Loading…

Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: A comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials

► Raman method used to screen sorbitol for the presence of low level adulterants. ► Compared a Raman based library spectral correlation method to chemometric methods. ► Correlation methods cannot identify adulterants present in sorbitol below ∼10%. ► Classification methods flagged sorbitol samples w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis 2012-03, Vol.61, p.191-198
Main Authors: Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M., Rodriguez, Jason D., Arzhantsev, Sergey, Buhse, Lucinda F., Kauffman, John F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3
container_end_page 198
container_issue
container_start_page 191
container_title Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis
container_volume 61
creator Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M.
Rodriguez, Jason D.
Arzhantsev, Sergey
Buhse, Lucinda F.
Kauffman, John F.
description ► Raman method used to screen sorbitol for the presence of low level adulterants. ► Compared a Raman based library spectral correlation method to chemometric methods. ► Correlation methods cannot identify adulterants present in sorbitol below ∼10%. ► Classification methods flagged sorbitol samples when an adulterant >2% was present. ► Quantification by PLS had the lowest limit of detection for the adulterant at ∼0.9%. In this study, pharmaceutical grade sorbitol was used as a model system for comparison of Raman based library spectral correlation methods with more sophisticated methods of chemometric data analysis. Both crystallizing sorbitol (CS) and non-crystallizing sorbitol (NCS) from several manufacturers were examined. The Raman spectrum of each sample was collected and identified by correlation with a spectral library that included the CS spectrum but not the NCS spectrum. The average hit quality index (HQI) for the measured NCS spectra and the library CS spectrum was 0.966 whereas the average HQI for the measured CS spectra was 0.991. Both HQIs exceeded the 0.950 threshold that is commonly used for material verification. To enhance the discrimination between CS and NCS, a CS/NCS classification model was constructed using soft independent modeling of class analogies (SIMCA). SIMCA was able to positively identify CS and NCS solutions with no mis-classifications. When CS was adulterated with low levels (0–5%) of ethylene glycol (EG) and diethylene glycol (DEG), the HQI values of the measured spectra and the CS library spectrum were still above 0.950. When the CS SIMCA model was applied to adulterated CS spectra, it determined that CS samples with adulterant levels as low as 2% were outside of the CS class. A quantitative PLS model was also applied to EG adulterated CS and resulted in a detection limit of 0.9% for EG. The results obtained from these studies highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate data analysis process for the detection of low level adulterants in pharmaceutical raw materials using Raman spectroscopic screening methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.12.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917853868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S073170851100687X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1008847942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEokvhD3AAXxAc2DC282FXXKqKL2klJKASN2viOKxXSZzaCVJ_CX-XWbLAraeRR887tufJsqcccg68enPID1ODuQDOcy5yAHEv23BVy62oiu_3sw3Ukm9rUOVZ9iilAwCUXBcPszMhBFRKwyb7tfNNxOhdes1sjyn5zrtIBxxbdrPgOK-NC3bJbBgmQlMYWeiY3bshDG6O3jIq-9Am1oXI5r2jMPa3yacj9wUHHFmanJ0j_gmGccbBjzi7lk17jANat8zeYs8GakaPfXqcPeiouCenep5dv3_37erjdvf5w6ery93WFoWYt40uO23pi7UA24C1jVCuo-1oatS6BdVIqcF1hUZwCnktC1k1TkJrpS0aeZ69XOdOMdwsLs1m8Mm6vsfRhSUZzWtVSlUpIl_dSXIApYpaF4JQsaI2hpSi68wU_YDxliBzVGcO5qjOHNUZLgypo9Cz0_ylGVz7L_LXFQEvTgAm2lUXcbQ-_efKSipVlsQ9X7kOg8EfJMxcf6WbSgAuQOmaiLcr4WizP0mvSda70brWR9Jk2uDveulvGVLCog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1008847942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: A comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M. ; Rodriguez, Jason D. ; Arzhantsev, Sergey ; Buhse, Lucinda F. ; Kauffman, John F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M. ; Rodriguez, Jason D. ; Arzhantsev, Sergey ; Buhse, Lucinda F. ; Kauffman, John F.</creatorcontrib><description>► Raman method used to screen sorbitol for the presence of low level adulterants. ► Compared a Raman based library spectral correlation method to chemometric methods. ► Correlation methods cannot identify adulterants present in sorbitol below ∼10%. ► Classification methods flagged sorbitol samples when an adulterant &gt;2% was present. ► Quantification by PLS had the lowest limit of detection for the adulterant at ∼0.9%. In this study, pharmaceutical grade sorbitol was used as a model system for comparison of Raman based library spectral correlation methods with more sophisticated methods of chemometric data analysis. Both crystallizing sorbitol (CS) and non-crystallizing sorbitol (NCS) from several manufacturers were examined. The Raman spectrum of each sample was collected and identified by correlation with a spectral library that included the CS spectrum but not the NCS spectrum. The average hit quality index (HQI) for the measured NCS spectra and the library CS spectrum was 0.966 whereas the average HQI for the measured CS spectra was 0.991. Both HQIs exceeded the 0.950 threshold that is commonly used for material verification. To enhance the discrimination between CS and NCS, a CS/NCS classification model was constructed using soft independent modeling of class analogies (SIMCA). SIMCA was able to positively identify CS and NCS solutions with no mis-classifications. When CS was adulterated with low levels (0–5%) of ethylene glycol (EG) and diethylene glycol (DEG), the HQI values of the measured spectra and the CS library spectrum were still above 0.950. When the CS SIMCA model was applied to adulterated CS spectra, it determined that CS samples with adulterant levels as low as 2% were outside of the CS class. A quantitative PLS model was also applied to EG adulterated CS and resulted in a detection limit of 0.9% for EG. The results obtained from these studies highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate data analysis process for the detection of low level adulterants in pharmaceutical raw materials using Raman spectroscopic screening methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-7085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-264X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.12.