Loading…
The effect of decreasing computed tomography dosage on radiostereometric analysis (RSA) accuracy at the glenohumeral joint
Abstract Standard, beaded radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and markerless RSA often use computed tomography (CT) scans to create three-dimensional (3D) bone models. However, ethical concerns exist due to risks associated with CT radiation exposure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of biomechanics 2011-11, Vol.44 (16), p.2847-2850 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-99d3f2a8505d9933089b578b9bbe6cfcbc3d05afa92fefff693c5596566f38dd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-99d3f2a8505d9933089b578b9bbe6cfcbc3d05afa92fefff693c5596566f38dd3 |
container_end_page | 2850 |
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 2847 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Fox, Anne-Marie V Kedgley, Angela E Lalone, Emily A Johnson, James A Athwal, George S Jenkyn, Thomas R |
description | Abstract Standard, beaded radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and markerless RSA often use computed tomography (CT) scans to create three-dimensional (3D) bone models. However, ethical concerns exist due to risks associated with CT radiation exposure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of decreasing CT dosage on RSA accuracy. Four cadaveric shoulder specimens were scanned using a normal-dose CT protocol and two low-dose protocols, where the dosage was decreased by 89% and 98%. 3D computer models of the humerus and scapula were created using each CT protocol. Bi-planar fluoroscopy was used to image five different static glenohumeral positions and two dynamic glenohumeral movements, of which a total of five static and four dynamic poses were selected for analysis. For standard RSA, negligible differences were found in bead (0.21±0.31 mm) and bony landmark (2.31±1.90 mm) locations when the CT dosage was decreased by 98% ( p -values>0.167). For markerless RSA kinematic results, excellent agreement was found between the normal-dose and lowest-dose protocol, with all Spearman rank correlation coefficients greater than 0.95. Average root mean squared errors of 1.04±0.68 mm and 2.42±0.81° were also found at this reduced dosage for static positions. In summary, CT dosage can be markedly reduced when performing shoulder RSA to minimize the risks of radiation exposure. Standard RSA accuracy was negligibly affected by the 98% CT dose reduction and for markerless RSA, the benefits of decreasing CT dosage to the subject outweigh the introduced errors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.009 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_963898527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0021929011005574</els_id><sourcerecordid>963898527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-99d3f2a8505d9933089b578b9bbe6cfcbc3d05afa92fefff693c5596566f38dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk9v1DAQxSMEoqXwFSpLCAGHXcZ2nMQXRFXxT6qERMvZcuzxrkMSb-0Eafn0ONotlXrpaS6_efNm3hTFOYU1BVp96NZd68OAZrtmQOkamjWAfFKc0qbmK8YbeFqcAjC6kkzCSfEipQ4A6rKWz4sTRqWQnNenxd-bLRJ0Ds1EgiMWTUSd_LghJgy7eUJLpjCETdS77Z7YkPQGSRhJ1NaHNGHEbGKK3hA96n6ffCLvfl5fvCfamDlqsyd6IlOeselxDNt5wKh70gU_Ti-LZ073CV8d61nx68vnm8tvq6sfX79fXlytjKBsWklpuWO6ESCszKahka2om1a2LVbGmdZwC0I7LZnLi7hKciOErERVOd5Yy8-KtwfdXQy3M6ZJDT4Z7Hs9YpiTkhVvZCNY_TgJjLNGSprJ1w_ILswxXyApCryUVVXSRa86UCaGlCI6tYt-0HGfIbXEqDp1F6NaYlTQqBxjbjw_ys_tgPZ_211uGXhzBHQyundRj8ane66sRS3LRejTgcN84D8eo0rG42jQ-pgjVzb4x718fCBhej_6PPU37jHd760SU6Cul6dbfo5SACHqkv8DTkPUlg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034966417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of decreasing computed tomography dosage on radiostereometric analysis (RSA) accuracy at the glenohumeral joint</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Fox, Anne-Marie V ; Kedgley, Angela E ; Lalone, Emily A ; Johnson, James A ; Athwal, George S ; Jenkyn, Thomas R</creator><creatorcontrib>Fox, Anne-Marie V ; Kedgley, Angela E ; Lalone, Emily A ; Johnson, James A ; Athwal, George S ; Jenkyn, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Standard, beaded radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and markerless RSA often use computed tomography (CT) scans to create three-dimensional (3D) bone models. However, ethical concerns exist due to risks associated with CT radiation exposure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of decreasing CT dosage on RSA accuracy. Four cadaveric shoulder specimens were scanned using a normal-dose CT protocol and two low-dose protocols, where the dosage was decreased by 89% and 98%. 