Loading…

State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Introduction

Risk-taking is normal in everyday life if there are associated (perceived) benefits. Benefit-Risk Analysis (BRA) compares the risk of a situation to its related benefits and addresses the acceptability of the risk. Over the past years BRA in relation to food and food ingredients has gained attention...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food and chemical toxicology 2012, Vol.50 (1), p.2-4
Main Authors: Verhagen, H., Tijhuis, M.J., Gunnlaugsdόttir, H., Kalogeras, N., Leino, O., Luteijn, J.M., Magnússon, S.H., Odekerken, G., Pohjola, M.V., Tuomisto, J.T., Ueland, Ø., White, B.C., Holm, F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2efbd81d7cf660fc36ca90b17a30a70cd02a81152a6ecc46b7369d2ae0063bc83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2efbd81d7cf660fc36ca90b17a30a70cd02a81152a6ecc46b7369d2ae0063bc83
container_end_page 4
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2
container_title Food and chemical toxicology
container_volume 50
creator Verhagen, H.
Tijhuis, M.J.
Gunnlaugsdόttir, H.
Kalogeras, N.
Leino, O.
Luteijn, J.M.
Magnússon, S.H.
Odekerken, G.
Pohjola, M.V.
Tuomisto, J.T.
Ueland, Ø.
White, B.C.
Holm, F.
description Risk-taking is normal in everyday life if there are associated (perceived) benefits. Benefit-Risk Analysis (BRA) compares the risk of a situation to its related benefits and addresses the acceptability of the risk. Over the past years BRA in relation to food and food ingredients has gained attention. Food, and even the same food ingredient, may confer both beneficial and adverse effects. Measures directed at food safety may lead to suboptimal or insufficient levels of ingredients from a benefit perspective. In BRA, benefits and risks of food (ingredients) are assessed in one go and may conditionally be expressed into one currency. This allows the comparison of adverse and beneficial effects to be qualitative and quantitative. A BRA should help policy-makers to make more informed and balanced benefit-risk management decisions. Not allowing food benefits to occur in order to guarantee food safety is a risk management decision much the same as accepting some risk in order to achieve more benefits. BRA in food and nutrition is making progress, but difficulties remain. The field may benefit from looking across its borders to learn from other research areas. The BEPRARIBEAN project (Best Practices for Risk-Benefit Analysis: experience from out of food into food; http://en.opasnet.org/w/Bepraribean) aims to do so, by working together with Medicines, Food Microbiology, Environmental Health, Economics & Marketing-Finance and Consumer Perception. All perspectives are reviewed and subsequently integrated to identify opportunities for further development of BRA for food and food ingredients. Interesting issues that emerge are the varying degrees of risk that are deemed acceptable within the areas and the trend towards more open and participatory BRA processes. A set of 6 ‘state of the art’ papers covering the above areas and a paper integrating the separate (re)views are published in this volume.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920792500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278691511002511</els_id><sourcerecordid>920792500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2efbd81d7cf660fc36ca90b17a30a70cd02a81152a6ecc46b7369d2ae0063bc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOxDAQRS0EguXxATSQjiphxiF2AhVCvCQkimVry3HG4GU3AduLRMc_8Id8CV4tUFJNc-69o8PYPkKBgOJ4WlgTCw6IBYgCQK6xEdayzEVZ4TobAZd1Lhqstth2CFNIBEqxybY4CtnIsh6xZhx1pGywWXyiTPuYuT5rqSfr4tfHp3fhOdO9nr0HF06z2z76oVuY6IZ-l21YPQu093N32OTq8uHiJr-7v769OL_LzQnUMedk267GThorBFhTCqMbaFHqErQE0wHXNWLFtSBjTkQrS9F0XBOAKFtTlzvsaNX74ofXBYWo5i4Yms10T8MiqIaDbHgFkEhckcYPIXiy6sW7ufbvCkEthampSsLUUpgCoZKOlDn4aV-0c-r-Er-GEnC4AqwelH5MQtRknBrSICab1ZI4WxGULLw58ioYR72hznlKc93g_nngG9eUhOo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>920792500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Introduction</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Verhagen, H. ; Tijhuis, M.J. ; Gunnlaugsdόttir, H. ; Kalogeras, N. ; Leino, O. ; Luteijn, J.M. ; Magnússon, S.H. ; Odekerken, G. ; Pohjola, M.V. ; Tuomisto, J.T. ; Ueland, Ø. ; White, B.C. ; Holm, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Verhagen, H. ; Tijhuis, M.J. ; Gunnlaugsdόttir, H. ; Kalogeras, N. ; Leino, O. ; Luteijn, J.M. ; Magnússon, S.H. ; Odekerken, G. ; Pohjola, M.V. ; Tuomisto, J.T. ; Ueland, Ø. ; White, B.C. ; Holm, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Risk-taking is normal in everyday life if there are associated (perceived) benefits. Benefit-Risk Analysis (BRA) compares the risk of a situation to its related benefits and addresses the acceptability of the risk. Over the past years BRA in relation to food and food ingredients has gained attention. Food, and even the same food ingredient, may confer both beneficial and adverse effects. Measures directed at food safety may lead to suboptimal or insufficient levels of ingredients from a benefit perspective. In BRA, benefits and risks of food (ingredients) are assessed in one go and may conditionally be expressed into one currency. This allows the comparison of adverse and beneficial effects to be qualitative and quantitative. A BRA should help policy-makers to make more informed and balanced benefit-risk management decisions. Not allowing food benefits to occur in order to guarantee food safety is a risk management decision much the same as accepting some risk in order to achieve more benefits. BRA in food and nutrition is making progress, but difficulties remain. The field may benefit from looking across its borders to learn from other research areas. The BEPRARIBEAN project (Best Practices for Risk-Benefit Analysis: experience from out of food into food; http://en.opasnet.org/w/Bepraribean) aims to do so, by working together with Medicines, Food Microbiology, Environmental Health, Economics &amp; Marketing-Finance and Consumer Perception. All perspectives are reviewed and subsequently integrated to identify opportunities for further development of BRA for food and food ingredients. Interesting issues that emerge are the varying degrees of risk that are deemed acceptable within the areas and the trend towards more open and participatory BRA processes. A set of 6 ‘state of the art’ papers covering the above areas and a paper integrating the separate (re)views are published in this volume.