Loading…

One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis

. Purpose:  To determine the effect of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia on contrast sensitivity (CS) using the Pelli‐Robson and Vector Vision CSV‐1000E CS tests. Methods:  A prospective, comparative study was conducted on 36 eye...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2012-02, Vol.90 (1), p.81-85
Main Authors: Townley, Deirdre, Kirwan, Caitriona, O'Keefe, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53
container_end_page 85
container_issue 1
container_start_page 81
container_title Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)
container_volume 90
creator Townley, Deirdre
Kirwan, Caitriona
O'Keefe, Michael
description . Purpose:  To determine the effect of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia on contrast sensitivity (CS) using the Pelli‐Robson and Vector Vision CSV‐1000E CS tests. Methods:  A prospective, comparative study was conducted on 36 eyes of 36 patients with myopia undergoing LASIK (18 eyes) and LASEK (18 eyes). Surgery was performed using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch & Lomb). CS was recorded preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results:  No statistically significant difference was found in LogMAR uncorrected visual acuity post‐LASIK (−0.02 ± 0.16) and LASEK (−0.04 ± 0.14). Using the Pelli‐Robson, CS was significantly lower in the LASIK group 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No significant postoperative reduction in CS was observed in either treatment group. Using the CSV‐1000E test, CS was significantly reduced post‐LASIK at 3 (p = 0.05) and 6 (p = 0.05) cycles/degree under photopic conditions. No significant postoperative change occurred in the LASEK group under photopic or scotopic conditions. There was no significant difference in postoperative CS between the LASIK and LASEK groups at 3, 6, 12 or 18 cycles/degree using the CSV‐1000E test. Conclusion:  One year postoperatively, there was no difference in CS between both treatment groups using the Pelli‐Robson and CSV‐1000E tests. CS was reduced postoperatively in the LASIK group at the lower spatial frequencies under photopic conditions. No postoperative change was detected in CS following LASIK or LASEK using the Pelli‐Robson test.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01822.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919225141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>919225141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EoqXwF5BvnHaxveuPHDhUEQ1IbXOgEhUXy9mdBaeOHWxvm1z55XhJiMQNXzzSPM-M_BohTElNy3m_rqnkvGqkUDUjZFYTqhird8_Q-anx_FTz-zP0KqU1IYIK0b5EZ8WRhMnZOfq19ID3YCIegnPhqRq3OAy4Cz5HkzJO4JPN9tHm_ZGw_vvUfgSfbfDGYWcSRGw9LuCIHyCaHDbWwZhswsb3RwC2Nv8AZ4vxL_MavRiMS_DmeF-gu6uPd_NP1fVy8Xl-eV11LResEh1te7aSfMVl17RtJ1smFQyKN4ZzIszQNg1TSpmVUJL0TDRKcdr1IHsJvLlA7w5jtzH8HCFlvbGpA-eMhzAmPaMzxjhtaSHVgexiSCnCoLfRbkzca0r0lL9e6ylaPcWsp_z1n_z1rqhvj0vG1Qb6k_g38AJ8OABP5fX7_x6sL5dfpqr41cG3KcPu5Jv4oIUsX62_3i70t5sFJfObe33b_AYNXqZJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>919225141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Townley, Deirdre ; Kirwan, Caitriona ; O'Keefe, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Townley, Deirdre ; Kirwan, Caitriona ; O'Keefe, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>. Purpose:  To determine the effect of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia on contrast sensitivity (CS) using the Pelli‐Robson and Vector Vision CSV‐1000E CS tests. Methods:  A prospective, comparative study was conducted on 36 eyes of 36 patients with myopia undergoing LASIK (18 eyes) and LASEK (18 eyes). Surgery was performed using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch &amp; Lomb). CS was recorded preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results:  No statistically significant difference was found in LogMAR uncorrected visual acuity post‐LASIK (−0.02 ± 0.16) and LASEK (−0.04 ± 0.14). Using the Pelli‐Robson, CS was significantly lower in the LASIK group 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No significant postoperative reduction in CS was observed in either treatment group. Using the CSV‐1000E test, CS was significantly reduced post‐LASIK at 3 (p = 0.05) and 6 (p = 0.05) cycles/degree under photopic conditions. No significant postoperative change occurred in the LASEK group under photopic or scotopic conditions. There was no significant difference in postoperative CS between the LASIK and LASEK groups at 3, 6, 12 or 18 cycles/degree using the CSV‐1000E test. Conclusion:  One year postoperatively, there was no difference in CS between both treatment groups using the Pelli‐Robson and CSV‐1000E tests. CS was reduced postoperatively in the LASIK group at the lower spatial frequencies under photopic conditions. No postoperative change was detected in CS following LASIK or LASEK using the Pelli‐Robson test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-375X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01822.