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22206890</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPBADA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>adulterated products ; Analysis ; Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - methods ; chemometrics ; Crystallization ; detection limit ; diethylene glycol ; Drug Contamination ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General pharmacology ; Medical sciences ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - classification ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; PLS ; Raman spectroscopy ; Rapid screening ; raw materials ; screening ; SIMCA ; Small Molecule Libraries - analysis ; sorbitol ; Sorbitol - analysis ; Sorbitol - classification ; Spectral library ; Spectrum Analysis, Raman - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2012-03, Vol.61, p.191-198</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25638855$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22206890$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arzhantsev, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhse, Lucinda F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kauffman, John F.</creatorcontrib><title>Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: A comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials</title><title>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis</title><addtitle>J Pharm Biomed Anal</addtitle><description>► Raman method used to screen sorbitol for the presence of low level adulterants. ► Compared a Raman based library spectral correlation method to chemometric methods. ► Correlation methods cannot identify adulterants present in sorbitol below ∼10%. ► Classification methods flagged sorbitol samples when an adulterant &gt;2% was present. ► Quantification by PLS had the lowest limit of detection for the adulterant at ∼0.9%. In this study, pharmaceutical grade sorbitol was used as a model system for comparison of Raman based library spectral correlation methods with more sophisticated methods of chemometric data analysis. Both crystallizing sorbitol (CS) and non-crystallizing sorbitol (NCS) from several manufacturers were examined. The Raman spectrum of each sample was collected and identified by correlation with a spectral library that included the CS spectrum but not the NCS spectrum. The average hit quality index (HQI) for the measured NCS spectra and the library CS spectrum was 0.966 whereas the average HQI for the measured CS spectra was 0.991. Both HQIs exceeded the 0.950 threshold that is commonly used for material verification. To enhance the discrimination between CS and NCS, a CS/NCS classification model was constructed using soft independent modeling of class analogies (SIMCA). SIMCA was able to positively identify CS and NCS solutions with no mis-classifications. When CS was adulterated with low levels (0–5%) of ethylene glycol (EG) and diethylene glycol (DEG), the HQI values of the measured spectra and the CS library spectrum were still above 0.950. When the CS SIMCA model was applied to adulterated CS spectra, it determined that CS samples with adulterant levels as low as 2% were outside of the CS class. A quantitative PLS model was also applied to EG adulterated CS and resulted in a detection limit of 0.9% for EG. The results obtained from these studies highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate data analysis process for the detection of low level adulterants in pharmaceutical raw materials using Raman spectroscopic screening methods.</description><subject>adulterated products</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - methods</subject><subject>chemometrics</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>detection limit</subject><subject>diethylene glycol</subject><subject>Drug Contamination</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - classification</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>PLS</subject><subject>Raman spectroscopy</subject><subject>Rapid screening</subject><subject>raw materials</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>SIMCA</subject><subject>Small Molecule Libraries - analysis</subject><subject>sorbitol</subject><subject>Sorbitol - analysis</subject><subject>Sorbitol - classification</subject><subject>Spectral library</subject><subject>Spectrum Analysis, Raman - methods</subject><issn>0731-7085</issn><issn>1873-264X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEokvhD3AAXxAc2DC282FXXKqKL2klJKASN2viOKxXSZzaCVJ_CX-XWbLAraeRR887tufJsqcccg68enPID1ODuQDOcy5yAHEv23BVy62oiu_3sw3Ukm9rUOVZ9iilAwCUXBcPszMhBFRKwyb7tfNNxOhdes1sjyn5zrtIBxxbdrPgOK-NC3bJbBgmQlMYWeiY3bshDG6O3jIq-9Am1oXI5r2jMPa3yacj9wUHHFmanJ0j_gmGccbBjzi7lk17jANat8zeYs8GakaPfXqcPeiouCenep5dv3_37erjdvf5w6ery93WFoWYt40uO23pi7UA24C1jVCuo-1oatS6BdVIqcF1hUZwCnktC1k1TkJrpS0aeZ69XOdOMdwsLs1m8Mm6vsfRhSUZzWtVSlUpIl_dSXIApYpaF4JQsaI2hpSi68wU_YDxliBzVGcO5qjOHNUZLgypo9Cz0_ylGVz7L_LXFQEvTgAm2lUXcbQ-_efKSipVlsQ9X7kOg8EfJMxcf6WbSgAuQOmaiLcr4WizP0mvSda70brWR9Jk2uDveulvGVLCog</recordid><startdate>20120305</startdate><enddate>20120305</enddate><creator>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M.</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Jason D.</creator><creator>Arzhantsev, Sergey</creator><creator>Buhse, Lucinda F.</creator><creator>Kauffman, John F.