Loading…
One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis
. Purpose: To determine the effect of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia on contrast sensitivity (CS) using the Pelli‐Robson and Vector Vision CSV‐1000E CS tests. Methods: A prospective, comparative study was conducted on 36 eye...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2012-02, Vol.90 (1), p.81-85 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53 |
container_end_page | 85 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 81 |
container_title | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Townley, Deirdre Kirwan, Caitriona O'Keefe, Michael |
description | .
Purpose: To determine the effect of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia on contrast sensitivity (CS) using the Pelli‐Robson and Vector Vision CSV‐1000E CS tests.
Methods: A prospective, comparative study was conducted on 36 eyes of 36 patients with myopia undergoing LASIK (18 eyes) and LASEK (18 eyes). Surgery was performed using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch & Lomb). CS was recorded preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.
Results: No statistically significant difference was found in LogMAR uncorrected visual acuity post‐LASIK (−0.02 ± 0.16) and LASEK (−0.04 ± 0.14). Using the Pelli‐Robson, CS was significantly lower in the LASIK group 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No significant postoperative reduction in CS was observed in either treatment group. Using the CSV‐1000E test, CS was significantly reduced post‐LASIK at 3 (p = 0.05) and 6 (p = 0.05) cycles/degree under photopic conditions. No significant postoperative change occurred in the LASEK group under photopic or scotopic conditions. There was no significant difference in postoperative CS between the LASIK and LASEK groups at 3, 6, 12 or 18 cycles/degree using the CSV‐1000E test.
Conclusion: One year postoperatively, there was no difference in CS between both treatment groups using the Pelli‐Robson and CSV‐1000E tests. CS was reduced postoperatively in the LASIK group at the lower spatial frequencies under photopic conditions. No postoperative change was detected in CS following LASIK or LASEK using the Pelli‐Robson test. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01822.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919225141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>919225141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EoqXwF5BvnHaxveuPHDhUEQ1IbXOgEhUXy9mdBaeOHWxvm1z55XhJiMQNXzzSPM-M_BohTElNy3m_rqnkvGqkUDUjZFYTqhird8_Q-anx_FTz-zP0KqU1IYIK0b5EZ8WRhMnZOfq19ID3YCIegnPhqRq3OAy4Cz5HkzJO4JPN9tHm_ZGw_vvUfgSfbfDGYWcSRGw9LuCIHyCaHDbWwZhswsb3RwC2Nv8AZ4vxL_MavRiMS_DmeF-gu6uPd_NP1fVy8Xl-eV11LResEh1te7aSfMVl17RtJ1smFQyKN4ZzIszQNg1TSpmVUJL0TDRKcdr1IHsJvLlA7w5jtzH8HCFlvbGpA-eMhzAmPaMzxjhtaSHVgexiSCnCoLfRbkzca0r0lL9e6ylaPcWsp_z1n_z1rqhvj0vG1Qb6k_g38AJ8OABP5fX7_x6sL5dfpqr41cG3KcPu5Jv4oIUsX62_3i70t5sFJfObe33b_AYNXqZJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>919225141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Townley, Deirdre ; Kirwan, Caitriona ; O'Keefe, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Townley, Deirdre ; Kirwan, Caitriona ; O'Keefe, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>.
Purpose: To determine the effect of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia on contrast sensitivity (CS) using the Pelli‐Robson and Vector Vision CSV‐1000E CS tests.
Methods: A prospective, comparative study was conducted on 36 eyes of 36 patients with myopia undergoing LASIK (18 eyes) and LASEK (18 eyes). Surgery was performed using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch & Lomb). CS was recorded preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.
Results: No statistically significant difference was found in LogMAR uncorrected visual acuity post‐LASIK (−0.02 ± 0.16) and LASEK (−0.04 ± 0.14). Using the Pelli‐Robson, CS was significantly lower in the LASIK group 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No significant postoperative reduction in CS was observed in either treatment group. Using the CSV‐1000E test, CS was significantly reduced post‐LASIK at 3 (p = 0.05) and 6 (p = 0.05) cycles/degree under photopic conditions. No significant postoperative change occurred in the LASEK group under photopic or scotopic conditions. There was no significant difference in postoperative CS between the LASIK and LASEK groups at 3, 6, 12 or 18 cycles/degree using the CSV‐1000E test.
Conclusion: One year postoperatively, there was no difference in CS between both treatment groups using the Pelli‐Robson and CSV‐1000E tests. CS was reduced postoperatively in the LASIK group at the lower spatial frequencies under photopic conditions. No postoperative change was detected in CS following LASIK or LASEK using the Pelli‐Robson test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-375X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01822.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20070279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aberrometry ; Adult ; contrast ; Contrast Sensitivity - physiology ; Corneal Stroma - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted ; Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ ; LASEK ; Lasers, Excimer - therapeutic use ; LASIK ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myopia - physiopathology ; Myopia - surgery ; photopic ; Prospective Studies ; scotopic ; Surgical Flaps ; Visual Acuity - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2012-02, Vol.90 (1), p.81-85</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Acta Ophthalmol</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Acta Ophthalmol.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20070279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Townley, Deirdre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirwan, Caitriona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keefe, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis</title><title>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>.
Purpose: To determine the effect of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia on contrast sensitivity (CS) using the Pelli‐Robson and Vector Vision CSV‐1000E CS tests.
Methods: A prospective, comparative study was conducted on 36 eyes of 36 patients with myopia undergoing LASIK (18 eyes) and LASEK (18 eyes). Surgery was performed using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch & Lomb). CS was recorded preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.
