Knowing what engineering and technology teachers need to know: an analysis of pre-service teachers engineering design problems

• Published in: International journal of technology and design education 2011-08, Vol.21 (3), p.307-320
• Main Authors: Fantz, Todd D., De Miranda, Michael A., Siller, Thomas J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Assignments; Comparative Analysis; Design; Design engineering; Education; Educational Change; Educational Strategies; Educational Technology; Engineering; Engineering design; Engineering Education; Engineering schools; Engineering Technology; Learning and Instruction; Mathematical analysis; Optimization; Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Preservice Teacher Education; Science Education; Science Teachers; STEM Education; Students; Teacher education; Teacher Education Curriculum; Teacher Education Programs; Teachers; Teaching Methods; Technological Literacy; Technology Education; Vocational Education Teachers
• ISSN: 0957-7572; 1573-1804
• DOI: 10.1007/s10798-010-9121-9

With the rapid advances in civilization, technological breakthroughs, and a globally growing workforce, there is a strong need for engineers capable of working in the 21st century environment (Galloway, The 21st century engineer: A proposal for engineering education reform. ASCE, Washington DC 2008 ). To help increase the quality and quantity of students choosing to pursue engineering, leaders have called on K-12 education to look for methods of inserting pre-engineering into the K-12 curriculum. Leaders in technology education have responded to the call to develop top quality candidates for engineers by infusing engineering into the technology education curriculum. Teacher preparation programs have used various methods to provide future technology teachers with the required content knowledge in order to effectively teach engineering design within the technology curriculum. One such program uses an ABET accredited engineering curriculum for the content and additional training to strengthen engineering education pedagogy for technology teachers. Students who graduate from this program possess both an engineering degree and technology teaching license. The purpose of this investigation was to ascertain the differences between technology teachers from this program and traditionally trained technology teachers. In particular, how each group incorporates the engineering design process in classroom assignments. Design briefs were gathered from pre-service teachers who graduated from the aforementioned program and compared to design briefs of practicing technology teachers around the United States. The engineering design process was used to develop a rubric to compare the usage of engineering content between the two groups. It was found that students with 4 years of engineering training were more likely to use all steps of the engineering design process. Further examination illustrates that engineering trained technology teachers were significantly more likely to use mathematical and analytical methods to determine optimum solutions. In order for technology education teachers to effectively infuse engineering design into coursework, they need to be familiar and comfortable with the engineering sciences and the design process. With limited engineering design experience, technology teachers are not as likely to use optimization techniques involving mathematical and analytical reasoning. These concepts are critical for engineering students to be successful in colleg