Loading…

An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior

How does the composition of a population affect the adoption of health behaviors and innovations? Homophily—similarity of social contacts—can increase dyadic-level influence, but it can also force less healthy individuals to interact primarily with one another, thereby excluding them from interactio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 2011-12, Vol.334 (6060), p.1269-1272
Main Author: Centola, Damon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3
container_end_page 1272
container_issue 6060
container_start_page 1269
container_title Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)
container_volume 334
creator Centola, Damon
description How does the composition of a population affect the adoption of health behaviors and innovations? Homophily—similarity of social contacts—can increase dyadic-level influence, but it can also force less healthy individuals to interact primarily with one another, thereby excluding them from interactions with healthier, more influential, early adopters. As a result, an important network-level effect of homophily is that the people who are most in need of a health innovation may be among the least likely to adopt it. Despite the importance of this thesis, confounding factors in observational data have made it difficult to test empirically. We report results from a controlled experimental study on the spread of a health innovation through fixed social networks in which the level of homophily was independently varied. We found that homophily significantly increased overall adoption of a new health behavior, especially among those most in need of it.
doi_str_mv 10.1126/science.1207055
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926881432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41352191</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41352191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9L5DAUB_AgLjr-OHtSiiCeqi9J0zTHcRh1QdjDrueSpi9Mh05Tk1ac_96sUxX2sqdA3iePvO8j5IzCDaUsvw2mwc7gDWUgQYg9MqOgRKoY8H0yA-B5WoAUh-QohDVArCl-QA4Zo1mWs2xGlvMuWb716JsNdoNuk9_DWG8TZ5NHt3H9qmm3SdMlwwqTee36oXHdRxF1O6ySO1zp18b5E_LD6jbg6XQek-f75Z_FY_r06-HnYv6UmkzyIbU15DqTiKLWaFBW1oBVkvGcIkUEK4SockElKC0KMBYzrKGoKstsvNX8mFzv-vbevYwYhnLTBINtqzt0YygVy4uCZpz9X4LiMQ4JUV7-I9du9F0cIyLJqFIFjeh2h4x3IXi0ZR8T035bUij_bqKcNlFOm4gvLqa2Y7XB-st_Rh_B1QR0MLq1XnemCd9OMBkHUdGd79w6DM5_1TPKRfwc5e-wSprN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>907219981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>publisher website</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Centola, Damon</creator><creatorcontrib>Centola, Damon</creatorcontrib><description>How does the composition of a population affect the adoption of health behaviors and innovations? Homophily—similarity of social contacts—can increase dyadic-level influence, but it can also force less healthy individuals to interact primarily with one another, thereby excluding them from interactions with healthier, more influential, early adopters. As a result, an important network-level effect of homophily is that the people who are most in need of a health innovation may be among the least likely to adopt it. Despite the importance of this thesis, confounding factors in observational data have made it difficult to test empirically. We report results from a controlled experimental study on the spread of a health innovation through fixed social networks in which the level of homophily was independently varied. We found that homophily significantly increased overall adoption of a new health behavior, especially among those most in need of it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/science.1207055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22144624</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SCIEAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Mass Index ; Diet Records ; Experimentation ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health Behavior ; Health education ; Humans ; Innovation ; Instrument panels ; Internet ; Interpersonal Relations ; Learning ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Neighborhood conditions ; Neighborhoods ; Obesity ; Peer Group ; Personality traits ; Population characteristics ; Psychology and medicine ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social Behavior ; Social Networking ; Social networks ; Social psychology ; Social Support ; Social Support Groups ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Taxa ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2011-12, Vol.334 (6060), p.1269-1272</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Advancement of Science</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011, American Association for the Advancement of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41352191$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41352191$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2884,2885,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25274329$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22144624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Centola, Damon</creatorcontrib><title>An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior</title><title>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</title><addtitle>Science</addtitle><description>How does the composition of a population affect the adoption of health behaviors and innovations? Homophily—similarity of social contacts—can increase dyadic-level influence, but it can also force less healthy individuals to interact primarily with one another, thereby excluding them from interactions with healthier, more influential, early adopters. As a result, an important network-level effect of homophily is that the people who are most in need of a health innovation may be among the least likely to adopt it. Despite the importance of this thesis, confounding factors in observational data have made it difficult to test empirically. We report results from a controlled experimental study on the spread of a health innovation through fixed social networks in which the level of homophily was independently varied. We found that homophily significantly increased overall adoption of a new health behavior, especially among those most in need of it.