Loading…

Route selection by rats and humans in a navigational traveling salesman problem

Spatial cognition is typically examined in non-human animals from the perspective of learning and memory. For this reason, spatial tasks are often constrained by the time necessary for training or the capacity of the animal’s short-term memory. A spatial task with limited learning and memory demands...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal cognition 2012-03, Vol.15 (2), p.239-250
Main Authors: Blaser, Rachel E., Ginchansky, Rachel R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-43963b20e4360490b76d985100972d4cbcb80bf7d1cbcac7202b63ca7d9584b53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-43963b20e4360490b76d985100972d4cbcb80bf7d1cbcac7202b63ca7d9584b53
container_end_page 250
container_issue 2
container_start_page 239
container_title Animal cognition
container_volume 15
creator Blaser, Rachel E.
Ginchansky, Rachel R.
description Spatial cognition is typically examined in non-human animals from the perspective of learning and memory. For this reason, spatial tasks are often constrained by the time necessary for training or the capacity of the animal’s short-term memory. A spatial task with limited learning and memory demands could allow for more efficient study of some aspects of spatial cognition. The traveling salesman problem (TSP), used to study human visuospatial problem solving, is a simple task with modifiable learning and memory requirements. In the current study, humans and rats were characterized in a navigational version of the TSP. Subjects visited each of 10 baited targets in any sequence from a set starting location. Unlike similar experiments, the roles of learning and memory were purposely minimized; all targets were perceptually available, no distracters were used, and each configuration was tested only once. The task yielded a variety of behavioral measures, including target revisits and omissions, route length, and frequency of transitions between each pair of targets. Both humans and rats consistently chose routes that were more efficient than chance, but less efficient than optimal, and generally less efficient than routes produced by the nearest-neighbor strategy. We conclude that the TSP is a useful and flexible task for the study of spatial cognition in human and non-human animals.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10071-011-0449-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926889650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>922758500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-43963b20e4360490b76d985100972d4cbcb80bf7d1cbcac7202b63ca7d9584b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9LwzAUxYMobk4_gC8SfPGpmqRJ0zzK8B8MBqLPIUmz2ZGmM2kH-_ambE4QBB-SHMjvnsu9B4BLjG4xQvwuDjfOEE6HUpHxIzDGNGeZoKw4PmhajsBZjCuEUEkFPgUjggXhSY_B_LXtOwujddZ0deuh3sKgugiVr-BH3ygfYe2hgl5t6qUaEOVgF9TGutovYVTOxkTBdWi1s805OFkoF-3F_p2A98eHt-lzNps_vUzvZ5mhiHQZzUWRa4IszQtEBdK8qETJ0jyCk4oabXSJ9IJXOEllOEFEF7lRvBKspJrlE3Cz8019P3sbO9nU0VjnlLdtH6UgRVmKgqF_kISzkqGBvP5Frto-pHkHCPO0MyEShHeQCW2MwS7kOtSNCluJkRzykLtUZEpFDqlInmqu9sa9bmx1qPiOIQFkB8T05Zc2_HT-2_ULD9OWLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921719299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Route selection by rats and humans in a navigational traveling salesman problem</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Blaser, Rachel E. ; Ginchansky, Rachel R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blaser, Rachel E. ; Ginchansky, Rachel R.</creatorcontrib><description>Spatial cognition is typically examined in non-human animals from the perspective of learning and memory. For this reason, spatial tasks are often constrained by the time necessary for training or the capacity of the animal’s short-term memory. A spatial task with limited learning and memory demands could allow for more efficient study of some aspects of spatial cognition. The traveling salesman problem (TSP), used to study human visuospatial problem solving, is a simple task with modifiable learning and memory requirements. In the current study, humans and rats were characterized in a navigational version of the TSP. Subjects visited each of 10 baited targets in any sequence from a set starting location. Unlike similar experiments, the roles of learning and memory were purposely minimized; all targets were perceptually available, no distracters were used, and each configuration was tested only once. The task yielded a variety of behavioral measures, including target revisits and omissions, route length, and frequency of transitions between each pair of targets. Both humans and rats consistently chose routes that were more efficient than chance, but less efficient than optimal, and generally less efficient than routes produced by the nearest-neighbor strategy. We conclude that the TSP is a useful and flexible task for the study of spatial cognition in human and non-human animals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-9448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-9456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0449-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21927849</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Animal behavior ; Animal cognition ; Animals ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cognition ; Female ; Humans ; Learning ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Memory ; Original Paper ; Problem Solving ; Psychology Research ; Psychomotor Performance ; Rats - psychology ; Rats, Long-Evans - psychology ; Reaction Time ; Rodents ; Spatial Behavior ; Young Adult ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Animal cognition, 2012-03, Vol.15 (2), p.239-250</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-43963b20e4360490b76d985100972d4cbcb80bf7d1cbcac7202b63ca7d9584b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-43963b20e4360490b76d985100972d4cbcb80bf7d1cbcac7202b63ca7d9584b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21927849$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blaser, Rachel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginchansky, Rachel R.