Loading…

The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China's Development Experience: The Role of Informal Economic Practices

China's economic reform has been understood mainly in terms of the "new institutional economics," emphasizing the role of marketized private firms and related laws. Andrew Walder and Yingyi Qian, however, have pointed out instead the crucial role played by Chinese local governments, e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Modern China 2011-01, Vol.37 (1), p.3-43
Main Author: Huang, Philip C. C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083
container_end_page 43
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Modern China
container_volume 37
creator Huang, Philip C. C.
description China's economic reform has been understood mainly in terms of the "new institutional economics," emphasizing the role of marketized private firms and related laws. Andrew Walder and Yingyi Qian, however, have pointed out instead the crucial role played by Chinese local governments, especially their township and village enterprises. Neither interpretation, however, can account for what has happened in China since the mid-1990s, when the main engine for development shifted to local governments' competition for and active support of outside investment. Typically, local governments have provided land and related infrastructural support below cost, plus special subsidies and tax privileges, and also circumvented formal rules and regulations on labor use and environmental protection. Those informal practices and the huge accompanying informal economy, not just the new enterprises drawn in, have been the main dynamic both for China's striking GDP growth and its mounting social and environmental crises. The analysis presented here is historical-cum-theoretical and calls for a new understanding of China's development experience and of its practical implications.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0097700410386434
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954608711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25759537</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0097700410386434</sage_id><sourcerecordid>25759537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1LHTEUhoNY8Gq776Yw4MLV2Hx_uCu3t_WCoIhdD5l4Uucyk0yTuaX992aYthRBdBGScJ734ZAchN4TfE6IUh8xNkphzAlmWnLGD9CKCEFrqZk8RKu5XM_1I3Sc8w5jrDClK7S_e4CqrJhg6pztKxvuq5tk3XLbDmNfDlMXQ66ir9YPXbBnufoMP6GP4wBhqja_RkgdBAcXs6m6jT3M7Db4mIYi2bgY4tC5v17Ib9Ebb_sM7_7sJ-jbl83d-rK-uv66XX-6qh0XZqo9YVbcS6c5pcxzAa4lvqWUa9ZaKT2RLTG4lZxT67HjmkvsNBhlhfAKa3aCzhbvmOKPPeSpGbrsoO9tgLjPjREloRUhL5JaMMpIoV9BUm00x-JlkqvyK9zM5OkTchf3KZSnaYihmiohmCkUXiiXYs4JfDOmbrDpd0NwMw9B83QISqReItl-h_-kz_MfFn6Xp5j--alQorSp2CM8NriM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928275539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China's Development Experience: The Role of Informal Economic Practices</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Huang, Philip C. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Philip C. C.</creatorcontrib><description>China's economic reform has been understood mainly in terms of the "new institutional economics," emphasizing the role of marketized private firms and related laws. Andrew Walder and Yingyi Qian, however, have pointed out instead the crucial role played by Chinese local governments, especially their township and village enterprises. Neither interpretation, however, can account for what has happened in China since the mid-1990s, when the main engine for development shifted to local governments' competition for and active support of outside investment. Typically, local governments have provided land and related infrastructural support below cost, plus special subsidies and tax privileges, and also circumvented formal rules and regulations on labor use and environmental protection. Those informal practices and the huge accompanying informal economy, not just the new enterprises drawn in, have been the main dynamic both for China's striking GDP growth and its mounting social and environmental crises. The analysis presented here is historical-cum-theoretical and calls for a new understanding of China's development experience and of its practical implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0097-7004</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0097700410386434</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; China ; Competition ; Corporations ; Crises ; Development ; Economic Change ; Economic competition ; Economic dependence ; Economic Development ; Economic growth ; Economic reform ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental protection ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Informal economy ; Informal groups ; Informal sector ; Institutional economics ; Investment ; Investments ; Land ; Local Government ; Peasant class ; Peoples Republic of China ; Planned economies ; Political change ; Reform ; Reforms ; Regulation ; Rules ; Subsidies ; Taxation ; Villages</subject><ispartof>Modern China, 2011-01, Vol.37 (1), p.3-43</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>2011 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25759537$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25759537$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224,33774,33775,58238,58471,79236</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Philip C. C.</creatorcontrib><title>The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China's Development Experience: The Role of Informal Economic Practices</title><title>Modern China</title><description>China's economic reform has been understood mainly in terms of the "new institutional economics," emphasizing the role of marketized private firms and related laws. Andrew Walder and Yingyi Qian, however, have pointed out instead the crucial role played by Chinese local governments, especially their township and village enterprises. Neither interpretation, however, can account for what has happened in China since the mid-1990s, when the main engine for development shifted to local governments' competition for and active support of outside investment. Typically, local governments have provided land and related infrastructural support below cost, plus special subsidies and tax privileges, and also circumvented formal rules and regulations on labor use and environmental protection. Those informal practices and the huge accompanying informal economy, not just the new enterprises drawn in, have been the main dynamic both for China's striking GDP growth and its mounting social and environmental crises. The analysis presented here is historical-cum-theoretical and calls for a new understanding of China's development experience and of its practical implications.