Loading…

Gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry by EPR and AMS, using tooth enamel from atomic-bomb survivors: a mini review

The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR, or electron spin resonance) method was used to measure CO₂⁻· radicals recorded in tooth enamel by exposure to atomic-bomb gamma rays. The EPR-estimated doses (i.e. ⁶⁰Co gamma-ray equivalent dose) were generally in good correlation with cytogenetic data of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation protection dosimetry 2012-03, Vol.149 (1), p.79-83
Main Authors: Nakamura, Nori, Hirai, Yuko, Kodama, Yoshiaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03
container_end_page 83
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 149
creator Nakamura, Nori
Hirai, Yuko
Kodama, Yoshiaki
description The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR, or electron spin resonance) method was used to measure CO₂⁻· radicals recorded in tooth enamel by exposure to atomic-bomb gamma rays. The EPR-estimated doses (i.e. ⁶⁰Co gamma-ray equivalent dose) were generally in good correlation with cytogenetic data of the same survivors, whereas plots of EPR-estimated dose or cytogenetically estimated dose against DS02 doses turned out to scatter more widely. Because those survivors whose EPR doses were higher (or lower) than DS02 doses tended to show also higher (or lower) responses for cytogenetic responses, the apparent variation appears primarily due to problems in individual DS02 doses rather than the measurement errors associated with the EPR or cytogenetic technique. A part of the enamel samples were also used for evaluation of neutron doses by measuring ⁴¹Ca/⁴⁰Ca ratios using the accelerator mass spectrometry technique. The results for the measured ratios were on average ~85 % of the calculated ratios by DS02 (but within the 95 % confidence bounds of the simulated results), which lends support to DS02-derived neutron doses to the survivors.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rpd/ncr478
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_928908187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1008827204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90T1PwzAQBmALgWgpLPwA5A2ECLUdN3bYqqoUpCIQH3Pk2A4YxXGxk6L8ewwtjEw33HOn070AHGN0iVGejv1KjRvpKeM7YIgZJUlKUbYLhghTmnBK0AAchPCOEGH5hO6DASEkY4RNhqBeCGtF4kUPRaNgo7vWuwYqF4zVre9h2cP5w-NPc3r3dAG7YJpX2DrXvkHdCKtrWHlnoWidNTIpnS1h6PzarJ0PV1BAaxoDvV4b_XkI9ipRB320rSPwcj1_nt0ky_vF7Wy6TCQluE04ThXLGJ4ISUpFcyG4xHmZcV7F8_OIJkzSTApOtRaaEK4yIlQcqKo4itIRON3sXXn30enQFtYEqetaNNp1ocgJzxHHnEV59q_ECHFOGEE00vMNld6F4HVVrLyxwvcRFd85FDGHYpNDxCfbvV1ptfqjv49PvwDVaoQe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1008827204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry by EPR and AMS, using tooth enamel from atomic-bomb survivors: a mini review</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Nakamura, Nori ; Hirai, Yuko ; Kodama, Yoshiaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Nori ; Hirai, Yuko ; Kodama, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><description>The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR, or electron spin resonance) method was used to measure CO₂⁻· radicals recorded in tooth enamel by exposure to atomic-bomb gamma rays. The EPR-estimated doses (i.e. ⁶⁰Co gamma-ray equivalent dose) were generally in good correlation with cytogenetic data of the same survivors, whereas plots of EPR-estimated dose or cytogenetically estimated dose against DS02 doses turned out to scatter more widely. Because those survivors whose EPR doses were higher (or lower) than DS02 doses tended to show also higher (or lower) responses for cytogenetic responses, the apparent variation appears primarily due to problems in individual DS02 doses rather than the measurement errors associated with the EPR or cytogenetic technique. A part of the enamel samples were also used for evaluation of neutron doses by measuring ⁴¹Ca/⁴⁰Ca ratios using the accelerator mass spectrometry technique. The results for the measured ratios were on average ~85 % of the calculated ratios by DS02 (but within the 95 % confidence bounds of the simulated results), which lends support to DS02-derived neutron doses to the survivors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr478</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22267275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Chromosome Aberrations ; Dental Enamel - radiation effects ; Dosimetry ; Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy ; Gamma Rays ; Humans ; Mass Spectrometry ; Neutrons ; Nuclear Weapons ; Particle Accelerators ; Radiometry ; Reviews ; Survivors</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2012-03, Vol.149 (1), p.79-83</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22267275$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Nori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirai, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodama, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><title>Gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry by EPR and AMS, using tooth enamel from atomic-bomb survivors: a mini review</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR, or electron spin resonance) method was used to measure CO₂⁻· radicals recorded in tooth enamel by exposure to atomic-bomb gamma rays. The EPR-estimated