Loading…
Gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry by EPR and AMS, using tooth enamel from atomic-bomb survivors: a mini review
The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR, or electron spin resonance) method was used to measure CO₂⁻· radicals recorded in tooth enamel by exposure to atomic-bomb gamma rays. The EPR-estimated doses (i.e. ⁶⁰Co gamma-ray equivalent dose) were generally in good correlation with cytogenetic data of th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiation protection dosimetry 2012-03, Vol.149 (1), p.79-83 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03 |
container_end_page | 83 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Radiation protection dosimetry |
container_volume | 149 |
creator | Nakamura, Nori Hirai, Yuko Kodama, Yoshiaki |
description | The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR, or electron spin resonance) method was used to measure CO₂⁻· radicals recorded in tooth enamel by exposure to atomic-bomb gamma rays. The EPR-estimated doses (i.e. ⁶⁰Co gamma-ray equivalent dose) were generally in good correlation with cytogenetic data of the same survivors, whereas plots of EPR-estimated dose or cytogenetically estimated dose against DS02 doses turned out to scatter more widely. Because those survivors whose EPR doses were higher (or lower) than DS02 doses tended to show also higher (or lower) responses for cytogenetic responses, the apparent variation appears primarily due to problems in individual DS02 doses rather than the measurement errors associated with the EPR or cytogenetic technique. A part of the enamel samples were also used for evaluation of neutron doses by measuring ⁴¹Ca/⁴⁰Ca ratios using the accelerator mass spectrometry technique. The results for the measured ratios were on average ~85 % of the calculated ratios by DS02 (but within the 95 % confidence bounds of the simulated results), which lends support to DS02-derived neutron doses to the survivors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rpd/ncr478 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_928908187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1008827204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90T1PwzAQBmALgWgpLPwA5A2ECLUdN3bYqqoUpCIQH3Pk2A4YxXGxk6L8ewwtjEw33HOn070AHGN0iVGejv1KjRvpKeM7YIgZJUlKUbYLhghTmnBK0AAchPCOEGH5hO6DASEkY4RNhqBeCGtF4kUPRaNgo7vWuwYqF4zVre9h2cP5w-NPc3r3dAG7YJpX2DrXvkHdCKtrWHlnoWidNTIpnS1h6PzarJ0PV1BAaxoDvV4b_XkI9ipRB320rSPwcj1_nt0ky_vF7Wy6TCQluE04ThXLGJ4ISUpFcyG4xHmZcV7F8_OIJkzSTApOtRaaEK4yIlQcqKo4itIRON3sXXn30enQFtYEqetaNNp1ocgJzxHHnEV59q_ECHFOGEE00vMNld6F4HVVrLyxwvcRFd85FDGHYpNDxCfbvV1ptfqjv49PvwDVaoQe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1008827204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry by EPR and AMS, using tooth enamel from atomic-bomb survivors: a mini review</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Nakamura, Nori ; Hirai, Yuko ; Kodama, Yoshiaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Nori ; Hirai, Yuko ; Kodama, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><description>The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR, or electron spin resonance) method was used to measure CO₂⁻· radicals recorded in tooth enamel by exposure to atomic-bomb gamma rays. The EPR-estimated doses (i.e. ⁶⁰Co gamma-ray equivalent dose) were generally in good correlation with cytogenetic data of the same survivors, whereas plots of EPR-estimated dose or cytogenetically estimated dose against DS02 doses turned out to scatter more widely. Because those survivors whose EPR doses were higher (or lower) than DS02 doses tended to show also higher (or lower) responses for cytogenetic responses, the apparent variation appears primarily due to problems in individual DS02 doses rather than the measurement errors associated with the EPR or cytogenetic technique. A part of the enamel samples were also used for evaluation of neutron doses by measuring ⁴¹Ca/⁴⁰Ca ratios using the accelerator mass spectrometry technique. The results for the measured ratios were on average ~85 % of the calculated ratios by DS02 (but within the 95 % confidence bounds of the simulated results), which lends support to DS02-derived neutron doses to the survivors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr478</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22267275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Chromosome Aberrations ; Dental Enamel - radiation effects ; Dosimetry ; Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy ; Gamma Rays ; Humans ; Mass Spectrometry ; Neutrons ; Nuclear Weapons ; Particle Accelerators ; Radiometry ; Reviews ; Survivors</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2012-03, Vol.149 (1), p.79-83</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22267275$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Nori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirai, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodama, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><title>Gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry by EPR and AMS, using tooth enamel from atomic-bomb survivors: a mini review</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR, or electron spin resonance) method was used to measure CO₂⁻· radicals recorded in tooth enamel by exposure to atomic-bomb gamma