Loading…

Can B‐domain deletion alter the immunogenicity of recombinant factor VIII? A meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies

See also Iorio A, Marcucci M, Makris M. Concentrate‐related inhibitor risk: is a difference always real? This issue, pp 2176–9. Summary.  Background: As a result of the infrequency of inhibitors in previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A and the small size of available clinical studies,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis 2011-11, Vol.9 (11), p.2180-2192
Main Authors: ALEDORT, L. M., NAVICKIS, R. J., WILKES, M. M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4002-2c15f9e9e2132d58d3f144daf6cf7e1984533fe79fc90ac9d5007fafbf13ed203
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4002-2c15f9e9e2132d58d3f144daf6cf7e1984533fe79fc90ac9d5007fafbf13ed203
container_end_page 2192
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2180
container_title Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis
container_volume 9
creator ALEDORT, L. M.
NAVICKIS, R. J.
WILKES, M. M.
description See also Iorio A, Marcucci M, Makris M. Concentrate‐related inhibitor risk: is a difference always real? This issue, pp 2176–9. Summary.  Background: As a result of the infrequency of inhibitors in previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A and the small size of available clinical studies, the immunogenicity of factor (F)VIII products has been difficult to assess. Objectives: A meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies was conducted to test the hypothesis that de novo inhibitor incidence differs between PTPs receiving full‐length recombinant FVIII (FL‐rFVIII) and B‐domain deleted recombinant FVIII (BDD‐rFVIII). Methods: Prospective studies with data on inhibitors in PTPs receiving FL‐rFVIII or BDD‐rFVIII were sought using systematic methods including bibliographic database searches. Data were secured from published study reports and inquiries to investigators. Between‐group differences in inhibitor incidence rates were evaluated using mixed effects Cox regression. Results: Twenty‐nine studies with 3012 total PTPs were included. Patients were at risk of de novo inhibitor development for a median of 79 exposure days. A total of 35 de novo inhibitors were observed. The cumulative hazard for all de novo inhibitors was 1.25% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.63–1.88%. The corresponding rate for high‐titer de novo inhibitors [> 5 Bethesda units (BU)] was 0.29% (CI, 0.01–0.57%). Exposure to BDD‐rFVIII was associated with an increased risk of all de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 7.26; CI, 2.12–24.9; P = 0.0016) and of high‐titer de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 10.8; CI, 2.17–53.7; P = 0.0037), compared with FL‐rFVIII. Conclusions: This meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies suggests that recombinant FVIII products may differ in immunogenicity.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04472.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918052563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>918052563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4002-2c15f9e9e2132d58d3f144daf6cf7e1984533fe79fc90ac9d5007fafbf13ed203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM9OGzEQh62qqATaV0C-ccriP7vZ9aGq0qhAqkhcQq-WY4-LI683rL2QXCoegWfsk3S3CTkzlxnJ3_w8-hDClGS0r6t1RgtejcuKTzJGKM1Inpcs235Ao-PDx7dZcH6KzmJcE0JFwcgndMpolVcTQUboz0wF_P3vy6tpauUCNuAhuSZg5RO0OD0AdnXdheY3BKdd2uHG4hZ0U69cUCFhq3RqWvxrPp9_w1NcQ1J9mgrK76KLA71pm7gBndwTYO1dH6M8jqkzDuJndGKVj_Dl0M_R_fWP5ex2vLi7mc-mi7HOCWFjpmlhBQhglDNTVIZbmudG2Ym2JVBR5QXnFkphtSBKC1MQUlplV5ZyMIzwc3S5z-2PeewgJlm7qMF7FaDpohS0IgUrJrwnqz2p-7NjC1ZuWlerdicpkYN8uZaDVzk4loN8-V--3ParF4dPulUN5rj4ZrsHvu6BZ-dh9-5g-XN5O0z8H92Hlvo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>918052563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can B‐domain deletion alter the immunogenicity of recombinant factor VIII? A meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies</title><source>Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>ALEDORT, L. M. ; NAVICKIS, R. J. ; WILKES, M. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>ALEDORT, L. M. ; NAVICKIS, R. J. ; WILKES, M. M.</creatorcontrib><description>See also Iorio A, Marcucci M, Makris M. Concentrate‐related inhibitor risk: is a difference always real? This issue, pp 2176–9. Summary.  Background: As a result of the infrequency of inhibitors in previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A and the small size of available clinical studies, the immunogenicity of factor (F)VIII products has been difficult to assess. Objectives: A meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies was conducted to test the hypothesis that de novo inhibitor incidence differs between PTPs receiving full‐length recombinant FVIII (FL‐rFVIII) and B‐domain deleted recombinant FVIII (BDD‐rFVIII). Methods: Prospective studies with data on inhibitors in PTPs receiving FL‐rFVIII or BDD‐rFVIII were sought using systematic methods including bibliographic database searches. Data were secured from published study reports and inquiries to investigators. Between‐group differences in inhibitor incidence rates were evaluated using mixed effects Cox regression. Results: Twenty‐nine studies with 3012 total PTPs were included. Patients were at risk of de novo inhibitor development for a median of 79 exposure days. A total of 35 de novo inhibitors were observed. The cumulative hazard for all de novo inhibitors was 1.25% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.63–1.88%. The corresponding rate for high‐titer de novo inhibitors [&gt; 5 Bethesda units (BU)] was 0.29% (CI, 0.01–0.57%). Exposure to BDD‐rFVIII was associated with an increased risk of all de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 7.26; CI, 2.12–24.9; P = 0.0016) and of high‐titer de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 10.8; CI, 2.17–53.7; P = 0.0037), compared with FL‐rFVIII. Conclusions: This meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies suggests that recombinant FVIII products may differ in immunogenicity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-7933</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1538-7836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04472.