3D computer models of the humerus and scapula were created using each CT protocol. Bi-planar fluoroscopy was used to image five different static glenohumeral positions and two dynamic glenohumeral movements, of which a total of five static and four dynamic poses were selected for analysis. For standard RSA, negligible differences were found in bead (0.21±0.31 mm) and bony landmark (2.31±1.90 mm) locations when the CT dosage was decreased by 98% ( p -values>0.167). For markerless RSA kinematic results, excellent agreement was found between the normal-dose and lowest-dose protocol, with all Spearman rank correlation coefficients greater than 0.95. Average root mean squared errors of 1.04±0.68 mm and 2.42±0.81° were also found at this reduced dosage for static positions. In summary, CT dosage can be markedly reduced when performing shoulder RSA to minimize the risks of radiation exposure. Standard RSA accuracy was negligibly affected by the 98% CT dose reduction and for markerless RSA, the benefits of decreasing CT dosage to the subject outweigh the introduced errors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21959337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Computed Tomography (CT) ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Humerus - diagnostic imaging ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Kinematics ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Medical sciences ; Osteoarticular system. Muscles ; Personal relationships ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation dose ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) ; Scapula - diagnostic imaging ; Shoulder ; Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Skeleton and joints ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - adverse effects ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2011-11, Vol.44 (16), p.2847-2850</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-99d3f2a8505d9933089b578b9bbe6cfcbc3d05afa92fefff693c5596566f38dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-99d3f2a8505d9933089b578b9bbe6cfcbc3d05afa92fefff693c5596566f38dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24757949$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21959337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fox, Anne-Marie V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kedgley, Angela E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalone, Emily A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athwal, George S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkyn, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of decreasing computed tomography dosage on radiostereometric analysis (RSA) accuracy at the glenohumeral joint</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Abstract Standard, beaded radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and markerless RSA often use computed tomography (CT) scans to create three-dimensional (3D) bone models. However, ethical concerns exist due to risks associated with CT radiation exposure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of decreasing CT dosage on RSA accuracy. Four cadaveric shoulder specimens were scanned using a normal-dose CT protocol and two low-dose protocols, where the dosage was decreased by 89% and 98%. 3D computer models of the humerus and scapula were created using each CT protocol. Bi-planar fluoroscopy was used to image five different static glenohumeral positions and two dynamic glenohumeral movements, of which a total of five static and four dynamic poses were selected for analysis. For standard RSA, negligible differences were found in bead (0.21±0.31 mm) and bony landmark (2.31±1.90 mm) locations when the CT dosage was decreased by 98% ( p -values>0.167). For markerless RSA kinematic results, excellent agreement was found between the normal-dose and lowest-dose protocol, with all Spearman rank correlation coefficients greater than 0.95. Average root mean squared errors of 1.04±0.68 mm and 2.42±0.81° were also found at this reduced dosage for static positions. In summary, CT dosage can be markedly reduced when performing shoulder RSA to minimize the risks of radiation exposure. Standard RSA accuracy was negligibly affected by the 98% CT dose reduction and for markerless RSA, the benefits of decreasing CT dosage to the subject outweigh the introduced errors.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computed Tomography (CT)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humerus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation dose</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA)</subject><subject>Scapula - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Skeleton and joints</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkk9v1DAQxSMEoqXwFSpLCAGHXcZ2nMQXRFXxT6qERMvZcuzxrkMSb-0Eafn0ONotlXrpaS6_efNm3hTFOYU1BVp96NZd68OAZrtmQOkamjWAfFKc0qbmK8YbeFqcAjC6kkzCSfEipQ4A6rKWz4sTRqWQnNenxd-bLRJ0Ds1EgiMWTUSd_LghJgy7eUJLpjCETdS77Z7YkPQGSRhJ1NaHNGHEbGKK3hA96n6ffCLvfl5fvCfamDlqsyd6IlOeselxDNt5wKh70gU_Ti-LZ073CV8d61nx68vnm8tvq6sfX79fXlytjKBsWklpuWO6ESCszKahka2om1a2LVbGmdZwC0I7LZnLi7hKciOErERVOd5Yy8-KtwfdXQy3M6ZJDT4Z7Hs9YpiTkhVvZCNY_TgJjLNGSprJ1w_ILswxXyApCryUVVXSRa86UCaGlCI6tYt-0HGfIbXEqDp1F6NaYlTQqBxjbjw_ys_tgPZ_211uGXhzBHQyundRj8ane66sRS3LRejTgcN84D8eo0rG42jQ-pgjVzb4x718fCBhej_6PPU37jHd760SU6Cul6dbfo5SACHqkv8DTkPUlg</recordid><startdate>20111110</startdate><enddate>20111110</enddate><creator>Fox, Anne-Marie V</creator><creator>Kedgley, Angela E</creator><creator>Lalone, Emily A</creator><creator>Johnson, James A</creator><creator>Athwal, George S</creator><creator>Jenkyn, Thomas