Loading…
Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation
Objectives: To test the fracture load of zirconia abutments with different types of implant–abutment connections after chewing simulation and to compare their bending moments to internally connected identical titanium abutments. Materials and methods: Forty‐eight identical customized zirconia abutme...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Clinical oral implants research 2012-01, Vol.23 (1), p.12-18 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-a06ec1c654382212090e39da3f4d38c0940d65aafdf0112b067303b4eb3dd4103 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-a06ec1c654382212090e39da3f4d38c0940d65aafdf0112b067303b4eb3dd4103 |
| container_end_page | 18 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 12 |
| container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Truninger, Thomas C. Stawarczyk, Bogna Leutert, Christian R. Sailer, Thomas R. Hämmerle, Christoph H.F. Sailer, Irena |
| description | Objectives: To test the fracture load of zirconia abutments with different types of implant–abutment connections after chewing simulation and to compare their bending moments to internally connected identical titanium abutments.
Materials and methods: Forty‐eight identical customized zirconia abutments with different implant–abutment connections were fabricated for four different test groups: one‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (BL; Straumann Bonelevel), two‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (RS; Nobel Biocare Replace Select), external implant–abutment connection (B; Brånemark MK III), two‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (SP; Straumann Standard Plus). Twelve titanium abutments with one‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (T; Straumann Bonelevel) served as control group. After aging by means of thermocycling (5–50°C, 120 s) and chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles, 49 N load, 1.67 Hz), static load was applied at a 30° angle to the palatal surface until failure. Bending moments were calculated for comparison of the groups. Data were analyzed descriptively and by performing the Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni correction.
Results: The mean bending moments of the abutments were 714.1 ± 184.9 N cm (T), 331.7 ± 57.8 N cm (BL), 429.7 ± 62.8 N cm (RS), 285.8 ± 64.4 N cm (B) and 379.9 ± 59.1 N cm (SP). The bending moments of control group T were significantly higher than those of all other groups. The values of group RS were significantly higher than those of group B but within the value range of groups SP and BL.
Conclusion: The bending moments of the different tested types of zirconia abutments vary with different implant–abutment connections after chewing simulation. The use of a secondary metallic component might have a beneficial influence on the stability of zirconia abutments.
To cite this article:
Truninger TC, Stawarczyk B, Leutert CR, Sailer TR, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant–abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 12–18.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02141.x |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02141.x |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920802359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>912271833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-a06ec1c654382212090e39da3f4d38c0940d65aafdf0112b067303b4eb3dd4103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcGO0zAQhi0EYsvCKyDfOKXM2EmaHDhAgQVUFQmB9mg5trPrkjgldtQu78A7Y2-6vYIvnrG_f2bsnxCKsMS4Xu-WWAJkUAAuGcRTYJjj8viILM4Xj8kCaiiyFZZ4QZ55vwOAsq7qp-Qi0jkvERbkzzvjtHU3tB9644KnQ0t_21ENzkoqnabBBuns1FPZTGFGDjbcUuuCGZ3s7iFzPCW233fShewBprGQMyrYwXkq20hReZPaJZW6NYcUe9tPnUzMc_KklZ03L077Jfnx8cP39ads8_Xq8_rtJlM5rzCTUBqFqixixhiy-E7Day15m2teKahz0GUhZatbQGQNlCsOvMlNw7XOEfgleTXX3Y_Dr8n4IHrrleni7GaYvKgZVMB4Uf-bRMZWWHEeyWom1Th4P5pW7Efby_FOIIjkmtiJZI5I5ojkmrh3TRyj9OWpydT0Rp-FDzZF4M0MHGxn7v67sFhvvqUo6rNZb30wx7Nejj9F_JpVIa63V2J7vV3nX97XouJ_AWbftu4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>912271833</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Truninger, Thomas C. ; Stawarczyk, Bogna ; Leutert, Christian R. ; Sailer, Thomas R. ; Hämmerle, Christoph H.F. ; Sailer, Irena</creator><creatorcontrib>Truninger, Thomas C. ; Stawarczyk, Bogna ; Leutert, Christian R. ; Sailer, Thomas R. ; Hämmerle, Christoph H.F. ; Sailer, Irena</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To test the fracture load of zirconia abutments with different types of implant–abutment connections after chewing simulation and to compare their bending moments to internally connected identical titanium abutments.