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21848690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Antibodies - analysis ; blood coagulation factor inhibitors ; Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Data Collection ; factor VIII ; Factor VIII - genetics ; Factor VIII - immunology ; Factor VIII - therapeutic use ; hemophilia ; hemophilia A ; Hemophilia A - drug therapy ; Hemophilia A - immunology ; Humans ; Immunogenetic Phenomena ; immunogenicity ; incidence ; previously treated patients ; Recombinant Proteins ; Sequence Deletion ; thromboembolism</subject><ispartof>Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis, 2011-11, Vol.9 (11), p.2180-2192</ispartof><rights>2011 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis</rights><rights>2011 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4002-2c15f9e9e2132d58d3f144daf6cf7e1984533fe79fc90ac9d5007fafbf13ed203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4002-2c15f9e9e2132d58d3f144daf6cf7e1984533fe79fc90ac9d5007fafbf13ed203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21848690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ALEDORT, L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVICKIS, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILKES, M. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Can B‐domain deletion alter the immunogenicity of recombinant factor VIII? A meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies</title><title>Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis</title><addtitle>J Thromb Haemost</addtitle><description>See also Iorio A, Marcucci M, Makris M. Concentrate‐related inhibitor risk: is a difference always real? This issue, pp 2176–9. Summary.  Background: As a result of the infrequency of inhibitors in previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A and the small size of available clinical studies, the immunogenicity of factor (F)VIII products has been difficult to assess. Objectives: A meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies was conducted to test the hypothesis that de novo inhibitor incidence differs between PTPs receiving full‐length recombinant FVIII (FL‐rFVIII) and B‐domain deleted recombinant FVIII (BDD‐rFVIII). Methods: Prospective studies with data on inhibitors in PTPs receiving FL‐rFVIII or BDD‐rFVIII were sought using systematic methods including bibliographic database searches. Data were secured from published study reports and inquiries to investigators. Between‐group differences in inhibitor incidence rates were evaluated using mixed effects Cox regression. Results: Twenty‐nine studies with 3012 total PTPs were included. Patients were at risk of de novo inhibitor development for a median of 79 exposure days. A total of 35 de novo inhibitors were observed. The cumulative hazard for all de novo inhibitors was 1.25% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.63–1.88%. The corresponding rate for high‐titer de novo inhibitors [&gt; 5 Bethesda units (BU)] was 0.29% (CI, 0.01–0.57%). Exposure to BDD‐rFVIII was associated with an increased risk of all de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 7.26; CI, 2.12–24.9; P = 0.0016) and of high‐titer de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 10.8; CI, 2.17–53.7; P = 0.0037), compared with FL‐rFVIII. Conclusions: This meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies suggests that recombinant FVIII products may differ in immunogenicity.</description><subject>Antibodies - analysis</subject><subject>blood coagulation factor inhibitors</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>factor VIII</subject><subject>Factor VIII - genetics</subject><subject>Factor VIII - immunology</subject><subject>Factor VIII - therapeutic use</subject><subject>hemophilia</subject><subject>hemophilia A</subject><subject>Hemophilia A - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hemophilia A - immunology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunogenetic Phenomena</subject><subject>immunogenicity</subject><subject>incidence</subject><subject>previously treated patients</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins</subject><subject>Sequence Deletion</subject><subject>thromboembolism</subject><issn>1538-7933</issn><issn>1538-7836</issn><issn>1538-7836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM9OGzEQh62qqATaV0C-ccriP7vZ9aGq0qhAqkhcQq-WY4-LI683rL2QXCoegWfsk3S3CTkzlxnJ3_w8-hDClGS0r6t1RgtejcuKTzJGKM1Inpcs235Ao-PDx7dZcH6KzmJcE0JFwcgndMpolVcTQUboz0wF_P3vy6tpauUCNuAhuSZg5RO0OD0AdnXdheY3BKdd2uHG4hZ0U69cUCFhq3RqWvxrPp9_w1NcQ1J9mgrK76KLA71pm7gBndwTYO1dH6M8jqkzDuJndGKVj_Dl0M_R_fWP5ex2vLi7mc-mi7HOCWFjpmlhBQhglDNTVIZbmudG2Ym2JVBR5QXnFkphtSBKC1MQUlplV5ZyMIzwc3S5z-2PeewgJlm7qMF7FaDpohS0IgUrJrwnqz2p-7NjC1ZuWlerdicpkYN8uZaDVzk4loN8-V--3ParF4dPulUN5rj4ZrsHvu6BZ-dh9-5g-XN5O0z8H92Hlvo</recordid><startdate>201111</startdate><enddate>201111</enddate><creator>ALEDORT, L. M.