Loading…

Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions

Background Fatigue is an underestimated cause of underperformance among physicians. There is evidence that fatigue or other byproducts of production pressure may negatively influence the quality of colonoscopy. Objective To investigate the practices and perceptions of U.S. endoscopists regarding the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2012-03, Vol.75 (3), p.641-648.e8
Main Authors: Whitson, Matthew J., MD, Bodian, Carol A., DrPH, Aisenberg, James, MD, Cohen, Lawrence B., MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3
container_end_page 648.e8
container_issue 3
container_start_page 641
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 75
creator Whitson, Matthew J., MD
Bodian, Carol A., DrPH
Aisenberg, James, MD
Cohen, Lawrence B., MD
description Background Fatigue is an underestimated cause of underperformance among physicians. There is evidence that fatigue or other byproducts of production pressure may negatively influence the quality of colonoscopy. Objective To investigate the practices and perceptions of U.S. endoscopists regarding the effect of production pressure on the performance of colonoscopy. Design We conducted a 40-question online survey to assess endoscopists' practices and perceptions concerning production pressure. Setting A total of 5030 U.S. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members. Main Outcome Measurements The proportion of endoscopists responding positively to questions pertaining to the impact of production pressure on colonoscopy practice. Results Ninety-two percent of respondents indicated that production pressure influenced one or more aspects of their endoscopic practices. Examples of production pressure included (1) postponing polypectomy for a subsequent session (2.8%), (2) reducing the length of time spent inspecting the colon (7.2%), and (3) proceeding with colonoscopy in a patient with an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio (69.2%). Forty-eight percent of respondents reported witnessing the effects of production pressure on a colleague. Respondents working fee-for-service and those with >10 years since completion of fellowship were more likely to describe their weekly workloads as excessive compared with those who were salaried (81.3% vs 71.3%; P = .01) and
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.032
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_922499651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0016510711023844</els_id><sourcerecordid>922499651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBvqCeEvyRTyGBqoqPSpU4lJ4trz0uDlk79SQVy6_H6S4gceBke-aZd8avhpCXnJWc8ebNUN56KAXjPL9LJsUjsuGsb4umbfvHZMMyVNSctSfkGeLAGOuE5E_JiRCy4pnckB-XSKcU7WJmH0O-AuKSgA4QJ52s_-nDLZ2_Ab1b9OjnPY2OmjjGENHEaf-entPM38ND4qa8LikE-5DzOONZFtRZ2QBSHSydIBmY1k74nDxxekR4cTxPyc3HD18vPhdXXz5dXpxfFaaS7VxsG-e6hvWd7k3VtYy7ynW6batauEbW0ohWbhtrdC11nVFXdXyrtbPALOuMk6fk7KCbf3m3AM5q59HAOOoAcUHVC1H1fVPzTPIDaVJETODUlPxOp73iTK1-q0Flv9Xq9xrKfueaV0f1ZbsD-6fit8EZeH0ENBo9uqSD8fiXqxvGMpq5twcOshf3HpJC4yEYsD6BmZWN_r9jvPun2ow--NzwO-wBh7ikkE1WXKFQTF2vi7HuRR5RyK6q5C-P5bQp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>922499651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Whitson, Matthew J., MD ; Bodian, Carol A., DrPH ; Aisenberg, James, MD ; Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Whitson, Matthew J., MD ; Bodian, Carol A., DrPH ; Aisenberg, James, MD ; Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Fatigue is an underestimated cause of underperformance among physicians. There is evidence that fatigue or other byproducts of production pressure may negatively influence the quality of colonoscopy. Objective To investigate the practices and perceptions of U.S. endoscopists regarding the effect of production pressure on the performance of colonoscopy. Design We conducted a 40-question online survey to assess endoscopists' practices and perceptions concerning production pressure. Setting A total of 5030 U.S. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members. Main Outcome Measurements The proportion of endoscopists responding positively to questions pertaining to the impact of production pressure on colonoscopy practice. Results Ninety-two percent of respondents indicated that production pressure influenced one or more aspects of their endoscopic practices. Examples of production pressure included (1) postponing polypectomy for a subsequent session (2.8%), (2) reducing the length of time spent inspecting the colon (7.2%), and (3) proceeding with colonoscopy in a patient with an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio (69.2%). Forty-eight percent of respondents reported witnessing the effects of production pressure on a colleague. Respondents working fee-for-service and those with &gt;10 years since completion of fellowship were more likely to describe their weekly workloads as excessive compared with those who were salaried (81.3% vs 71.3%; P = .01) and &lt;10 years out of training (81% vs 72.7%; P = .01). Limitations Nonresponse bias due to low response rate (22.3%). Conclusion Production pressure influences the conduct of colonoscopy for many endoscopists and could have an adverse effect on the outcome of colorectal cancer screening. (Clinical trial registration number: RE:GIE D 11-01288R1.) The study was an Internet study and did not involve human subjects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22341109</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GAENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maryland heights, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonoscopy - standards ; Colonoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Workload - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2012-03, Vol.75 (3), p.641-648.e8</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25600341$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22341109$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whitson, Matthew J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodian, Carol A., DrPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aisenberg, James, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Fatigue is an underestimated cause of underperformance among physicians. There is evidence that fatigue or other byproducts of production pressure may negatively influence the quality of colonoscopy. Objective To investigate the practices and perceptions of U.S. endoscopists regarding the effect of production pressure on the performance of colonoscopy. Design We conducted a 40-question online survey to assess endoscopists' practices and perceptions concerning production pressure. Setting A total of 5030 U.S. