenue growth induce Q and investment to comove positively. Similarly, shocks to current cash flow, arising from shocks to the user cost of capital in our model, cause investment and cash flow per unit of capital to comove positively. Furthermore, we show that this alternative mechanism for the relationship among investment, Q, and cash flow delivers larger cash flow effects for smaller-and faster-growing firms, as observed in the data. Moreover, the empirically small sensitivity of investment to Tobin's Q does not imply implausibly large adjustment costs in our model (since there are no adjustment costs). Calibrating the model generates values of Q similar to those in the data; investment is more sensitive to cash flow than it is to ß, and both responses are of empirically plausible magnitudes.</description><subject>Access to credit</subject><subject>Business investment</subject><subject>Capital formation</subject><subject>Capital investments</subject><subject>Capital stock</subject><subject>Capital stocks</subject><subject>Cash flow</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Corporate finance</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Financial investments</subject><subject>Financial management</subject><subject>Financing methods</subject><subject>Investment policy</subject><subject>Investment value</subject><subject>Net investment</subject><subject>Research papers</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Stochastic models</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>User costs</subject><issn>0034-6527</issn><issn>1467-937X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p0aMQvOil7uVHm8bbGJsOBiooeCtp2rKOrqlJ6tx_b0bFgxfhQXjkw-PLF6FLAncEJJvY0vm-mNjCAiRHaER4IiLJxPsxGgEwHiUxFafozLkNAJA0FSP0_Gh2-AWrtsAz5dZ40YR9WlWl9njZfoaL27L1eFf7tek9Xtha-9q07h5P2zCq2fta4_lX16hWHX7O0UmlGlde_Lxj9LaYv84eo9XTw3I2XUWap8RHFROUqIomVIKShDINKQEuIZFSCJqmcS4o5bySoOM4L4s4j9MkT0SiKy0LxsboZrjbWfPRh5zZtna6bEKO0vQuk0RQKbgQQV7_kRvT2xA9IGCUUCp5QNGAtDXO2bLKOltvld1nBLJDu9nQbja0G_zt4E3f_UuvBrpx3thfzAkHAXHKvgG0pYUK</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>ABEL, ANDREW B.</creator><creator>EBERLY, JANICE C.</creator><general>Review of Economic Studies Ltd., Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation</title><author>ABEL, ANDREW B. ; EBERLY, JANICE C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Access to credit</topic><topic>Business investment</topic><topic>Capital formation</topic><topic>Capital investments</topic><topic>Capital stock</topic><topic>Capital stocks</topic><topic>Cash flow</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Corporate finance</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Financial investments</topic><topic>Financial management</topic><topic>Financing methods</topic><topic>Investment policy</topic><topic>Investment value</topic><topic>Net investment</topic><topic>Research papers</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Stochastic models</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>User costs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ABEL, ANDREW B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EBERLY, JANICE C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Review of economic studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ABEL, ANDREW B.</au><au>EBERLY, JANICE C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation</atitle><jtitle>The Review of economic studies</jtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1179</spage><epage>1200</epage><pages>1179-1200</pages><issn>0034-6527</issn><eissn>1467-937X</eissn><abstract>We derive a closed-form solution for Tobin's Q in a stochastic dynamic framework. We show analytically that investment is positively related to Tobin's Q and cash flow, even in the absence of adjustment costs or financing frictions. Both Q and investment move in the same direction as expected revenue growth, so changes in expected revenue growth induce Q and investment to comove positively. Similarly, shocks to current cash flow, arising from shocks to the user cost of capital in our model, cause investment and cash flow per unit of capital to comove positively. Furthermore, we show that this alternative mechanism for the relationship among investment, Q, and cash flow delivers larger cash flow effects for smaller-and faster-growing firms, as observed in the data. Moreover, the empirically small sensitivity of investment to Tobin's Q does not imply implausibly large adjustment costs in our model (since there are no adjustment costs). Calibrating the model generates values of Q similar to those in the data; investment is more sensitive to cash flow than it is to ß, and both responses are of empirically plausible magnitudes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Review of Economic Studies Ltd., Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/restud/rdr006</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-6527
ispartof The Review of economic studies, 2011-10, Vol.78 (4), p.1179-1200
issn 0034-6527
1467-937X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917297477
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Oxford Journals Online; JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources
subjects Access to credit
Business investment
Capital formation
Capital investments
Capital stock
Capital stocks
Cash flow
Coefficients
Corporate finance
Costs
Economic models
Financial investments
Financial management
Financing methods
Investment policy
Investment value
Net investment
Research papers
Revenue
Stochastic models
Studies
User costs
title How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A44%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Q%20and%20Cash%20Flow%20Affect%20Investment%20without%20Frictions:%20An%20Analytic%20Explanation&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20economic%20studies&rft.au=ABEL,%20ANDREW%20B.&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1179&rft.epage=1200&rft.pages=1179-1200&rft.issn=0034-6527&rft.eissn=1467-937X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/restud/rdr006&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41407058%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f3721af26290a9123c0810490699772885b72244f90c55bed5b586b676cfc9d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=903212294&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41407058&rft_oup_id=10.1093/restud/rdr006&rfr_iscdi=true