Loading…
Prosodic and temporal features for language modeling for dialog
► Speakers’ underlying cognitive processes and states may be revealed by prosody. ► Features of the local prosodic context can help predict what words are likely next. ► Speaking rate, volume, pitch and time-until-utterance-end features were informative. ► A 8.4% perplexity reduction on the Switchbo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Speech communication 2012-02, Vol.54 (2), p.161-174 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ► Speakers’ underlying cognitive processes and states may be revealed by prosody. ► Features of the local prosodic context can help predict what words are likely next. ► Speaking rate, volume, pitch and time-until-utterance-end features were informative. ► A 8.4% perplexity reduction on the Switchboard corpus was obtained. ► In a recognizer, this gave up to a 1.0% relative reduction in word error rate.
If we can model the cognitive and communicative processes underlying speech, we should be able to better predict what a speaker will do. With this idea as inspiration, we examine a number of prosodic and timing features as potential sources of information on what words the speaker is likely to say next. In spontaneous dialog we find that word probabilities do vary with such features. Using perplexity as the metric, the most informative of these included recent speaking rate, volume, and pitch, and time until end of utterance. Using simple combinations of such features to augment trigram language models gave up to a 8.4% perplexity benefit on the Switchboard corpus, and up to a 1.0% relative reduction in word error rate (0.3% absolute) on the Verbmobil II corpus. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-6393 1872-7182 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.specom.2011.07.009 |