SEXUAL CONFLICT AND ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION ACROSS WATER STRIDER POPULATIONS

Microevolutionary studies have demonstrated sexually antagonistic selection on sexual traits, and existing evidence supports a macroevolutionary pattern of sexually antagonistic coevolution. Two current questions are how antagonistic selection withinpopulations scales to divergence among populations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evolution 2012-02, Vol.66 (2), p.544-557
Main Authors: Perry, Jennifer C., Rowe, Locke
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal reproduction
Animals
Biological Evolution
Biological variation
Body Size
Canada
Causal covariation
Coevolution
Comparative studies
Evolution
Female
Female animals
Genitalia
Gerris incognitus
Heteroptera - anatomy & histology
Heteroptera - genetics
Heteroptera - physiology
Insects
intraspecific comparative study
Male
Male animals
Mating behavior
Morphology
Personality traits
Sexual Behavior, Animal
Sexual selection
sexual size dimorphism
sexually antagonistic coevolution
sexually antagonistic trait
water striders
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Microevolutionary studies have demonstrated sexually antagonistic selection on sexual traits, and existing evidence supports a macroevolutionary pattern of sexually antagonistic coevolution. Two current questions are how antagonistic selection withinpopulations scales to divergence among populations, and to what extent intraspecific divergence matches species-level patterns. To address these questions, we conducted an intraspecific comparative study of sexual armaments and mating behaviors in a water strider (Gerris incognitus) in which male genitals grasp resistant females and female abdominal structures help ward off males. The degree of exaggeration of these armaments coevolves across species. We found a similar strong pattern of antagonistic coevolution among populations, suggesting that sexual conflict drives population differentiation in morphology. Furthermore, relative exaggeration in armaments was closely related to mating outcomes in a common environment. Interestingly, the effect of armaments on mating was mediated by population sexual size dimorphism. When females had a large size advantage, mating activity was low and independent of armaments, but when males had a relative size advantage, mating activity depended on which sex had relatively exaggerated armaments. Thus, a strong signal of sexually antagonistic coevolution is apparent even among populations. These results open opportunities to understand links between sexual arms races, ecological variation, and reproductive isolation.
ISSN:0014-3820
1558-5646
DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01464.x