Loading…
The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China's Development Experience: The Role of Informal Economic Practices
China's economic reform has been understood mainly in terms of the "new institutional economics," emphasizing the role of marketized private firms and related laws. Andrew Walder and Yingyi Qian, however, have pointed out instead the crucial role played by Chinese local governments, e...
Saved in:
Published in: | Modern China 2011-01, Vol.37 (1), p.3-43 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083 |
container_end_page | 43 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Modern China |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Huang, Philip C. C. |
description | China's economic reform has been understood mainly in terms of the "new institutional economics," emphasizing the role of marketized private firms and related laws. Andrew Walder and Yingyi Qian, however, have pointed out instead the crucial role played by Chinese local governments, especially their township and village enterprises. Neither interpretation, however, can account for what has happened in China since the mid-1990s, when the main engine for development shifted to local governments' competition for and active support of outside investment. Typically, local governments have provided land and related infrastructural support below cost, plus special subsidies and tax privileges, and also circumvented formal rules and regulations on labor use and environmental protection. Those informal practices and the huge accompanying informal economy, not just the new enterprises drawn in, have been the main dynamic both for China's striking GDP growth and its mounting social and environmental crises. The analysis presented here is historical-cum-theoretical and calls for a new understanding of China's development experience and of its practical implications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0097700410386434 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954608711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25759537</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0097700410386434</sage_id><sourcerecordid>25759537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1LHTEUhoNY8Gq776Yw4MLV2Hx_uCu3t_WCoIhdD5l4Uucyk0yTuaX992aYthRBdBGScJ734ZAchN4TfE6IUh8xNkphzAlmWnLGD9CKCEFrqZk8RKu5XM_1I3Sc8w5jrDClK7S_e4CqrJhg6pztKxvuq5tk3XLbDmNfDlMXQ66ir9YPXbBnufoMP6GP4wBhqja_RkgdBAcXs6m6jT3M7Db4mIYi2bgY4tC5v17Ib9Ebb_sM7_7sJ-jbl83d-rK-uv66XX-6qh0XZqo9YVbcS6c5pcxzAa4lvqWUa9ZaKT2RLTG4lZxT67HjmkvsNBhlhfAKa3aCzhbvmOKPPeSpGbrsoO9tgLjPjREloRUhL5JaMMpIoV9BUm00x-JlkqvyK9zM5OkTchf3KZSnaYihmiohmCkUXiiXYs4JfDOmbrDpd0NwMw9B83QISqReItl-h_-kz_MfFn6Xp5j--alQorSp2CM8NriM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928275539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China's Development Experience: The Role of Informal Economic Practices</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Huang, Philip C. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Philip C. C.</creatorcontrib><description>China's economic reform has been understood mainly in terms of the "new institutional economics," emphasizing the role of marketized private firms and related laws. Andrew Walder and Yingyi Qian, however, have pointed out instead the crucial role played by Chinese local governments, especially their township and village enterprises. Neither interpretation, however, can account for what has happened in China since the mid-1990s, when the main engine for development shifted to local governments' competition for and active support of outside investment. Typically, local governments have provided land and related infrastructural support below cost, plus special subsidies and tax privileges, and also circumvented formal rules and regulations on labor use and environmental protection. Those informal practices and the huge accompanying informal economy, not just the new enterprises drawn in, have been the main dynamic both for China's striking GDP growth and its mounting social and environmental crises. The analysis presented here is historical-cum-theoretical and calls for a new understanding of China's development experience and of its practical implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0097-7004</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0097700410386434</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; China ; Competition ; Corporations ; Crises ; Development ; Economic Change ; Economic competition ; Economic dependence ; Economic Development ; Economic growth ; Economic reform ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental protection ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Informal economy ; Informal groups ; Informal sector ; Institutional economics ; Investment ; Investments ; Land ; Local Government ; Peasant class ; Peoples Republic of China ; Planned economies ; Political change ; Reform ; Reforms ; Regulation ; Rules ; Subsidies ; Taxation ; Villages</subject><ispartof>Modern China, 2011-01, Vol.37 (1), p.3-43</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>2011 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25759537$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25759537$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224,33774,33775,58238,58471,79236</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Philip C. C.</creatorcontrib><title>The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China's Development Experience: The Role of Informal Economic Practices</title><title>Modern China</title><description>China's economic reform has been understood mainly in terms of the "new institutional economics," emphasizing the role of marketized private firms and related laws. Andrew Walder and Yingyi Qian, however, have pointed out instead the crucial role played by Chinese local governments, especially their township and village enterprises. Neither interpretation, however, can account for what has happened in China since the mid-1990s, when the main engine for development shifted to local governments' competition for and active support of outside investment. Typically, local governments have provided land and related infrastructural support below cost, plus special subsidies and tax privileges, and also circumvented formal rules and regulations on labor use and environmental protection. Those informal practices and the huge accompanying informal economy, not just the new enterprises drawn in, have been the main dynamic both for China's striking GDP growth and its mounting social and environmental crises. The analysis presented here is historical-cum-theoretical and calls for a new understanding of China's development experience and of its practical implications.