EMPIRICAL STUDIES IN INDUSTRIAL LOCATION: AN ASSESSMENT OF THEIR METHODS AND RESULTS

ABSTRACT This paper surveys recent evidence on the determinants of (national and/or foreign) industrial location. We find that the basic analytical framework has remained essentially unaltered since the early contributions of the early 1980s while, in contrast, there have been advances in the qualit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of regional science 2010-08, Vol.50 (3), p.685-711
Main Authors: Arauzo-Carod, Josep-Maria, Liviano-Solis, Daniel, Manjón-Antolín, Miguel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bgi / Prodig
Econometric models
Econometrics
Geography of industry and energy
Human geography
Industrialization, industrial space
Information
Location of industry
Neoclassical economics
Panel data
Research methodology
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6205-c06d9416257f55455c8034738aca709d80fc11f5f0f946a36035c97479c0098e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6205-c06d9416257f55455c8034738aca709d80fc11f5f0f946a36035c97479c0098e3
container_end_page 711
container_issue 3
container_start_page 685
container_title Journal of regional science
container_volume 50
creator Arauzo-Carod, Josep-Maria
Liviano-Solis, Daniel
Manjón-Antolín, Miguel
description ABSTRACT This paper surveys recent evidence on the determinants of (national and/or foreign) industrial location. We find that the basic analytical framework has remained essentially unaltered since the early contributions of the early 1980s while, in contrast, there have been advances in the quality of the data (more firm and plant level information, geographical disaggregation, panel structure, etc.) and, to a lesser extent, the econometric modeling. We also identify certain determinants (neoclassical and institutional factors) that tend to provide largely consistent results across the reviewed studies. In light of this evidence, we finally suggest future lines of research.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00625.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921289044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2094511201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6205-c06d9416257f55455c8034738aca709d80fc11f5f0f946a36035c97479c0098e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUE2P0zAQjRBIlIX_ECEhTgnj-CtG4lDadJtV26A4BW6W8TqQkn5s3EL773HIqgdOWB575Hlv5vkFQYggRn6928SIMB4JnvI4ARAxAEtofH4SjK6Fp8EIIEki4l-eBy-c2wAAIoSNgipbfsrLfDJehLJaT_NMhvnK7-laVmXuXxfFZFzlxep9OF6FYykzKZfZqgqLWVjNs7wMl1k1L6bSl6dhmcn1opIvg2e1bp199XjfBOtZVk3m0aK47UdFhiVAIwPsXhDk5fKaUkKpSQETjlNtNAdxn0JtEKppDbUgTGMGmBrBCRfGfzS1-CZ4O_Q9dPuHk3VHtW2csW2rd3Z_ckokKEkFEOKRr_9BbvanbufFKY5xknJOmAelA8h0e-c6W6tD12x1d1EIVG-22qjeU9V7qnqz1V-z1dlT7wZqZw_WXHnfWr3p7Hdn1C-FNQV_XHwkgPq08YF9HHywlCruJ_w4bn2zN49itTO6rTu9M427Nk0w5kIA9rgPA-5309rLf4tVd0Upfeb50cBv3NGer3zd_VSMY07Vl9WtYp_hq0CzVH3EfwAjLLA2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733287746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EMPIRICAL STUDIES IN INDUSTRIAL LOCATION: AN ASSESSMENT OF THEIR METHODS AND RESULTS</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Arauzo-Carod, Josep-Maria ; Liviano-Solis, Daniel ; Manjón-Antolín, Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Arauzo-Carod, Josep-Maria ; Liviano-Solis, Daniel ; Manjón-Antolín, Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT This paper surveys recent evidence on the determinants of (national and/or foreign) industrial location. We find that the basic analytical framework has remained essentially unaltered since the early contributions of the early 1980s while, in contrast, there have been advances in the quality of the data (more firm and plant level information, geographical disaggregation, panel structure, etc.) and, to a lesser extent, the econometric modeling. We also identify certain determinants (neoclassical and institutional factors) that tend to provide largely consistent results across the reviewed studies. In light of this evidence, we finally suggest future lines of research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00625.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRESAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Bgi / Prodig ; Econometric models ; Econometrics ; Geography of industry and energy ; Human geography ; Industrialization, industrial space ; Information ; Location of industry ; Neoclassical economics ; Panel data ; Research methodology ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of regional science, 2010-08, Vol.50 (3), p.685-711</ispartof><rights>2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI), 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Aug 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6205-c06d9416257f55455c8034738aca709d80fc11f5f0f946a36035c97479c0098e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6205-c06d9416257f55455c8034738aca709d80fc11f5f0f946a36035c97479c0098e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27847,27905,27906,33204,33205</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23379903$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/blajregsc/v_3a50_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a685-711.