Materials and methods: Forty‐eight identical customized zirconia abutments with different implant–abutment connections were fabricated for four different test groups: one‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (BL; Straumann Bonelevel), two‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (RS; Nobel Biocare Replace Select), external implant–abutment connection (B; Brånemark MK III), two‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (SP; Straumann Standard Plus). Twelve titanium abutments with one‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (T; Straumann Bonelevel) served as control group. After aging by means of thermocycling (5–50°C, 120 s) and chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles, 49 N load, 1.67 Hz), static load was applied at a 30° angle to the palatal surface until failure. Bending moments were calculated for comparison of the groups. Data were analyzed descriptively and by performing the Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni correction.
Results: The mean bending moments of the abutments were 714.1 ± 184.9 N cm (T), 331.7 ± 57.8 N cm (BL), 429.7 ± 62.8 N cm (RS), 285.8 ± 64.4 N cm (B) and 379.9 ± 59.1 N cm (SP). The bending moments of control group T were significantly higher than those of all other groups. The values of group RS were significantly higher than those of group B but within the value range of groups SP and BL.
Conclusion: The bending moments of the different tested types of zirconia abutments vary with different implant–abutment connections after chewing simulation. The use of a secondary metallic component might have a beneficial influence on the stability of zirconia abutments.
To cite this article:
Truninger TC, Stawarczyk B, Leutert CR, Sailer TR, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant–abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 12–18.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02141.x</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02141.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21443610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aging ; bending moment ; chewing simulation ; Dental Abutments ; Dental Implant-Abutment Design ; dental implants ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; implant abutments ; implant-abutment connection ; Mastication - physiology ; Materials Testing ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Stress, Mechanical ; thermocycling ; Titanium - chemistry ; zirconia abutments ; Zirconium - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2012-01, Vol.23 (1), p.12-18</ispartof><rights>2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><rights>2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-a06ec1c654382212090e39da3f4d38c0940d65aafdf0112b067303b4eb3dd4103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-a06ec1c654382212090e39da3f4d38c0940d65aafdf0112b067303b4eb3dd4103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21443610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Truninger, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stawarczyk, Bogna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leutert, Christian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sailer, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hämmerle, Christoph H.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sailer, Irena</creatorcontrib><title>Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Objectives: To test the fracture load of zirconia abutments with different types of implant–abutment connections after chewing simulation and to compare their bending moments to internally connected identical titanium abutments.
Materials and methods: Forty‐eight identical customized zirconia abutments with different implant–abutment connections were fabricated for four different test groups: one‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (BL; Straumann Bonelevel), two‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (RS; Nobel Biocare Replace Select), external implant–abutment connection (B; Brånemark MK III), two‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (SP; Straumann Standard Plus). Twelve titanium abutments with one‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (T; Straumann Bonelevel) served as control group. After aging by means of thermocycling (5–50°C, 120 s) and chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles, 49 N load, 1.67 Hz), static load was applied at a 30° angle to the palatal surface until failure. Bending moments were calculated for comparison of the groups. Data were analyzed descriptively and by performing the Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni correction.
Results: The mean bending moments of the abutments were 714.1 ± 184.9 N cm (T), 331.7 ± 57.8 N cm (BL), 429.7 ± 62.8 N cm (RS), 285.8 ± 64.4 N cm (B) and 379.9 ± 59.1 N cm (SP). The bending moments of control group T were significantly higher than those of all other groups. The values of group RS were significantly higher than those of group B but within the value range of groups SP and BL.
Conclusion: The bending moments of the different tested types of zirconia abutments vary with different implant–abutment connections after chewing simulation. The use of a secondary metallic component might have a beneficial influence on the stability of zirconia abutments.