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members. Main Outcome Measurements The proportion of endoscopists responding positively to questions pertaining to the impact of production pressure on colonoscopy practice. Results Ninety-two percent of respondents indicated that production pressure influenced one or more aspects of their endoscopic practices. Examples of production pressure included (1) postponing polypectomy for a subsequent session (2.8%), (2) reducing the length of time spent inspecting the colon (7.2%), and (3) proceeding with colonoscopy in a patient with an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio (69.2%). Forty-eight percent of respondents reported witnessing the effects of production pressure on a colleague. Respondents working fee-for-service and those with &gt;10 years since completion of fellowship were more likely to describe their weekly workloads as excessive compared with those who were salaried (81.3% vs 71.3%; P = .01) and &lt;10 years out of training (81% vs 72.7%; P = .01). Limitations Nonresponse bias due to low response rate (22.3%). Conclusion Production pressure influences the conduct of colonoscopy for many endoscopists and could have an adverse effect on the outcome of colorectal cancer screening. (Clinical trial registration number: RE:GIE D 11-01288R1.) The study was an Internet study and did not involve human subjects.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - standards</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Workload - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBvqCeEvyRTyGBqoqPSpU4lJ4trz0uDlk79SQVy6_H6S4gceBke-aZd8avhpCXnJWc8ebNUN56KAXjPL9LJsUjsuGsb4umbfvHZMMyVNSctSfkGeLAGOuE5E_JiRCy4pnckB-XSKcU7WJmH0O-AuKSgA4QJ52s_-nDLZ2_Ab1b9OjnPY2OmjjGENHEaf-entPM38ND4qa8LikE-5DzOONZFtRZ2QBSHSydIBmY1k74nDxxekR4cTxPyc3HD18vPhdXXz5dXpxfFaaS7VxsG-e6hvWd7k3VtYy7ynW6batauEbW0ohWbhtrdC11nVFXdXyrtbPALOuMk6fk7KCbf3m3AM5q59HAOOoAcUHVC1H1fVPzTPIDaVJETODUlPxOp73iTK1-q0Flv9Xq9xrKfueaV0f1ZbsD-6fit8EZeH0ENBo9uqSD8fiXqxvGMpq5twcOshf3HpJC4yEYsD6BmZWN_r9jvPun2ow--NzwO-wBh7ikkE1WXKFQTF2vi7HuRR5RyK6q5C-P5bQp</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Whitson, Matthew J., MD</creator><creator>Bodian, Carol A., DrPH</creator><creator>Aisenberg, James, MD</creator><creator>Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions</title><author>Whitson, Matthew J., MD ; Bodian, Carol A., DrPH ; Aisenberg, James, MD ; Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - standards</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Workload - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whitson, Matthew J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodian, Carol A., DrPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aisenberg, James, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whitson, Matthew J., MD</au><au>Bodian, Carol A., DrPH</au><au>Aisenberg, James, MD</au><au>Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>641</spage><epage>648.e8</epage><pages>641-648.e8</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><coden>GAENBQ</coden><abstract>Background Fatigue is an underestimated cause of underperformance among physicians. There is evidence that fatigue or other byproducts of production pressure may negatively influence the quality of colonoscopy. Objective To investigate the practices and perceptions of U.S. endoscopists regarding the effect of production pressure on the performance of colonoscopy. Design We conducted a 40-question online survey to assess endoscopists' practices and perceptions concerning production pressure. Setting A total of 5030 U.S. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members. Main Outcome Measurements The proportion of endoscopists responding positively to questions pertaining to the impact of production pressure on colonoscopy practice. Results Ninety-two percent of respondents indicated that production pressure influenced one or more aspects of their endoscopic practices. Examples of production pressure included (1) postponing polypectomy for a subsequent session (2.8%), (2) reducing the length of time spent inspecting the colon (7.2%), and (3) proceeding with colonoscopy in a patient with an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio (69.2%). Forty-eight percent of respondents reported witnessing the effects of production pressure on a colleague. Respondents working fee-for-service and those with &gt;10 years since completion of fellowship were more likely to describe their weekly workloads as excessive compared with those who were salaried (81.3% vs 71.3%; P = .01) and &lt;10 years out of training (81% vs 72.7%; P = .01). Limitations Nonresponse bias due to low response rate (22.3%). Conclusion Production pressure influences the conduct of colonoscopy for many endoscopists and could have an adverse effect on the outcome of colorectal cancer screening. (Clinical trial registration number: RE:GIE D 11-01288R1.) The study was an Internet study and did not involve human subjects.</abstract><cop>Maryland heights, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22341109</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.032</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2012-03, Vol.75 (3), p.641-648.e8
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_922499651
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Biological and medical sciences
Colonoscopy - standards
Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data
Digestive system. Abdomen
Endoscopy
Female
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires
Workload - statistics & numerical data
title Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T12%3A03%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20production%20pressure%20jeopardizing%20the%20quality%20of%20colonoscopy?%20A%20survey%20of%20U.S.%20endoscopists'%20practices%20and%20perceptions&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Whitson,%20Matthew%20J.,%20MD&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=641&rft.epage=648.e8&rft.pages=641-648.e8&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft.coden=GAENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E922499651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=922499651&rft_id=info:pmid/22341109&rfr_iscdi=true