Loading…
Conventional and Piecewise Growth Modeling Techniques: Applications and Implications for Investigating Head Start Children’s Early Literacy Learning
This article reviews the mechanics of conventional and piecewise growth models to demonstrate the unique affordances of each technique for examining the nature and predictors of children’s early literacy learning during the transition from preschool through first grade. Using the nationally represen...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Evaluation Review 2011-06, Vol.35 (3), p.204-239 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-7ad51ebb0244165fbbd6e88a020f28cc1d32a696edfe35baa132a0e80102eb563 |
| container_end_page | 239 |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 204 |
| container_title | Evaluation Review |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Hindman, Annemarie H. Cromley, Jennifer G. Skibbe, Lori E. Miller, Alison L. |
| description | This article reviews the mechanics of conventional and piecewise growth models to demonstrate the unique affordances of each technique for examining the nature and predictors of children’s early literacy learning during the transition from preschool through first grade. Using the nationally representative Family and Child Experiences Survey (FACES) data set, 1997 cohort, the authors show how piecewise models revealed discrete contributions of child, family, and classroom experiences to children’s literacy skills within particular years, whereas conventional models, which considered the whole 3-year trajectory of change as a single outcome, revealed fewer of these nuanced contributions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0193841X11412068 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919958832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ939574</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0193841X11412068</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2479292461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-7ad51ebb0244165fbbd6e88a020f28cc1d32a696edfe35baa132a0e80102eb563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LxDAQxYMouq7ePYgUPXiqziTN11GW9YsVPSh4K2k71Uq31WZX8b83dVVEED2F8H5v3jCPsS2EA0StDwGtMAneIibIQZklNkApeSwsV8ts0Mtxr6-xde8fAAAh0atsjaMNdoQBk6O2eaZmVrWNqyPXFNFVRTm9VJ6ik659md1HF21BddXcRdeU3zfV05z8BlspXe1p8-Mdspvj8fXoNJ5cnpyNjiZxniicxdoVEinLgCcJKllmWaHIGAccSm7yHAvBnbKKipKEzJzD8AcyYU1OmVRiyPYXcx-7ts-dpdPK51TXrqF27lOL1kpjBP8XCYjhIH-RxmqRoMHkHyQobRBlIHd_kA_tvAsX7SGlrBFKBGjvNwgtaG2VfA-FBZV3rfcdleljV01d95oipH3p6c_Sg2XnY_A8m1LxZfhsOQDbC4C6Kv-Sx-dWWKn7yHghe3dH35b6Le8NBIC5vg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1907796514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conventional and Piecewise Growth Modeling Techniques: Applications and Implications for Investigating Head Start Children’s Early Literacy Learning</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Hindman, Annemarie H. ; Cromley, Jennifer G. ; Skibbe, Lori E. ; Miller, Alison L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hindman, Annemarie H. ; Cromley, Jennifer G. ; Skibbe, Lori E. ; Miller, Alison L.</creatorcontrib><description>This article reviews the mechanics of conventional and piecewise growth models to demonstrate the unique affordances of each technique for examining the nature and predictors of children’s early literacy learning during the transition from preschool through first grade. Using the nationally representative Family and Child Experiences Survey (FACES) data set, 1997 cohort, the authors show how piecewise models revealed discrete contributions of child, family, and classroom experiences to children’s literacy skills within particular years, whereas conventional models, which considered the whole 3-year trajectory of change as a single outcome, revealed fewer of these nuanced contributions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0193-841X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0193841X11412068</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21917710</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EVREDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Child ; Child Development ; Child Language ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children & youth ; Classrooms ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Disadvantaged Youth ; Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale ; Early Intervention (Education) - statistics & numerical data ; Education ; Educational Measurement ; Educational policy ; Educational research ; Elementary School Students ; Emergent Literacy ; Evaluation research ; Family ; Female ; Grade 1 ; Growth models ; Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Influences ; Kindergarten ; Learning ; Literacy ; Literacy skills ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Models, Statistical ; National Household Education Survey ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Policy analysis ; Poverty ; Predictor Variables ; Preschool Children ; Preschool Education ; Primary education ; Project Head Start ; Reading ; Reading instruction ; Schools ; Skill Development ; Skills ; Statistical Analysis ; Surveys ; Transitions ; U.S.A ; United States ; Woodcock Johnson Psycho Educational Battery</subject><ispartof>Evaluation Review, 2011-06, Vol.35 (3), p.204-239</ispartof><rights>SAGE Publications 2011</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-7ad51ebb0244165fbbd6e88a020f28cc1d32a696edfe35baa132a0e80102eb563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,777,781,789,27846,27903,27905,27906,33204,33205,33756,79113</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ939574$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21917710$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hindman, Annemarie H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cromley, Jennifer G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skibbe, Lori E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Alison L.</creatorcontrib><title>Conventional and Piecewise Growth Modeling Techniques: Applications and Implications for Investigating Head Start Children’s Early Literacy Learning</title><title>Evaluation Review</title><addtitle>Eval Rev</addtitle><description>This article reviews the mechanics of conventional and piecewise growth models to demonstrate the unique affordances of each technique for examining the nature and predictors of children’s early literacy learning during the transition from preschool through first grade. Using the nationally representative Family and Child Experiences Survey (FACES) data set, 1997 cohort, the authors show how piecewise models revealed discrete contributions of child, family, and classroom experiences to children’s literacy skills within particular years, whereas conventional models, which considered the whole 3-year trajectory of change as a single outcome, revealed fewer of these nuanced contributions.