To cite this article:
Truninger TC, Stawarczyk B, Leutert CR, Sailer TR, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant–abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 12–18.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02141.x</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>bending moment</subject><subject>chewing simulation</subject><subject>Dental Abutments</subject><subject>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</subject><subject>dental implants</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>implant abutments</subject><subject>implant-abutment connection</subject><subject>Mastication - physiology</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>thermocycling</subject><subject>Titanium - chemistry</subject><subject>zirconia abutments</subject><subject>Zirconium - chemistry</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcGO0zAQhi0EYsvCKyDfOKXM2EmaHDhAgQVUFQmB9mg5trPrkjgldtQu78A7Y2-6vYIvnrG_f2bsnxCKsMS4Xu-WWAJkUAAuGcRTYJjj8viILM4Xj8kCaiiyFZZ4QZ55vwOAsq7qp-Qi0jkvERbkzzvjtHU3tB9644KnQ0t_21ENzkoqnabBBuns1FPZTGFGDjbcUuuCGZ3s7iFzPCW233fShewBprGQMyrYwXkq20hReZPaJZW6NYcUe9tPnUzMc_KklZ03L077Jfnx8cP39ads8_Xq8_rtJlM5rzCTUBqFqixixhiy-E7Day15m2teKahz0GUhZatbQGQNlCsOvMlNw7XOEfgleTXX3Y_Dr8n4IHrrleni7GaYvKgZVMB4Uf-bRMZWWHEeyWom1Th4P5pW7Efby_FOIIjkmtiJZI5I5ojkmrh3TRyj9OWpydT0Rp-FDzZF4M0MHGxn7v67sFhvvqUo6rNZb30wx7Nejj9F_JpVIa63V2J7vV3nX97XouJ_AWbftu4</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Truninger, Thomas C.</creator><creator>Stawarczyk, Bogna</creator><creator>Leutert, Christian R.</creator><creator>Sailer, Thomas R.</creator><creator>Hämmerle, Christoph H.F.</creator><creator>Sailer, Irena</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation</title><author>Truninger, Thomas C. ; Stawarczyk, Bogna ; Leutert, Christian R. ; Sailer, Thomas R. ; Hämmerle, Christoph H.F. ; Sailer, Irena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-a06ec1c654382212090e39da3f4d38c0940d65aafdf0112b067303b4eb3dd4103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>bending moment</topic><topic>chewing simulation</topic><topic>Dental Abutments</topic><topic>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>implant abutments</topic><topic>implant-abutment connection</topic><topic>Mastication - physiology</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>thermocycling</topic><topic>Titanium - chemistry</topic><topic>zirconia abutments</topic><topic>Zirconium - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Truninger, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stawarczyk, Bogna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leutert, Christian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sailer, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hämmerle, Christoph H.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sailer, Irena</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Truninger, Thomas C.</au><au>Stawarczyk, Bogna</au><au>Leutert, Christian R.</au><au>Sailer, Thomas R.</au><au>Hämmerle, Christoph H.F.</au><au>Sailer, Irena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>12-18</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To test the fracture load of zirconia abutments with different types of implant–abutment connections after chewing simulation and to compare their bending moments to internally connected identical titanium abutments.
Materials and methods: Forty‐eight identical customized zirconia abutments with different implant–abutment connections were fabricated for four different test groups: one‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (BL; Straumann Bonelevel), two‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (RS; Nobel Biocare Replace Select), external implant–abutment connection (B; Brånemark MK III), two‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (SP; Straumann Standard Plus). Twelve titanium abutments with one‐piece internal implant–abutment connection (T; Straumann Bonelevel) served as control group. After aging by means of thermocycling (5–50°C, 120 s) and chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles, 49 N load, 1.67 Hz), static load was applied at a 30° angle to the palatal surface until failure. Bending moments were calculated for comparison of the groups. Data were analyzed descriptively and by performing the Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni correction.
Results: The mean bending moments of the abutments were 714.1 ± 184.9 N cm (T), 331.7 ± 57.8 N cm (BL), 429.7 ± 62.8 N cm (RS), 285.8 ± 64.4 N cm (B) and 379.9 ± 59.1 N cm (SP). The bending moments of control group T were significantly higher than those of all other groups. The values of group RS were significantly higher than those of group B but within the value range of groups SP and BL.
Conclusion: The bending moments of the different tested types of zirconia abutments vary with different implant–abutment connections after chewing simulation. The use of a secondary metallic component might have a beneficial influence on the stability of zirconia abutments.
To cite this article:
Truninger TC, Stawarczyk B, Leutert CR, Sailer TR, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant–abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 12–18.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02141.x</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21443610</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02141.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2012-01, Vol.23 (1), p.12-18 |
| issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_920802359 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
| subjects | Aging bending moment chewing simulation Dental Abutments Dental Implant-Abutment Design dental implants Dental Restoration Failure Dental Stress Analysis Dentistry implant abutments implant-abutment connection Mastication - physiology Materials Testing Statistics, Nonparametric Stress, Mechanical thermocycling Titanium - chemistry zirconia abutments Zirconium - chemistry |
| title | Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A31%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bending%20moments%20of%20zirconia%20and%20titanium%20abutments%20with%20internal%20and%20external%20implant-abutment%20connections%20after%20aging%20and%20chewing%20simulation&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Truninger,%20Thomas%20C.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=12-18&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02141.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E912271833%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-a06ec1c654382212090e39da3f4d38c0940d65aafdf0112b067303b4eb3dd4103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=912271833&rft_id=info:pmid/21443610&rfr_iscdi=true |