Loading…

The long-term box office performance of sequel movies

With a 26-year-long database of nationally distributed movies, we estimate the prevalence and effectiveness of sequels over time, while controlling for other factors that might influence demand. In particular, we examine whether the effectiveness of a strategy increases over time (possibly due to ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marketing letters 2012-03, Vol.23 (1), p.13-29
Main Authors: Dhar, Tirtha, Sun, Guanghui, Weinberg, Charles B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title Marketing letters
container_volume 23
creator Dhar, Tirtha
Sun, Guanghui
Weinberg, Charles B.
description With a 26-year-long database of nationally distributed movies, we estimate the prevalence and effectiveness of sequels over time, while controlling for other factors that might influence demand. In particular, we examine whether the effectiveness of a strategy increases over time (possibly due to managerial learning) or decreases (possibly because its effectiveness is competed away or because of consumer satiation). After taking into account both supply side and demand side effects by using simultaneous equations, we find that sequels have a positive effect indirectly (i.e., supply side effect) through a significantly larger number of theaters showing such movies compared to non-sequel movies. In terms of direct effect (i.e., demand side effect), sequels do better than non-sequels in generating more attendance in the first week and in total. Parent movies, the movies from which sequels originate, also do better than non-sequels in terms of total attendance and first-week attendance. Interestingly, sequel movies generate less total attendance than parent movies. On the other hand, sequels generate more revenues upfront than parents. We also find that the impact of sequels on first-week attendance has been increasing over time, but the number of sequels released has not. Our follow-up analysis suggests that one reason can be due to the higher (inflation-adjusted) production budget of a sequel than of the original (i.e., the parent) movie possibly leading to a decreasing gross margin for sequels within a movie franchise.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11002-011-9146-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_963633682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41488764</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41488764</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwIOwePEUfS_JZpOjFP9BwUsFb2GzJrVld1OTrei3N2VFwYOneYffzDyGkFOESwSorhJmYRQQqUYhKe6RCZYVp1Dq530yAc3yLUV5SI5SWgOAkoATUi5eXdGGfkkHF7vCho8ieL9qXLFx0YfY1X2-gy-Se9u6tujC-8qlY3Lg6za5k2-dkqfbm8Xsns4f7x5m13PaCMEHWirpGK-sA8u8d4pXImuTm63X3FpZKYYNg0rgi2cWbclQ2lqLCoQWAHxKLsbcTQy5Pg2mW6XGtW3du7BNRksuOZeKZfL8D7kO29jn54xmrEQlQGYIR6iJIaXovNnEVVfHT4NgdjOacUaTZzS7GQ1mDxs9KbP90sXf4P9MZ6NpnYYQf1oECqUqKfgXppl8Tg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>922518406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The long-term box office performance of sequel movies</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Dhar, Tirtha ; Sun, Guanghui ; Weinberg, Charles B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dhar, Tirtha ; Sun, Guanghui ; Weinberg, Charles B.</creatorcontrib><description>With a 26-year-long database of nationally distributed movies, we estimate the prevalence and effectiveness of sequels over time, while controlling for other factors that might influence demand. In particular, we examine whether the effectiveness of a strategy increases over time (possibly due to managerial learning) or decreases (possibly because its effectiveness is competed away or because of consumer satiation). After taking into account both supply side and demand side effects by using simultaneous equations, we find that sequels have a positive effect indirectly (i.e., supply side effect) through a significantly larger number of theaters showing such movies compared to non-sequel movies. In terms of direct effect (i.e., demand side effect), sequels do better than non-sequels in generating more attendance in the first week and in total. Parent movies, the movies from which sequels originate, also do better than non-sequels in terms of total attendance and first-week attendance. Interestingly, sequel movies generate less total attendance than parent movies. On the other hand, sequels generate more revenues upfront than parents. We also find that the impact of sequels on first-week attendance has been increasing over time, but the number of sequels released has not. Our follow-up analysis suggests that one reason can be due to the higher (inflation-adjusted) production budget of a sequel than of the original (i.e., the parent) movie possibly leading to a decreasing gross margin for sequels within a movie franchise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0923-0645</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-059X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11002-011-9146-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Audiences ; Brands ; Business and Management ; Consumers ; Econometric models ; Film criticism ; Film industry ; Film sequels ; Franchising ; Leisure industry ; Market strategy ; Marketing ; Modeling ; Motion picture industry ; Motion pictures ; Movies ; Parameter estimation ; Production budgets ; Remakes &amp; sequels ; Sequel movies ; Supply and demand ; Theater</subject><ispartof>Marketing letters, 2012-03, Vol.23 (1), p.13-29</ispartof><rights>2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/922518406/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/922518406?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,33224,36060,36061,44363,58238,58471,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dhar, Tirtha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Guanghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Charles B.