Loading…
Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: A comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials
► Raman method used to screen sorbitol for the presence of low level adulterants. ► Compared a Raman based library spectral correlation method to chemometric methods. ► Correlation methods cannot identify adulterants present in sorbitol below ∼10%. ► Classification methods flagged sorbitol samples w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis 2012-03, Vol.61, p.191-198 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3 |
container_end_page | 198 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 191 |
container_title | Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M. Rodriguez, Jason D. Arzhantsev, Sergey Buhse, Lucinda F. Kauffman, John F. |
description | ► Raman method used to screen sorbitol for the presence of low level adulterants. ► Compared a Raman based library spectral correlation method to chemometric methods. ► Correlation methods cannot identify adulterants present in sorbitol below ∼10%. ► Classification methods flagged sorbitol samples when an adulterant >2% was present. ► Quantification by PLS had the lowest limit of detection for the adulterant at ∼0.9%.
In this study, pharmaceutical grade sorbitol was used as a model system for comparison of Raman based library spectral correlation methods with more sophisticated methods of chemometric data analysis. Both crystallizing sorbitol (CS) and non-crystallizing sorbitol (NCS) from several manufacturers were examined. The Raman spectrum of each sample was collected and identified by correlation with a spectral library that included the CS spectrum but not the NCS spectrum. The average hit quality index (HQI) for the measured NCS spectra and the library CS spectrum was 0.966 whereas the average HQI for the measured CS spectra was 0.991. Both HQIs exceeded the 0.950 threshold that is commonly used for material verification. To enhance the discrimination between CS and NCS, a CS/NCS classification model was constructed using soft independent modeling of class analogies (SIMCA). SIMCA was able to positively identify CS and NCS solutions with no mis-classifications. When CS was adulterated with low levels (0–5%) of ethylene glycol (EG) and diethylene glycol (DEG), the HQI values of the measured spectra and the CS library spectrum were still above 0.950. When the CS SIMCA model was applied to adulterated CS spectra, it determined that CS samples with adulterant levels as low as 2% were outside of the CS class. A quantitative PLS model was also applied to EG adulterated CS and resulted in a detection limit of 0.9% for EG. The results obtained from these studies highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate data analysis process for the detection of low level adulterants in pharmaceutical raw materials using Raman spectroscopic screening methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.12.002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917853868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S073170851100687X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1008847942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEokvhD3AAXxAc2DC282FXXKqKL2klJKASN2viOKxXSZzaCVJ_CX-XWbLAraeRR887tufJsqcccg68enPID1ODuQDOcy5yAHEv23BVy62oiu_3sw3Ukm9rUOVZ9iilAwCUXBcPszMhBFRKwyb7tfNNxOhdes1sjyn5zrtIBxxbdrPgOK-NC3bJbBgmQlMYWeiY3bshDG6O3jIq-9Am1oXI5r2jMPa3yacj9wUHHFmanJ0j_gmGccbBjzi7lk17jANat8zeYs8GakaPfXqcPeiouCenep5dv3_37erjdvf5w6ery93WFoWYt40uO23pi7UA24C1jVCuo-1oatS6BdVIqcF1hUZwCnktC1k1TkJrpS0aeZ69XOdOMdwsLs1m8Mm6vsfRhSUZzWtVSlUpIl_dSXIApYpaF4JQsaI2hpSi68wU_YDxliBzVGcO5qjOHNUZLgypo9Cz0_ylGVz7L_LXFQEvTgAm2lUXcbQ-_efKSipVlsQ9X7kOg8EfJMxcf6WbSgAuQOmaiLcr4WizP0mvSda70brWR9Jk2uDveulvGVLCog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1008847942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: A comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M. ; Rodriguez, Jason D. ; Arzhantsev, Sergey ; Buhse, Lucinda F. ; Kauffman, John F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M. ; Rodriguez, Jason D. ; Arzhantsev, Sergey ; Buhse, Lucinda F. ; Kauffman, John F.</creatorcontrib><description>► Raman method used to screen sorbitol for the presence of low level adulterants. ► Compared a Raman based library spectral correlation method to chemometric methods. ► Correlation methods cannot identify adulterants present in sorbitol below ∼10%. ► Classification methods flagged sorbitol samples when an adulterant >2% was present. ► Quantification by PLS had the lowest limit of detection for the adulterant at ∼0.9%.
