Loading…

Combining atlas-based parcellation of regional brain data acquired across scanners at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths

Longitudinal brain morphometric studies designed for data acquisition at a single MRI field strength can be seriously limited by system replacements from lower to higher field strength. Merging data across field strengths has not been endorsed for a variety of reasons, yet the ability to combine suc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2012-04, Vol.60 (2), p.940-951
Main Authors: Pfefferbaum, Adolf, Rohlfing, Torsten, Rosenbloom, Margaret J, Sullivan, Edith V
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 951
container_issue 2
container_start_page 940
container_title NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)
container_volume 60
creator Pfefferbaum, Adolf
Rohlfing, Torsten
Rosenbloom, Margaret J
Sullivan, Edith V
description Longitudinal brain morphometric studies designed for data acquisition at a single MRI field strength can be seriously limited by system replacements from lower to higher field strength. Merging data across field strengths has not been endorsed for a variety of reasons, yet the ability to combine such data would broaden longitudinal investigations. To determine whether structural T1-weighted MRI data acquired across MR field strengths could be merged, parcellations of archival SPGR data acquired in 114 individuals at 1.5 T and at 3.0 T within 3 weeks of each other were compared. The first set of analyses examined 1) the correspondence between regional tissue volumes derived from data collected at 1.5 T and 3.0 T and 2) whether there were systematic differences for which a correction factor could be determined and applied to improve measurement agreement. Comparability of regional volume determination at 1.5 T and 3.0 T was assessed with intraclass correlation (ICC) computed on volumes derived from the automated and unsupervised SRI24 atlas registration and parcellation method. A second set of analyses measured the reliability of the registration and quantification using the same approach on longitudinal data acquired in 69 healthy adults at a single field strength, 1.5 T, at an interval < 2 years. The mainstay of the analyses was based on the SRI24 method; to examine the potential of merging data across field strengths and across image analysis packages, a secondary set of analyses used FreeSurfer instead of the SRI24 method. For both methods, a regression-based linear correction function significantly improved correspondence. The results indicated high correspondence between most selected cortical, subcortical, and CSF-filled spaces; correspondence was lowest in the globus pallidus, a region rich in iron, which in turn has a considerable field-dependent effect on signal intensity. Thus, the application of a regression-based correction function that improved the correspondence in regional volume estimations argues well for the proposition that selected T1-weighted regional anatomical brain data can be reliably combined across 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths with the application of an appropriate correction procedure.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.092
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_928372862</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>928372862</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p172t-bc20fba1ad8138bf030e37bbefc89833cabd54a736079d36a2b15b4fe68dec123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkTtPwzAUhS0EoqXwF5A3pgRfOw97RBUvqRJLmaPrR0KqxEntZODfE6DsTPcbPh3pnEsIBZYCg-L-kHo3h6HtsXEpZ8BTBilT_Iysgak8UXnJz785F4kEUCtyFeOBMaYgk5dkxTlXJWfZmszbodetb31DceowJhqjs3TEYFzX4dQOng41Da5ZCDuqA7aeWpyQojnObVhkNGGIkUaD3rsQlyAKaU73FL2lImUL1a3rLI1TcL6ZPuI1uaixi-7mdDfk_elxv31Jdm_Pr9uHXTJCyadEG85qjYBWgpC6ZoI5UWrtaiOVFMKgtnmGpShYqawokGvIdVa7QlpngIsNufvNHcNwnF2cqr6NP8W8G-ZYKS5FyWXxH7OQCjiwxbw9mbPuna3GsLwhfFZ_m4ovZrR8hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>926891210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combining atlas-based parcellation of regional brain data acquired across scanners at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Pfefferbaum, Adolf ; Rohlfing, Torsten ; Rosenbloom, Margaret J ; Sullivan, Edith V</creator><creatorcontrib>Pfefferbaum, Adolf ; Rohlfing, Torsten ; Rosenbloom, Margaret J ; Sullivan, Edith V</creatorcontrib><description>Longitudinal brain morphometric studies designed for data acquisition at a single MRI field strength can be seriously limited by system replacements from lower to higher field strength. Merging data across field strengths has not been endorsed for a variety of reasons, yet the ability to combine such data would broaden longitudinal investigations. To determine whether structural T1-weighted MRI data acquired across MR field strengths could be merged, parcellations of archival SPGR data acquired in 114 individuals at 1.5 T and at 3.0 T within 3 weeks of each other were compared. The first set of analyses examined 1) the correspondence between regional tissue