</creatorcontrib><title>The long-term box office performance of sequel movies</title><title>Marketing letters</title><addtitle>Mark Lett</addtitle><description>With a 26-year-long database of nationally distributed movies, we estimate the prevalence and effectiveness of sequels over time, while controlling for other factors that might influence demand. In particular, we examine whether the effectiveness of a strategy increases over time (possibly due to managerial learning) or decreases (possibly because its effectiveness is competed away or because of consumer satiation). After taking into account both supply side and demand side effects by using simultaneous equations, we find that sequels have a positive effect indirectly (i.e., supply side effect) through a significantly larger number of theaters showing such movies compared to non-sequel movies. In terms of direct effect (i.e., demand side effect), sequels do better than non-sequels in generating more attendance in the first week and in total. Parent movies, the movies from which sequels originate, also do better than non-sequels in terms of total attendance and first-week attendance. Interestingly, sequel movies generate less total attendance than parent movies. On the other hand, sequels generate more revenues upfront than parents. We also find that the impact of sequels on first-week attendance has been increasing over time, but the number of sequels released has not. Our follow-up analysis suggests that one reason can be due to the higher (inflation-adjusted) production budget of a sequel than of the original (i.e., the parent) movie possibly leading to a decreasing gross margin for sequels within a movie franchise.</description><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Econometric models</subject><subject>Film criticism</subject><subject>Film industry</subject><subject>Film sequels</subject><subject>Franchising</subject><subject>Leisure industry</subject><subject>Market strategy</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Motion picture industry</subject><subject>Motion pictures</subject><subject>Movies</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Production budgets</subject><subject>Remakes &amp; sequels</subject><subject>Sequel movies</subject><subject>Supply and demand</subject><subject>Theater</subject><issn>0923-0645</issn><issn>1573-059X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwIOwePEUfS_JZpOjFP9BwUsFb2GzJrVld1OTrei3N2VFwYOneYffzDyGkFOESwSorhJmYRQQqUYhKe6RCZYVp1Dq530yAc3yLUV5SI5SWgOAkoATUi5eXdGGfkkHF7vCho8ieL9qXLFx0YfY1X2-gy-Se9u6tujC-8qlY3Lg6za5k2-dkqfbm8Xsns4f7x5m13PaCMEHWirpGK-sA8u8d4pXImuTm63X3FpZKYYNg0rgi2cWbclQ2lqLCoQWAHxKLsbcTQy5Pg2mW6XGtW3du7BNRksuOZeKZfL8D7kO29jn54xmrEQlQGYIR6iJIaXovNnEVVfHT4NgdjOacUaTZzS7GQ1mDxs9KbP90sXf4P9MZ6NpnYYQf1oECqUqKfgXppl8Tg</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Dhar, Tirtha</creator><creator>Sun, Guanghui</creator><creator>Weinberg, Charles B.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>The long-term box office performance of sequel movies</title><author>Dhar, Tirtha ; Sun, Guanghui ; Weinberg, Charles B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Econometric models</topic><topic>Film criticism</topic><topic>Film industry</topic><topic>Film sequels</topic><topic>Franchising</topic><topic>Leisure industry</topic><topic>Market strategy</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Motion picture industry</topic><topic>Motion pictures</topic><topic>Movies</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Production budgets</topic><topic>Remakes &amp; sequels</topic><topic>Sequel movies</topic><topic>Supply and demand</topic><topic>Theater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dhar, Tirtha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Guanghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Charles B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Marketing letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dhar, Tirtha</au><au>Sun, Guanghui</au><au>Weinberg, Charles B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The long-term box office performance of sequel movies</atitle><jtitle>Marketing letters</jtitle><stitle>Mark Lett</stitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>13-29</pages><issn>0923-0645</issn><eissn>1573-059X</eissn><abstract>With a 26-year-long database of nationally distributed movies, we estimate the prevalence and effectiveness of sequels over time, while controlling for other factors that might influence demand. In particular, we examine whether the effectiveness of a strategy increases over time (possibly due to managerial learning) or decreases (possibly because its effectiveness is competed away or because of consumer satiation). After taking into account both supply side and demand side effects by using simultaneous equations, we find that sequels have a positive effect indirectly (i.e., supply side effect) through a significantly larger number of theaters showing such movies compared to non-sequel movies. In terms of direct effect (i.e., demand side effect), sequels do better than non-sequels in generating more attendance in the first week and in total. Parent movies, the movies from which sequels originate, also do better than non-sequels in terms of total attendance and first-week attendance. Interestingly, sequel movies generate less total attendance than parent movies. On the other hand, sequels generate more revenues upfront than parents. We also find that the impact of sequels on first-week attendance has been increasing over time, but the number of sequels released has not. Our follow-up analysis suggests that one reason can be due to the higher (inflation-adjusted) production budget of a sequel than of the original (i.e., the parent) movie possibly leading to a decreasing gross margin for sequels within a movie franchise.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11002-011-9146-1</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0923-0645
ispartof Marketing letters, 2012-03, Vol.23 (1), p.13-29
issn 0923-0645
1573-059X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_963633682
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link
subjects Audiences
Brands
Business and Management
Consumers
Econometric models
Film criticism
Film industry
Film sequels
Franchising
Leisure industry
Market strategy
Marketing
Modeling
Motion picture industry
Motion pictures
Movies
Parameter estimation
Production budgets
Remakes & sequels
Sequel movies
Supply and demand
Theater
title The long-term box office performance of sequel movies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A15%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20long-term%20box%20office%20performance%20of%20sequel%20movies&rft.jtitle=Marketing%20letters&rft.au=Dhar,%20Tirtha&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=13-29&rft.issn=0923-0645&rft.eissn=1573-059X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11002-011-9146-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41488764%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=922518406&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41488764&rfr_iscdi=true