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Diet Records</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Instrument panels</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neighborhood conditions</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Population characteristics</subject><subject>Psychology and medicine</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social Networking</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Social Support Groups</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0036-8075</issn><issn>1095-9203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c9L5DAUB_AgLjr-OHtSiiCeqi9J0zTHcRh1QdjDrueSpi9Mh05Tk1ac_96sUxX2sqdA3iePvO8j5IzCDaUsvw2mwc7gDWUgQYg9MqOgRKoY8H0yA-B5WoAUh-QohDVArCl-QA4Zo1mWs2xGlvMuWb716JsNdoNuk9_DWG8TZ5NHt3H9qmm3SdMlwwqTee36oXHdRxF1O6ySO1zp18b5E_LD6jbg6XQek-f75Z_FY_r06-HnYv6UmkzyIbU15DqTiKLWaFBW1oBVkvGcIkUEK4SockElKC0KMBYzrKGoKstsvNX8mFzv-vbevYwYhnLTBINtqzt0YygVy4uCZpz9X4LiMQ4JUV7-I9du9F0cIyLJqFIFjeh2h4x3IXi0ZR8T035bUij_bqKcNlFOm4gvLqa2Y7XB-st_Rh_B1QR0MLq1XnemCd9OMBkHUdGd79w6DM5_1TPKRfwc5e-wSprN</recordid><startdate>20111202</startdate><enddate>20111202</enddate><creator>Centola, Damon</creator><general>American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><general>The American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111202</creationdate><title>An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior</title><author>Centola, Damon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Diet Records</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Instrument panels</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neighborhood conditions</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Population characteristics</topic><topic>Psychology and medicine</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social Networking</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Social Support Groups</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Centola, Damon</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Centola, Damon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior</atitle><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle><addtitle>Science</addtitle><date>2011-12-02</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>334</volume><issue>6060</issue><spage>1269</spage><epage>1272</epage><pages>1269-1272</pages><issn>0036-8075</issn><eissn>1095-9203</eissn><coden>SCIEAS</coden><abstract>How does the composition of a population affect the adoption of health behaviors and innovations? Homophily—similarity of social contacts—can increase dyadic-level influence, but it can also force less healthy individuals to interact primarily with one another, thereby excluding them from interactions with healthier, more influential, early adopters. As a result, an important network-level effect of homophily is that the people who are most in need of a health innovation may be among the least likely to adopt it. Despite the importance of this thesis, confounding factors in observational data have made it difficult to test empirically. We report results from a controlled experimental study on the spread of a health innovation through fixed social networks in which the level of homophily was independently varied. We found that homophily significantly increased overall adoption of a new health behavior, especially among those most in need of it.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Association for the Advancement of Science</pub><pmid>22144624</pmid><doi>10.1126/science.1207055</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-8075
ispartof Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2011-12, Vol.334 (6060), p.1269-1272
issn 0036-8075
1095-9203
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926881432
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; publisher website; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Body Mass Index
Diet Records
Experimentation
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Health Behavior
Health education
Humans
Innovation
Instrument panels
Internet
Interpersonal Relations
Learning
Male
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Neighborhood conditions
Neighborhoods
Obesity
Peer Group
Personality traits
Population characteristics
Psychology and medicine
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Social Behavior
Social Networking
Social networks
Social psychology
Social Support
Social Support Groups
Statistics, Nonparametric
Taxa
Young Adult
title An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T20%3A23%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Experimental%20Study%20of%20Homophily%20in%20the%20Adoption%20of%20Health%20Behavior&rft.jtitle=Science%20(American%20Association%20for%20the%20Advancement%20of%20Science)&rft.au=Centola,%20Damon&rft.date=2011-12-02&rft.volume=334&rft.issue=6060&rft.spage=1269&rft.epage=1272&rft.pages=1269-1272&rft.issn=0036-8075&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft.coden=SCIEAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/science.1207055&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41352191%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-fd06a47ee5daece7bfc0f972361e1ee0f555b651709a580cfe4ed08bbf2f517a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=907219981&rft_id=info:pmid/22144624&rft_jstor_id=41352191&rfr_iscdi=true