Response strategies in an international strategic alliance experimental context: Cross-country differences

International strategic alliances have grown increasingly popular in recent decades, yet their failure rate is extremely high. Poor management of adverse situations contributes significantly to such high failure rates. Moreover, the international environments in which international strategic allianc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of international management 2012-03, Vol.18 (1), p.66-84
Main Authors: Tjemkes, Brian V., Furrer, Olivier, Adolfs, Koen, Aydinlik, Arzu Ülgen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cross-cultural analysis
Cross-national analysis
Exchange
Exchange variables
Experiments
International strategic alliances
Japan
Management
Managers
National culture
Netherlands
Response strategies
Strategic behaviour
Strategic management
Switzerland
Turkey
United Kingdom
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:International strategic alliances have grown increasingly popular in recent decades, yet their failure rate is extremely high. Poor management of adverse situations contributes significantly to such high failure rates. Moreover, the international environments in which international strategic alliances operate exacerbate the adverse situations and make their management more critical. However, extant research does not specify how people from different national cultures respond to these adverse situations. In order to better understand cross-national differences, this study investigates future managers' preferences for specific response strategies in an international strategic alliance experimental context. Using a scenario-based experiment with 1379 business students in five countries—Japan, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United Kingdom—the authors assess whether preferences for seven response strategies—exit, opportunism, aggressive voice, creative voice, considerate voice, patience, and neglect—vary across countries. The results indicate that national culture, both directly and interactively through relationship-level exchange variables that characterize the adversity of the situation, influences response strategy preference. This study advances literature on response strategies by explaining that when faced with the same adverse situation, future managers from different countries likely prefer different response strategies, depending on which response strategies they believe are most adequate in their cultural environment.
ISSN:1075-4253
1873-0620
DOI:10.1016/j.intman.2011.06.003