Loading…
An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior
How does the composition of a population affect the adoption of health behaviors and innovations? Homophily—similarity of social contacts—can increase dyadic-level influence, but it can also force less healthy individuals to interact primarily with one another, thereby excluding them from interactio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 2011-12, Vol.334 (6060), p.1269-1272 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3 |
container_end_page | 1272 |
container_issue | 6060 |
container_start_page | 1269 |
container_title | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) |
container_volume | 334 |
creator | Centola, Damon |
description | How does the composition of a population affect the adoption of health behaviors and innovations? Homophily—similarity of social contacts—can increase dyadic-level influence, but it can also force less healthy individuals to interact primarily with one another, thereby excluding them from interactions with healthier, more influential, early adopters. As a result, an important network-level effect of homophily is that the people who are most in need of a health innovation may be among the least likely to adopt it. Despite the importance of this thesis, confounding factors in observational data have made it difficult to test empirically. We report results from a controlled experimental study on the spread of a health innovation through fixed social networks in which the level of homophily was independently varied. We found that homophily significantly increased overall adoption of a new health behavior, especially among those most in need of it. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1126/science.1207055 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926881432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41352191</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41352191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9L5DAUB_AgLjr-OHtSiiCeqi9J0zTHcRh1QdjDrueSpi9Mh05Tk1ac_96sUxX2sqdA3iePvO8j5IzCDaUsvw2mwc7gDWUgQYg9MqOgRKoY8H0yA-B5WoAUh-QohDVArCl-QA4Zo1mWs2xGlvMuWb716JsNdoNuk9_DWG8TZ5NHt3H9qmm3SdMlwwqTee36oXHdRxF1O6ySO1zp18b5E_LD6jbg6XQek-f75Z_FY_r06-HnYv6UmkzyIbU15DqTiKLWaFBW1oBVkvGcIkUEK4SockElKC0KMBYzrKGoKstsvNX8mFzv-vbevYwYhnLTBINtqzt0YygVy4uCZpz9X4LiMQ4JUV7-I9du9F0cIyLJqFIFjeh2h4x3IXi0ZR8T035bUij_bqKcNlFOm4gvLqa2Y7XB-st_Rh_B1QR0MLq1XnemCd9OMBkHUdGd79w6DM5_1TPKRfwc5e-wSprN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>907219981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>publisher website</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Centola, Damon</creator><creatorcontrib>Centola, Damon</creatorcontrib><description>How does the composition of a population affect the adoption of health behaviors and innovations? Homophily—similarity of social contacts—can increase dyadic-level influence, but it can also force less healthy individuals to interact primarily with one another, thereby excluding them from interactions with healthier, more influential, early adopters. As a result, an important network-level effect of homophily is that the people who are most in need of a health innovation may be among the least likely to adopt it. Despite the importance of this thesis, confounding factors in observational data have made it difficult to test empirically. We report results from a controlled experimental study on the spread of a health innovation through fixed social networks in which the level of homophily was independently varied. We found that homophily significantly increased overall adoption of a new health behavior, especially among those most in need of it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/science.1207055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22144624</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SCIEAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Mass Index ; Diet Records ; Experimentation ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health Behavior ; Health education ; Humans ; Innovation ; Instrument panels ; Internet ; Interpersonal Relations ; Learning ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Neighborhood conditions ; Neighborhoods ; Obesity ; Peer Group ; Personality traits ; Population characteristics ; Psychology and medicine ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social Behavior ; Social Networking ; Social networks ; Social psychology ; Social Support ; Social Support Groups ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Taxa ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2011-12, Vol.334 (6060), p.1269-1272</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Advancement of Science</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011, American Association for the Advancement of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41352191$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41352191$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2884,2885,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25274329$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22144624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Centola, Damon</creatorcontrib><title>An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior</title><title>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</title><addtitle>Science</addtitle><description>How does the composition of a population affect the adoption of health behaviors and innovations? Homophily—similarity of social contacts—can increase dyadic-level influence, but it can also force less healthy individuals to interact primarily with one another, thereby excluding them from interactions with healthier, more influential, early adopters. As a result, an important network-level effect of homophily is that the people who are most in need of a health innovation may be among the least likely to adopt it. Despite the importance of this thesis, confounding factors in observational data have made it difficult to test empirically. We report results from a controlled experimental study on the spread of a health innovation through fixed social networks in which the level of homophily was independently varied. We found that homophily significantly increased overall adoption of a new health behavior, especially among those most in need of it.