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120305</creationdate><title>Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: A comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials</title><author>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M. ; Rodriguez, Jason D. ; Arzhantsev, Sergey ; Buhse, Lucinda F. ; Kauffman, John F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>adulterated products</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - methods</topic><topic>chemometrics</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>detection limit</topic><topic>diethylene glycol</topic><topic>Drug Contamination</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - classification</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>PLS</topic><topic>Raman spectroscopy</topic><topic>Rapid screening</topic><topic>raw materials</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>SIMCA</topic><topic>Small Molecule Libraries - analysis</topic><topic>sorbitol</topic><topic>Sorbitol - analysis</topic><topic>Sorbitol - classification</topic><topic>Spectral library</topic><topic>Spectrum Analysis, Raman - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arzhantsev, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhse, Lucinda F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kauffman, John F.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M.</au><au>Rodriguez, Jason D.</au><au>Arzhantsev, Sergey</au><au>Buhse, Lucinda F.</au><au>Kauffman, John F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: A comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J Pharm Biomed Anal</addtitle><date>2012-03-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>61</volume><spage>191</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>191-198</pages><issn>0731-7085</issn><eissn>1873-264X</eissn><coden>JPBADA</coden><abstract>► Raman method used to screen sorbitol for the presence of low level adulterants. ► Compared a Raman based library spectral correlation method to chemometric methods. ► Correlation methods cannot identify adulterants present in sorbitol below ∼10%. ► Classification methods flagged sorbitol samples when an adulterant &gt;2% was present. ► Quantification by PLS had the lowest limit of detection for the adulterant at ∼0.9%. In this study, pharmaceutical grade sorbitol was used as a model system for comparison of Raman based library spectral correlation methods with more sophisticated methods of chemometric data analysis. Both crystallizing sorbitol (CS) and non-crystallizing sorbitol (NCS) from several manufacturers were examined. The Raman spectrum of each sample was collected and identified by correlation with a spectral library that included the CS spectrum but not the NCS spectrum. The average hit quality index (HQI) for the measured NCS spectra and the library CS spectrum was 0.966 whereas the average HQI for the measured CS spectra was 0.991. Both HQIs exceeded the 0.950 threshold that is commonly used for material verification. To enhance the discrimination between CS and NCS, a CS/NCS classification model was constructed using soft independent modeling of class analogies (SIMCA). SIMCA was able to positively identify CS and NCS solutions with no mis-classifications. When CS was adulterated with low levels (0–5%) of ethylene glycol (EG) and diethylene glycol (DEG), the HQI values of the measured spectra and the CS library spectrum were still above 0.950. When the CS SIMCA model was applied to adulterated CS spectra, it determined that CS samples with adulterant levels as low as 2% were outside of the CS class. A quantitative PLS model was also applied to EG adulterated CS and resulted in a detection limit of 0.9% for EG. The results obtained from these studies highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate data analysis process for the detection of low level adulterants in pharmaceutical raw materials using Raman spectroscopic screening methods.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>22206890</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpba.2011.12.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0731-7085
ispartof Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2012-03, Vol.61, p.191-198
issn 0731-7085
1873-264X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917853868
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects adulterated products
Analysis
Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry
Biological and medical sciences
Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - methods
chemometrics
Crystallization
detection limit
diethylene glycol
Drug Contamination
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General pharmacology
Medical sciences
Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis
Pharmaceutical Preparations - classification
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
PLS
Raman spectroscopy
Rapid screening
raw materials
screening
SIMCA
Small Molecule Libraries - analysis
sorbitol
Sorbitol - analysis
Sorbitol - classification
Spectral library
Spectrum Analysis, Raman - methods
title Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: A comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A47%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Libraries,%20classifiers,%20and%20quantifiers:%20A%20comparison%20of%20chemometric%20methods%20for%20the%20analysis%20of%20Raman%20spectra%20of%20contaminated%20pharmaceutical%20materials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmaceutical%20and%20biomedical%20analysis&rft.au=Gryniewicz-Ruzicka,%20Connie%20M.&rft.date=2012-03-05&rft.volume=61&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=191-198&rft.issn=0731-7085&rft.eissn=1873-264X&rft.coden=JPBADA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpba.2011.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1008847942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1008847942&rft_id=info:pmid/22206890&rfr_iscdi=true