volumes derived from data collected at 1.5 T and 3.0 T and 2) whether there were systematic differences for which a correction factor could be determined and applied to improve measurement agreement. Comparability of regional volume determination at 1.5 T and 3.0 T was assessed with intraclass correlation (ICC) computed on volumes derived from the automated and unsupervised SRI24 atlas registration and parcellation method. A second set of analyses measured the reliability of the registration and quantification using the same approach on longitudinal data acquired in 69 healthy adults at a single field strength, 1.5 T, at an interval &lt; 2 years. The mainstay of the analyses was based on the SRI24 method; to examine the potential of merging data across field strengths and across image analysis packages, a secondary set of analyses used FreeSurfer instead of the SRI24 method. For both methods, a regression-based linear correction function significantly improved correspondence. The results indicated high correspondence between most selected cortical, subcortical, and CSF-filled spaces; correspondence was lowest in the globus pallidus, a region rich in iron, which in turn has a considerable field-dependent effect on signal intensity. Thus, the application of a regression-based correction function that improved the correspondence in regional volume estimations argues well for the proposition that selected T1-weighted regional anatomical brain data can be reliably combined across 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths with the application of an appropriate correction procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.092</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22297204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - anatomy &amp; histology ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2012-04, Vol.60 (2), p.940-951</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22297204$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pfefferbaum, Adolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohlfing, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbloom, Margaret J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Edith V</creatorcontrib><title>Combining atlas-based parcellation of regional brain data acquired across scanners at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Longitudinal brain morphometric studies designed for data acquisition at a single MRI field strength can be seriously limited by system replacements from lower to higher field strength. Merging data across field strengths has not been endorsed for a variety of reasons, yet the ability to combine such data would broaden longitudinal investigations. To determine whether structural T1-weighted MRI data acquired across MR field strengths could be merged, parcellations of archival SPGR data acquired in 114 individuals at 1.5 T and at 3.0 T within 3 weeks of each other were compared. The first set of analyses examined 1) the correspondence between regional tissue volumes derived from data collected at 1.5 T and 3.0 T and 2) whether there were systematic differences for which a correction factor could be determined and applied to improve measurement agreement. Comparability of regional volume determination at 1.5 T and 3.0 T was assessed with intraclass correlation (ICC) computed on volumes derived from the automated and unsupervised SRI24 atlas registration and parcellation method. A second set of analyses measured the reliability of the registration and quantification using the same approach on longitudinal data acquired in 69 healthy adults at a single field strength, 1.5 T, at an interval &lt; 2 years. The mainstay of the analyses was based on the SRI24 method; to examine the potential of merging data across field strengths and across image analysis packages, a secondary set of analyses used FreeSurfer instead of the SRI24 method. For both methods, a regression-based linear correction function significantly improved correspondence. The results indicated high correspondence between most selected cortical, subcortical, and CSF-filled spaces; correspondence was lowest in the globus pallidus, a region rich in iron, which in turn has a considerable field-dependent effect on signal intensity. Thus, the application of a regression-based correction function that improved the correspondence in regional volume estimations argues well for the proposition that selected T1-weighted regional anatomical brain data can be reliably combined across 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths with the application of an appropriate correction procedure.