</creatorcontrib><title>Route selection by rats and humans in a navigational traveling salesman problem</title><title>Animal cognition</title><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><description>Spatial cognition is typically examined in non-human animals from the perspective of learning and memory. For this reason, spatial tasks are often constrained by the time necessary for training or the capacity of the animal’s short-term memory. A spatial task with limited learning and memory demands could allow for more efficient study of some aspects of spatial cognition. The traveling salesman problem (TSP), used to study human visuospatial problem solving, is a simple task with modifiable learning and memory requirements. In the current study, humans and rats were characterized in a navigational version of the TSP. Subjects visited each of 10 baited targets in any sequence from a set starting location. Unlike similar experiments, the roles of learning and memory were purposely minimized; all targets were perceptually available, no distracters were used, and each configuration was tested only once. The task yielded a variety of behavioral measures, including target revisits and omissions, route length, and frequency of transitions between each pair of targets. Both humans and rats consistently chose routes that were more efficient than chance, but less efficient than optimal, and generally less efficient than routes produced by the nearest-neighbor strategy. We conclude that the TSP is a useful and flexible task for the study of spatial cognition in human and non-human animals.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Rats - psychology</subject><subject>Rats, Long-Evans - psychology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Spatial Behavior</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1435-9448</issn><issn>1435-9456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV9LwzAUxYMobk4_gC8SfPGpmqRJ0zzK8B8MBqLPIUmz2ZGmM2kH-_ambE4QBB-SHMjvnsu9B4BLjG4xQvwuDjfOEE6HUpHxIzDGNGeZoKw4PmhajsBZjCuEUEkFPgUjggXhSY_B_LXtOwujddZ0deuh3sKgugiVr-BH3ygfYe2hgl5t6qUaEOVgF9TGutovYVTOxkTBdWi1s805OFkoF-3F_p2A98eHt-lzNps_vUzvZ5mhiHQZzUWRa4IszQtEBdK8qETJ0jyCk4oabXSJ9IJXOEllOEFEF7lRvBKspJrlE3Cz8019P3sbO9nU0VjnlLdtH6UgRVmKgqF_kISzkqGBvP5Frto-pHkHCPO0MyEShHeQCW2MwS7kOtSNCluJkRzykLtUZEpFDqlInmqu9sa9bmx1qPiOIQFkB8T05Zc2_HT-2_ULD9OWLw</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Blaser, Rachel E.</creator><creator>Ginchansky, Rachel R.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Route selection by rats and humans in a navigational traveling salesman problem</title><author>Blaser, Rachel E. ; Ginchansky, Rachel R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-43963b20e4360490b76d985100972d4cbcb80bf7d1cbcac7202b63ca7d9584b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Rats - psychology</topic><topic>Rats, Long-Evans - psychology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Spatial Behavior</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blaser, Rachel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginchansky, Rachel R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Journals (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blaser, Rachel E.</au><au>Ginchansky, Rachel R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Route selection by rats and humans in a navigational traveling salesman problem</atitle><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle><stitle>Anim Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>239-250</pages><issn>1435-9448</issn><eissn>1435-9456</eissn><abstract>Spatial cognition is typically examined in non-human animals from the perspective of learning and memory. For this reason, spatial tasks are often constrained by the time necessary for training or the capacity of the animal’s short-term memory. A spatial task with limited learning and memory demands could allow for more efficient study of some aspects of spatial cognition. The traveling salesman problem (TSP), used to study human visuospatial problem solving, is a simple task with modifiable learning and memory requirements. In the current study, humans and rats were characterized in a navigational version of the TSP. Subjects visited each of 10 baited targets in any sequence from a set starting location. Unlike similar experiments, the roles of learning and memory were purposely minimized; all targets were perceptually available, no distracters were used, and each configuration was tested only once. The task yielded a variety of behavioral measures, including target revisits and omissions, route length, and frequency of transitions between each pair of targets. Both humans and rats consistently chose routes that were more efficient than chance, but less efficient than optimal, and generally less efficient than routes produced by the nearest-neighbor strategy. We conclude that the TSP is a useful and flexible task for the study of spatial cognition in human and non-human animals.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21927849</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10071-011-0449-7</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1435-9448
ispartof Animal cognition, 2012-03, Vol.15 (2), p.239-250
issn 1435-9448
1435-9456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_926889650
source Springer Nature
subjects Adolescent
Animal behavior
Animal cognition
Animals
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cognition
Female
Humans
Learning
Life Sciences
Male
Memory
Original Paper
Problem Solving
Psychology Research
Psychomotor Performance
Rats - psychology
Rats, Long-Evans - psychology
Reaction Time
Rodents
Spatial Behavior
Young Adult
Zoology
title Route selection by rats and humans in a navigational traveling salesman problem
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A55%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Route%20selection%20by%20rats%20and%20humans%20in%20a%20navigational%20traveling%20salesman%20problem&rft.jtitle=Animal%20cognition&rft.au=Blaser,%20Rachel%20E.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=239-250&rft.issn=1435-9448&rft.eissn=1435-9456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10071-011-0449-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E922758500%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-43963b20e4360490b76d985100972d4cbcb80bf7d1cbcac7202b63ca7d9584b53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921719299&rft_id=info:pmid/21927849&rfr_iscdi=true