Loading…
Intergenerational Relationships and Female Inheritance Expectations: Comparative Results From Eight Societies in Asia, Europe, and North America
In the current article, the author (a) integrates two major theoretical approaches for the explanation of inheritance expectations, namely, the institutional approach of cultural anthropology and the interactionist approach of family research and social gerontology; (b) takes into account the instit...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cross-cultural psychology 2010-09, Vol.41 (5-6), p.690-705 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a455t-7d1a67514946ff700721a84affde4dc7fde52070d6f80d92523b15a69179d6743 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a455t-7d1a67514946ff700721a84affde4dc7fde52070d6f80d92523b15a69179d6743 |
container_end_page | 705 |
container_issue | 5-6 |
container_start_page | 690 |
container_title | Journal of cross-cultural psychology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Nauck, Bernhard |
description | In the current article, the author (a) integrates two major theoretical approaches for the explanation of inheritance expectations, namely, the institutional approach of cultural anthropology and the interactionist approach of family research and social gerontology; (b) takes into account the institutional settings of kinship systems and inheritance regimes on the societal level; and (c) relates these institutional settings to the intergenerational relationships between parents and parents-in-law and their offspring. At the societal level, these relations are formulated as two hypotheses: The lineage hypothesis refers to the inheritance regime and its impact on individual inheritance expectations, whereas the welfare hypothesis refers to the relation between levels of affluence and quality of inheritance (instrumental or expressive inheritance).The empirical analysis is based on standardized interviews with women from India, China, Palestine, Turkey, Indonesia, Russia, Germany, and the United States (N = 5,282), which were collected for the Value of Children in Six Cultures research project. Descriptive results show strong cross-cultural differences in matrilineal, patrilineal, and bilineal inheritance expectations. In subsequent multivariate logistic regression analyses, the author tested societal, relational, and individual predictors on inheritance expectations. The results support the lineage and welfare hypotheses but provide no evidence for exchange-based assumptions on the effects of the quality of intergenerational relationships on inheritance expectations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0022022110375161 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954623097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0022022110375161</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2145578821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a455t-7d1a67514946ff700721a84affde4dc7fde52070d6f80d92523b15a69179d6743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1r3DAQhkVJoJuk9x5Fc-glbvQtq7dl2U0XQgNJezaqPd5VsC1HkkP7L_qTI2d7KIEQGJiBed53pGEQ-kjJF0q1viSEsRyUEq4lVfQdWlApWSEFY0doMbeLuf8encR4TwihUpsF-rsdEoQdDBBscn6wHb6F7rmMezdGbIcGb6C3HeDtsIfgkh1qwOvfI9TpwH3FK9-PdjZ4hCyPU5ci3gTf47Xb7RO-87WD5CBiN-BldPYCr6fgR7h4tv_uQ9rjZZ_Na3uGjlvbRfjwL5-in5v1j9W34vrmartaXhdWSJkK3VCr8keFEaptNSGaUVsK27YNiKbWOUlGNGlUW5LGMMn4LyqtMlSbRmnBT9Hng-8Y_MMEMVW9izV0nR3AT7EyUijGidFvkiU3ebzJi3-L1LKklBPOM_npBXnvp5C3P0O8JEzI-Ynnr0G0LCXXSnKVKXKg6uBjDNBWY3C9DX8qSqr5NKqXp5ElxUES7Q7-M32NfwLvR7b0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1885376536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intergenerational Relationships and Female Inheritance Expectations: Comparative Results From Eight Societies in Asia, Europe, and North America</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Nauck, Bernhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Nauck, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><description>In the current article, the author (a) integrates two major theoretical approaches for the explanation of inheritance expectations, namely, the institutional approach of cultural anthropology and the interactionist approach of family research and social gerontology; (b) takes into account the institutional settings of kinship systems and inheritance regimes on the societal level; and (c) relates these institutional settings to the intergenerational relationships between parents and parents-in-law and their offspring. At the societal level, these relations are formulated as two hypotheses: The lineage hypothesis refers to the inheritance regime and its impact on individual inheritance expectations, whereas the welfare hypothesis refers to the relation between levels of affluence and quality of inheritance (instrumental or expressive inheritance).The empirical analysis is based on standardized interviews with women from India, China, Palestine, Turkey, Indonesia, Russia, Germany, and the United States (N = 5,282), which were collected for the Value of Children in Six Cultures research project. Descriptive results show strong cross-cultural differences in