</creator><creator>NAVICKIS, R. J.</creator><creator>WILKES, M. M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201111</creationdate><title>Can B‐domain deletion alter the immunogenicity of recombinant factor VIII? A meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies</title><author>ALEDORT, L. M. ; NAVICKIS, R. J. ; WILKES, M. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4002-2c15f9e9e2132d58d3f144daf6cf7e1984533fe79fc90ac9d5007fafbf13ed203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Antibodies - analysis</topic><topic>blood coagulation factor inhibitors</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>factor VIII</topic><topic>Factor VIII - genetics</topic><topic>Factor VIII - immunology</topic><topic>Factor VIII - therapeutic use</topic><topic>hemophilia</topic><topic>hemophilia A</topic><topic>Hemophilia A - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hemophilia A - immunology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunogenetic Phenomena</topic><topic>immunogenicity</topic><topic>incidence</topic><topic>previously treated patients</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins</topic><topic>Sequence Deletion</topic><topic>thromboembolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ALEDORT, L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVICKIS, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILKES, M. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ALEDORT, L. M.</au><au>NAVICKIS, R. J.</au><au>WILKES, M. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can B‐domain deletion alter the immunogenicity of recombinant factor VIII? A meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis</jtitle><addtitle>J Thromb Haemost</addtitle><date>2011-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2180</spage><epage>2192</epage><pages>2180-2192</pages><issn>1538-7933</issn><issn>1538-7836</issn><eissn>1538-7836</eissn><abstract>See also Iorio A, Marcucci M, Makris M. Concentrate‐related inhibitor risk: is a difference always real? This issue, pp 2176–9. Summary.  Background: As a result of the infrequency of inhibitors in previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A and the small size of available clinical studies, the immunogenicity of factor (F)VIII products has been difficult to assess. Objectives: A meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies was conducted to test the hypothesis that de novo inhibitor incidence differs between PTPs receiving full‐length recombinant FVIII (FL‐rFVIII) and B‐domain deleted recombinant FVIII (BDD‐rFVIII). Methods: Prospective studies with data on inhibitors in PTPs receiving FL‐rFVIII or BDD‐rFVIII were sought using systematic methods including bibliographic database searches. Data were secured from published study reports and inquiries to investigators. Between‐group differences in inhibitor incidence rates were evaluated using mixed effects Cox regression. Results: Twenty‐nine studies with 3012 total PTPs were included. Patients were at risk of de novo inhibitor development for a median of 79 exposure days. A total of 35 de novo inhibitors were observed. The cumulative hazard for all de novo inhibitors was 1.25% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.63–1.88%. The corresponding rate for high‐titer de novo inhibitors [&gt; 5 Bethesda units (BU)] was 0.29% (CI, 0.01–0.57%). Exposure to BDD‐rFVIII was associated with an increased risk of all de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 7.26; CI, 2.12–24.9; P = 0.0016) and of high‐titer de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 10.8; CI, 2.17–53.7; P = 0.0037), compared with FL‐rFVIII. Conclusions: This meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies suggests that recombinant FVIII products may differ in immunogenicity.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21848690</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04472.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1538-7933
ispartof Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis, 2011-11, Vol.9 (11), p.2180-2192
issn 1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_918052563
source Electronic Journals Library
subjects Antibodies - analysis
blood coagulation factor inhibitors
Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Data Collection
factor VIII
Factor VIII - genetics
Factor VIII - immunology
Factor VIII - therapeutic use
hemophilia
hemophilia A
Hemophilia A - drug therapy
Hemophilia A - immunology
Humans
Immunogenetic Phenomena
immunogenicity
incidence
previously treated patients
Recombinant Proteins
Sequence Deletion
thromboembolism
title Can B‐domain deletion alter the immunogenicity of recombinant factor VIII? A meta‐analysis of prospective clinical studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A42%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20B%E2%80%90domain%20deletion%20alter%20the%20immunogenicity%20of%20recombinant%20factor%20VIII?%20A%20meta%E2%80%90analysis%20of%20prospective%20clinical%20studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thrombosis%20and%20haemostasis&rft.au=ALEDORT,%20L.%20M.&rft.date=2011-11&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2180&rft.epage=2192&rft.pages=2180-2192&rft.issn=1538-7933&rft.eissn=1538-7836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04472.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E918052563%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4002-2c15f9e9e2132d58d3f144daf6cf7e1984533fe79fc90ac9d5007fafbf13ed203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=918052563&rft_id=info:pmid/21848690&rfr_iscdi=true