R</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111110</creationdate><title>The effect of decreasing computed tomography dosage on radiostereometric analysis (RSA) accuracy at the glenohumeral joint</title><author>Fox, Anne-Marie V ; Kedgley, Angela E ; Lalone, Emily A ; Johnson, James A ; Athwal, George S ; Jenkyn, Thomas R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-99d3f2a8505d9933089b578b9bbe6cfcbc3d05afa92fefff693c5596566f38dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computed Tomography (CT)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humerus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation dose</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA)</topic><topic>Scapula - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Skeleton and joints</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fox, Anne-Marie V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kedgley, Angela E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalone, Emily A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athwal, George S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkyn, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fox, Anne-Marie V</au><au>Kedgley, Angela E</au><au>Lalone, Emily A</au><au>Johnson, James A</au><au>Athwal, George S</au><au>Jenkyn, Thomas R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of decreasing computed tomography dosage on radiostereometric analysis (RSA) accuracy at the glenohumeral joint</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2011-11-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>2847</spage><epage>2850</epage><pages>2847-2850</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Abstract Standard, beaded radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and markerless RSA often use computed tomography (CT) scans to create three-dimensional (3D) bone models. However, ethical concerns exist due to risks associated with CT radiation exposure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of decreasing CT dosage on RSA accuracy. Four cadaveric shoulder specimens were scanned using a normal-dose CT protocol and two low-dose protocols, where the dosage was decreased by 89% and 98%. 3D computer models of the humerus and scapula were created using each CT protocol. Bi-planar fluoroscopy was used to image five different static glenohumeral positions and two dynamic glenohumeral movements, of which a total of five static and four dynamic poses were selected for analysis. For standard RSA, negligible differences were found in bead (0.21±0.31 mm) and bony landmark (2.31±1.90 mm) locations when the CT dosage was decreased by 98% ( p -values>0.167). For markerless RSA kinematic results, excellent agreement was found between the normal-dose and lowest-dose protocol, with all Spearman rank correlation coefficients greater than 0.95. Average root mean squared errors of 1.04±0.68 mm and 2.42±0.81° were also found at this reduced dosage for static positions. In summary, CT dosage can be markedly reduced when performing shoulder RSA to minimize the risks of radiation exposure. Standard RSA accuracy was negligibly affected by the 98% CT dose reduction and for markerless RSA, the benefits of decreasing CT dosage to the subject outweigh the introduced errors.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21959337</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.009</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2011-11, Vol.44 (16), p.2847-2850 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_963898527 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Accuracy Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Computed Tomography (CT) Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Humerus - diagnostic imaging Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Kinematics Male Medical imaging Medical sciences Osteoarticular system. Muscles Personal relationships Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Radiation Dosage Radiation dose Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) Scapula - diagnostic imaging Shoulder Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging Skeleton and joints Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed - adverse effects Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system |
title | The effect of decreasing computed tomography dosage on radiostereometric analysis (RSA) accuracy at the glenohumeral joint |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A49%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20decreasing%20computed%20tomography%20dosage%20on%20radiostereometric%20analysis%20(RSA)%20accuracy%20at%20the%20glenohumeral%20joint&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Fox,%20Anne-Marie%20V&rft.date=2011-11-10&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=2847&rft.epage=2850&rft.pages=2847-2850&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E963898527%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-99d3f2a8505d9933089b578b9bbe6cfcbc3d05afa92fefff693c5596566f38dd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034966417&rft_id=info:pmid/21959337&rfr_iscdi=true |