matrilineal, patrilineal, and bilineal inheritance expectations. In subsequent multivariate logistic regression analyses, the author tested societal, relational, and individual predictors on inheritance expectations. The results support the lineage and welfare hypotheses but provide no evidence for exchange-based assumptions on the effects of the quality of intergenerational relationships on inheritance expectations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0221</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022022110375161</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPGB5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Affluence ; Aging (Individuals) ; Asia ; Children ; China ; Comparative analysis ; Cross cultural studies ; Cultural anthropology ; Cultural Differences ; Cultural heritage ; Europe ; Expectations ; Family relations ; Family studies ; Females ; Genealogy ; Genetic crosses ; Geriatrics ; Gerontology ; Heredity ; Inheritance ; Inheritance and succession ; Inheritances ; Intergenerational relations ; Intergenerational relationships ; International comparisons ; Kinship ; Lineage ; North America ; Parents & parenting ; Regression analysis ; Turkey ; Welfare ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 2010-09, Vol.41 (5-6), p.690-705</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2010</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2010</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Sep-Nov 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a455t-7d1a67514946ff700721a84affde4dc7fde52070d6f80d92523b15a69179d6743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a455t-7d1a67514946ff700721a84affde4dc7fde52070d6f80d92523b15a69179d6743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998,30999,33222,33223,33773,79235</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nauck, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><title>Intergenerational Relationships and Female Inheritance Expectations: Comparative Results From Eight Societies in Asia, Europe, and North America</title><title>Journal of cross-cultural psychology</title><description>In the current article, the author (a) integrates two major theoretical approaches for the explanation of inheritance expectations, namely, the institutional approach of cultural anthropology and the interactionist approach of family research and social gerontology; (b) takes into account the institutional settings of kinship systems and inheritance regimes on the societal level; and (c) relates these institutional settings to the intergenerational relationships between parents and parents-in-law and their offspring. At the societal level, these relations are formulated as two hypotheses: The lineage hypothesis refers to the inheritance regime and its impact on individual inheritance expectations, whereas the welfare hypothesis refers to the relation between levels of affluence and quality of inheritance (instrumental or expressive inheritance).The empirical analysis is based on standardized interviews with women from India, China, Palestine, Turkey, Indonesia, Russia, Germany, and the United States (N = 5,282), which were collected for the Value of Children in Six Cultures research project. Descriptive results show strong cross-cultural differences in matrilineal, patrilineal, and bilineal inheritance expectations. In subsequent multivariate logistic regression analyses, the author tested societal, relational, and individual predictors on inheritance expectations. The results support the lineage and welfare hypotheses but provide no evidence for exchange-based assumptions on the effects of the quality of intergenerational relationships on inheritance expectations.</description><subject>Affluence</subject><subject>Aging (Individuals)</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Cultural Differences</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>Family relations</subject><subject>Family studies</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Genealogy</subject><subject>Genetic crosses</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Heredity</subject><subject>Inheritance</subject><subject>Inheritance and succession</subject><subject>Inheritances</subject><subject>Intergenerational relations</subject><subject>Intergenerational relationships</subject><subject>International comparisons</subject><subject>Kinship</subject><subject>Lineage</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0022-0221</issn><issn>1552-5422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1r3DAQhkVJoJuk9x5Fc-glbvQtq7dl2U0XQgNJezaqPd5VsC1HkkP7L_qTI2d7KIEQGJiBed53pGEQ-kjJF0q1viSEsRyUEq4lVfQdWlApWSEFY0doMbeLuf8encR4TwihUpsF-rsdEoQdDBBscn6wHb6F7rmMezdGbIcGb6C3HeDtsIfgkh1qwOvfI9TpwH3FK9-PdjZ4hCyPU5ci3gTf47Xb7RO-87WD5CBiN-BldPYCr6fgR7h4tv_uQ9rjZZ_Na3uGjlvbRfjwL5-in5v1j9W34vrmartaXhdWSJkK3VCr8keFEaptNSGaUVsK27YNiKbWOUlGNGlUW5LGMMn4LyqtMlSbRmnBT9Hng-8Y_MMEMVW9izV0nR3AT7EyUijGidFvkiU3ebzJi3-L1LKklBPOM_npBXnvp5C3P0O8JEzI-Ynnr0G0LCXXSnKVKXKg6uBjDNBWY3C9DX8qSqr5NKqXp5ElxUES7Q7-M32NfwLvR7b0</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Nauck, Bernhard</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Intergenerational