Loading…

Comparison of dual-source 64-slice adenosine stress CT perfusion with stress-gated SPECT-MPI for evaluation of left ventricular function and volumes

Background Evaluation of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (LVEF) represent important components of pharmacologic stress imaging with either myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) or gated single-photon emission CT (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI). Objectives We compared mea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography 2012, Vol.6 (1), p.24-30
Main Authors: Uthamalingam, Shanmugam, MD, Gurm, Gagandeep S., MD, Sidhu, Manavjot S., MD, Verdini, Daniel J., MD, Vorasettakarnkij, Yongkasem, MD, Engel, Leif-Christopher, MD, Blankstein, Ron, MD, Mamuya, Wilfred S., MD, Hoffman, Udo, MD, Brady, Thomas J., MD, Cury, Ricardo C., MD, Ghoshhajra, Brian B., MD, MBA
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Evaluation of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (LVEF) represent important components of pharmacologic stress imaging with either myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) or gated single-photon emission CT (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI). Objectives We compared measurements of left ventricular function and volumes obtained with CTP and SPECT-MPI. Methods Forty-seven patients (mean age, 62 ± 11 years; male, n = 39) underwent stress CTP and SPECT-MPI. LVEF (in %), end-systolic volume (ESV; in mL), and end-diastolic volume (EDV; in mL) derived from stress CTP images were compared with SPECT-MPI. Results Stress CTP was in good agreement with SPECT-MPI for quantification of LVEF ( r = 0.91), EDV ( r = 0.75), and ESV ( r = 0.83; all P < 0.001). The mean LVEF measured by stress CTP (66% ± 17%) was similar to SPECT-MPI (64% ± 15%). Similar values were also derived for mean EDV (123 ± 30 mL vs 120 ± 34 mL) and ESV (44 ± 28 mL vs 51 ± 34 mL) for CTP and SPECT-MPI, respectively. Good agreement was also shown between both techniques for the assessment of regional wall motion with identical wall motion scores in 95.3% of the segments (κ = 0.79). Conclusions LVEF and LV volume parameters as determined by dual-source 64-slice adenosine stress CTP show a high correlation with values obtained with stress-gated SPECT-MPI.
ISSN:1934-5925
1876-861X
DOI:10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.016