Loading…
The long-term box office performance of sequel movies
With a 26-year-long database of nationally distributed movies, we estimate the prevalence and effectiveness of sequels over time, while controlling for other factors that might influence demand. In particular, we examine whether the effectiveness of a strategy increases over time (possibly due to ma...
Saved in:
Published in: | Marketing letters 2012-03, Vol.23 (1), p.13-29 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003 |
container_end_page | 29 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 13 |
container_title | Marketing letters |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Dhar, Tirtha Sun, Guanghui Weinberg, Charles B. |
description | With a 26-year-long database of nationally distributed movies, we estimate the prevalence and effectiveness of sequels over time, while controlling for other factors that might influence demand. In particular, we examine whether the effectiveness of a strategy increases over time (possibly due to managerial learning) or decreases (possibly because its effectiveness is competed away or because of consumer satiation). After taking into account both supply side and demand side effects by using simultaneous equations, we find that sequels have a positive effect indirectly (i.e., supply side effect) through a significantly larger number of theaters showing such movies compared to non-sequel movies. In terms of direct effect (i.e., demand side effect), sequels do better than non-sequels in generating more attendance in the first week and in total. Parent movies, the movies from which sequels originate, also do better than non-sequels in terms of total attendance and first-week attendance. Interestingly, sequel movies generate less total attendance than parent movies. On the other hand, sequels generate more revenues upfront than parents. We also find that the impact of sequels on first-week attendance has been increasing over time, but the number of sequels released has not. Our follow-up analysis suggests that one reason can be due to the higher (inflation-adjusted) production budget of a sequel than of the original (i.e., the parent) movie possibly leading to a decreasing gross margin for sequels within a movie franchise. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11002-011-9146-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_963633682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41488764</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41488764</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwIOwePEUfS_JZpOjFP9BwUsFb2GzJrVld1OTrei3N2VFwYOneYffzDyGkFOESwSorhJmYRQQqUYhKe6RCZYVp1Dq530yAc3yLUV5SI5SWgOAkoATUi5eXdGGfkkHF7vCho8ieL9qXLFx0YfY1X2-gy-Se9u6tujC-8qlY3Lg6za5k2-dkqfbm8Xsns4f7x5m13PaCMEHWirpGK-sA8u8d4pXImuTm63X3FpZKYYNg0rgi2cWbclQ2lqLCoQWAHxKLsbcTQy5Pg2mW6XGtW3du7BNRksuOZeKZfL8D7kO29jn54xmrEQlQGYIR6iJIaXovNnEVVfHT4NgdjOacUaTZzS7GQ1mDxs9KbP90sXf4P9MZ6NpnYYQf1oECqUqKfgXppl8Tg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>922518406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The long-term box office performance of sequel movies</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Dhar, Tirtha ; Sun, Guanghui ; Weinberg, Charles B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dhar, Tirtha ; Sun, Guanghui ; Weinberg, Charles B.</creatorcontrib><description>With a 26-year-long database of nationally distributed movies, we estimate the prevalence and effectiveness of sequels over time, while controlling for other factors that might influence demand. In particular, we examine whether the effectiveness of a strategy increases over time (possibly due to managerial learning) or decreases (possibly because its effectiveness is competed away or because of consumer satiation). After taking into account both supply side and demand side effects by using simultaneous equations, we find that sequels have a positive effect indirectly (i.e., supply side effect) through a significantly larger number of theaters showing such movies compared to non-sequel movies. In terms of direct effect (i.e., demand side effect), sequels do better than non-sequels in generating more attendance in the first week and in total. Parent movies, the movies from which sequels originate, also do better than non-sequels in terms of total attendance and first-week attendance. Interestingly, sequel movies generate less total attendance than parent movies. On the other hand, sequels generate more revenues upfront than parents. We also find that the impact of sequels on first-week attendance has been increasing over time, but the number of sequels released has not. Our follow-up analysis suggests that one reason can be due to the higher (inflation-adjusted) production budget of a sequel than of the original (i.e., the parent) movie possibly leading to a decreasing gross margin for sequels within a movie franchise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0923-0645</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-059X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11002-011-9146-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Audiences ; Brands ; Business and Management ; Consumers ; Econometric models ; Film criticism ; Film industry ; Film sequels ; Franchising ; Leisure industry ; Market strategy ; Marketing ; Modeling ; Motion picture industry ; Motion pictures ; Movies ; Parameter estimation ; Production budgets ; Remakes & sequels ; Sequel movies ; Supply and demand ; Theater</subject><ispartof>Marketing letters, 2012-03, Vol.23 (1), p.13-29</ispartof><rights>2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/922518406/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/922518406?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,33224,36060,36061,44363,58238,58471,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dhar, Tirtha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Guanghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Charles B.