Loading…

Allergy to goat's and sheep's milk in a population of cow's milk-allergic children treated with oral immunotherapy

To cite this article: Rodríguez del Río P, Sánchez‐García S, Escudero C, Pastor‐Vargas C, Sánchez Hernández JJ, Pérez‐Rangel I, Ibáñez MD. Allergy to goat’s and sheep’s milk in a population of cow’s milk–allergic children treated with oral immunotherapy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2012: 23: 128–132. Ba...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric allergy and immunology 2012-03, Vol.23 (2), p.128-132
Main Authors: Rodríguez del Río, Pablo, Sánchez-García, Silvia, Escudero, Carmelo, Pastor-Vargas, Carlos, Sánchez Hernández, José J., Pérez-Rangel, Inmaculada, Ibáñez, María Dolores
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To cite this article: Rodríguez del Río P, Sánchez‐García S, Escudero C, Pastor‐Vargas C, Sánchez Hernández JJ, Pérez‐Rangel I, Ibáñez MD. Allergy to goat’s and sheep’s milk in a population of cow’s milk–allergic children treated with oral immunotherapy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2012: 23: 128–132. Background:  Cow’s milk oral immunotherapy (CMOIT) is a recognized treatment for persistent cow’s milk (CM) allergy. However, further data are necessary on tolerance to milk from other mammals. Objective:  To describe the clinical and immunologic features of goat’s and sheep’s milk (GSM) allergy in patients who tolerated CM after CMOIT. Methods:  Fifty‐eight CM‐allergic patients who successfully underwent CMOIT in our department were evaluated using skin prick test (SPT), specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E determination, enzyme‐linked immunoassay (ELISA), and controlled oral challenge to assess allergy to GSM. Statistical analysis was carried out to identify markers of allergy to GSM. Results:  Fifteen of 58 (25.9%) patients were allergic to either goat’s or sheep’s milk or to both, as confirmed by a controlled positive oral challenge. Forty‐seven percent of all positive oral challenges were classified as anaphylactic reactions. Specific IgE to CM casein, goat’s whole milk, and sheep’s whole milk was 13.2, 18.0, and 21.4 kUA/l in the group of GSM‐allergic patients and 6.6, 6.5, and 6.5 kUA/l in the GSM‐non‐allergic patients (p 
ISSN:0905-6157
1399-3038
DOI:10.1111/j.1399-3038.2012.01284.x