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20070279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aberrometry ; Adult ; contrast ; Contrast Sensitivity - physiology ; Corneal Stroma - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted ; Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ ; LASEK ; Lasers, Excimer - therapeutic use ; LASIK ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myopia - physiopathology ; Myopia - surgery ; photopic ; Prospective Studies ; scotopic ; Surgical Flaps ; Visual Acuity - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2012-02, Vol.90 (1), p.81-85</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Acta Ophthalmol</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Acta Ophthalmol.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20070279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Townley, Deirdre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirwan, Caitriona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keefe, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis</title><title>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>. Purpose:  To determine the effect of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia on contrast sensitivity (CS) using the Pelli‐Robson and Vector Vision CSV‐1000E CS tests. Methods:  A prospective, comparative study was conducted on 36 eyes of 36 patients with myopia undergoing LASIK (18 eyes) and LASEK (18 eyes). Surgery was performed using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch &amp; Lomb). CS was recorded preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results:  No statistically significant difference was found in LogMAR uncorrected visual acuity post‐LASIK (−0.02 ± 0.16) and LASEK (−0.04 ± 0.14). Using the Pelli‐Robson, CS was significantly lower in the LASIK group 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No significant postoperative reduction in CS was observed in either treatment group. Using the CSV‐1000E test, CS was significantly reduced post‐LASIK at 3 (p = 0.05) and 6 (p = 0.05) cycles/degree under photopic conditions. No significant postoperative change occurred in the LASEK group under photopic or scotopic conditions. There was no significant difference in postoperative CS between the LASIK and LASEK groups at 3, 6, 12 or 18 cycles/degree using the CSV‐1000E test. Conclusion:  One year postoperatively, there was no difference in CS between both treatment groups using the Pelli‐Robson and CSV‐1000E tests. CS was reduced postoperatively in the LASIK group at the lower spatial frequencies under photopic conditions. No postoperative change was detected in CS following LASIK or LASEK using the Pelli‐Robson test.</description><subject>Aberrometry</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>contrast</subject><subject>Contrast Sensitivity - physiology</subject><subject>Corneal Stroma - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted</subject><subject>Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ</subject><subject>LASEK</subject><subject>Lasers, Excimer - therapeutic use</subject><subject>LASIK</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myopia - surgery</subject><subject>photopic</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>scotopic</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1755-375X</issn><issn>1755-3768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EoqXwF5BvnHaxveuPHDhUEQ1IbXOgEhUXy9mdBaeOHWxvm1z55XhJiMQNXzzSPM-M_BohTElNy3m_rqnkvGqkUDUjZFYTqhird8_Q-anx_FTz-zP0KqU1IYIK0b5EZ8WRhMnZOfq19ID3YCIegnPhqRq3OAy4Cz5HkzJO4JPN9tHm_ZGw_vvUfgSfbfDGYWcSRGw9LuCIHyCaHDbWwZhswsb3RwC2Nv8AZ4vxL_MavRiMS_DmeF-gu6uPd_NP1fVy8Xl-eV11LResEh1te7aSfMVl17RtJ1smFQyKN4ZzIszQNg1TSpmVUJL0TDRKcdr1IHsJvLlA7w5jtzH8HCFlvbGpA-eMhzAmPaMzxjhtaSHVgexiSCnCoLfRbkzca0r0lL9e6ylaPcWsp_z1n_z1rqhvj0vG1Qb6k_g38AJ8OABP5fX7_x6sL5dfpqr41cG3KcPu5Jv4oIUsX62_3i70t5sFJfObe33b_AYNXqZJ</recordid><startdate>201202</startdate><enddate>201202</enddate><creator>Townley, Deirdre</creator><creator>Kirwan, Caitriona</creator><creator>O'Keefe, Michael</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201202</creationdate><title>One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis</title><author>Townley, Deirdre ; Kirwan, Caitriona ; O'Keefe, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aberrometry</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>contrast</topic><topic>Contrast Sensitivity - physiology</topic><topic>Corneal Stroma - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted</topic><topic>Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ</topic><topic>LASEK</topic><topic>Lasers, Excimer - therapeutic use</topic><topic>LASIK</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myopia - surgery</topic><topic>photopic</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>scotopic</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Townley, Deirdre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirwan, Caitriona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keefe, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Townley, Deirdre</au><au>Kirwan, Caitriona</au><au>O'Keefe, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis</atitle><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2012-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>81-85</pages><issn>1755-375X</issn><eissn>1755-3768</eissn><abstract>. Purpose:  To determine the effect of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia on contrast sensitivity (CS) using the Pelli‐Robson and Vector Vision CSV‐1000E CS tests. Methods:  A prospective, comparative study was conducted on 36 eyes of 36 patients with myopia undergoing LASIK (18 eyes) and LASEK (18 eyes). Surgery was performed using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch &amp; Lomb). CS was recorded preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results:  No statistically significant difference was found in LogMAR uncorrected visual acuity post‐LASIK (−0.02 ± 0.16) and LASEK (−0.04 ± 0.14). Using the Pelli‐Robson, CS was significantly lower in the LASIK group 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No significant postoperative reduction in CS was observed in either treatment group. Using the CSV‐1000E test, CS was significantly reduced post‐LASIK at 3 (p = 0.05) and 6 (p = 0.05) cycles/degree under photopic conditions. No significant postoperative change occurred in the LASEK group under photopic or scotopic conditions. There was no significant difference in postoperative CS between the LASIK and LASEK groups at 3, 6, 12 or 18 cycles/degree using the CSV‐1000E test. Conclusion:  One year postoperatively, there was no difference in CS between both treatment groups using the Pelli‐Robson and CSV‐1000E tests. CS was reduced postoperatively in the LASIK group at the lower spatial frequencies under photopic conditions. No postoperative change was detected in CS following LASIK or LASEK using the Pelli‐Robson test.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20070279</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01822.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-375X
ispartof Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2012-02, Vol.90 (1), p.81-85
issn 1755-375X
1755-3768
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919225141
source Wiley
subjects Aberrometry
Adult
contrast
Contrast Sensitivity - physiology
Corneal Stroma - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ
LASEK
Lasers, Excimer - therapeutic use
LASIK
Male
Middle Aged
Myopia - physiopathology
Myopia - surgery
photopic
Prospective Studies
scotopic
Surgical Flaps
Visual Acuity - physiology
Young Adult
title One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A36%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20year%20follow-up%20of%20contrast%20sensitivity%20following%20conventional%20laser%20in%20situ%20keratomileusis%20and%20laser%20epithelial%20keratomileusis&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ophthalmologica%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Townley,%20Deirdre&rft.date=2012-02&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=81-85&rft.issn=1755-375X&rft.eissn=1755-3768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01822.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E919225141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4562-6c14d2b75b57c344c74278ef853a5506af4332888ab6870d2638851cde7d7e53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=919225141&rft_id=info:pmid/20070279&rfr_iscdi=true