</creatorcontrib><title>The long-term box office performance of sequel movies</title><title>Marketing letters</title><addtitle>Mark Lett</addtitle><description>With a 26-year-long database of nationally distributed movies, we estimate the prevalence and effectiveness of sequels over time, while controlling for other factors that might influence demand. In particular, we examine whether the effectiveness of a strategy increases over time (possibly due to managerial learning) or decreases (possibly because its effectiveness is competed away or because of consumer satiation). After taking into account both supply side and demand side effects by using simultaneous equations, we find that sequels have a positive effect indirectly (i.e., supply side effect) through a significantly larger number of theaters showing such movies compared to non-sequel movies. In terms of direct effect (i.e., demand side effect), sequels do better than non-sequels in generating more attendance in the first week and in total. Parent movies, the movies from which sequels originate, also do better than non-sequels in terms of total attendance and first-week attendance. Interestingly, sequel movies generate less total attendance than parent movies. On the other hand, sequels generate more revenues upfront than parents. We also find that the impact of sequels on first-week attendance has been increasing over time, but the number of sequels released has not. Our follow-up analysis suggests that one reason can be due to the higher (inflation-adjusted) production budget of a sequel than of the original (i.e., the parent) movie possibly leading to a decreasing gross margin for sequels within a movie franchise.</description><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Econometric models</subject><subject>Film criticism</subject><subject>Film industry</subject><subject>Film sequels</subject><subject>Franchising</subject><subject>Leisure industry</subject><subject>Market strategy</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Motion picture industry</subject><subject>Motion pictures</subject><subject>Movies</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Production budgets</subject><subject>Remakes & sequels</subject><subject>Sequel movies</subject><subject>Supply and demand</subject><subject>Theater</subject><issn>0923-0645</issn><issn>1573-059X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwIOwePEUfS_JZpOjFP9BwUsFb2GzJrVld1OTrei3N2VFwYOneYffzDyGkFOESwSorhJmYRQQqUYhKe6RCZYVp1Dq530yAc3yLUV5SI5SWgOAkoATUi5eXdGGfkkHF7vCho8ieL9qXLFx0YfY1X2-gy-Se9u6tujC-8qlY3Lg6za5k2-dkqfbm8Xsns4f7x5m13PaCMEHWirpGK-sA8u8d4pXImuTm63X3FpZKYYNg0rgi2cWbclQ2lqLCoQWAHxKLsbcTQy5Pg2mW6XGtW3du7BNRksuOZeKZfL8D7kO29jn54xmrEQlQGYIR6iJIaXovNnEVVfHT4NgdjOacUaTZzS7GQ1mDxs9KbP90sXf4P9MZ6NpnYYQf1oECqUqKfgXppl8Tg</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Dhar, Tirtha</creator><creator>Sun, Guanghui</creator><creator>Weinberg, Charles B.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>The long-term box office performance of sequel movies</title><author>Dhar, Tirtha ; Sun, Guanghui ; Weinberg, Charles B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Econometric models</topic><topic>Film criticism</topic><topic>Film industry</topic><topic>Film sequels</topic><topic>Franchising</topic><topic>Leisure industry</topic><topic>Market strategy</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Motion picture industry</topic><topic>Motion pictures</topic><topic>Movies</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Production budgets</topic><topic>Remakes & sequels</topic><topic>Sequel movies</topic><topic>Supply and demand</topic><topic>Theater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dhar, Tirtha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Guanghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Charles B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Marketing letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dhar, Tirtha</au><au>Sun, Guanghui</au><au>Weinberg, Charles B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The long-term box office performance of sequel movies</atitle><jtitle>Marketing letters</jtitle><stitle>Mark Lett</stitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>13-29</pages><issn>0923-0645</issn><eissn>1573-059X</eissn><abstract>With a 26-year-long database of nationally distributed movies, we estimate the prevalence and effectiveness of sequels over time, while controlling for other factors that might influence demand. In particular, we examine whether the effectiveness of a strategy increases over time (possibly due to managerial learning) or decreases (possibly because its effectiveness is competed away or because of consumer satiation). After taking into account both supply side and demand side effects by using simultaneous equations, we find that sequels have a positive effect indirectly (i.e., supply side effect) through a significantly larger number of theaters showing such movies compared to non-sequel movies. In terms of direct effect (i.e., demand side effect), sequels do better than non-sequels in generating more attendance in the first week and in total. Parent movies, the movies from which sequels originate, also do better than non-sequels in terms of total attendance and first-week attendance. Interestingly, sequel movies generate less total attendance than parent movies. On the other hand, sequels generate more revenues upfront than parents. We also find that the impact of sequels on first-week attendance has been increasing over time, but the number of sequels released has not. Our follow-up analysis suggests that one reason can be due to the higher (inflation-adjusted) production budget of a sequel than of the original (i.e., the parent) movie possibly leading to a decreasing gross margin for sequels within a movie franchise.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11002-011-9146-1</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0923-0645 |
ispartof | Marketing letters, 2012-03, Vol.23 (1), p.13-29 |
issn | 0923-0645 1573-059X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_963633682 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link |
subjects | Audiences Brands Business and Management Consumers Econometric models Film criticism Film industry Film sequels Franchising Leisure industry Market strategy Marketing Modeling Motion picture industry Motion pictures Movies Parameter estimation Production budgets Remakes & sequels Sequel movies Supply and demand Theater |
title | The long-term box office performance of sequel movies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A15%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20long-term%20box%20office%20performance%20of%20sequel%20movies&rft.jtitle=Marketing%20letters&rft.au=Dhar,%20Tirtha&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=13-29&rft.issn=0923-0645&rft.eissn=1573-059X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11002-011-9146-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41488764%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-586e237be0b2ffe83742ffc860bf93bb67821c20741df2b1b5216ba9470494003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=922518406&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41488764&rfr_iscdi=true |