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Economic Change</subject><subject>Economic competition</subject><subject>Economic dependence</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Informal economy</subject><subject>Informal groups</subject><subject>Informal sector</subject><subject>Institutional economics</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Local Government</subject><subject>Peasant class</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Planned economies</subject><subject>Political change</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Rules</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Villages</subject><issn>0097-7004</issn><issn>1552-6836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1LHTEUhoNY8Gq776Yw4MLV2Hx_uCu3t_WCoIhdD5l4Uucyk0yTuaX992aYthRBdBGScJ734ZAchN4TfE6IUh8xNkphzAlmWnLGD9CKCEFrqZk8RKu5XM_1I3Sc8w5jrDClK7S_e4CqrJhg6pztKxvuq5tk3XLbDmNfDlMXQ66ir9YPXbBnufoMP6GP4wBhqja_RkgdBAcXs6m6jT3M7Db4mIYi2bgY4tC5v17Ib9Ebb_sM7_7sJ-jbl83d-rK-uv66XX-6qh0XZqo9YVbcS6c5pcxzAa4lvqWUa9ZaKT2RLTG4lZxT67HjmkvsNBhlhfAKa3aCzhbvmOKPPeSpGbrsoO9tgLjPjREloRUhL5JaMMpIoV9BUm00x-JlkqvyK9zM5OkTchf3KZSnaYihmiohmCkUXiiXYs4JfDOmbrDpd0NwMw9B83QISqReItl-h_-kz_MfFn6Xp5j--alQorSp2CM8NriM</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Huang, Philip C. C.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China's Development Experience: The Role of Informal Economic Practices</title><author>Huang, Philip C. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Economic Change</topic><topic>Economic competition</topic><topic>Economic dependence</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Informal economy</topic><topic>Informal groups</topic><topic>Informal sector</topic><topic>Institutional economics</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Local Government</topic><topic>Peasant class</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Planned economies</topic><topic>Political change</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Rules</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Villages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Philip C. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Modern China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Philip C. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China's Development Experience: The Role of Informal Economic Practices</atitle><jtitle>Modern China</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>3-43</pages><issn>0097-7004</issn><eissn>1552-6836</eissn><abstract>China's economic reform has been understood mainly in terms of the "new institutional economics," emphasizing the role of marketized private firms and related laws. Andrew Walder and Yingyi Qian, however, have pointed out instead the crucial role played by Chinese local governments, especially their township and village enterprises. Neither interpretation, however, can account for what has happened in China since the mid-1990s, when the main engine for development shifted to local governments' competition for and active support of outside investment. Typically, local governments have provided land and related infrastructural support below cost, plus special subsidies and tax privileges, and also circumvented formal rules and regulations on labor use and environmental protection. Those informal practices and the huge accompanying informal economy, not just the new enterprises drawn in, have been the main dynamic both for China's striking GDP growth and its mounting social and environmental crises. The analysis presented here is historical-cum-theoretical and calls for a new understanding of China's development experience and of its practical implications.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0097700410386434</doi><tpages>41</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0097-7004 |
ispartof | Modern China, 2011-01, Vol.37 (1), p.3-43 |
issn | 0097-7004 1552-6836 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954608711 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE |
subjects | Capitalism China Competition Corporations Crises Development Economic Change Economic competition Economic dependence Economic Development Economic growth Economic reform Environmental degradation Environmental protection GDP Gross Domestic Product Informal economy Informal groups Informal sector Institutional economics Investment Investments Land Local Government Peasant class Peoples Republic of China Planned economies Political change Reform Reforms Regulation Rules Subsidies Taxation Villages |
title | The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China's Development Experience: The Role of Informal Economic Practices |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A06%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Theoretical%20and%20Practical%20Implications%20of%20China's%20Development%20Experience:%20The%20Role%20of%20Informal%20Economic%20Practices&rft.jtitle=Modern%20China&rft.au=Huang,%20Philip%20C.%20C.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=3-43&rft.issn=0097-7004&rft.eissn=1552-6836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0097700410386434&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25759537%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f13a5d6c84223f45ecb1fb22483ba66f16b190b6442af0c48460c8e97a55f7083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928275539&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25759537&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0097700410386434&rfr_iscdi=true |