In this study, pharmaceutical grade sorbitol was used as a model system for comparison of Raman based library spectral correlation methods with more sophisticated methods of chemometric data analysis. Both crystallizing sorbitol (CS) and non-crystallizing sorbitol (NCS) from several manufacturers were examined. The Raman spectrum of each sample was collected and identified by correlation with a spectral library that included the CS spectrum but not the NCS spectrum. The average hit quality index (HQI) for the measured NCS spectra and the library CS spectrum was 0.966 whereas the average HQI for the measured CS spectra was 0.991. Both HQIs exceeded the 0.950 threshold that is commonly used for material verification. To enhance the discrimination between CS and NCS, a CS/NCS classification model was constructed using soft independent modeling of class analogies (SIMCA). SIMCA was able to positively identify CS and NCS solutions with no mis-classifications. When CS was adulterated with low levels (0–5%) of ethylene glycol (EG) and diethylene glycol (DEG), the HQI values of the measured spectra and the CS library spectrum were still above 0.950. When the CS SIMCA model was applied to adulterated CS spectra, it determined that CS samples with adulterant levels as low as 2% were outside of the CS class. A quantitative PLS model was also applied to EG adulterated CS and resulted in a detection limit of 0.9% for EG. The results obtained from these studies highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate data analysis process for the detection of low level adulterants in pharmaceutical raw materials using Raman spectroscopic screening methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-7085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-264X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.12.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22206890</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPBADA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>adulterated products ; Analysis ; Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - methods ; chemometrics ; Crystallization ; detection limit ; diethylene glycol ; Drug Contamination ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General pharmacology ; Medical sciences ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - classification ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; PLS ; Raman spectroscopy ; Rapid screening ; raw materials ; screening ; SIMCA ; Small Molecule Libraries - analysis ; sorbitol ; Sorbitol - analysis ; Sorbitol - classification ; Spectral library ; Spectrum Analysis, Raman - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2012-03, Vol.61, p.191-198</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25638855$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22206890$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arzhantsev, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhse, Lucinda F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kauffman, John F.</creatorcontrib><title>Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: A comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials</title><title>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis</title><addtitle>J Pharm Biomed Anal</addtitle><description>► Raman method used to screen sorbitol for the presence of low level adulterants. ► Compared a Raman based library spectral correlation method to chemometric methods. ► Correlation methods cannot identify adulterants present in sorbitol below ∼10%. ► Classification methods flagged sorbitol samples when an adulterant >2% was present. ► Quantification by PLS had the lowest limit of detection for the adulterant at ∼0.9%.
In this study, pharmaceutical grade sorbitol was used as a model system for comparison of Raman based library spectral correlation methods with more sophisticated methods of chemometric data analysis. Both crystallizing sorbitol (CS) and non-crystallizing sorbitol (NCS) from several manufacturers were examined. The Raman spectrum of each sample was collected and identified by correlation with a spectral library that included the CS spectrum but not the NCS spectrum. The average hit quality index (HQI) for the measured NCS spectra and the library CS spectrum was 0.966 whereas the average HQI for the measured CS spectra was 0.991. Both HQIs exceeded the 0.950 threshold that is commonly used for material verification. To enhance the discrimination between CS and NCS, a CS/NCS classification model was constructed using soft independent modeling of class analogies (SIMCA). SIMCA was able to positively identify CS and NCS solutions with no mis-classifications. When CS was adulterated with low levels (0–5%) of ethylene glycol (EG) and diethylene glycol (DEG), the HQI values of the measured spectra and the CS library spectrum were still above 0.950. When the CS SIMCA model was applied to adulterated CS spectra, it determined that CS samples with adulterant levels as low as 2% were outside of the CS class. A quantitative PLS model was also applied to EG adulterated CS and resulted in a detection limit of 0.9% for EG. The results obtained from these studies highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate data analysis process for the detection of low level adulterants in pharmaceutical raw materials using Raman spectroscopic screening methods.</description><subject>adulterated products</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - methods</subject><subject>chemometrics</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>detection limit</subject><subject>diethylene glycol</subject><subject>Drug Contamination</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - classification</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>PLS</subject><subject>Raman spectroscopy</subject><subject>Rapid screening</subject><subject>raw materials</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>SIMCA</subject><subject>Small Molecule Libraries - analysis</subject><subject>sorbitol</subject><subject>Sorbitol - analysis</subject><subject>Sorbitol - classification</subject><subject>Spectral library</subject><subject>Spectrum Analysis, Raman - methods</subject><issn>0731-7085</issn><issn>1873-264X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEokvhD3AAXxAc2DC282FXXKqKL2klJKASN2viOKxXSZzaCVJ_CX-XWbLAraeRR887tufJsqcccg68enPID1ODuQDOcy5yAHEv23BVy62oiu_3sw3Ukm9rUOVZ9iilAwCUXBcPszMhBFRKwyb7tfNNxOhdes1sjyn5zrtIBxxbdrPgOK-NC3bJbBgmQlMYWeiY3bshDG6O3jIq-9Am1oXI5r2jMPa3yacj9wUHHFmanJ0j_gmGccbBjzi7lk17jANat8zeYs8GakaPfXqcPeiouCenep5dv3_37erjdvf5w6ery93WFoWYt40uO23pi7UA24C1jVCuo-1oatS6BdVIqcF1hUZwCnktC1k1TkJrpS0aeZ69XOdOMdwsLs1m8Mm6vsfRhSUZzWtVSlUpIl_dSXIApYpaF4JQsaI2hpSi68wU_YDxliBzVGcO5qjOHNUZLgypo9Cz0_ylGVz7L_LXFQEvTgAm2lUXcbQ-_efKSipVlsQ9X7kOg8EfJMxcf6WbSgAuQOmaiLcr4WizP0mvSda70brWR9Jk2uDveulvGVLCog</recordid><startdate>20120305</startdate><enddate>20120305</enddate><creator>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M.