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkTtPwzAUhS0EoqXwF5A3pgRfOw97RBUvqRJLmaPrR0KqxEntZODfE6DsTPcbPh3pnEsIBZYCg-L-kHo3h6HtsXEpZ8BTBilT_Iysgak8UXnJz785F4kEUCtyFeOBMaYgk5dkxTlXJWfZmszbodetb31DceowJhqjs3TEYFzX4dQOng41Da5ZCDuqA7aeWpyQojnObVhkNGGIkUaD3rsQlyAKaU73FL2lImUL1a3rLI1TcL6ZPuI1uaixi-7mdDfk_elxv31Jdm_Pr9uHXTJCyadEG85qjYBWgpC6ZoI5UWrtaiOVFMKgtnmGpShYqawokGvIdVa7QlpngIsNufvNHcNwnF2cqr6NP8W8G-ZYKS5FyWXxH7OQCjiwxbw9mbPuna3GsLwhfFZ_m4ovZrR8hw</recordid><startdate>20120402</startdate><enddate>20120402</enddate><creator>Pfefferbaum, Adolf</creator><creator>Rohlfing, Torsten</creator><creator>Rosenbloom, Margaret J</creator><creator>Sullivan, Edith V</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120402</creationdate><title>Combining atlas-based parcellation of regional brain data acquired across scanners at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths</title><author>Pfefferbaum, Adolf ; Rohlfing, Torsten ; Rosenbloom, Margaret J ; Sullivan, Edith V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p172t-bc20fba1ad8138bf030e37bbefc89833cabd54a736079d36a2b15b4fe68dec123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfefferbaum, Adolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohlfing, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbloom, Margaret J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Edith V</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfefferbaum, Adolf</au><au>Rohlfing, Torsten</au><au>Rosenbloom, Margaret J</au><au>Sullivan, Edith V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combining atlas-based parcellation of regional brain data acquired across scanners at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2012-04-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>940</spage><epage>951</epage><pages>940-951</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Longitudinal brain morphometric studies designed for data acquisition at a single MRI field strength can be seriously limited by system replacements from lower to higher field strength. Merging data across field strengths has not been endorsed for a variety of reasons, yet the ability to combine such data would broaden longitudinal investigations. To determine whether structural T1-weighted MRI data acquired across MR field strengths could be merged, parcellations of archival SPGR data acquired in 114 individuals at 1.5 T and at 3.0 T within 3 weeks of each other were compared. The first set of analyses examined 1) the correspondence between regional tissue volumes derived from data collected at 1.5 T and 3.0 T and 2) whether there were systematic differences for which a correction factor could be determined and applied to improve measurement agreement. Comparability of regional volume determination at 1.5 T and 3.0 T was assessed with intraclass correlation (ICC) computed on volumes derived from the automated and unsupervised SRI24 atlas registration and parcellation method. A second set of analyses measured the reliability of the registration and quantification using the same approach on longitudinal data acquired in 69 healthy adults at a single field strength, 1.5 T, at an interval &lt; 2 years. The mainstay of the analyses was based on the SRI24 method; to examine the potential of merging data across field strengths and across image analysis packages, a secondary set of analyses used FreeSurfer instead of the SRI24 method. For both methods, a regression-based linear correction function significantly improved correspondence. The results indicated high correspondence between most selected cortical, subcortical, and CSF-filled spaces; correspondence was lowest in the globus pallidus, a region rich in iron, which in turn has a considerable field-dependent effect on signal intensity. Thus, the application of a regression-based correction function that improved the correspondence in regional volume estimations argues well for the proposition that selected T1-weighted regional anatomical brain data can be reliably combined across 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths with the application of an appropriate correction procedure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22297204</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.092</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8119
ispartof NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2012-04, Vol.60 (2), p.940-951
issn 1053-8119
1095-9572
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_928372862
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adult
Brain - anatomy & histology
Brain Mapping - methods
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
title Combining atlas-based parcellation of regional brain data acquired across scanners at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T05%3A41%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining%20atlas-based%20parcellation%20of%20regional%20brain%20data%20acquired%20across%20scanners%20at%201.5%20T%20and%203.0%20T%20field%20strengths&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Pfefferbaum,%20Adolf&rft.date=2012-04-02&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=940&rft.epage=951&rft.pages=940-951&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.092&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E928372862%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p172t-bc20fba1ad8138bf030e37bbefc89833cabd54a736079d36a2b15b4fe68dec123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=926891210&rft_id=info:pmid/22297204&rfr_iscdi=true