Loading…

Polymer indentation: Numerical analysis and comparison with a spherical cavity model

Three dimensional analyses of indentation of a polymer by a rigid indenter are carried out. The polymer is characterized by a finite strain elastic-viscoplastic constitutive relation and the calculations are carried out with a dynamic finite element program used to simulate quasi-static behavior. Tw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the mechanics and physics of solids 2011-09, Vol.59 (9), p.1669-1684
Main Authors: Tvergaard, V., Needleman, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Three dimensional analyses of indentation of a polymer by a rigid indenter are carried out. The polymer is characterized by a finite strain elastic-viscoplastic constitutive relation and the calculations are carried out with a dynamic finite element program used to simulate quasi-static behavior. Two types of indenter are considered; a conical indenter and a pyramidal indenter. For each indenter type, different values of the sharpness of the indenter are considered and two rates of indentation are analyzed. Significant sink-in is found to occur in all cases considered. The amount of sink-in is found to be smaller for sharper indenters. The calculated values of both the nominal and true hardness do not differ significantly for the two indenter shapes. An expanding spherical cavity model is also considered and the predictions of this model are compared with the finite element results for various indenter shapes and indentation rates. The spherical cavity model is found to give fairly good agreement with the predictions of the finite element analyses for the nominal polymer hardness for both indenter shapes. ► We carry out 3D finite deformation finite element analyses of polymer indentation. ► Results are presented for conical and pyramidal indenters and for two imposed indentation rates. ► The finite element results are compared with the predictions of an expanding spherical cavity model. ► The predictions of the two formulations for the nominal indentation pressure are in fairly good agreement.
ISSN:0022-5096
DOI:10.1016/j.jmps.2011.06.006