</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Jason D.</creator><creator>Arzhantsev, Sergey</creator><creator>Buhse, Lucinda F.</creator><creator>Kauffman, John F.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120305</creationdate><title>Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: A comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials</title><author>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M. ; Rodriguez, Jason D. ; Arzhantsev, Sergey ; Buhse, Lucinda F. ; Kauffman, John F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>adulterated products</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - methods</topic><topic>chemometrics</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>detection limit</topic><topic>diethylene glycol</topic><topic>Drug Contamination</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - classification</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>PLS</topic><topic>Raman spectroscopy</topic><topic>Rapid screening</topic><topic>raw materials</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>SIMCA</topic><topic>Small Molecule Libraries - analysis</topic><topic>sorbitol</topic><topic>Sorbitol - analysis</topic><topic>Sorbitol - classification</topic><topic>Spectral library</topic><topic>Spectrum Analysis, Raman - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arzhantsev, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhse, Lucinda F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kauffman, John F.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Connie M.</au><au>Rodriguez, Jason D.</au><au>Arzhantsev, Sergey</au><au>Buhse, Lucinda F.</au><au>Kauffman, John F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: A comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J Pharm Biomed Anal</addtitle><date>2012-03-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>61</volume><spage>191</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>191-198</pages><issn>0731-7085</issn><eissn>1873-264X</eissn><coden>JPBADA</coden><abstract>► Raman method used to screen sorbitol for the presence of low level adulterants. ► Compared a Raman based library spectral correlation method to chemometric methods. ► Correlation methods cannot identify adulterants present in sorbitol below ∼10%. ► Classification methods flagged sorbitol samples when an adulterant >2% was present. ► Quantification by PLS had the lowest limit of detection for the adulterant at ∼0.9%.
In this study, pharmaceutical grade sorbitol was used as a model system for comparison of Raman based library spectral correlation methods with more sophisticated methods of chemometric data analysis. Both crystallizing sorbitol (CS) and non-crystallizing sorbitol (NCS) from several manufacturers were examined. The Raman spectrum of each sample was collected and identified by correlation with a spectral library that included the CS spectrum but not the NCS spectrum. The average hit quality index (HQI) for the measured NCS spectra and the library CS spectrum was 0.966 whereas the average HQI for the measured CS spectra was 0.991. Both HQIs exceeded the 0.950 threshold that is commonly used for material verification. To enhance the discrimination between CS and NCS, a CS/NCS classification model was constructed using soft independent modeling of class analogies (SIMCA). SIMCA was able to positively identify CS and NCS solutions with no mis-classifications. When CS was adulterated with low levels (0–5%) of ethylene glycol (EG) and diethylene glycol (DEG), the HQI values of the measured spectra and the CS library spectrum were still above 0.950. When the CS SIMCA model was applied to adulterated CS spectra, it determined that CS samples with adulterant levels as low as 2% were outside of the CS class. A quantitative PLS model was also applied to EG adulterated CS and resulted in a detection limit of 0.9% for EG. The results obtained from these studies highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate data analysis process for the detection of low level adulterants in pharmaceutical raw materials using Raman spectroscopic screening methods.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>22206890</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpba.2011.12.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0731-7085 |
ispartof | Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2012-03, Vol.61, p.191-198 |
issn | 0731-7085 1873-264X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917853868 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | adulterated products Analysis Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry Biological and medical sciences Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - methods chemometrics Crystallization detection limit diethylene glycol Drug Contamination Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General pharmacology Medical sciences Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis Pharmaceutical Preparations - classification Pharmacology. Drug treatments PLS Raman spectroscopy Rapid screening raw materials screening SIMCA Small Molecule Libraries - analysis sorbitol Sorbitol - analysis Sorbitol - classification Spectral library Spectrum Analysis, Raman - methods |
title | Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: A comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A47%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Libraries,%20classifiers,%20and%20quantifiers:%20A%20comparison%20of%20chemometric%20methods%20for%20the%20analysis%20of%20Raman%20spectra%20of%20contaminated%20pharmaceutical%20materials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmaceutical%20and%20biomedical%20analysis&rft.au=Gryniewicz-Ruzicka,%20Connie%20M.&rft.date=2012-03-05&rft.volume=61&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=191-198&rft.issn=0731-7085&rft.eissn=1873-264X&rft.coden=JPBADA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpba.2011.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1008847942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b95f9c708720cb0ccb28ef101972079d08b3390ef49a0e8a173436be30dc3c4b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1008847942&rft_id=info:pmid/22206890&rfr_iscdi=true |