rays. The EPR-estimated doses (i.e. ⁶⁰Co gamma-ray equivalent dose) were generally in good correlation with cytogenetic data of the same survivors, whereas plots of EPR-estimated dose or cytogenetically estimated dose against DS02 doses turned out to scatter more widely. Because those survivors whose EPR doses were higher (or lower) than DS02 doses tended to show also higher (or lower) responses for cytogenetic responses, the apparent variation appears primarily due to problems in individual DS02 doses rather than the measurement errors associated with the EPR or cytogenetic technique. A part of the enamel samples were also used for evaluation of neutron doses by measuring ⁴¹Ca/⁴⁰Ca ratios using the accelerator mass spectrometry technique. The results for the measured ratios were on average ~85 % of the calculated ratios by DS02 (but within the 95 % confidence bounds of the simulated results), which lends support to DS02-derived neutron doses to the survivors.</description><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>Dental Enamel - radiation effects</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Neutrons</subject><subject>Nuclear Weapons</subject><subject>Particle Accelerators</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Survivors</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90T1PwzAQBmALgWgpLPwA5A2ECLUdN3bYqqoUpCIQH3Pk2A4YxXGxk6L8ewwtjEw33HOn070AHGN0iVGejv1KjRvpKeM7YIgZJUlKUbYLhghTmnBK0AAchPCOEGH5hO6DASEkY4RNhqBeCGtF4kUPRaNgo7vWuwYqF4zVre9h2cP5w-NPc3r3dAG7YJpX2DrXvkHdCKtrWHlnoWidNTIpnS1h6PzarJ0PV1BAaxoDvV4b_XkI9ipRB320rSPwcj1_nt0ky_vF7Wy6TCQluE04ThXLGJ4ISUpFcyG4xHmZcV7F8_OIJkzSTApOtRaaEK4yIlQcqKo4itIRON3sXXn30enQFtYEqetaNNp1ocgJzxHHnEV59q_ECHFOGEE00vMNld6F4HVVrLyxwvcRFd85FDGHYpNDxCfbvV1ptfqjv49PvwDVaoQe</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Nakamura, Nori</creator><creator>Hirai, Yuko</creator><creator>Kodama, Yoshiaki</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry by EPR and AMS, using tooth enamel from atomic-bomb survivors: a mini review</title><author>Nakamura, Nori ; Hirai, Yuko ; Kodama, Yoshiaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>Dental Enamel - radiation effects</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Neutrons</topic><topic>Nuclear Weapons</topic><topic>Particle Accelerators</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Survivors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Nori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirai, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodama, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakamura, Nori</au><au>Hirai, Yuko</au><au>Kodama, Yoshiaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry by EPR and AMS, using tooth enamel from atomic-bomb survivors: a mini review</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>79-83</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR, or electron spin resonance) method was used to measure CO₂⁻· radicals recorded in tooth enamel by exposure to atomic-bomb gamma rays. The EPR-estimated doses (i.e. ⁶⁰Co gamma-ray equivalent dose) were generally in good correlation with cytogenetic data of the same survivors, whereas plots of EPR-estimated dose or cytogenetically estimated dose against DS02 doses turned out to scatter more widely. Because those survivors whose EPR doses were higher (or lower) than DS02 doses tended to show also higher (or lower) responses for cytogenetic responses, the apparent variation appears primarily due to problems in individual DS02 doses rather than the measurement errors associated with the EPR or cytogenetic technique. A part of the enamel samples were also used for evaluation of neutron doses by measuring ⁴¹Ca/⁴⁰Ca ratios using the accelerator mass spectrometry technique. The results for the measured ratios were on average ~85 % of the calculated ratios by DS02 (but within the 95 % confidence bounds of the simulated results), which lends support to DS02-derived neutron doses to the survivors.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>22267275</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncr478</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-8420 |
ispartof | Radiation protection dosimetry, 2012-03, Vol.149 (1), p.79-83 |
issn | 0144-8420 1742-3406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_928908187 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Chromosome Aberrations Dental Enamel - radiation effects Dosimetry Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy Gamma Rays Humans Mass Spectrometry Neutrons Nuclear Weapons Particle Accelerators Radiometry Reviews Survivors |
title | Gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry by EPR and AMS, using tooth enamel from atomic-bomb survivors: a mini review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A35%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gamma-ray%20and%20neutron%20dosimetry%20by%20EPR%20and%20AMS,%20using%20tooth%20enamel%20from%20atomic-bomb%20survivors:%20a%20mini%20review&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Nakamura,%20Nori&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=79-83&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncr478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1008827204%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1008827204&rft_id=info:pmid/22267275&rfr_iscdi=true |