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Diet Records</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Instrument panels</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neighborhood conditions</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Population characteristics</subject><subject>Psychology and medicine</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social Networking</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Social Support Groups</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0036-8075</issn><issn>1095-9203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c9L5DAUB_AgLjr-OHtSiiCeqi9J0zTHcRh1QdjDrueSpi9Mh05Tk1ac_96sUxX2sqdA3iePvO8j5IzCDaUsvw2mwc7gDWUgQYg9MqOgRKoY8H0yA-B5WoAUh-QohDVArCl-QA4Zo1mWs2xGlvMuWb716JsNdoNuk9_DWG8TZ5NHt3H9qmm3SdMlwwqTee36oXHdRxF1O6ySO1zp18b5E_LD6jbg6XQek-f75Z_FY_r06-HnYv6UmkzyIbU15DqTiKLWaFBW1oBVkvGcIkUEK4SockElKC0KMBYzrKGoKstsvNX8mFzv-vbevYwYhnLTBINtqzt0YygVy4uCZpz9X4LiMQ4JUV7-I9du9F0cIyLJqFIFjeh2h4x3IXi0ZR8T035bUij_bqKcNlFOm4gvLqa2Y7XB-st_Rh_B1QR0MLq1XnemCd9OMBkHUdGd79w6DM5_1TPKRfwc5e-wSprN</recordid><startdate>20111202</startdate><enddate>20111202</enddate><creator>Centola, Damon</creator><general>American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><general>The American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111202</creationdate><title>An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior</title><author>Centola, Damon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Diet Records</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Instrument panels</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neighborhood conditions</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Population characteristics</topic><topic>Psychology and medicine</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social Networking</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Social Support Groups</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Centola, Damon</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Centola, Damon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior</atitle><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle><addtitle>Science</addtitle><date>2011-12-02</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>334</volume><issue>6060</issue><spage>1269</spage><epage>1272</epage><pages>1269-1272</pages><issn>0036-8075</issn><eissn>1095-9203</eissn><coden>SCIEAS</coden><abstract>How does the composition of a population affect the adoption of health behaviors and innovations? Homophily—similarity of social contacts—can increase dyadic-level influence, but it can also force less healthy individuals to interact primarily with one another, thereby excluding them from interactions with healthier, more influential, early adopters. As a result, an important network-level effect of homophily is that the people who are most in need of a health innovation may be among the least likely to adopt it. Despite the importance of this thesis, confounding factors in observational data have made it difficult to test empirically. We report results from a controlled experimental study on the spread of a health innovation through fixed social networks in which the level of homophily was independently varied. We found that homophily significantly increased overall adoption of a new health behavior, especially among those most in need of it.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Association for the Advancement of Science</pub><pmid>22144624</pmid><doi>10.1126/science.1207055</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-8075 |
ispartof | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2011-12, Vol.334 (6060), p.1269-1272 |
issn | 0036-8075 1095-9203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926881432 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; publisher website; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Body Mass Index Diet Records Experimentation Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Health Behavior Health education Humans Innovation Instrument panels Internet Interpersonal Relations Learning Male Middle Aged Miscellaneous Neighborhood conditions Neighborhoods Obesity Peer Group Personality traits Population characteristics Psychology and medicine Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Social Behavior Social Networking Social networks Social psychology Social Support Social Support Groups Statistics, Nonparametric Taxa Young Adult |
title | An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T20%3A23%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Experimental%20Study%20of%20Homophily%20in%20the%20Adoption%20of%20Health%20Behavior&rft.jtitle=Science%20(American%20Association%20for%20the%20Advancement%20of%20Science)&rft.au=Centola,%20Damon&rft.date=2011-12-02&rft.volume=334&rft.issue=6060&rft.spage=1269&rft.epage=1272&rft.pages=1269-1272&rft.issn=0036-8075&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft.coden=SCIEAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/science.1207055&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41352191%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=907219981&rft_id=info:pmid/22144624&rft_jstor_id=41352191&rfr_iscdi=true |