Loading…

A multi-centre pathologist survey on pathological processing and regression grading of colorectal cancer resection specimens treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation

To ascertain the approach and degree of consensus of pathologists in the handling and regression grading of colorectal cancer resection specimens treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation, a ten-part questionnaire was circulated to 18 gastrointestinal pathologists in eight countries. The questions wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology 2012-02, Vol.460 (2), p.151-155
Main Authors: Chetty, Runjan, Gill, Pelvender, Govender, Dhirendra, Bateman, Adrian, Chang, Hee Jin, Driman, David, Duthie, Fraser, Gomez, Marisa, Jaynes, Eleanor, Lee, Cheok Soon, Locketz, Michael, Mescoli, Claudia, Rowsell, Corwyn, Rullier, Anne, Serra, Stefano, Shepherd, Neil, Szentgyorgyi, Eva, Vajpeyi, Rajkumar, Wang, Lai Mun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To ascertain the approach and degree of consensus of pathologists in the handling and regression grading of colorectal cancer resection specimens treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation, a ten-part questionnaire was circulated to 18 gastrointestinal pathologists in eight countries. The questions were specific and addressed pertinent issues related to colorectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. There is a lack of consensus on how to handle the specimen, number of sections taken, correlation with pre- and post-operative radiological imaging, and especially, regression grading schema employed. Consensus in the form of guidelines is required so that the pathological assessment of these specimens will provide clinically relevant information for patient management, irrespective of location.
ISSN:0945-6317
1432-2307
DOI:10.1007/s00428-012-1193-3