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6915</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21679738</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>adverse effects ; Benefit-risk ; BEPRARIBEAN ; Best practice ; consumer attitudes ; environmental health ; Food ; food microbiology ; food safety ; ingredients ; nutrition ; Policy Making ; risk ; Risk Assessment ; risk management ; risk-benefit analysis ; toxicology</subject><ispartof>Food and chemical toxicology, 2012, Vol.50 (1), p.2-4</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2efbd81d7cf660fc36ca90b17a30a70cd02a81152a6ecc46b7369d2ae0063bc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2efbd81d7cf660fc36ca90b17a30a70cd02a81152a6ecc46b7369d2ae0063bc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21679738$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verhagen, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tijhuis, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunnlaugsdόttir, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalogeras, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leino, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luteijn, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnússon, S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odekerken, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pohjola, M.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuomisto, J.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueland, Ø.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, B.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holm, F.</creatorcontrib><title>State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Introduction</title><title>Food and chemical toxicology</title><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><description>Risk-taking is normal in everyday life if there are associated (perceived) benefits. Benefit-Risk Analysis (BRA) compares the risk of a situation to its related benefits and addresses the acceptability of the risk. Over the past years BRA in relation to food and food ingredients has gained attention. Food, and even the same food ingredient, may confer both beneficial and adverse effects. Measures directed at food safety may lead to suboptimal or insufficient levels of ingredients from a benefit perspective. In BRA, benefits and risks of food (ingredients) are assessed in one go and may conditionally be expressed into one currency. This allows the comparison of adverse and beneficial effects to be qualitative and quantitative. A BRA should help policy-makers to make more informed and balanced benefit-risk management decisions. Not allowing food benefits to occur in order to guarantee food safety is a risk management decision much the same as accepting some risk in order to achieve more benefits. BRA in food and nutrition is making progress, but difficulties remain. The field may benefit from looking across its borders to learn from other research areas. The BEPRARIBEAN project (Best Practices for Risk-Benefit Analysis: experience from out of food into food; http://en.opasnet.org/w/Bepraribean) aims to do so, by working together with Medicines, Food Microbiology, Environmental Health, Economics &amp; Marketing-Finance and Consumer Perception. All perspectives are reviewed and subsequently integrated to identify opportunities for further development of BRA for food and food ingredients. Interesting issues that emerge are the varying degrees of risk that are deemed acceptable within the areas and the trend towards more open and participatory BRA processes. A set of 6 ‘state of the art’ papers covering the above areas and a paper integrating the separate (re)views are published in this volume.</description><subject>adverse effects</subject><subject>Benefit-risk</subject><subject>BEPRARIBEAN</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>consumer attitudes</subject><subject>environmental health</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>food microbiology</subject><subject>food safety</subject><subject>ingredients</subject><subject>nutrition</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>risk management</subject><subject>risk-benefit analysis</subject><subject>toxicology</subject><issn>0278-6915</issn><issn>1873-6351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLtOxDAQRS0EguXxATSQjiphxiF2AhVCvCQkimVry3HG4GU3AduLRMc_8Id8CV4tUFJNc-69o8PYPkKBgOJ4WlgTCw6IBYgCQK6xEdayzEVZ4TobAZd1Lhqstth2CFNIBEqxybY4CtnIsh6xZhx1pGywWXyiTPuYuT5rqSfr4tfHp3fhOdO9nr0HF06z2z76oVuY6IZ-l21YPQu093N32OTq8uHiJr-7v769OL_LzQnUMedk267GThorBFhTCqMbaFHqErQE0wHXNWLFtSBjTkQrS9F0XBOAKFtTlzvsaNX74ofXBYWo5i4Yms10T8MiqIaDbHgFkEhckcYPIXiy6sW7ufbvCkEthampSsLUUpgCoZKOlDn4aV-0c-r-Er-GEnC4AqwelH5MQtRknBrSICab1ZI4WxGULLw58ioYR72hznlKc93g_nngG9eUhOo</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Verhagen, H.</creator><creator>Tijhuis, M.J.</creator><creator>Gunnlaugsdόttir, H.</creator><creator>Kalogeras, N.