Efficacy of Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review

• Published in: The American journal of sports medicine 2010-11, Vol.38 (11), p.2337-2345
• Main Authors: Ng, Vincent Y., Arora, Naveen, Best, Thomas M., Pan, Xueliang, Ellis, Thomas J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Arthritis; Biological and medical sciences; Clinical outcomes; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Female; Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery; Health Status Indicators; Hip Injuries - surgery; Hip joint; Hip Joint - surgery; Humans; Joint surgery; Juxtaarticular diseases. Extraarticular rhumatism; Male; Medical sciences; Osteoarthritis, Hip - etiology; Patients; Risk Factors; Sports injuries; Sports medicine; Systematic review; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0363-5465; 1552-3365
• DOI: 10.1177/0363546510365530

Background Recent case studies on the surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) have introduced a large amount of clinical data. However, there has been no clear consensus on its efficacy. Hypothesis The current literature can be clarified to address 4 questions: (1) Does treatment for FAI succeed in improving symptoms? (2) In which subset of patients should treatment for FAI be avoided? (3) Is labral refixation superior to simple resection? (4) Does treatment for FAI alter the natural progression of osteoarthritis in this group of typically young patients? Study Design Systematic review. Methods Twenty-three reports of case studies on the surgical treatment of FAI were identified and a systematic review was conducted. Data from each study were collected to answer each of the 4 focus questions. Results This review of 970 cases included 1 level II evidence trial, 2 level III studies, and 20 level IV studies. Based on patient outcome scores and effect size, all studies demonstrated improvement of patient symptoms. Up to 30% of patients will eventually require total hip arthroplasty; those patients with Outerbridge grade III or IV cartilage damage seen intraoperatively or with preoperative radiographs showing greater than Tonnis grade I osteoarthritis will have worse outcomes with treatment for FAI. Only 2 studies directly compared labral refixation with labral debridement. Several studies reported postoperative osteoarthritis findings; only a minority of these patients had progression of their osteoarthritis. Conclusion Surgical treatment for FAI reliably improves patient symptoms in the majority of patients without advanced osteoarthritis or chondral damage. Early evidence supports labral refixation. It is too soon to predict whether progression of osteoarthritis is delayed. Clinical Relevance These results may be used to help predict the outcome of surgical treatment of FAI in different patient populations and to assess the need for labral refixation.