Loading…

Properties of particleboard made from kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as function of particle geometry

► The suitability and classify the particle geometry of kenaf stem particle were evaluated. ► Kenaf have two distinct part and each part have different classes of particle geometry. ► The use of kenaf stem in particleboard manufacture is feasible only if it is being mixed with rubberwood. ► Differen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials in engineering 2012-02, Vol.34, p.406-411
Main Authors: Juliana, A.H., Paridah, M.T., Rahim, S., Nor Azowa, I., Anwar, U.M.K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f58c8c58231df6471c25e03ddf2c08dc0f02a093d417ee81970c54ecd2c51be13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f58c8c58231df6471c25e03ddf2c08dc0f02a093d417ee81970c54ecd2c51be13
container_end_page 411
container_issue
container_start_page 406
container_title Materials in engineering
container_volume 34
creator Juliana, A.H.
Paridah, M.T.
Rahim, S.
Nor Azowa, I.
Anwar, U.M.K.
description ► The suitability and classify the particle geometry of kenaf stem particle were evaluated. ► Kenaf have two distinct part and each part have different classes of particle geometry. ► The use of kenaf stem in particleboard manufacture is feasible only if it is being mixed with rubberwood. ► Different particle geometry of kenaf core and bast consequently affected the properties. An examination of particle geometry was carried out after the kenaf stems were chipped and flaked and the identified geometry was compared with that of rubberwood. The particle geometries were then classified into several classes; 10 for kenaf core, 7 for kenaf bast, and 7 for rubberwood. The results indicate that most of kenaf core particles were of rectangular or nearly rectangular shapes whilst kenaf bast was in the form of curl and kneel form. Overall, board made from a combination of 70% rubberwood (RW) and 30% kenaf (K) was characterized by greater strength and stability than boards comprising 100% kenaf. These results provide enough evidence that combining rubberwood with kenaf particles imparts better mechanical and physical properties of the admixture RW–K board. Nonetheless, segregation of kenaf core and kenaf bast is necessary since both materials produced different particle geometries thus require different processing parameters. Between the two, kenaf core has better compatibility with rubberwood and shows superior performance than kenaf bast.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.019
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_963860293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261306911005851</els_id><sourcerecordid>963860293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f58c8c58231df6471c25e03ddf2c08dc0f02a093d417ee81970c54ecd2c51be13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OAzEQhK8AifDzBhTugCLHrp27-BokFAFBigQF1JazXiOH3DnYF6S8PReFgopqp5gZzX5FcYlQImB9uypb2zvOpQTEEnQJ2BwVI5A1jhXUzUlxmvMKAKeIclT41xQ3nPrAWUQvNnaQtOZltMmJ1joWPsVWfHJnvbgW87AMmbZZkO06uwzdIBfljbBZ-G1HfYjd3xrxwbHlPu3Oi2Nv15kvfu9Z8f748DabjxcvT8-z-8WYlNL92FeaNFVaKnS-nkyRZMWgnPOSQDsCD9JCo9wEp8wamylQNWFykipcMqqz4urQu0nxa8u5N-2wl9dr23HcZtPUStcgGzU4JwcnpZhzYm82KbQ27QyC2ZM0K3MgafYkDWgzkBxid4cYD198B04mU-CO2IXE1BsXw_8FP_MtgUY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>963860293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Properties of particleboard made from kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as function of particle geometry</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Juliana, A.H. ; Paridah, M.T. ; Rahim, S. ; Nor Azowa, I. ; Anwar, U.M.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Juliana, A.H. ; Paridah, M.T. ; Rahim, S. ; Nor Azowa, I. ; Anwar, U.M.K.</creatorcontrib><description>► The suitability and classify the particle geometry of kenaf stem particle were evaluated. ► Kenaf have two distinct part and each part have different classes of particle geometry. ► The use of kenaf stem in particleboard manufacture is feasible only if it is being mixed with rubberwood. ► Different particle geometry of kenaf core and bast consequently affected the properties. An examination of particle geometry was carried out after the kenaf stems were chipped and flaked and the identified geometry was compared with that of rubberwood. The particle geometries were then classified into several classes; 10 for kenaf core, 7 for kenaf bast, and 7 for rubberwood. The results indicate that most of kenaf core particles were of rectangular or nearly rectangular shapes whilst kenaf bast was in the form of curl and kneel form. Overall, board made from a combination of 70% rubberwood (RW) and 30% kenaf (K) was characterized by greater strength and stability than boards comprising 100% kenaf. These results provide enough evidence that combining rubberwood with kenaf particles imparts better mechanical and physical properties of the admixture RW–K board. Nonetheless, segregation of kenaf core and kenaf bast is necessary since both materials produced different particle geometries thus require different processing parameters. Between the two, kenaf core has better compatibility with rubberwood and shows superior performance than kenaf bast.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-3069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>A. Composites ; Admixtures ; B. Particulates and powders ; H. Selection for material properties ; Hibiscus cannabinus ; Kenaf ; Physical properties ; Process parameters ; Rubberwood ; Segregations ; Stems</subject><ispartof>Materials in engineering, 2012-02, Vol.34, p.406-411</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f58c8c58231df6471c25e03ddf2c08dc0f02a093d417ee81970c54ecd2c51be13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f58c8c58231df6471c25e03ddf2c08dc0f02a093d417ee81970c54ecd2c51be13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Juliana, A.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paridah, M.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahim, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nor Azowa, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anwar, U.M.