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Economic Change</subject><subject>Economic competition</subject><subject>Economic dependence</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Informal economy</subject><subject>Informal groups</subject><subject>Informal sector</subject><subject>Institutional economics</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Local Government</subject><subject>Peasant class</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Planned economies</subject><subject>Political change</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Rules</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Villages</subject><issn>0097-7004</issn><issn>1552-6836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1LHTEUhoNY8Gq776Yw4MLV2Hx_uCu3t_WCoIhdD5l4Uucyk0yTuaX992aYthRBdBGScJ734ZAchN4TfE6IUh8xNkphzAlmWnLGD9CKCEFrqZk8RKu5XM_1I3Sc8w5jrDClK7S_e4CqrJhg6pztKxvuq5tk3XLbDmNfDlMXQ66ir9YPXbBnufoMP6GP4wBhqja_RkgdBAcXs6m6jT3M7Db4mIYi2bgY4tC5v17Ib9Ebb_sM7_7sJ-jbl83d-rK-uv66XX-6qh0XZqo9YVbcS6c5pcxzAa4lvqWUa9ZaKT2RLTG4lZxT67HjmkvsNBhlhfAKa3aCzhbvmOKPPeSpGbrsoO9tgLjPjREloRUhL5JaMMpIoV9BUm00x-JlkqvyK9zM5OkTchf3KZSnaYihmiohmCkUXiiXYs4JfDOmbrDpd0NwMw9B83QISqReItl-h_-kz_MfFn6Xp5j--alQorSp2CM8NriM</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Huang, Philip C. C.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China's Development Experience: The Role of Informal Economic Practices</title><author>Huang, Philip C. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Economic Change</topic><topic>Economic competition</topic><topic>Economic dependence</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Informal economy</topic><topic>Informal groups</topic><topic>Informal sector</topic><topic>Institutional economics</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Local Government</topic><topic>Peasant class</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Planned economies</topic><topic>Political change</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Rules</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Villages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Philip C. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Modern China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Philip C. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China's Development Experience: The Role of Informal Economic Practices</atitle><jtitle>Modern China</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>3-43</pages><issn>0097-7004</issn><eissn>1552-6836</eissn><abstract>China's economic reform has been understood mainly in terms of the "new institutional economics," emphasizing the role of marketized private firms and related laws. Andrew Walder and Yingyi Qian, however, have pointed out instead the crucial role played by Chinese local governments, especially their township and village enterprises. Neither interpretation, however, can account for what has happened in China since the mid-1990s, when the main engine for development shifted to local governments' competition for and active support of outside investment. Typically, local governments have provided land and related infrastructural support below cost, plus special subsidies and tax privileges, and also circumvented formal rules and regulations on labor use and environmental protection. Those informal practices and the huge accompanying informal economy, not just the new enterprises drawn in, have been the main dynamic both for China's striking GDP growth and its mounting social and environmental crises. The analysis presented here is historical-cum-theoretical and calls for a new understanding of China's development experience and of its practical implications.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0097700410386434</doi><tpages>41</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0097-7004
ispartof Modern China, 2011-01, Vol.37 (1), p.3-43
issn 0097-7004
1552-6836
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954608711
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Capitalism
China
Competition
Corporations
Crises
Development
Economic Change
Economic competition
Economic dependence
Economic Development
Economic growth
Economic reform
Environmental degradation
Environmental protection
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
Informal economy
Informal groups
Informal sector
Institutional economics
Investment
Investments
Land
Local Government
Peasant class
Peoples Republic of China
Planned economies
Political change
Reform
Reforms
Regulation
Rules
Subsidies
Taxation
Villages
title The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China's Development Experience: The Role of Informal Economic Practices
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A06%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Theoretical%20and%20Practical%20Implications%20of%20China's%20Development%20Experience:%20The%20Role%20of%20Informal%20Economic%20Practices&rft.jtitle=Modern%20China&rft.au=Huang,%20Philip%20C.%20C.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=3-43&rft.issn=0097-7004&rft.eissn=1552-6836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0097700410386434&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25759537%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928275539&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25759537&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0097700410386434&rfr_iscdi=true