doses (i.e. ⁶⁰Co gamma-ray equivalent dose) were generally in good correlation with cytogenetic data of the same survivors, whereas plots of EPR-estimated dose or cytogenetically estimated dose against DS02 doses turned out to scatter more widely. Because those survivors whose EPR doses were higher (or lower) than DS02 doses tended to show also higher (or lower) responses for cytogenetic responses, the apparent variation appears primarily due to problems in individual DS02 doses rather than the measurement errors associated with the EPR or cytogenetic technique. A part of the enamel samples were also used for evaluation of neutron doses by measuring ⁴¹Ca/⁴⁰Ca ratios using the accelerator mass spectrometry technique. The results for the measured ratios were on average ~85 % of the calculated ratios by DS02 (but within the 95 % confidence bounds of the simulated results), which lends support to DS02-derived neutron doses to the survivors.</description><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>Dental Enamel - radiation effects</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Neutrons</subject><subject>Nuclear Weapons</subject><subject>Particle Accelerators</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Survivors</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90T1PwzAQBmALgWgpLPwA5A2ECLUdN3bYqqoUpCIQH3Pk2A4YxXGxk6L8ewwtjEw33HOn070AHGN0iVGejv1KjRvpKeM7YIgZJUlKUbYLhghTmnBK0AAchPCOEGH5hO6DASEkY4RNhqBeCGtF4kUPRaNgo7vWuwYqF4zVre9h2cP5w-NPc3r3dAG7YJpX2DrXvkHdCKtrWHlnoWidNTIpnS1h6PzarJ0PV1BAaxoDvV4b_XkI9ipRB320rSPwcj1_nt0ky_vF7Wy6TCQluE04ThXLGJ4ISUpFcyG4xHmZcV7F8_OIJkzSTApOtRaaEK4yIlQcqKo4itIRON3sXXn30enQFtYEqetaNNp1ocgJzxHHnEV59q_ECHFOGEE00vMNld6F4HVVrLyxwvcRFd85FDGHYpNDxCfbvV1ptfqjv49PvwDVaoQe</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Nakamura, Nori</creator><creator>Hirai, Yuko</creator><creator>Kodama, Yoshiaki</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry by EPR and AMS, using tooth enamel from atomic-bomb survivors: a mini review</title><author>Nakamura, Nori ; Hirai, Yuko ; Kodama, Yoshiaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>Dental Enamel - radiation effects</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Neutrons</topic><topic>Nuclear Weapons</topic><topic>Particle Accelerators</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Survivors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Nori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirai, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodama, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakamura, Nori</au><au>Hirai, Yuko</au><au>Kodama, Yoshiaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry by EPR and AMS, using tooth enamel from atomic-bomb survivors: a mini review</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>79-83</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR, or electron spin resonance) method was used to measure CO₂⁻· radicals recorded in tooth enamel by exposure to atomic-bomb gamma rays. The EPR-estimated doses (i.e. ⁶⁰Co gamma-ray equivalent dose) were generally in good correlation with cytogenetic data of the same survivors, whereas plots of EPR-estimated dose or cytogenetically estimated dose against DS02 doses turned out to scatter more widely. Because those survivors whose EPR doses were higher (or lower) than DS02 doses tended to show also higher (or lower) responses for cytogenetic responses, the apparent variation appears primarily due to problems in individual DS02 doses rather than the measurement errors associated with the EPR or cytogenetic technique. A part of the enamel samples were also used for evaluation of neutron doses by measuring ⁴¹Ca/⁴⁰Ca ratios using the accelerator mass spectrometry technique. The results for the measured ratios were on average ~85 % of the calculated ratios by DS02 (but within the 95 % confidence bounds of the simulated results), which lends support to DS02-derived neutron doses to the survivors.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>22267275</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncr478</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 2012-03, Vol.149 (1), p.79-83
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_928908187
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Chromosome Aberrations
Dental Enamel - radiation effects
Dosimetry
Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy
Gamma Rays
Humans
Mass Spectrometry
Neutrons
Nuclear Weapons
Particle Accelerators
Radiometry
Reviews
Survivors
title Gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry by EPR and AMS, using tooth enamel from atomic-bomb survivors: a mini review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A35%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gamma-ray%20and%20neutron%20dosimetry%20by%20EPR%20and%20AMS,%20using%20tooth%20enamel%20from%20atomic-bomb%20survivors:%20a%20mini%20review&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Nakamura,%20Nori&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=79-83&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncr478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1008827204%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-813d76715ac2bd49aa8c19b688f9549c4257c46ca84eeae228d62ad715ff13d03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1008827204&rft_id=info:pmid/22267275&rfr_iscdi=true