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Properties of particleboard made from kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as function of particle geometry</title><title>Materials in engineering</title><description>► The suitability and classify the particle geometry of kenaf stem particle were evaluated. ► Kenaf have two distinct part and each part have different classes of particle geometry. ► The use of kenaf stem in particleboard manufacture is feasible only if it is being mixed with rubberwood. ► Different particle geometry of kenaf core and bast consequently affected the properties. An examination of particle geometry was carried out after the kenaf stems were chipped and flaked and the identified geometry was compared with that of rubberwood. The particle geometries were then classified into several classes; 10 for kenaf core, 7 for kenaf bast, and 7 for rubberwood. The results indicate that most of kenaf core particles were of rectangular or nearly rectangular shapes whilst kenaf bast was in the form of curl and kneel form. Overall, board made from a combination of 70% rubberwood (RW) and 30% kenaf (K) was characterized by greater strength and stability than boards comprising 100% kenaf. These results provide enough evidence that combining rubberwood with kenaf particles imparts better mechanical and physical properties of the admixture RW–K board. Nonetheless, segregation of kenaf core and kenaf bast is necessary since both materials produced different particle geometries thus require different processing parameters. Between the two, kenaf core has better compatibility with rubberwood and shows superior performance than kenaf bast.</description><subject>A. Composites</subject><subject>Admixtures</subject><subject>B. Particulates and powders</subject><subject>H. Selection for material properties</subject><subject>Hibiscus cannabinus</subject><subject>Kenaf</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Rubberwood</subject><subject>Segregations</subject><subject>Stems</subject><issn>0261-3069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kL1OAzEQhK8AifDzBhTugCLHrp27-BokFAFBigQF1JazXiOH3DnYF6S8PReFgopqp5gZzX5FcYlQImB9uypb2zvOpQTEEnQJ2BwVI5A1jhXUzUlxmvMKAKeIclT41xQ3nPrAWUQvNnaQtOZltMmJ1joWPsVWfHJnvbgW87AMmbZZkO06uwzdIBfljbBZ-G1HfYjd3xrxwbHlPu3Oi2Nv15kvfu9Z8f748DabjxcvT8-z-8WYlNL92FeaNFVaKnS-nkyRZMWgnPOSQDsCD9JCo9wEp8wamylQNWFykipcMqqz4urQu0nxa8u5N-2wl9dr23HcZtPUStcgGzU4JwcnpZhzYm82KbQ27QyC2ZM0K3MgafYkDWgzkBxid4cYD198B04mU-CO2IXE1BsXw_8FP_MtgUY</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Juliana, A.H.</creator><creator>Paridah, M.T.</creator><creator>Rahim, S.</creator><creator>Nor Azowa, I.</creator><creator>Anwar, U.M.K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Properties of particleboard made from kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as function of particle geometry</title><author>Juliana, A.H. ; Paridah, M.T. ; Rahim, S. ; Nor Azowa, I. ; Anwar, U.M.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f58c8c58231df6471c25e03ddf2c08dc0f02a093d417ee81970c54ecd2c51be13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>A. Composites</topic><topic>Admixtures</topic><topic>B. Particulates and powders</topic><topic>H. Selection for material properties</topic><topic>Hibiscus cannabinus</topic><topic>Kenaf</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Rubberwood</topic><topic>Segregations</topic><topic>Stems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Juliana, A.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paridah, M.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahim, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nor Azowa, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anwar, U.M.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Materials in engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Juliana, A.H.</au><au>Paridah, M.T.</au><au>Rahim, S.</au><au>Nor Azowa, I.</au><au>Anwar, U.M.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Properties of particleboard made from kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as function of particle geometry</atitle><jtitle>Materials in engineering</jtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>34</volume><spage>406</spage><epage>411</epage><pages>406-411</pages><issn>0261-3069</issn><abstract>► The suitability and classify the particle geometry of kenaf stem particle were evaluated. ► Kenaf have two distinct part and each part have different classes of particle geometry. ► The use of kenaf stem in particleboard manufacture is feasible only if it is being mixed with rubberwood. ► Different particle geometry of kenaf core and bast consequently affected the properties. An examination of particle geometry was carried out after the kenaf stems were chipped and flaked and the identified geometry was compared with that of rubberwood. The particle geometries were then classified into several classes; 10 for kenaf core, 7 for kenaf bast, and 7 for rubberwood. The results indicate that most of kenaf core particles were of rectangular or nearly rectangular shapes whilst kenaf bast was in the form of curl and kneel form. Overall, board made from a combination of 70% rubberwood (RW) and 30% kenaf (K) was characterized by greater strength and stability than boards comprising 100% kenaf. These results provide enough evidence that combining rubberwood with kenaf particles imparts better mechanical and physical properties of the admixture RW–K board. Nonetheless, segregation of kenaf core and kenaf bast is necessary since both materials produced different particle geometries thus require different processing parameters. Between the two, kenaf core has better compatibility with rubberwood and shows superior performance than kenaf bast.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.019</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-3069
ispartof Materials in engineering, 2012-02, Vol.34, p.406-411
issn 0261-3069
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_963860293
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects A. Composites
Admixtures
B. Particulates and powders
H. Selection for material properties
Hibiscus cannabinus
Kenaf
Physical properties
Process parameters
Rubberwood
Segregations
Stems
title Properties of particleboard made from kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as function of particle geometry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T23%3A36%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Properties%20of%20particleboard%20made%20from%20kenaf%20(%20Hibiscus%20cannabinus%20L.)%20as%20function%20of%20particle%20geometry&rft.jtitle=Materials%20in%20engineering&rft.au=Juliana,%20A.H.&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.spage=406&rft.epage=411&rft.pages=406-411&rft.issn=0261-3069&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E963860293%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f58c8c58231df6471c25e03ddf2c08dc0f02a093d417ee81970c54ecd2c51be13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=963860293&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true