Relationships and Female Inheritance Expectations: Comparative Results From Eight Societies in Asia, Europe, and North America</title><author>Nauck, Bernhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a455t-7d1a67514946ff700721a84affde4dc7fde52070d6f80d92523b15a69179d6743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Affluence</topic><topic>Aging (Individuals)</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Cultural Differences</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>Family relations</topic><topic>Family studies</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Genealogy</topic><topic>Genetic crosses</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Heredity</topic><topic>Inheritance</topic><topic>Inheritance and succession</topic><topic>Inheritances</topic><topic>Intergenerational relations</topic><topic>Intergenerational relationships</topic><topic>International comparisons</topic><topic>Kinship</topic><topic>Lineage</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nauck, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of cross-cultural psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nauck, Bernhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intergenerational Relationships and Female Inheritance Expectations: Comparative Results From Eight Societies in Asia, Europe, and North America</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cross-cultural psychology</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>690</spage><epage>705</epage><pages>690-705</pages><issn>0022-0221</issn><eissn>1552-5422</eissn><coden>JCPGB5</coden><abstract>In the current article, the author (a) integrates two major theoretical approaches for the explanation of inheritance expectations, namely, the institutional approach of cultural anthropology and the interactionist approach of family research and social gerontology; (b) takes into account the institutional settings of kinship systems and inheritance regimes on the societal level; and (c) relates these institutional settings to the intergenerational relationships between parents and parents-in-law and their offspring. At the societal level, these relations are formulated as two hypotheses: The lineage hypothesis refers to the inheritance regime and its impact on individual inheritance expectations, whereas the welfare hypothesis refers to the relation between levels of affluence and quality of inheritance (instrumental or expressive inheritance).The empirical analysis is based on standardized interviews with women from India, China, Palestine, Turkey, Indonesia, Russia, Germany, and the United States (N = 5,282), which were collected for the Value of Children in Six Cultures research project. Descriptive results show strong cross-cultural differences in matrilineal, patrilineal, and bilineal inheritance expectations. In subsequent multivariate logistic regression analyses, the author tested societal, relational, and individual predictors on inheritance expectations. The results support the lineage and welfare hypotheses but provide no evidence for exchange-based assumptions on the effects of the quality of intergenerational relationships on inheritance expectations.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0022022110375161</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0221 |
ispartof | Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 2010-09, Vol.41 (5-6), p.690-705 |
issn | 0022-0221 1552-5422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_954623097 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Affluence Aging (Individuals) Asia Children China Comparative analysis Cross cultural studies Cultural anthropology Cultural Differences Cultural heritage Europe Expectations Family relations Family studies Females Genealogy Genetic crosses Geriatrics Gerontology Heredity Inheritance Inheritance and succession Inheritances Intergenerational relations Intergenerational relationships International comparisons Kinship Lineage North America Parents & parenting Regression analysis Turkey Welfare Women |
title | Intergenerational Relationships and Female Inheritance Expectations: Comparative Results From Eight Societies in Asia, Europe, and North America |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A33%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intergenerational%20Relationships%20and%20Female%20Inheritance%20Expectations:%20Comparative%20Results%20From%20Eight%20Societies%20in%20Asia,%20Europe,%20and%20North%20America&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cross-cultural%20psychology&rft.au=Nauck,%20Bernhard&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=690&rft.epage=705&rft.pages=690-705&rft.issn=0022-0221&rft.eissn=1552-5422&rft.coden=JCPGB5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022022110375161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2145578821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a455t-7d1a67514946ff700721a84affde4dc7fde52070d6f80d92523b15a69179d6743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1885376536&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022022110375161&rfr_iscdi=true |