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arauzo-Carod, Josep-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liviano-Solis, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjón-Antolín, Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>EMPIRICAL STUDIES IN INDUSTRIAL LOCATION: AN ASSESSMENT OF THEIR METHODS AND RESULTS</title><title>Journal of regional science</title><description>ABSTRACT This paper surveys recent evidence on the determinants of (national and/or foreign) industrial location. We find that the basic analytical framework has remained essentially unaltered since the early contributions of the early 1980s while, in contrast, there have been advances in the quality of the data (more firm and plant level information, geographical disaggregation, panel structure, etc.) and, to a lesser extent, the econometric modeling. We also identify certain determinants (neoclassical and institutional factors) that tend to provide largely consistent results across the reviewed studies. In light of this evidence, we finally suggest future lines of research.</description><subject>Bgi / Prodig</subject><subject>Econometric models</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Geography of industry and energy</subject><subject>Human geography</subject><subject>Industrialization, industrial space</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Location of industry</subject><subject>Neoclassical economics</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0022-4146</issn><issn>1467-9787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUE2P0zAQjRBIlIX_ECEhTgnj-CtG4lDadJtV26A4BW6W8TqQkn5s3EL773HIqgdOWB575Hlv5vkFQYggRn6928SIMB4JnvI4ARAxAEtofH4SjK6Fp8EIIEki4l-eBy-c2wAAIoSNgipbfsrLfDJehLJaT_NMhvnK7-laVmXuXxfFZFzlxep9OF6FYykzKZfZqgqLWVjNs7wMl1k1L6bSl6dhmcn1opIvg2e1bp199XjfBOtZVk3m0aK47UdFhiVAIwPsXhDk5fKaUkKpSQETjlNtNAdxn0JtEKppDbUgTGMGmBrBCRfGfzS1-CZ4O_Q9dPuHk3VHtW2csW2rd3Z_ckokKEkFEOKRr_9BbvanbufFKY5xknJOmAelA8h0e-c6W6tD12x1d1EIVG-22qjeU9V7qnqz1V-z1dlT7wZqZw_WXHnfWr3p7Hdn1C-FNQV_XHwkgPq08YF9HHywlCruJ_w4bn2zN49itTO6rTu9M427Nk0w5kIA9rgPA-5309rLf4tVd0Upfeb50cBv3NGer3zd_VSMY07Vl9WtYp_hq0CzVH3EfwAjLLA2</recordid><startdate>201008</startdate><enddate>201008</enddate><creator>Arauzo-Carod, Josep-Maria</creator><creator>Liviano-Solis, Daniel</creator><creator>Manjón-Antolín, Miguel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Regional Science Research Institute</general><general>Wiley Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201008</creationdate><title>EMPIRICAL STUDIES IN INDUSTRIAL LOCATION: AN ASSESSMENT OF THEIR METHODS AND RESULTS</title><author>Arauzo-Carod, Josep-Maria ; Liviano-Solis, Daniel ; Manjón-Antolín, Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6205-c06d9416257f55455c8034738aca709d80fc11f5f0f946a36035c97479c0098e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Bgi / Prodig</topic><topic>Econometric models</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Geography of industry and energy</topic><topic>Human geography</topic><topic>Industrialization, industrial space</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Location of industry</topic><topic>Neoclassical economics</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arauzo-Carod, Josep-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liviano-Solis, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjón-Antolín, Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of regional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arauzo-Carod, Josep-Maria</au><au>Liviano-Solis, Daniel</au><au>Manjón-Antolín, Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EMPIRICAL STUDIES IN INDUSTRIAL LOCATION: AN ASSESSMENT OF THEIR METHODS AND RESULTS</atitle><jtitle>Journal of regional science</jtitle><date>2010-08</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>685</spage><epage>711</epage><pages>685-711</pages><issn>0022-4146</issn><eissn>1467-9787</eissn><coden>JRESAM</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT This paper surveys recent evidence on the determinants of (national and/or foreign) industrial location. We find that the basic analytical framework has remained essentially unaltered since the early contributions of the early 1980s while, in contrast, there have been advances in the quality of the data (more firm and plant level information, geographical disaggregation, panel structure, etc.) and, to a lesser extent, the econometric modeling. We also identify certain determinants (neoclassical and institutional factors) that tend to provide largely consistent results across the reviewed studies. In light of this evidence, we finally suggest future lines of research.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00625.x</doi><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4146
ispartof Journal of regional science, 2010-08, Vol.50 (3), p.685-711
issn 0022-4146
1467-9787
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921289044
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Bgi / Prodig
Econometric models
Econometrics
Geography of industry and energy
Human geography
Industrialization, industrial space
Information
Location of industry
Neoclassical economics
Panel data
Research methodology
Studies
title EMPIRICAL STUDIES IN INDUSTRIAL LOCATION: AN ASSESSMENT OF THEIR METHODS AND RESULTS
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A01%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EMPIRICAL%20STUDIES%20IN%20INDUSTRIAL%20LOCATION:%20AN%20ASSESSMENT%20OF%20THEIR%20METHODS%20AND%20RESULTS&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20regional%20science&rft.au=Arauzo-Carod,%20Josep-Maria&rft.date=2010-08&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=685&rft.epage=711&rft.pages=685-711&rft.issn=0022-4146&rft.eissn=1467-9787&rft.coden=JRESAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00625.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2094511201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6205-c06d9416257f55455c8034738aca709d80fc11f5f0f946a36035c97479c0098e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733287746&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true