Loading…
Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions
Background Fatigue is an underestimated cause of underperformance among physicians. There is evidence that fatigue or other byproducts of production pressure may negatively influence the quality of colonoscopy. Objective To investigate the practices and perceptions of U.S. endoscopists regarding the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2012-03, Vol.75 (3), p.641-648.e8 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3 |
container_end_page | 648.e8 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 641 |
container_title | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Whitson, Matthew J., MD Bodian, Carol A., DrPH Aisenberg, James, MD Cohen, Lawrence B., MD |
description | Background Fatigue is an underestimated cause of underperformance among physicians. There is evidence that fatigue or other byproducts of production pressure may negatively influence the quality of colonoscopy. Objective To investigate the practices and perceptions of U.S. endoscopists regarding the effect of production pressure on the performance of colonoscopy. Design We conducted a 40-question online survey to assess endoscopists' practices and perceptions concerning production pressure. Setting A total of 5030 U.S. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members. Main Outcome Measurements The proportion of endoscopists responding positively to questions pertaining to the impact of production pressure on colonoscopy practice. Results Ninety-two percent of respondents indicated that production pressure influenced one or more aspects of their endoscopic practices. Examples of production pressure included (1) postponing polypectomy for a subsequent session (2.8%), (2) reducing the length of time spent inspecting the colon (7.2%), and (3) proceeding with colonoscopy in a patient with an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio (69.2%). Forty-eight percent of respondents reported witnessing the effects of production pressure on a colleague. Respondents working fee-for-service and those with >10 years since completion of fellowship were more likely to describe their weekly workloads as excessive compared with those who were salaried (81.3% vs 71.3%; P = .01) and |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.032 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_922499651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0016510711023844</els_id><sourcerecordid>922499651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBvqCeEvyRTyGBqoqPSpU4lJ4trz0uDlk79SQVy6_H6S4gceBke-aZd8avhpCXnJWc8ebNUN56KAXjPL9LJsUjsuGsb4umbfvHZMMyVNSctSfkGeLAGOuE5E_JiRCy4pnckB-XSKcU7WJmH0O-AuKSgA4QJ52s_-nDLZ2_Ab1b9OjnPY2OmjjGENHEaf-entPM38ND4qa8LikE-5DzOONZFtRZ2QBSHSydIBmY1k74nDxxekR4cTxPyc3HD18vPhdXXz5dXpxfFaaS7VxsG-e6hvWd7k3VtYy7ynW6batauEbW0ohWbhtrdC11nVFXdXyrtbPALOuMk6fk7KCbf3m3AM5q59HAOOoAcUHVC1H1fVPzTPIDaVJETODUlPxOp73iTK1-q0Flv9Xq9xrKfueaV0f1ZbsD-6fit8EZeH0ENBo9uqSD8fiXqxvGMpq5twcOshf3HpJC4yEYsD6BmZWN_r9jvPun2ow--NzwO-wBh7ikkE1WXKFQTF2vi7HuRR5RyK6q5C-P5bQp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>922499651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Whitson, Matthew J., MD ; Bodian, Carol A., DrPH ; Aisenberg, James, MD ; Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Whitson, Matthew J., MD ; Bodian, Carol A., DrPH ; Aisenberg, James, MD ; Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Fatigue is an underestimated cause of underperformance among physicians. There is evidence that fatigue or other byproducts of production pressure may negatively influence the quality of colonoscopy. Objective To investigate the practices and perceptions of U.S. endoscopists regarding the effect of production pressure on the performance of colonoscopy. Design We conducted a 40-question online survey to assess endoscopists' practices and perceptions concerning production pressure. Setting A total of 5030 U.S. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members. Main Outcome Measurements The proportion of endoscopists responding positively to questions pertaining to the impact of production pressure on colonoscopy practice. Results Ninety-two percent of respondents indicated that production pressure influenced one or more aspects of their endoscopic practices. Examples of production pressure included (1) postponing polypectomy for a subsequent session (2.8%), (2) reducing the length of time spent inspecting the colon (7.2%), and (3) proceeding with colonoscopy in a patient with an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio (69.2%). Forty-eight percent of respondents reported witnessing the effects of production pressure on a colleague. Respondents working fee-for-service and those with >10 years since completion of fellowship were more likely to describe their weekly workloads as excessive compared with those who were salaried (81.3% vs 71.3%; P = .01) and <10 years out of training (81% vs 72.7%; P = .01). Limitations Nonresponse bias due to low response rate (22.3%). Conclusion Production pressure influences the conduct of colonoscopy for many endoscopists and could have an adverse effect on the outcome of colorectal cancer screening. (Clinical trial registration number: RE:GIE D 11-01288R1.) The study was an Internet study and did not involve human subjects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22341109</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GAENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maryland heights, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonoscopy - standards ; Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Workload - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2012-03, Vol.75 (3), p.641-648.e8</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25600341$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22341109$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whitson, Matthew J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodian, Carol A., DrPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aisenberg, James, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Fatigue is an underestimated cause of underperformance among physicians. There is evidence that fatigue or other byproducts of production pressure may negatively influence the quality of colonoscopy. Objective To investigate the practices and perceptions of U.S. endoscopists regarding the effect of production pressure on the performance of colonoscopy. Design We conducted a 40-question online survey to assess endoscopists' practices and perceptions concerning production pressure. Setting A total of 5030 U.S. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members. Main Outcome Measurements The proportion of endoscopists responding positively to questions pertaining to the impact of production pressure on colonoscopy practice. Results Ninety-two percent of respondents indicated that production pressure influenced one or more aspects of their endoscopic practices. Examples of production pressure included (1) postponing polypectomy for a subsequent session (2.8%), (2) reducing the length of time spent inspecting the colon (7.2%), and (3) proceeding with colonoscopy in a patient with an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio (69.2%). Forty-eight percent of respondents reported witnessing the effects of production pressure on a colleague. Respondents working fee-for-service and those with >10 years since completion of fellowship were more likely to describe their weekly workloads as excessive compared with those who were salaried (81.3% vs 71.3%; P = .01) and <10 years out of training (81% vs 72.7%; P = .01). Limitations Nonresponse bias due to low response rate (22.3%). Conclusion Production pressure influences the conduct of colonoscopy for many endoscopists and could have an adverse effect on the outcome of colorectal cancer screening. (Clinical trial registration number: RE:GIE D 11-01288R1.) The study was an Internet study and did not involve human subjects.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - standards</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Workload - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBvqCeEvyRTyGBqoqPSpU4lJ4trz0uDlk79SQVy6_H6S4gceBke-aZd8avhpCXnJWc8ebNUN56KAXjPL9LJsUjsuGsb4umbfvHZMMyVNSctSfkGeLAGOuE5E_JiRCy4pnckB-XSKcU7WJmH0O-AuKSgA4QJ52s_-nDLZ2_Ab1b9OjnPY2OmjjGENHEaf-entPM38ND4qa8LikE-5DzOONZFtRZ2QBSHSydIBmY1k74nDxxekR4cTxPyc3HD18vPhdXXz5dXpxfFaaS7VxsG-e6hvWd7k3VtYy7ynW6batauEbW0ohWbhtrdC11nVFXdXyrtbPALOuMk6fk7KCbf3m3AM5q59HAOOoAcUHVC1H1fVPzTPIDaVJETODUlPxOp73iTK1-q0Flv9Xq9xrKfueaV0f1ZbsD-6fit8EZeH0ENBo9uqSD8fiXqxvGMpq5twcOshf3HpJC4yEYsD6BmZWN_r9jvPun2ow--NzwO-wBh7ikkE1WXKFQTF2vi7HuRR5RyK6q5C-P5bQp</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Whitson, Matthew J., MD</creator><creator>Bodian, Carol A., DrPH</creator><creator>Aisenberg, James, MD</creator><creator>Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions</title><author>Whitson, Matthew J., MD ; Bodian, Carol A., DrPH ; Aisenberg, James, MD ; Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - standards</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Workload - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whitson, Matthew J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodian, Carol A., DrPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aisenberg, James, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whitson, Matthew J., MD</au><au>Bodian, Carol A., DrPH</au><au>Aisenberg, James, MD</au><au>Cohen, Lawrence B., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>641</spage><epage>648.e8</epage><pages>641-648.e8</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><coden>GAENBQ</coden><abstract>Background Fatigue is an underestimated cause of underperformance among physicians. There is evidence that fatigue or other byproducts of production pressure may negatively influence the quality of colonoscopy. Objective To investigate the practices and perceptions of U.S. endoscopists regarding the effect of production pressure on the performance of colonoscopy. Design We conducted a 40-question online survey to assess endoscopists' practices and perceptions concerning production pressure. Setting A total of 5030 U.S. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members. Main Outcome Measurements The proportion of endoscopists responding positively to questions pertaining to the impact of production pressure on colonoscopy practice. Results Ninety-two percent of respondents indicated that production pressure influenced one or more aspects of their endoscopic practices. Examples of production pressure included (1) postponing polypectomy for a subsequent session (2.8%), (2) reducing the length of time spent inspecting the colon (7.2%), and (3) proceeding with colonoscopy in a patient with an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio (69.2%). Forty-eight percent of respondents reported witnessing the effects of production pressure on a colleague. Respondents working fee-for-service and those with >10 years since completion of fellowship were more likely to describe their weekly workloads as excessive compared with those who were salaried (81.3% vs 71.3%; P = .01) and <10 years out of training (81% vs 72.7%; P = .01). Limitations Nonresponse bias due to low response rate (22.3%). Conclusion Production pressure influences the conduct of colonoscopy for many endoscopists and could have an adverse effect on the outcome of colorectal cancer screening. (Clinical trial registration number: RE:GIE D 11-01288R1.) The study was an Internet study and did not involve human subjects.</abstract><cop>Maryland heights, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22341109</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.032</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5107 |
ispartof | Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2012-03, Vol.75 (3), p.641-648.e8 |
issn | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_922499651 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Biological and medical sciences Colonoscopy - standards Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data Digestive system. Abdomen Endoscopy Female Gastroenterology and Hepatology Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Practice Patterns, Physicians Surveys and Questionnaires Workload - statistics & numerical data |
title | Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T12%3A03%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20production%20pressure%20jeopardizing%20the%20quality%20of%20colonoscopy?%20A%20survey%20of%20U.S.%20endoscopists'%20practices%20and%20perceptions&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Whitson,%20Matthew%20J.,%20MD&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=641&rft.epage=648.e8&rft.pages=641-648.e8&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft.coden=GAENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E922499651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b6ff86098a9c48701f4f8a77452f6353c273b6dca53a5ff8f481baafde0d08cf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=922499651&rft_id=info:pmid/22341109&rfr_iscdi=true |