Incorporating Indirect Costs into a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding

• Published in: Value in health 2012-03, Vol.15 (2), p.299-304
• Main Authors: Finkelstein, Eric A., PhD, Allaire, Benjamin T., MS, DiBonaventura, Marco daCosta, PhD, Burgess, Somali M., PhD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Absenteeism; Adult; Algorithms; bariatric surgery; Bariatric Surgery - economics; Bariatric Surgery - methods; business case; Cost benefit analysis; Cost containment; Cost Savings - statistics & numerical data; Costs and Cost Analysis - methods; Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics & numerical data; Expenditure; Female; Health Care Costs; Health Care Surveys; Humans; Indirect costs; Internal Medicine; Laparoscopy - economics; Male; obesity; Obesity - surgery; return on investment; Savings; United States
• ISSN: 1098-3015; 1524-4733
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.12.004

Abstract Objectives The objective of this study was to estimate the time to breakeven and 5-year net costs of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) taking both direct and indirect costs and cost savings into account. Methods Estimates of direct cost savings from LAGB were available from the literature. Although longitudinal data on indirect cost savings were not available, these estimates were generated by quantifying the relationship between medical expenditures and absenteeism and between medical expenditures and presenteeism (reduced on-the-job productivity) and combining these elasticity estimates with estimates of the direct cost savings to generate total savings. These savings were then combined with the direct and indirect costs of the procedure to quantify net savings. Results By including indirect costs, the time to breakeven was reduced by half a year, from 16 to 14 quarters. After 5 years, net savings in medical expenditures from a gastric banding procedure were estimated to be $4970 (±$3090). Including absenteeism increased savings to $6180 (±$3550). Savings were further increased to $10,960 (±$5864) when both absenteeism and presenteeism estimates were included. Conclusions This study presented a novel approach for including absenteeism and presenteeism estimates in cost-benefit analyses. Application of the approach to gastric banding among surgery-eligible obese employees revealed that the inclusion of indirect costs and cost savings improves the business case for the procedure. This approach can easily be extended to other populations and treatments.