Loading…

Active surveillance criteria for prostate cancer: Can they be applied to Japanese patients?

Prostate‐specific antigen screening has significantly increased the percentage of men who are diagnosed with low‐risk prostate cancer. All men undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy for primary treatment of prostate cancer from April 2004 to September 2010 in our hospital were examined in order...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of urology 2012-02, Vol.19 (2), p.163-166
Main Authors: Goto, Yusuke, Nozumi, Kazuyoshi, Miyazaki, Kanetaka, Matsumoto, Akihiro, Inoue, Atsushi, Kito, Hiroki, Hasegawa, Naoki, Nagata, Maki, Kakuta, Yukio, Suzuki, Hiroyoshi, Yamaguchi, Kunio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Prostate‐specific antigen screening has significantly increased the percentage of men who are diagnosed with low‐risk prostate cancer. All men undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy for primary treatment of prostate cancer from April 2004 to September 2010 in our hospital were examined in order to determine whether active surveillance criteria could be applied to Japanese men. From pathological data of prostate biopsies, whether these men met five published criteria for active surveillance (Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance Study, University of California, San Francisco, Toronto and Kakehi criteria) was evaluated. Men who met any of the criteria had a statistically significant lower extracapsular extension rate and organ‐confinement rate. From the view of the possibility of Gleason upgrading and organ‐confinement rate, the Johns Hopkins Medical Institution and Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance Study criteria showed to be appropriate for Japanese patients. However, the present study had limitations of selection bias and a limited number of cases.
ISSN:0919-8172
1442-2042
DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02900.x