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Disadvantaged Youth</subject><subject>Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale</subject><subject>Early Intervention (Education) - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Educational policy</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Emergent Literacy</subject><subject>Evaluation research</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grade 1</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influences</subject><subject>Kindergarten</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Literacy skills</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>National Household Education Survey</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Preschool Education</subject><subject>Primary education</subject><subject>Project Head Start</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading instruction</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Transitions</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Woodcock Johnson Psycho Educational Battery</subject><issn>0193-841X</issn><issn>1552-3926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1LxDAQxYMouq7ePYgUPXiqziTN11GW9YsVPSh4K2k71Uq31WZX8b83dVVEED2F8H5v3jCPsS2EA0StDwGtMAneIibIQZklNkApeSwsV8ts0Mtxr6-xde8fAAAh0atsjaMNdoQBk6O2eaZmVrWNqyPXFNFVRTm9VJ6ik659md1HF21BddXcRdeU3zfV05z8BlspXe1p8-Mdspvj8fXoNJ5cnpyNjiZxniicxdoVEinLgCcJKllmWaHIGAccSm7yHAvBnbKKipKEzJzD8AcyYU1OmVRiyPYXcx-7ts-dpdPK51TXrqF27lOL1kpjBP8XCYjhIH-RxmqRoMHkHyQobRBlIHd_kA_tvAsX7SGlrBFKBGjvNwgtaG2VfA-FBZV3rfcdleljV01d95oipH3p6c_Sg2XnY_A8m1LxZfhsOQDbC4C6Kv-Sx-dWWKn7yHghe3dH35b6Le8NBIC5vg</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Hindman, Annemarie H.</creator><creator>Cromley, Jennifer G.</creator><creator>Skibbe, Lori E.</creator><creator>Miller, Alison L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Conventional and Piecewise Growth Modeling Techniques</title><author>Hindman, Annemarie H. ; Cromley, Jennifer G. ; Skibbe, Lori E. ; Miller, Alison L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-7ad51ebb0244165fbbd6e88a020f28cc1d32a696edfe35baa132a0e80102eb563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Disadvantaged Youth</topic><topic>Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale</topic><topic>Early Intervention (Education) - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Educational policy</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Emergent Literacy</topic><topic>Evaluation research</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grade 1</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influences</topic><topic>Kindergarten</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Literacy skills</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>National Household Education Survey</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Preschool Education</topic><topic>Primary education</topic><topic>Project Head Start</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading instruction</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Transitions</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Woodcock Johnson Psycho Educational Battery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hindman, Annemarie H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cromley, Jennifer G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skibbe, Lori E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Alison L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Evaluation Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hindman, Annemarie H.</au><au>Cromley, Jennifer G.</au><au>Skibbe, Lori E.</au><au>Miller, Alison L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ939574</ericid><atitle>Conventional and Piecewise Growth Modeling Techniques: Applications and Implications for Investigating Head Start Children’s Early Literacy Learning</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation Review</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Rev</addtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>204-239</pages><issn>0193-841X</issn><eissn>1552-3926</eissn><coden>EVREDL</coden><abstract>This article reviews the mechanics of conventional and piecewise growth models to demonstrate the unique affordances of each technique for examining the nature and predictors of children’s early literacy learning during the transition from preschool through first grade. Using the nationally representative Family and Child Experiences Survey (FACES) data set, 1997 cohort, the authors show how piecewise models revealed discrete contributions of child, family, and classroom experiences to children’s literacy skills within particular years, whereas conventional models, which considered the whole 3-year trajectory of change as a single outcome, revealed fewer of these nuanced contributions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21917710</pmid><doi>10.1177/0193841X11412068</doi><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0193-841X |
| ispartof | Evaluation Review, 2011-06, Vol.35 (3), p.204-239 |
| issn | 0193-841X 1552-3926 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_919958832 |
| source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; ERIC; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE |
| subjects | Child Child Development Child Language Child, Preschool Children Children & youth Classrooms Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Disadvantaged Youth Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Early Intervention (Education) - statistics & numerical data Education Educational Measurement Educational policy Educational research Elementary School Students Emergent Literacy Evaluation research Family Female Grade 1 Growth models Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey Health technology assessment Humans Influences Kindergarten Learning Literacy Literacy skills Longitudinal Studies Male Models, Statistical National Household Education Survey Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) Policy analysis Poverty Predictor Variables Preschool Children Preschool Education Primary education Project Head Start Reading Reading instruction Schools Skill Development Skills Statistical Analysis Surveys Transitions U.S.A United States Woodcock Johnson Psycho Educational Battery |
| title | Conventional and Piecewise Growth Modeling Techniques: Applications and Implications for Investigating Head Start Children’s Early Literacy Learning |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A20%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conventional%20and%20Piecewise%20Growth%20Modeling%20Techniques:%20Applications%20and%20Implications%20for%20Investigating%20Head%20Start%20Children%E2%80%99s%20Early%20Literacy%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20Review&rft.au=Hindman,%20Annemarie%20H.&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=204-239&rft.issn=0193-841X&rft.eissn=1552-3926&rft.coden=EVREDL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0193841X11412068&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2479292461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-7ad51ebb0244165fbbd6e88a020f28cc1d32a696edfe35baa132a0e80102eb563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1907796514&rft_id=info:pmid/21917710&rft_ericid=EJ939574&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0193841X11412068&rfr_iscdi=true |