Differentiation between amnestic-mild cognitive impairment and early-stage Alzheimer's disease using the Frontal Assessment Battery test

• Published in: Psychogeriatrics 2011-12, Vol.11 (4), p.235-241
• Main Authors: YAMAO, Ayumi, NAGATA, Tomoyuki, SHINAGAWA, Shunichiro, NUKARIYA, Kazutaka, OCHIAI, Yusuke, KASAHARA, Hiroo, NAKAYAMA, Kazuhiko
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis; Alzheimer's disease; Amnesia - complications; Amnesia - diagnosis; amnestic-mild cognitive impairment (A-MCI); Cognitive ability; Cognitive Dysfunction - complications; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diagnosis, Differential; Executive Function; Female; Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB); Humans; Male; Medical screening; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data; non-memory; Older people; Severity of Illness Index
• ISSN: 1346-3500; 1479-8301
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2011.00377.x

Background:  Previous research has described the executive dysfunction that occurs in patients with amnestic‐mild cognitive impairments (A‐MCI) and early‐stage Alzheimer's disease (EAD), which are comparatively similar stages of dementia. The aim of the present cross‐sectional study is to evaluate executive dysfunction using the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) screening test in two groups and to investigate the interaction with other cognitive impairments. Methods:  Among 170 consecutive patients with Alzheimer's disease or A‐MCI, we recruited 48 subjects who were under 75 years of age and had been diagnosed as having either A‐MCI or EAD. We then compared the total and the subtest scores of the mini‐mental state examination (MMSE) and the FAB between the two groups. Moreover, we investigated the statistical interactive associations of the FAB subtest scores with the influential MMSE subtest scores or the diagnosis (A‐MCI or EAD). Results:  No significant differences in the age, sex ratio, duration of illness, and education years were observed between the two groups. However, significant differences in the FAB total and subtest scores (conflicting instructions and go/no‐go) were found between the two groups. Furthermore, significant differences in the MMSE total and subtest scores (orientation, memory delayed recall, and attention and calculation) were also noted between the two groups. In a generalized linear model analysis, only two FAB subtest scores (conflicting instructions and go/no‐go) were significantly influenced by the diagnosis (A‐MCI or EAD) in a manner that was independent of the interaction with the orientation or memory delayed recall. Conclusion:  The present findings suggest that the FAB total score and subtest scores reflecting interference performances (conflicting instructions and go/no‐go) significantly declined in patients with EAD, independent of the disorientation and memory disorder. Such characteristics of neuropsychological screening test scores may be useful to clinicians for differentiating EAD and A‐MCI at bedside.