Results: No statistically significant difference was found in LogMAR uncorrected visual acuity post‐LASIK (−0.02 ± 0.16) and LASEK (−0.04 ± 0.14). Using the Pelli‐Robson, CS was significantly lower in the LASIK group 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No significant postoperative reduction in CS was observed in either treatment group. Using the CSV‐1000E test, CS was significantly reduced post‐LASIK at 3 (p = 0.05) and 6 (p = 0.05) cycles/degree under photopic conditions. No significant postoperative change occurred in the LASEK group under photopic or scotopic conditions. There was no significant difference in postoperative CS between the LASIK and LASEK groups at 3, 6, 12 or 18 cycles/degree using the CSV‐1000E test.
Conclusion: One year postoperatively, there was no difference in CS between both treatment groups using the Pelli‐Robson and CSV‐1000E tests. CS was reduced postoperatively in the LASIK group at the lower spatial frequencies under photopic conditions. No postoperative change was detected in CS following LASIK or LASEK using the Pelli‐Robson test.</description><subject>Aberrometry</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>contrast</subject><subject>Contrast Sensitivity - physiology</subject><subject>Corneal Stroma - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted</subject><subject>Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ</subject><subject>LASEK</subject><subject>Lasers, Excimer - therapeutic use</subject><subject>LASIK</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myopia - surgery</subject><subject>photopic</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>scotopic</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1755-375X</issn><issn>1755-3768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EoqXwF5BvnHaxveuPHDhUEQ1IbXOgEhUXy9mdBaeOHWxvm1z55XhJiMQNXzzSPM-M_BohTElNy3m_rqnkvGqkUDUjZFYTqhird8_Q-anx_FTz-zP0KqU1IYIK0b5EZ8WRhMnZOfq19ID3YCIegnPhqRq3OAy4Cz5HkzJO4JPN9tHm_ZGw_vvUfgSfbfDGYWcSRGw9LuCIHyCaHDbWwZhswsb3RwC2Nv8AZ4vxL_MavRiMS_DmeF-gu6uPd_NP1fVy8Xl-eV11LResEh1te7aSfMVl17RtJ1smFQyKN4ZzIszQNg1TSpmVUJL0TDRKcdr1IHsJvLlA7w5jtzH8HCFlvbGpA-eMhzAmPaMzxjhtaSHVgexiSCnCoLfRbkzca0r0lL9e6ylaPcWsp_z1n_z1rqhvj0vG1Qb6k_g38AJ8OABP5fX7_x6sL5dfpqr41cG3KcPu5Jv4oIUsX62_3i70t5sFJfObe33b_AYNXqZJ</recordid><startdate>201202</startdate><enddate>201202</enddate><creator>Townley, Deirdre</creator><creator>Kirwan, Caitriona</creator><creator>O'Keefe, Michael</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201202</creationdate><title>One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis</title><author>Townley, Deirdre ; Kirwan, Caitriona ; O'Keefe, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aberrometry</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>contrast</topic><topic>Contrast Sensitivity - physiology</topic><topic>Corneal Stroma - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted</topic><topic>Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ</topic><topic>LASEK</topic><topic>Lasers, Excimer - therapeutic use</topic><topic>LASIK</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myopia - surgery</topic><topic>photopic</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>scotopic</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Townley, Deirdre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirwan, Caitriona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keefe, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Townley, Deirdre</au><au>Kirwan, Caitriona</au><au>O'Keefe, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis</atitle><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2012-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>81-85</pages><issn>1755-375X</issn><eissn>1755-3768</eissn><abstract>.
Purpose: To determine the effect of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia on contrast sensitivity (CS) using the Pelli‐Robson and Vector Vision CSV‐1000E CS tests.
Methods: A prospective, comparative study was conducted on 36 eyes of 36 patients with myopia undergoing LASIK (18 eyes) and LASEK (18 eyes). Surgery was performed using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch & Lomb). CS was recorded preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.
Results: No statistically significant difference was found in LogMAR uncorrected visual acuity post‐LASIK (−0.02 ± 0.16) and LASEK (−0.04 ± 0.14). Using the Pelli‐Robson, CS was significantly lower in the LASIK group 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No significant postoperative reduction in CS was observed in either treatment group. Using the CSV‐1000E test, CS was significantly reduced post‐LASIK at 3 (p = 0.05) and 6 (p = 0.05) cycles/degree under photopic conditions. No significant postoperative change occurred in the LASEK group under photopic or scotopic conditions. There was no significant difference in postoperative CS between the LASIK and LASEK groups at 3, 6, 12 or 18 cycles/degree using the CSV‐1000E test.
Conclusion: One year postoperatively, there was no difference in CS between both treatment groups using the Pelli‐Robson and CSV‐1000E tests. CS was reduced postoperatively in the LASIK group at the lower spatial frequencies under photopic conditions. No postoperative change was detected in CS following LASIK or LASEK using the Pelli‐Robson test.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20070279</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01822.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1755-375X |
ispartof | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2012-02, Vol.90 (1), p.81-85 |
issn | 1755-375X 1755-3768 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919225141 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Aberrometry Adult contrast Contrast Sensitivity - physiology Corneal Stroma - surgery Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ LASEK Lasers, Excimer - therapeutic use LASIK Male Middle Aged Myopia - physiopathology Myopia - surgery photopic Prospective Studies scotopic Surgical Flaps Visual Acuity - physiology Young Adult |
title | One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A36%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20year%20follow-up%20of%20contrast%20sensitivity%20following%20conventional%20laser%20in%20situ%20keratomileusis%20and%20laser%20epithelial%20keratomileusis&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ophthalmologica%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Townley,%20Deirdre&rft.date=2012-02&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=81-85&rft.issn=1755-375X&rft.eissn=1755-3768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01822.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E919225141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=919225141&rft_id=info:pmid/20070279&rfr_iscdi=true |