</creator><creator>Leino, O.</creator><creator>Luteijn, J.M.</creator><creator>Magnússon, S.H.</creator><creator>Odekerken, G.</creator><creator>Pohjola, M.V.</creator><creator>Tuomisto, J.T.</creator><creator>Ueland, Ø.</creator><creator>White, B.C.</creator><creator>Holm, F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Introduction</title><author>Verhagen, H. ; Tijhuis, M.J. ; Gunnlaugsdόttir, H. ; Kalogeras, N. ; Leino, O. ; Luteijn, J.M. ; Magnússon, S.H. ; Odekerken, G. ; Pohjola, M.V. ; Tuomisto, J.T. ; Ueland, Ø. ; White, B.C. ; Holm, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2efbd81d7cf660fc36ca90b17a30a70cd02a81152a6ecc46b7369d2ae0063bc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>adverse effects</topic><topic>Benefit-risk</topic><topic>BEPRARIBEAN</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>consumer attitudes</topic><topic>environmental health</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>food microbiology</topic><topic>food safety</topic><topic>ingredients</topic><topic>nutrition</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>risk management</topic><topic>risk-benefit analysis</topic><topic>toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verhagen, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tijhuis, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunnlaugsdόttir, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalogeras, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leino, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luteijn, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnússon, S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odekerken, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pohjola, M.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuomisto, J.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueland, Ø.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, B.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holm, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verhagen, H.</au><au>Tijhuis, M.J.</au><au>Gunnlaugsdόttir, H.</au><au>Kalogeras, N.</au><au>Leino, O.</au><au>Luteijn, J.M.</au><au>Magnússon, S.H.</au><au>Odekerken, G.</au><au>Pohjola, M.V.</au><au>Tuomisto, J.T.</au><au>Ueland, Ø.</au><au>White, B.C.</au><au>Holm, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Introduction</atitle><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>2-4</pages><issn>0278-6915</issn><eissn>1873-6351</eissn><abstract>Risk-taking is normal in everyday life if there are associated (perceived) benefits. Benefit-Risk Analysis (BRA) compares the risk of a situation to its related benefits and addresses the acceptability of the risk. Over the past years BRA in relation to food and food ingredients has gained attention. Food, and even the same food ingredient, may confer both beneficial and adverse effects. Measures directed at food safety may lead to suboptimal or insufficient levels of ingredients from a benefit perspective. In BRA, benefits and risks of food (ingredients) are assessed in one go and may conditionally be expressed into one currency. This allows the comparison of adverse and beneficial effects to be qualitative and quantitative. A BRA should help policy-makers to make more informed and balanced benefit-risk management decisions. Not allowing food benefits to occur in order to guarantee food safety is a risk management decision much the same as accepting some risk in order to achieve more benefits. BRA in food and nutrition is making progress, but difficulties remain. The field may benefit from looking across its borders to learn from other research areas. The BEPRARIBEAN project (Best Practices for Risk-Benefit Analysis: experience from out of food into food; http://en.opasnet.org/w/Bepraribean) aims to do so, by working together with Medicines, Food Microbiology, Environmental Health, Economics &amp; Marketing-Finance and Consumer Perception. All perspectives are reviewed and subsequently integrated to identify opportunities for further development of BRA for food and food ingredients. Interesting issues that emerge are the varying degrees of risk that are deemed acceptable within the areas and the trend towards more open and participatory BRA processes. A set of 6 ‘state of the art’ papers covering the above areas and a paper integrating the separate (re)views are published in this volume.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21679738</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.007</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-6915
ispartof Food and chemical toxicology, 2012, Vol.50 (1), p.2-4
issn 0278-6915
1873-6351
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920792500
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects adverse effects
Benefit-risk
BEPRARIBEAN
Best practice
consumer attitudes
environmental health
Food
food microbiology
food safety
ingredients
nutrition
Policy Making
risk
Risk Assessment
risk management
risk-benefit analysis
toxicology
title State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Introduction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A16%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%20of%20the%20art%20in%20benefit%E2%80%93risk%20analysis:%20Introduction&rft.jtitle=Food%20and%20chemical%20toxicology&rft.au=Verhagen,%20H.&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=2-4&rft.issn=0278-6915&rft.eissn=1873-6351&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E920792500%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2efbd81d7cf660fc36ca90b17a30a70cd02a81152a6ecc46b7369d2ae0063bc83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=920792500&rft_id=info:pmid/21679738&rfr_iscdi=true